Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-21 Thread marius schebella
hi (miller), for the project I am currently working on, I would need exactly this behaviour: a path declaration relative to the directory of a pd-file. I put all abstractions in a subfolder 'abs'. It would be extremely useful if [declare -stdpath abs] (or some other command) would add this sub

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 13, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 17:42 -0500, Mike McGonagle wrote: >> Hi Roman, >> >> Not sure if this is the problem, but I had similar troubles like >> this, >> and to solve the issue, I saved the patch that contains the [declare] >> in it, and then r

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 17:42 -0500, Mike McGonagle wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Not sure if this is the problem, but I had similar troubles like this, > and to solve the issue, I saved the patch that contains the [declare] > in it, and then reopened it. I guess the issue here is that declare > really on

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 18:47 -0400, marius schebella wrote: > hi roman, > > thanks for bringing this one up :). just tested it on OSX and here is > what I got: it has some effect, but not as supposed. It extends the path > relative to the directory of the pdpatch (and not as stated in the help >

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-12 Thread Miller Puckette
ouch, this is a bug in that case. On my dolist to check it out... cheers M On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:47:50PM -0400, marius schebella wrote: > hi roman, > > thanks for bringing this one up :). just tested it on OSX and here is > what I got: it has some effect, but not as supposed. It extends t

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-12 Thread Martin Peach
Roman Haefeli wrote: > hi all > > i have [tcpserver] from mrpeach installed in: > > /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/mrpeach/tcpserver.pd_linux > > and i have a patch with: > > [declare -stdpath extra/mrpeach] > > [tcpserver] > > > however, [tcpserver] doesn't instantiate. as verbose output i get: >

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-12 Thread marius schebella
hi roman, thanks for bringing this one up :). just tested it on OSX and here is what I got: it has some effect, but not as supposed. It extends the path relative to the directory of the pdpatch (and not as stated in the help "relative to Pd"). in your case: it seems your testpatch resides in /

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-12 Thread Mike McGonagle
Hi Roman, Not sure if this is the problem, but I had similar troubles like this, and to solve the issue, I saved the patch that contains the [declare] in it, and then reopened it. I guess the issue here is that declare really only operates when a patch is first opened from a file. (I could be wron

[PD-dev] [declare -stdpath]: does it work?

2008-08-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi all i have [tcpserver] from mrpeach installed in: /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/mrpeach/tcpserver.pd_linux and i have a patch with: [declare -stdpath extra/mrpeach] [tcpserver] however, [tcpserver] doesn't instantiate. as verbose output i get: tried /home/roman/extra/mrpeach/tcpserver.l_i386 a