Hallo,
Jamie Bullock hat gesagt: // Jamie Bullock wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:52 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I can have a [namecanvas $0something] in it and so the message I would use
would be
[obj etc etc(
|
[s $0something]
Try:
[clear(
|
[s
On 09/02/2007, at 1.47, Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
1) If it looks right to me there are 3 ways to determine paths and
libs on OSX and i am not quite sure if i am doing something wrong
or if it just has not been considered.
You can change the settings in the TCL-Interface of PD, but there
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:45:12AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I can only think of a small handful of usecases where [namecanvas] is
actually necessary.
Hi Frank,
I agree with you that most things can be done by dynamically creating a
subpatch or something like that. Maybe we should define
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Quoting patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hello,
i tried fractal.tar.gz and it didn't work. i am on linux with a nvidia
geforce fx 5600 xt and gem is compiled from cvs:
GEM: Graphics Environment for Multimedia
GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs
GEM: compiled: Jan 31 2007
here's my
Hallo,
padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
I found this behaviour slightly surprising, but on reflection it makes sense.
Pd doesn't seem to check deeply into subpatches when looking for DSP feedback
loops.
I started making a simple waveguide synth and decided, for a change, to work
Hallo,
Luke Iannini (pd) hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Actually I don't understand why people are so in love with
[namecanvas]. In five or six years of using Pd, I've never written a
patch with it.
Can't think of everything I've done with it before, but dynamically
resizing the
Like Frank, I haven't had a chance to check you patch..but wasn't there
something about the creation order of these things which makes a
difference? I remember getting *very* frustrated by this once.
d.
padawan12 wrote:
I found this behaviour slightly surprising, but on reflection it makes
Hi All,
I asked Kyle Buza (of mmonoplayer) about adding the sources for his
console soundchip emulator externals to Pd-CVS so that they could be
included in Pd-Extended. He's sending me the sources as he digs them
up. Most of them are written for Max, but I was hoping that someone
would be
Hi Chris,
I don't do much with audio myself, but still I'd love to see this patch
since applications of bonk~ are quite interesting to me. Not sure if
it's just me, but I didn't get the attachment. Would you mind sending
it again or maybe you have URL to get it from?
Best,
paris
This doesn't necessarily mean that it's broken - for example, it still works
mostly for me. Have you tried any of the binaries? You're on fedora?
Kevin
On 2/9/07, Ed Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've compiled the latest version of vasp and it
appears to be broken. The library
Hi Alex, all
...but PDs dB goes to 0, because we have to have the numbers following the same
scheme - so that 0 means 0 always I think. Industry uses dBFS (deciBel Full
Scale) because it is measuring the signal against the full scale from -96dB in
16bit recordings to 0dB (all bits used).
Same seemes to be the case in the last Pd-extended OS installer.
Is it a matter of the source-code, intel-compatibility or an
Installer issue ???
Am 09.02.2007 um 15:59 schrieb Kevin McCoy:
This doesn't necessarily mean that it's broken - for example, it
still works mostly for me. Have
Yep! I just compiled it from source for an Intel 10.4 mac, and it's broken!
Luigi Rensinghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same seemes to be the case in the
last Pd-extended OS installer.
Is it a matter of the source-code, intel-compatibility or an Installer issue ???
Am 09.02.2007 um 15:59
Am 09.02.2007 um 16:44 schrieb Ed Kelly:
Yep! I just compiled it from source for an Intel 10.4 mac, and it's
broken!
True! I'll look into it shortly (hopefully this evening)!
greetings,
Thomas
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
I'm away from Pd so I cannot check your patch, but your description
sounds like you're getting your execution order wrong by trying to
force a certain order through subpatches although you have a feedback-delay
(recirculating delay)
hi guillaume,
snap is still required - what's the external for it? also if you have 5
minutes, can you upload a demo of how it's sound on your website? and
why not, a screenshot!
also i still have this error too:
error: pack: O: bad type
... you might be able to track this down from the Find
Hallo,
Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
Like Frank, I haven't had a chance to check you patch..but wasn't there
something about the creation order of these things which makes a
difference? I remember getting *very* frustrated by this once.
