Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-28 Thread puredata
if anyone wants to work on this: https://github.com/patricksebastien/loopStationPD fork & pull request ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-28 Thread puredata
Yes I would like to have a solution within PD. The Meh patch is very very nice, but I am not sure how cross-fading and quantization is implemented (will try to contact the author). Will take a look at ipoke~. Will put my patch on github, maybe someone will want to join me in making a loop s

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread michael noble
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:18 PM, wrote: > I'm struggling at making my own loop station solution inside pd. I'm > trying to mimic SooperLooper I guess you want to stick with pure pd if you are avoiding the SooperLooper app, but a half-way point might be to use the old SooperLooper ladspa plugin,

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread D Stone
; Today's Topics: > >1. Re: patch wanted: loop station (Julian Brooks) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:30:33 + > From: Julian Brooks > Subject: Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station > To: Will - > Cc: "pd-list@iem.at"

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread Julian Brooks
of days. >> > Noticed that on most recent vanilla on debian 64b (xfce if it matters) >> that >> > when double clicking a patch to open pd, pd opens but the patch doesn't. >> > Interestingly when you then go to open (ctl-o or whatever) said patch, >> the >> > dialogue box opens in the c

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread Julian Brooks
, pd opens but the patch doesn't. > > Interestingly when you then go to open (ctl-o or whatever) said patch, > the > > dialogue box opens in the correct folder. > > > > Not a biggie but it's there. > > > > Anyone else on that behaviour? > >

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread patrice colet
hello roman, there are several ways to sync audio loops, in most methods we try to read audio samples in a way that they are in sync by changing read speed or chunk size, or stretching it with fft, or by making slices with bonk~'s attack detection. The last methods allows to quantize sound

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread Will -
pen (ctl-o or whatever) said patch, the > dialogue box opens in the correct folder. > > Not a biggie but it's there. > > Anyone else on that behaviour? > > Jb > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread Julian Brooks
NOt quite what you're after but Katja's SliceJockey is my favourite looping code for Pd http://www.katjaas.nl/slicejockey/slicejockey.html Certainly worth checking how she's done it. Yeah sooperlooper, I used to make use of that before Pd. It's good stuff. Jb On 27 March 2014 07:14, Roman Haef

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 05:09 -0400, pured...@11h11.com wrote: > Not sure exactly what is making the click / glitch in my patches. I > think the fact that I bring down the jack buffer to 64 didn't help... > but I cannot be sure. > > I am still looking the archive / search engine to find a loop s

Re: [PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-26 Thread Ed Kelly
The way to deal with this in real-time is to fade in for a short period at the start, and fade out at the end. In order for that to respond in real time, I've found a good way is to delay the audio stream by a tiny value (e.g. 5ms) then fade the audio at 5ms - 1 audio block (about 1.46ms). That

[PD] patch wanted: loop station

2014-03-26 Thread puredata
Hi everyone, I'm struggling at making my own loop station solution inside pd. I'm trying to mimic SooperLooper, that is: - multiple sync options - multiple quantize options + something i am not sure SooperLooper do: cross-fading begin/end of loop to avoid glitches. I have code a patch, bu