The thing I'm really afraid of is:
Do subpatches with several [phasor~] used as a audiosignals produce a
different result as intended without summing up in total over 1.
Especially as in my cases where I'm using lots of [phasor~] mostly for
amplitude modulation and most of the time they are not
Did you try graphing the output of the combined [phasor~] objects? To
me, it seems likely that the lack of a zero-crossing in the [phasor~]
waveform would create a large amount of DC offset, and perhaps that is
what you are hearing. [creb/blosc~], [osc~] and pretty much any other
audio
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von
Derek
Holzer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. November 2010 14:49
An: pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] Strange behavior between [phasor~] and [creb/blosc~]
Did you try graphing the output
. November 2010 14:49
An: pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] Strange behavior between [phasor~] and [creb/blosc~]
Did you try graphing the output of the combined [phasor~] objects? To
me, it seems likely that the lack of a zero-crossing in the [phasor~]
waveform would create a large amount of DC offset
2010 19:08
An: Ingo
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: Re: AW: [PD] Strange behavior between [phasor~] and [creb/blosc~]
Have a look here:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/PureData/DCOffset
My basic formula is
[*~ 2]
|
[-~ 1]
Best!
D.
On 11/23/10 3:18 PM, Ingo wrote:
Hi Derek
