Re: [PD-dev] Compiling externals for Windows

2015-06-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 14:39 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 13:08 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2015-06-23 11:06, Roman Haefeli wrote: set ::deken::installpath $env(USERPROFILE) makes deken download to the correct path in W7. Can't test in Windows XP

[PD-dev] [pure-data:patches] #553 Order of sys_staticpath wrong for Windows

2015-06-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
--- ** [patches:#553] Order of sys_staticpath wrong for Windows** **Status:** open **Group:** bugfix **Created:** Tue Jun 23, 2015 01:37 PM UTC by Roman Haefeli **Last Updated:** Tue Jun 23, 2015 01:37 PM UTC **Owner:** Miller Puckette Attached patch changes order for sys_staticpath

[PD-dev] first impression about deken

2015-06-21 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I'm all excited about deken. Both, downloading/installing and building/uploading was really easy and worked well for me. -- Issue #1 -- When I download a package that wants to extract to a folder that already exists, the plugin hangs and with it whole Pd. Scenario to trigger this

[PD-dev] Compiling iemnet on Windows XP

2015-06-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey I'm trying to compile iemnet on Windows XP 32-bit with mingw-w64 (using the mingw32-make command). I'm stuck at: --- iemnet_notify.o: In function `pollfun': c:\puredata\pd-iemnet/iemnet_notify.c:122: undefined reference to `read' iemnet_notify.o: In function `iemnet__notify':

Re: [PD-dev] Compiling externals for Windows

2015-06-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:00 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:04 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:29 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: the question is, why does it still try to use the old path? could it be something in the path settings

Re: [PD-dev] Compiling externals for Windows

2015-06-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:04 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:29 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: the question is, why does it still try to use the old path? could it be something in the path settings? could you do try the following?: - start Pd - turn

Re: [PD-dev] Compiling externals for Windows

2015-06-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:16 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote: Miller merged a fix from IOhannes a while ago to do with Windows default search paths which might help this issue. I tested on Windows 7 and Pd does find deken in the right place now: --- deken-plugin.tcl (Pd externals search) in

[PD-dev] Compiling externals for Windows

2015-06-21 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all The new deken plugin makes me want to compile externals for Windows. There seem to be many ways to go and I might save some time if I knew beforehand what works and what no so well. I have access to the following archs: * Debian 7 (i386, amd64, armv6l) * Debian 8 (i383, amd64) * Ubuntu

[PD-dev] maintenance of builds for deken

2015-07-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I compiled some externals for several platforms to be used with Deken. Now, I'm thinking about stream-lining the process and I stumble across some culprits and I still have lots of questions. Here the list of externals / libraries I'm interested in maintaining builds: iemnet osc

[PD-dev] [pure-data:bugs] #1212 [declare -stdpath] does not work on Windows

2015-07-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
--- ** [bugs:#1212] [declare -stdpath] does not work on Windows** **Status:** open **Group:** v0.46 **Created:** Sat Jul 04, 2015 11:37 AM UTC by Roman Haefeli **Last Updated:** Sat Jul 04, 2015 11:37 AM UTC **Owner:** Miller Puckette [declare -stdpath] doesn't expand any paths (or at least

Re: [PD-dev] Windows installer for Pd

2015-11-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 10:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2015-11-11 10:41, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 09:07 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> On 2015-11-10 21:54, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> > >> wine? shouldn't that on

Re: [PD-dev] Windows installer for Pd

2015-11-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 10:48 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2015-11-11 10:41, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> iirc, the main problem with this is, that for the *uninstaller* you need > >> > to enumerate the files as well (again you can use wildcards, but then > >&

Re: [PD-dev] Windows installer for Pd

2015-11-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 09:07 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2015-11-10 21:54, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > The not so nice part about NSIS is that you have to list every single > > file of your source packet explicitly and tell it where to install. > > Since

Re: [PD-dev] Windows installer for Pd

2015-11-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 12:13 -0700, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Exactly. I see no reason why is has to be installer OR zip. Most open > source projects provide *both* and leave it up to the downloaders. > > > (Also, I don’t believe Roman was ever advocating for *not* providing a > zip.) > > > How does

Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?

