Re: [PD] Increment/Decrement a number

2012-12-06 Thread Ingo
This is how I would fix your current patch. Ingo Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Sebastian Valenzuela Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 05:56 An: Pure Data Forum Betreff: [PD] Increment/Decrement a number

Re: [PD] Increment/Decrement a number

2012-12-06 Thread Ingo
Here's a counter that lets you count the same value from separate locations like counter buttons, incremental wheels, ext. midi input, etc. Ingo Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Sebastian Valenzuela Gesendet:

[PD] Pd on the Pi : Miller's version

2012-12-06 Thread Pierre Massat
Dear list, I know that Miller Puckette has been working on improving Pd on the RPi lately, and I came upon a thread where he talks about his attempt to get audio in working, and mentioned his version of Pd compiled for the RPi. I would like to know in which respects it is different from the

Re: [PD] Pd on the Pi : Miller's version

2012-12-06 Thread Johnny Mauser
Interesting question. In addition i am very interested in using GEM on Rpi. Is that possible? Best -j- Am 06.12.2012 12:09 schrieb Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com: Dear list, I know that Miller Puckette has been working on improving Pd on the RPi lately, and I came upon a thread where he

[PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So [phasor~ 1] | [rate~ 1.5] will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't do the trick with non-integers. Any

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Simon Iten
What are you trying to accomplish? On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis adr...@gmail.com wrote: How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So [phasor~ 1] | [rate~ 1.5]

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8feature=plcp On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten itensi...@gmail.com wrote: What are you trying to accomplish? On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis adr...@gmail.com wrote: How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd?

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all them controlled by the same number box? .hc On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8feature=plcp On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Cyrille Henry
somthing like this? cheers c Le 06/12/2012 14:43, Alexandros Drymonitis a écrit : How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So [phasor~ 1] | [rate~ 1.5] will actually give a

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Don't think I really follow. Each [rate~] actually outputs a [phasor~] with a different frequency (different frequency ratio), all driven by the same [phasor~]. How can you send a value from one number box to all [phasor~]s? On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Yup! That's super, thanks! On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Cyrille Henry c...@chnry.net wrote: somthing like this? cheers c Le 06/12/2012 14:43, Alexandros Drymonitis a écrit : How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Leaving out [rate~] should use less CPU since [rate~] doesn't have to do the analysis part, if I understand it correctly. phasors.pd Description: Binary data .hcOn Dec 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:Don't think I really follow. Each [rate~] actually outputs a [phasor~] with a

Re: [PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

2012-12-06 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Well, I guess that would do as well, didn't think very thoroughly I guess. Still it doesn't sound the same with either versions of [rate~] when I put the patch together. Anyway, thanks a lot. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.atwrote: Leaving out [rate~] should

Re: [PD] Pd on the Pi : Miller's version

2012-12-06 Thread me.grimm
afaik gem needs to be ported to opengl-es to run on the pi. there's a thread on this topic and i think the port has been done? http://www.mail-archive.com/gem-dev@iem.at/msg01930.html here are some specs. http://elinux.org/RPi_VideoCore_APIs#OpenGL_ES johannes would know mare obviously m On

Re: [PD] Pd on the Pi : Miller's version

2012-12-06 Thread me.grimm
I came upon a thread where he talks about his attempt to get audio in working, wheres the thread? I would also like to know if anybody has some feedback to give about audio in, it still sounds like shit on my end. what hardware are you using? i see there has been some improvements on the USB

Re: [PD] Increment/Decrement a number

2012-12-06 Thread Max
two more ways to add to the mix: float_value_counters.pd Description: Binary data Am 06.12.2012 um 10:38 schrieb Ingo i...@miamiwave.com: Here's a counter that lets you count the same value from separate locations like counter buttons, incremental wheels, ext. midi input, etc. Ingo

Re: [PD] Pd on the Pi : Miller's version

2012-12-06 Thread Miller Puckette
Hi all - Here's the thread: http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=66t=19155p=218405#p218405 ... and the upshot is you have to slow USB down to 1.1 (instead of the default 2.0) to get correct audio input. The version of Pd I've uploaded (http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.html) is

Re: [PD] Pd-extended on Windows now has localization support

2012-12-06 Thread Seiichiro MATSUMURA
Hi, Thank you Shimamoto-san. I really appreciate your contribution for the completes. After the finishing Japanese translation last February I did not look them back. I am not sure whether the translation of functions or messages around Linux are correct because I only use Mac OSX. If you find

Re: [PD] Patch bugged on pd-extended 0.43.4

2012-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
If you download the zip build, then you can run it without installing it at all by double-clicking the 'pd-extended.bat file thats included there. .hc On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:36 PM, Esteban Viveros wrote: Pd libraries can't be loaded... I tried tge pd-settings.reg , but I only can run pd