jMax I want that year back.
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of i go
bananas
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:56 PM
To: Jonathan Wilkes
Cc: PD List
Subject: Re: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
If not, contacting
the handful of developers who have
From: Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu
To: i go bananas hard@gmail.com; Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: PD List pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
jMax I want
From: i go bananas hard@gmail.com
To: PD List pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 11:55 AM
Subject: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
just a quick update on the behind the scenes work i have been doing to see if
we can get [expr] under the
Le 2011-12-03 à 09:35:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
(You also need to contact devs who added functionality and fixed any
bugs in the expr code.)
Those depend on whether those people agreed, explicitly or implicitly, to
give up their copyright.
I don't think anyone claims copyright on
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: i go bananas hard@gmail.com; PD List pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
Le 2011-12-03 à 09:35:00
Le 2011-12-03 à 12:07:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
Well, one can either contact everyone who has ever contributed to the
code and get an explicit ok, or one can pay a lawyer to explain
whether what a non-lawyer wrote on a list back in sep-oct actually
matches up with the law.
Match up
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:35:26PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I don't think anyone claims copyright on correcting a small typo, for
example.
There are all kinds of crazy people in the world who claim things they don't
have the right to, but to pursue the matter ad absurdum, any lawsuit
Le 2011-12-03 à 14:06:00, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
There are all kinds of crazy people in the world who claim things they
don't have the right to, but to pursue the matter ad absurdum, any
lawsuit over a small typo is going to be thrown out for failing a de
minimis test.
Does that still
If not, contacting
the handful of developers who have worked on expr might be a workable
solution.
that's what i HAVE done.
at the moment, it seems that we still need to contact IRCAM directly, but
we just need to wait for Shahrokh to identify which jMax code was used.