2015-11-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey Hans Good to hear from you. Hope you're doing well. On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 11:10 -0700, Dan Wilcox wrote: > I’d like to find a way to bring in the consistent font sizing in as > well as the help patches Jonathan updated. Maybe worth bringing up > again? Yeah, keeping all the work for

Re: [PD-dev] sound filer samplerate outlet?

2015-11-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 13:08 -0700, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Totally agree. There’s a list of basic info in the WAV/AIFF headers > that is already parsed when reading that could simply be dumped out > via a list/message. +1 And number of channels would be good, too. Roman signature.asc

Re: [PD-dev] moving to git

2015-10-19 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:45 +, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Hi Roman, > If you do that over http then you don't have any way of knowing > whether the > > data that you requested is the data that you get back. Ah, I see. In my short-sighted notion of security I was only thinking about not

[PD-dev] Windows installer for Pd

2015-10-20 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all In order to make Pd as accessible as possible also to casual Pd users on Windows, I think it should come as an installer (as other software does as well). That's one of the things I think Pd-extended did right. What's the stance about it from Miller and other people? I just went ahead

Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?

2015-10-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:48 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 01/10/15 00:25, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > Since Pd-Extended is basically EOL at this point, maybe we should > > discuss more formal plans on a transition to Pd-vanilla+deken. > > I think the main outstanding issue is whether

Re: [PD-dev] loading classes: search by directory rather than extension

2015-09-24 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 22:20 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > iirc, this has been discussed at length, Oh, IOhannes... that is some news! I truly hope your patches make it into Pd. I fully support your proposals and I'm convinced they make class loading in Pd much more stringent than it is

Re: [PD-dev] overview of upstream sources?

2015-12-17 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 14:34 +0100, katja wrote: > With the decentralization of Pd lib version control it is hard to > locate / identify upstream source repositories. Would it be feasible > and useful to generate (and regularly update) an overview of forks > based on http://git.puredata.info/cgit/,

Re: [PD-dev] building on OS X

2015-12-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
and I even got some simple libraries compiled - with the pd-lib-builder Makefile. Yes, I'm using it. I didn't expect it to be that easy. Roman On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 09:53 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hey all > > I got access to a pristine OS X (10.9) virtual machine I can use for &

Re: [PD-dev] building on OS X

2015-12-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
I hope you'll be o.k. with me bringing this back to the list... On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 23:57 +0100, katja wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > >> ifeq ($(uname), MINGW) > >> ldlibs = -lwsock32 > &

[PD-dev] building on OS X

2015-12-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I got access to a pristine OS X (10.9) virtual machine I can use for building. Before I start my journey, I need some advice from the experienced: * Do I need XCode? (and thus an Apple-ID?) * How do I install all other necessary tools (git, etc.)? I heard about homebrew, fink,

[PD-dev] how to package libs with third party deps with deken?

2015-12-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey Me being most familiar with Debian-like system, I'm used to the notion that third-party libraries are taken care of by the system/package manager. When distributing my own package, I simply define the dependencies. How can/should externals be distributed with deken that depend on other

Re: [PD-dev] building on OS X

2015-12-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
: > > > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:00 AM, pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > > > From: Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> > > > > Subject: [PD-dev] building on OS X > > &g

Re: [PD-dev] building on OS X

2015-12-17 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 11:22 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > And no, I think I won't discuss my ideas with upstream.. :-) That sounds much harsher than I intended it to be. I mean I don't see the point of approaching upstream pro-actively with regard to what I said about the culture establis

[PD-dev] [declare -stdlib] does not work anymore

2016-01-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I see some commits in git trying to 'fix' [declare]. While I definitely appreciate it taking immediate effect, the -stdlib flag doesn't work for me anymore (the way I expect it). Probably there is still some confusion about the meaning of the flags, or they are intentionally changed

Re: [PD-dev] [declare -stdlib] does not work anymore

2016-01-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 00:54 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 01/12/2016 11:56 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > On 01/12/2016 11:34 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > >> i will check this immediately. > > > > actually it turns out that loading anything via it's absolute path is > > broken (and