Actually Andy's problem is not
Hallo,
Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
But it is true that creation order affects this? Can you explain how,
since I could never quite get it worked out properly and it cost me many
hours and maybe even a few gray hairs ;-)
It's similar to normal messages, just replace
Hi Frank,
and thanks for all that! I'll make sure it goes into every tutorial I
ever write ever again ;-)
But actually, what I was referring to was this problem of--for
example--having a feedback system where the send~ is inside a subpatch
and the receive~ is outside of it. IIRC, you have
Luigi Rensinghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
1) If it looks right to me there are 3 ways to determine paths and
libs on OSX and i am not quite sure if i am doing something wrong or
if it just has not been considered.
You can change the settings in the TCL-Interface of PD, but there are
not
Hello everyone,
I just purchased a Ground Control Pro in hopes that I could use the midi
foot controller to control my PD patches. However, I don't get any midiIn
output. Using the Test Audio Midi patch in the PD extended-0.39.2 build I
receive no output to the message boxes. I have made sure
Hi all,
is it at all related to the problem I had ~4 months ago? The symptoms
seem similar.
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2006-09/thread.html#7597
./MiS
Thomas Grill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 09.02.2007 um 16:44 schrieb Ed Kelly:
Yep! I just compiled it from source for
Frank Barknecht wrote
Try:
[clear(
|
[s $0something]
That's why [namecanvas] is not the final word on the functionality it
provides.
I don't understand what you mean. If you mean because it makes PD crash,
then try this:
[clear(
|
[s pd-whateverthisfileiscalled.pd]
with no use of
hello,
i posted before, but it did not come up the list, so sorry for
posting this three or four times in case the other posts show up..
do you guys know of any objects or abstractions that are able to play back
(in a loop)
a couple of approx. 1.5 min.. stereo interleaved files as stereo files ?
Hallo,
Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
and thanks for all that! I'll make sure it goes into every tutorial I
ever write ever again ;-)
But actually, what I was referring to was this problem of--for
example--having a feedback system where the send~ is inside a subpatch
Hallo,
Matteo Sisti Sette hat gesagt: // Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote
Try:
[clear(
|
[s $0something]
That's why [namecanvas] is not the final word on the functionality it
provides.
I don't understand what you mean. If you mean because it makes PD crash,
F. Barknecht wrote
Well, that's an error of the patch-author.
Well, whenever a program crashes and can't recover (that is, it forces the
operating system to close it), it is ALWAYS a bug of the program (unless it
is of the operating system of course) no matter how erroneous the input from
the
Hmmmfunny, they just had a big discussion on the SuperCollider list
about whether or not more Windows-like sanity checks to save the
application from programmers who don't know how to program was
necessary. Usually such fool-proofing kinds of checks come at an added
expense in terms of CPU
Did you leave the Audio MIDI Setup application open when running PD?
This is usually necessary in my experience. Did your specific interface
appear on the list of available MIDI devices in PD?
d.
Benjamin Brown wrote:
I just purchased a Ground Control Pro in hopes that I could use the midi
Hi all,
i fixed the bug and checked the changes into the cvs.
There are also new Mac UB binaries on http://g.org/ext/beta now.
all the best,
Thomas
Am 09.02.2007 um 17:28 schrieb Thomas Grill:
Am 09.02.2007 um 16:44 schrieb Ed Kelly:
Yep! I just compiled it from source for an Intel 10.4
hi chris,
oh no, crashing mine (linux 0.40.2). i'll give a try pd-extended.
pat
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
hello there again..
i was not so clear.. basically what i am wondering about is if there are
any object or abstractions that are able to play back (in a loop)
a couple of approx. 1.5 min.. stereo interleaved files .. : )
best
alexandre
--
alexandre r. decoupigny
www.listeningart.blogspot.com
32 matches
Mail list logo
