On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
exactly! the entire keyword thing is rather a mess anyhow, and i don't
think it should be mimicked anywhere. introducing a new atomtype should
be enough.
What happens to [t], [pack], [unpack], [route] with new atom types? why?
_ _ __ ___ _
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Could either of you make any needed changes directly to the
pd-0.40-extended branch? I am not sure I know what needs doing.
when do you want to release?
For the idea about naming them from LAC, was that just having a central
place to claim macro numbers?
On Apr 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Could either of you make any needed changes directly to the
pd-0.40-extended branch? I am not sure I know what needs doing.
when do you want to release?
By the end of the month. Then we can work on 0.41...
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am fine with leaving the string patch in this release as it is if
it will be compatible with a generic approach to defining new atoms
types. Can anyone speak to that?
does the patch still register the string keyword? (and in doing so
breaks all other
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am fine with leaving the string patch in this release as it is if
it will be compatible with a generic approach to defining new atoms
types. Can anyone speak to that?
does the patch still register the string keyword? (and in
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:07 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Martin Peach wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am fine with leaving the string patch in this release as it is
if it will be compatible with a generic approach to defining
new atoms types. Can
with
a sonar attached.
Still at the dangerous stage, implements a minimal http 1.1 server.
It's pd-extended 0403 from today's autobuild.
Martin
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Peach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: pd-dev@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] string support
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey,
IOhannes and Miller worked out a solution for declaring generic
types, it didn't sound to hard to implement. For the next Pd-
extended release, I think we'll probably should remove the Martin's
string patch in favor of this approach.
OK if the new method is
On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey,
IOhannes and Miller worked out a solution for declaring generic
types, it didn't sound to hard to implement. For the next Pd-
extended release, I think we'll probably should remove the Martin's
string
: pd-dev@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] string support and generic types
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:12:01 -0400
On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey,
IOhannes and Miller worked out a solution for declaring generic
types, it didn't sound to hard
10 matches
Mail list logo