Re: [PD-dev] comport - compilation with mingw

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 14:19 -0500, Martin Peach wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ... > > > > I see you fixed even more for Windows than what I did. I would like > > to > > integrate your changes,

Re: [PD-dev] comport version

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
That's what I'll do, I guess. Thanks. Roman On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 09:31 -0800, Miller Puckette wrote: > I suggest, once you get it up and running again, call it 1.1 :) > > M > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:41:28AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > Hey all

[PD-dev] comport - compilation with mingw

2017-02-26 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I'm trying to cross-compile comport for Windows on Linux and stumbled across this error: i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -DPD -I "/home/roman/.wine/drive_c/Pd//src/" -DMSW -DNT  -o comport.o -c comport.c comport.c: In function ‘set_break’: comport.c:422:29: error: ‘nr’ undeclared (first use in

Re: [PD-dev] comport - compilation with mingw

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:28 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Son, 2017-02-26 at 15:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hey all > > > > >

Re: [PD-dev] comport - compilation with mingw

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 11:02 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2017-02-27 10:59, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > Now, I wonder whether I rather should host the git forks of those > > externals under the umbrella of the pure-data group than under my > > personal 'red

[PD-dev] Pd groups on github.com (was: Re: comport - compilation with mingw)

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 11:02 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2017-02-27 10:59, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > Now, I wonder whether I rather should host the git forks of those > > externals under the umbrella of the pure-data group than under my > > personal 'red

Re: [PD-dev] "comport" has moved to git (was Re: comport)

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 11:22 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2017-02-27 11:14, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 11:02 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > > > > On 2017-02-27 10:59, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > > >

[PD-dev] comport version

2017-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all There is ambiguous information about comport's version. CHANGES.txt suggests it is currently at 1.0, whereas comport-meta.pd says it is at 0.2. Can we agree on one? Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: [PD-dev] Conflict: incoming OSC data and DSP on

2017-04-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
hed modified version of your test patch still exhibit > > the > > problem? > > Yes, same exact problem. > > > > > On 12 Apr 2017, at 16:01, Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Does the attached modified version of your test patch st

Re: [PD-dev] Conflict: incoming OSC data and DSP on

2017-04-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mit, 2017-04-12 at 16:13 +0100, Niccolò Granieri wrote: > > > > Just a wild guess: It looks like your localhost connection is slow > > for > > some reason. Is there some anti virus software installed? If so, > > does > > the problem still occur when anti virus is stopped? > No antivirus

Re: [PD-dev] Conflict: incoming OSC data and DSP on

2017-04-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mit, 2017-04-12 at 16:46 +0100, Niccolò Granieri wrote: > > > > It seems unlikely to me that this issue is related to the data > > being > > OSC formatted. Does it happen with FUDI messages as well? > No it doesn't. In fact the workaround I found is to receive OSC data > in one istance of Pd,

Re: [PD-dev] Conflict: incoming OSC data and DSP on

2017-04-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Die, 2017-04-11 at 18:33 +0200, Damian Stewart wrote: > Fwiw I can reproduce exactly the behaviour that Niccolò is seeing > here. OSX 10.12.3, pd vanilla 0.47.1 64 bit. I cannot with the same Pd version on Linux. I wonder whether it is related to the high refresh rate of the number boxes.

Re: [PD-dev] line object (non tilde version)

2017-04-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sam, 2017-04-15 at 12:39 +0200, cristiano piatti wrote: > Good morning, > could someone please make me a line usage example ? > I need to linearize an incoming number to multiply audio signal from > 0 > to 1 avoiding clicks. Use [line~] instead of [line], if you want to avoid zipper noise.

