On Sat, 11 Dec 2010, Martin . wrote:
But, we could also conclude that war/military is commercial, at least in
the sense that war is waged for profit, and thus GPL should do
GPL is not noncommercial.
The GPL even forbids a noncommercial clause to be added.
___
The GPL doesn't restrict people from doing commercial business with the
software (although v3 does try to restrict certain types of monkey business).
-Jonathan
--- On Sat, 12/11/10, Martin . wrote:
From: Martin .
Subject: Re: [PD] pd-pidip into Debian
To: "PD List"
Date: Sat
I agree but how could such a term ever be enforced if the military were to
use it? Through litigation? IMO such a term is unenforceable
... arguably making it redundant-although I am happy to hear other's point
of view?
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Martin . wrote:
> +1 for including the lin
+1 for including the line about military use in pd's license. That will make
us all happy. And the military then has to use maxmsp.
Though, I assume it means military institutions and not my own militant
guerilla art.
But, we could also conclude that war/military is commercial, at least in the
se
Bernardo Barros wrote:
2010/12/4 Mathieu Bouchard:
It's because GPL is for hippies, or something.
It's the other way around. BSD is hippier:
Someone in Berkley smoked marijuana and said:
"hey man, let's just give it away, who cares what people will do with it,
let them turn this into
2010/12/4 Mathieu Bouchard :
> It's because GPL is for hippies, or something.
It's the other way around. BSD is hippier:
Someone in Berkley smoked marijuana and said:
"hey man, let's just give it away, who cares what people will do with it,
let them turn this into proprietary or whatever".
I don'
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I don't get all this discussion... why not just stick with plain GPL?
It's because GPL is for hippies, or something.
That's why Google Code restricted the possible licenses to choose...
What's why ? I don't follow. Do you really know why Google di
I read somewhere they used the Pd test-tone patch to torture inmates at
Guantanamo Bay.
Doesn't that suck?
We certainly wouldn't want a license which allows that kind of thing to
happen, would we?
D.
On 12/4/10 9:25 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Well, I hope they are all joking. I bel
Well, I hope they are all joking. I believe SourceForge also only
allows code with free licenses, so code with such restrictions would
not be allowed on SourceForge. But I could be wrong there.
.hc
On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I don't get all this discussion... w
I don't get all this discussion... why not just stick with plain GPL?
That's why Google Code restricted the possible licenses to choose...
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
From now on I refuse to allow my code to be used in anything that sucks.
The licensee thereby agrees to not make fan videos of Kate Ryan or Avril
Lavigne or Johnny Halliday, no matter how noncommercial you may be doing
it.
__
_or a sexually aroused gas mask.
___
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of João Pais
[jmmmp...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 8:40 PM
To: pd-list@iem.at; Derek Holzer
Subject: Re: [PD] pd-pidip into Debian
The processor running Pd must not be inside the vacuum cleaner, so we
can still use his precious code :) as long as the processor blows its
OK i guess...
On 4 December 2010 02:40, João Pais wrote:
>> From now on I refuse to allow my code to be used in anything that sucks.
>
> so you'll never try
From now on I refuse to allow my code to be used in anything that sucks.
so you'll never try to control a vacuum cleaner with Pd...
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
From now on I refuse to allow my code to be used in anything that sucks.
D.
On 12/3/10 5:51 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
pidip and unauthorized are now published with a non-standard license
that says : * any project that promotes : racism, national
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
pidip and unauthorized are now published with a non-standard license
that says : * any project that promotes : racism, nationalism,
xenophobia, sexism, homophobia, religious hatred or missionarism .. (
expandable list)
«Nationalism» is a broad wo
ola,
pidip and unauthorized are now published with a non-standard license
that says :
the code published here can be studied,
modified, used by anyone that
provides all the original credits
and sources in derivative projects.
there are restrictions on its
i want to like this reply, but i can't find the facebook 'like' button
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:46:22PM +0100, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> good!!! i'm free to do what i like now!!!
>
> yeh!
>
> sevy
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> Ok, will do. I also have to remove pidip from Pd-extend
thank you officer
you'll stay in too,
you made your good job of tracking deviants,
a song for you :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nULKw8s061E
ciao,
sevy
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
PDP has a regular GPL license, so its staying in.
.hc
On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Patrick Pagano wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Patrick Pagano wrote:
removing pdp/pidip is a bad idea
it's also a bad idea to cause the simple things that cause people to want
to remove pidip.
if the military decides to use pidip for military use, chances it will be
classified information, and no-one of us will eve
PDP has a regular GPL license, so its staying in.
.hc
On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Patrick Pagano wrote:
removing pdp/pidip is a bad idea
On 11/23/2010 11:58 AM, John Harrison wrote:
Yves:
It's your code so you get to choose. From my standpoint as an
educator, removal of PiDiP from pd-e
removing pdp/pidip is a bad idea
On 11/23/2010 11:58 AM, John Harrison wrote:
Yves:
It's your code so you get to choose. From my standpoint as an
educator, removal of PiDiP from pd-extended is very unfortunate. I
hope at some point you reconsider your position.
-John
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 a
Yves:
It's your code so you get to choose. From my standpoint as an educator,
removal of PiDiP from pd-extended is very unfortunate. I hope at some point
you reconsider your position.
-John
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:46 AM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> good!!! i'm free to do what i like now!!!
good!!! i'm free to do what i like now!!!
yeh!
sevy
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, will do. I also have to remove pidip from Pd-extended based on
this license.
.hc
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:18 AM, ydego...@free.fr wrote:
jooo, que espeso ...
i told you 1 times not to package my stu
24 matches
Mail list logo
