On 04/09/2012 06:38 PM, Julian Brooks wrote:
Apologies for dredging up old posts...
Did we ever get one good/merged [wiimote]?
Julian
Funny you asked. I made several releases of disis_wiimote since,
including making it output-compatible with vanilla wiimote. Also, the
latest version 0.9.0
Very nice. As per usual many thanks for sharing. And really good to see
the L2ork project steaming ahead.
All good wishes,
Julian
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Apologies for dredging up old posts...
Did we ever get one good/merged [wiimote]?
Julian
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:09 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
I can easily test this at the next rehearsal. But I think the more important
question is whether that would make any difference. In other words, are
the wiimote maintainers interested in merging disis_wiimote functionality.
OK, so
I just tested that with the [wiimote] from pd-svn and it seems I can
have three continuous streams going at the same time (though the
update
rate seems to lower). I enabled accelerometers, IR and motionplus and
got updates on all three. Is it really a limitation by cwiid, then?
Roman
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
I just tested that with the [wiimote] from pd-svn and it seems I can
have three continuous streams going at the same time (though the
update
rate seems to lower). I enabled accelerometers, IR and motionplus and
got updates on all
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 15:36 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
This doesn't work:
* accelerometers, motionplus, classic controller
That is because libcwiid is not supporting pass-through plus + extension
(yet, my student is working on updating libcwiid and we'll hopefully have
something
On 02/17/2012 03:42 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
What version of libcwiid are you running? I tried both wiimote and
disis_wiimote and both are limited by the same limitation. It appears there may
have been some kind of a regression in libcwiid if the older version works fine.
Sorry, I meant to
On 02/17/2012 01:27 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
I just tested that with the [wiimote] from pd-svn and it seems I can
have three continuous streams going at the same time (though the
update
rate seems to lower). I enabled accelerometers, IR
explicitly enables external they wish to use (eg. RPT_NUNCHUK), then all
is well... I just fixed this in the
Ugh, too tired... that should've been extension, not an external
last checked it and it poses code legibility advantages over
disis_wiimote. Where it still falls short is
And that
I can easily test this at the next rehearsal. But I think the more important
question is whether that would make any difference. In other words, are
the wiimote maintainers interested in merging disis_wiimote functionality.
OK, so studied the wiimote structure and decided to adopt its output
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:09 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
I can easily test this at the next rehearsal. But I think the more important
question is whether that would make any difference. In other words, are
the wiimote maintainers interested in merging disis_wiimote functionality.
So, I
Yeah, no doubt that disis-wiimote has been well tested. I'm just
highlighting different cases. I know a couple projects that needed 6
wiimotes connected to 1 computer, where I think L2Ork does one
wiimote per computer. Now, it would be good to rely on a single object
to handle all cases.
- Original Message -
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
To: 'Hans-Christoph Steiner' h...@at.or.at
Cc: 'pd-list' pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] wiimote report
Yeah, no doubt that disis-wiimote has been well tested. I'm just
I thought I saw a comment in your code that said it only handled one
controller.
-Jonathan
It's been a while since I edited the source and/or tested more than one wiimote
per computer. It may be just a leftover comment. Also, I think this is in part
because each wiimote would have its own
-Original Message-
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf
Of Ivica Ico Bukvic
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 2:00 PM
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes'; 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'
Cc: 'pd-list'
Subject: Re: [PD] wiimote report
I thought I saw a comment
- Original Message -
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' jancs...@yahoo.com; 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'
h...@at.or.at
Cc: 'pd-list' pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: [PD] wiimote report
I thought I saw a comment in your
- Original Message -
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' jancs...@yahoo.com; 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'
h...@at.or.at
Cc: 'pd-list' pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 2:27 PM
Subject: RE: [PD] wiimote report
-Original Message
Cool. I guess the other question is this: does the threading stuff in your
class solve
a problem with dropouts that still exists in the other wiimote class? Can
you put
together a demo patch that would cause dropouts on the old wiimote
class before
you revised it, but which doesn't cause
- Original Message -
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' jancs...@yahoo.com; 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'
h...@at.or.at
Cc: 'pd-list' pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 3:59 PM
Subject: RE: [PD] wiimote report
Cool. I guess the other question
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i should go for supercollider/osc. or is there another
wii external for linux?
thanks+ciao,
ub
it still crashes a lot though,
...@xdv.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 9:48 AM
To: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] wiimote report
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i should go for supercollider
Should I install this version of wait for Gilded Palace of Sin?!
Ha!
pp
-Original Message-
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Ivica
Ico Bukvic
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:39 AM
To: u...@xdv.org; 'pd-list'
Subject: Re: [PD] wiimote report
Try
] On Behalf
Of u...@xdv.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 9:48 AM
To: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] wiimote report
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, u...@xdv.org wrote:
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i should go for supercollider/osc. or is there another
wii external
, 2012 10:48 AM
To: u...@xdv.org
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] wiimote report
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, u...@xdv.org wrote:
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 16:47 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, u...@xdv.org wrote:
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i should
On 02/10/12 17:11, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hm.. we have clearly more success stories with [disis_wimoote] than with
[wiimote] pd-svn. Probably [disis_wiimote] should be in debian?
i don't know, it feels like we have clearly more bug reports for
[wiimote] than for [disis_wiimote]
otoh, some
Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, u...@xdv.org wrote:
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i should go for
it still crashes a lot though, especially with
With what?
sorry. with gem and dsp on. it seems to me like the more there is going
on, the sooner it crashes.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
On 10.02.2012 16:47, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, u...@xdv.org wrote:
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a lot though ...
well, seems like i should go for supercollider/osc.
On 02/10/12 17:38, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
and why couldn't a lot of people benefit from the disis_wiimote?
i think nobody challenged that.
it is open source and it's just a matter of packaging it for a
specific distro.
yes, somebody has to do the work.
btw, [wiimote] is open source
On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, u...@xdv.org wrote:
to answer my question:
i changed onoff from int to float and it works such that i can turn
reports on and off.
it still crashes a
Why have two wiimote objects? Is there a specific reason why they can't
be merged? If we pool the work on it we'll have one better wiimote
object versus two different wiimote objects that are both less good.
Do you mind elaborating why you believe both objects are less good in and of
while i appreciate your work with pd-l2ork, i think it would be great if
you would be trying to get the fixes into upstream (where you forked
from).
I did, but many fixes never got anywhere (we had this discussion a while ago),
and while in the early days I spent most of my time providing
Well, what I understand is that pd-l2ork has already been synthesised as a
pile of patches over pd 0.42. If I'm getting it right, disis_wiimote could
be too, but is not yet, go on git as a set of patches over a certain
version of wiimote, which would open the possibility to merge patches
upstream.
Not really, there are a bunch of features pd-l2ork has that pd and pd-extended
dont have and even more bugfixes.
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A
Composition, Music Technology
Director, DISIS Interactive Sound Intermedia Studio
Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
Assistant Director, CCTAD
Virginia
On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Why have two wiimote objects? Is there a specific reason why they can't
be merged? If we pool the work on it we'll have one better wiimote
object versus two different wiimote objects that are both less good.
Do you mind elaborating why
On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
while i appreciate your work with pd-l2ork, i think it would be great if
you would be trying to get the fixes into upstream (where you forked
from).
I did, but many fixes never got anywhere (we had this discussion a while
ago), and
hey there,
i'm having a weird problem with wiimote. connecting and buttons work
fine, but when i try to
turn on some additional reporting, nothing happens. the device and
bluetooth is ok, as i can
get everything with wmgui, which also uses libcwiid, so i guess the
library is ok too.
i added
40 matches
Mail list logo