Re: [PD-dev] building with msys2

2017-07-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mit, 2017-07-12 at 09:55 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > - would it be possible to configure your mail-client to properly > quote the emails you reply to? i'm spending more time figuring out > what is a reply to what and who said what than with the actual > content. Both versions of PC's

[PD-dev] Window position fix lost

2017-07-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all Back in February IOhannes commited a fix for window position on X11. It fixed all the window jumping troubles I had before and that I tried to address by manually adjusting windowframex and windowframey in pd- gui.tcl. Soon after, the fix doesn't have any effect anymore. With current

[PD-dev] Pd's build date / build version

2017-07-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I couldn't find any reliable way to identify a compiled Pd binary. The only info I have is the creation date. Wouldn't it be cool for developers if Pd would display its build date somewhere and possible even the version (shortened commit hash)? It happened to me that I was using an

[PD-dev] Pd does not link against jack

2017-07-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I don't know exactly for how long, but jack support seems broken in current git master. This is how I compile Pd: $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --enable-jack $ make -j The resulting binary doesn't link against jack libraries: $ ldd src/pd linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb7757000)

Re: [PD-dev] Pd does not link against jack

2017-07-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
Now I'm having a hard believing myself, but apparently the last commit that builds a pd linked against libjack is: 637ef74e  (which is over a year old. Can that be true?) Roman On Don, 2017-07-06 at 21:17 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hey all > > I don't know exactly for how long,

Re: [PD-dev] weak jack linking and segfaults (was Re: Pd does not link against jack)

2017-07-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 03:23 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Should be fixed: https://github.com/pure-data/pure- > data/pull/88/commits/13fbd62af8be66cdd83147d935380c19eb5c3eac Cool! I see it's already in the master branch. Tested and works. Thank you! Roman > > On Jul 9, 2017, at 12:00 PM,

Re: [PD-dev] Pd's build date / build version

2017-07-16 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fre, 2017-07-14 at 21:56 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 07/13/2017 05:35 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > Hey all > > > > I couldn't find any reliable way to identify a compiled Pd binary. > > The > > only info I have is the creation date. >

[PD-dev] trying to compile Pd on OS X (10.11)

2017-05-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I'm trying to compile current Pd for Mac on a 10.11.6 machine. And I'm stuck at linking stage: /bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CXX   --mode=link g++  -g -O2 -weak_framework Jackmp     -L/usr/local/lib  -o pd pd-d_arithmetic.o pd-d_array.o pd-d_ctl.o pd-d_dac.o pd-d_delay.o pd-d_fft.o

Re: [PD-dev] trying to compile Pd on OS X (10.11)

2017-05-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Don, 2017-05-04 at 14:02 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2017-05-04 13:30, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > Hey all > > > > I'm trying to compile current Pd for Mac on a 10.11.6 machine. And > > I'm > > stuck at linking stage: > >

Re: [PD-dev] trying to compile Pd on OS X (10.11)

2017-05-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fre, 2017-05-05 at 09:35 -0400, cjniven wrote: > What version of jack did you end up installing? I’m having the same > problem myself on OS X 10.12. Pd works fine with jack now after I installed the JackOSX package from IOhannes' second link. The package apparently installs (along a lot of

Re: [PD-dev] atoms not same height as objects?

2017-09-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
Just to add another data point of opinion: I would find symbol and number atoms with same size as message and object boxes visually more pleasing than the current smaller boxes.  Since Dan insinuated that he'll address "harmonization" of box sizes between platforms, please consider releasing

Re: [PD-dev] jack detection on OSX (Re: [PD] Pd-0.48 for macOS not compiled with jack support(?))

2017-08-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
> > On Aug 28, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > > > On 08/28/2017 11:24 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > I cannot confirm. The instructions say: > > > > > > ./configure > > > > > > but without '--enable-ja

Re: [PD-dev] How to customize Pd.app for macOS?

2017-12-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
> Sorry i don't have the knowledge on how to do this correctly, i just > figured that out from looking at the source code > (tcl/dialog_audio.tcl) > and this one post i found about it. [1] > > best, ingo > > > [1] > http://forum.critterandguitari.com/t/audio-

[PD-dev] How to customize Pd.app for macOS?

2017-12-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I'd like to know whether it is possible to modify Pd.app in a way that it starts an included patch automatically with included preference settings? In other words, I'd like to make a stand-alone app from a patch. From what I was able to figure out, double-clicking the Pd.app starts

Re: [PD-dev] How to customize Pd.app for macOS?

2017-12-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
(currently 781) and specify the desired start options there:   exec -- $pd_exec -guiport $::port -open ../patches/mypatch.pd & Seems to work. BTW, I'm amazed how easy it is to build a Pd.app on macOS. Nice work, Dan! Roman On Mit, 2017-12-13 at 13:41 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Mit, 201

[PD-dev] purest_json from Deken links to wrong libraries in Debian Stretch

2018-04-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all Ubuntu 16.04 ships libjson-c2, Debian Stretch ships libjson-c3. The externals from purest_json from Deken link against libjson-c.so.2 and thus do not work in Debian Stretch. I only discovered that after I removed "obsolete" packages (packages that were installed from previous releases

Re: [PD-dev] deken: major revamp of the packaging format for externals

2018-02-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 17:06 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > TL;DR: i suggest a new deken fileformat to be ready for double- > precision Sounds all good and necessary. Thanks for your work. What does it mean for package maintainers? Are they supposed to re- upload the existing packages with

Re: [PD-dev] pd-0.49-0: Deken not working in Raspberry Pi 3 B+

2019-05-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:49 PM Frodo Jedi < > frodojedi.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have just compiled and installed pd-0.49-0 on my Raspberry Pi 3 > > B+. > > When launching Deken to find and install externals nothing happens > > (Of course I have internet enabled in the Pi).

Re: [PD-dev] pd-0.49-0: Deken not working in Raspberry Pi 3 B+

2019-05-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 15:59 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:49 PM Frodo Jedi < > > frodojedi.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I have just compiled and installed pd-0.49-0 on my Raspberry Pi 3 > > > B+. >

Re: [PD-dev] Compile i386 externals on Linux amd64

2019-05-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 23:55 +0200, Thomas Mayer wrote: > Hi, > > On 29.04.19 13:44, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > Hey all > > > > Is there an easy way to use the pd-lib-builder Makefile to compile > > externals for Linux i386 on Linux amd64? Currently, I'm using a &

Re: [PD-dev] Compile i386 externals on Linux amd64

2019-05-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > [...] > this boils down to: > > # apt-get install gcc-multilib-i686-linux-gnu > $ make CC=i686-linux-gnu-gcc > > (you might also have to enable multiarch:i386 on your target system; > i > have this enabled on virtually all

[PD-dev] Compile i386 externals on Linux amd64

2019-04-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all Is there an easy way to use the pd-lib-builder Makefile to compile externals for Linux i386 on Linux amd64? Currently, I'm using a Debian Stretch i386 KVM VM specifically for this purpose. But since I am successfully cross-compiling for Windows 32bit and 64bit targets with mingw

Re: [PD-dev] dynamic patching - is iemguts the way to go?

2019-08-20 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 12:09 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > I think the way to do this in libpd is to open them all as separate > patches > within one instance of Pd (so that symbols are shared) and use > "tabsend" > and "tabreceive" to route signals to/from them, using shared names > like >

Re: [PD-dev] where is the search priority set?

2019-08-20 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 14:17 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > By working on Pd's manual, I can see the current priority is to > > look first > > in the directory containing the patch, then in the search paths. I > > still > > want to maintain that structure. I just think that the order of the > > paths

Re: [PD-dev] Somewhat nice circles using data structures with anti-aliasing implementing Xiaolin Wu circle algorithm (vanilla)

2019-10-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 23:51 +0200, Ingo Stock wrote: > Hey list, > > i implemented the Xiaolin Wu circle algorithm to get somewhat nice > circles with data structures in Pd vanilla. > > Patch and description are in the forum: >

Re: [PD-dev] networking updates

2019-10-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey Dan On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 03:49 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Christoph and I have more or less finished some work that updates > Pd's networking and also fixes some bugs and a couple pain points: Cool. Thank you both! I did test a few things with patches I just made up (on Ubuntu 18.04),

Re: [PD-dev] A gift from a PD user :)

2020-04-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Jakob On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 00:30 +0200, Jakob Skouborg wrote: > > So here is something that I have created with Pure Data, a 64 voice > granular sample player: Beautiful sound example, interesting patch. Thanks a lot for sharing. You could add a: [declare -path zexy -lib zexy -path tof

Re: [PD-dev] A gift from a PD user :)

2020-04-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 16:43 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > cyclone is best loaded as "-lib cyclone" Oh, thanks for the correction. I only see now that it has a cyclone.pd_linux binary. What do I miss with [declare -path cyclone]? I'm just curious. Roman signature.asc Description: This

Re: [PD-dev] Variable amount of signal inlets and outlets

2020-05-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 12:57 +0200, Christof Ressi wrote: > One word of warning about externals with multiple signal > inputs/outputs (quoting from > https://github.com/pure-data/externals-howto#signal-classes): > "Optimisation of the DSP-tree tries to avoid unnecessary copy- > operations.

Re: [PD-dev] How to create an unsigned Pd.app?

2020-06-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Dan On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 14:41 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Howdy Roman, > > > On Jun 10, 2020, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > > > From: Roman Haefeli > > > > It seems the official builds for macOS distributed by Miller are > >

[PD-dev] How to create an unsigned Pd.app?

2020-06-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all I only loosely followed the discussion about how apps for upcoming macOS versions need to be signed and notarized to run without warnings. It seems the official builds for macOS distributed by Miller are signed. Also, when I do 'make app' I seem to get a signed Pd.app. Is there an easy

Re: [PD-dev] Re : How to create an unsigned Pd.app?

2020-06-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 11:40 +0200, Nicolas Danet wrote: > Comment/remove the codesign commands < > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/d5766fd0600a5444a7e26754bed4f175d96ac568/mac/osx-app.sh#L363 > > ? Yes, that solves all my problems. Only realized now that three parts are signed.

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 18:51 -0300, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > On 1/10/2021 6:06 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > From what I understand, the > > [fluidsynth~] external doesn't make use of this stuff, so there is > > no > > point in bloating the library and the number of dep

Re: [PD-dev] Releasing to deken

2021-01-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 00:46 +, David Rush wrote: > > 3 - Do I need to support all architectures on day 1? (currently I > build Linux/Win) I don't claim authority in the matter, but I'd say no. Just support the architectures you're able to build for. You can always ask others to build your

Re: [PD-dev] Releasing to deken

2021-01-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 00:46 +, David Rush wrote: > > 2 - Can deken packages be deleted/removed/name changed? Yes / Yes / I don't know However, deleting already uploaded packages is discouraged. Check your results with scrutiny before uploading them. If you find issues, you always can

Re: [PD-dev] Releasing to deken

2021-01-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 00:46 +, David Rush wrote: > > 5 - One or Two packages? If the packages can be used on their own in a meaningful way, I would distribute them separately. Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 07:13 -0300, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > > sh linuxdep32.sh > > rm linuxdep32 > > ~~~ > > > > However, the crucial part is that the included libfluidsynth.so > > should > > not be "tainted" with support for all kinds of things. This means, > > you > > can't take the one

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:29 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > that seems all wrong: Thanks for chiming in and for your voice of reason. Clearly, I only have a half-baked understanding of what the purpose of those scripts is. I'll try to wrap what you said up into a PR when I find time.

[PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
I took the liberty to move this over to pd-dev On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 03:48 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Em qui., 7 de jan. de 2021 às 20:07, Roman Haefeli < > reduz...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 00:14 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > &

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 11:23 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Em sex., 8 de jan. de 2021 às 08:48, Roman Haefeli < > reduz...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > Hopefully, we'll be able to create fluid~ that also supports sf3 > > files. > > I thought we already did :

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:47 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:29 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > > Hopefully, we'll be able to create fluid~ that also supports sf3 > files. I got fluidsynth compiled with libsndfile support. When loading a

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 20:18 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > Em sex., 8 de jan. de 2021 às 19:21, Roman Haefeli < > reduz...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:47 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:2

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 12:28 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > The fluidsynth command utility loads and plays the example SF3-file I > found fine. [fluid~] says it loaded it, but I get only silence when > playing notes. [fluid~] works with /usr/share/sounds/sf3/MuseScore_General_Lite

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:14 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Since I'm still learning a lot, I wonder > if > this is the way to go or if it's considered hacky to fix things after > the fact? I'd like to hear some expert opinion. Only now, I understand what the localdeps.*.sh scripts d

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 16:40 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > Em dom., 10 de jan. de 2021 às 13:40, Roman Haefeli < > reduz...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > I sitll compiled fluidsynth so that it has the exact support I > > want, > > not more, not les

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 14:39 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > What feels sane for me is creating a new object, with a different > name (fluidsynth~) and its own design that is cleaner and doesn't try > to fix this compatibility issues, cause it's just a nightmare with no > simple solution.

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 23:13 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:47 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:29 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > Hopefully, we'll be able to create fluid~ that also supports sf3 > > files. > >

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
So, I created a script that tracks all dependencies of fluidsynth~.pd_linux and copies them to the local folder. On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:14 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > What I'm still wondering is how to distinguish dependencies required > to > be included into a Deken packag

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 16:52 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 1/14/21 10:42 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > See PR: > > https://github.com/porres/pd-fluidsynth/pull/5 > > > > given that i consider myself upstream of the original > "localdeps.*.sh" >

Re: [PD-dev] [PD] soundtouch~ for Pd Vanilla

2021-01-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
I took liberty of moving this to pd-dev. On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 22:59 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > It's only missing binaries for windows64 bits, linux64 bits and > raspberry pi versions. Hopefully other people can build and upload > them. For compiling it on any of the Linux archs

Re: [PD-dev] [PD] soundtouch~ for Pd Vanilla

2021-01-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 11:21 +0100, Christof Ressi wrote: > > ~~~ > > $ pd -open soundtouch~-help.pd > > pd: AAFilter.cpp:107: void soundtouch::AAFilter::calculateCoeffs(): > > Assertion `length >= 2' failed. > > Pd: signal > > ~~~ > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/1402219 > > According

Re: [PD-dev] [PD] soundtouch~ for Pd Vanilla

2021-02-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 13:03 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > I'm hoping we could have all > binaries for this version and hopefully update this too to the new > soundtouch version, but I needed help :) Yeah, I see. I guess my help is limited to providing binaries for missing archs once

[PD-dev] New [command] external

2021-07-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all, I am recently trying to dive into the C realm and revamped ggee's [shell] external. Because its API is different in many ways from the original, I decided to give it a new name. Before I publish this to a wider audience through Deken, I would like to make sure I do not destroy the

[PD-dev] Pd breaks zexy (?)

2021-08-20 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all I just compiled Pd from master and found that I cannot load [fifop] from zexy anymore. When loading it, I get: ~~~ error: /home/roman/Documents/Pd/externals/zexy/zexy.pd_linux: /home/roman/Documents/Pd/externals/zexy/zexy.pd_linux: undefined symbol: get_sys_sleepgrain fifop error: ...

Re: [PD-dev] Pd breaks zexy (?)

2021-08-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 12:42 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > Well, I've never been able to articulate a clear and complete > policy... > Roughly speaking, I'm maintaining source and binary compatibility for > anything > that uses the public API (m_pd.h) and trying not to break things that > use >

[PD-dev] -stderr garbled

2021-08-23 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Since f16dd5ec34 (I believe) everything printed to stderr is garbled. For instance, when doing: [list a b 12( | [print] in 'pd -stderr', I get: ~~~ verbose(2): print: listverbose(2): averbose(2): bverbose(2): 12 ~~~ Without '-stderr', the print output looks fine in the Pd console.

[PD-dev] current master does not build on macOS Catalina

2021-10-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi I having troubles building current Pd on macOS catalina. This is how I run configure: ./configure --enable-jack --disable-jack-framework --disable-locales And here is where the building stops: ~~~ x_file.c:1062:13: error: implicitly declaring library function 'snprintf' with type 'int

Re: [PD-dev] New [command] external

2021-09-22 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 14:19 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > On 13/7/21 12:26 π.μ., Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > However, since the exit code outlet fires always last, it > > > probably would make > > > sense the make it the left-most. Are there

  1   2   >