Thanks, I'll take a look at the article.
Mitch
On Oct 20, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Mitchell Turner wrote:
Jamie,
Here are two abstractions that may be useful to people. The first
allows easy communication between the ReMOTE ZERO SL by
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 03:19 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
snip
This has been sitting in my inbox for ages, sorry I never replied to it.
My s-abstractions collection is just such a set of abstractions that you
describe, with no external dependencies. Much of it was made by stealing
Miller's
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:42:29AM +0100, Jamie Bullock wrote:
I'm looking self-contained DSP abstractions that only use Pd - no
externals. Things like reverbs, different types of filters, delays, a
pitch shifter, harmonizer -- a kind of basic 'FX' toolbox.
I'm thinking very much along the
On Aug 31, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Mitchell Turner wrote:
Jamie,
Here are two abstractions that may be useful to people. The first
allows easy communication between the ReMOTE ZERO SL by Novation
and Pd. I've included the abstraction plus a file called
PureData.syx which must be up
Jamie Bullock wrote:
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 04:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting hard off [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm
more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
each and every piece of software has a licence.
Jamie,
Here are two abstractions that may be useful to people. The first
allows easy communication between the ReMOTE ZERO SL by Novation and
Pd. I've included the abstraction plus a file called PureData.syx
which must be up loaded to the ReMOTE ZERO (the file tells the ReMOTE
ZERO
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 04:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting hard off [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm
more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
each and every piece of software has a licence.
just because
]
Subject: [PD] 'pure' pd DSP abstractions wanted!
To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi everyone,
I'm looking self-contained DSP abstractions that only use Pd - no
externals. Things like reverbs, different types of filters, delays, a
pitch shifter
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 07:38 -0400, Mitchell Turner wrote:
Jamie,
I'm not sure this fits in with your project. I have an abstraction
that allows easy interface between Pd and the REMOTE SL Zero
(Novation).
Let me know if you want to include it or take a look at it.
That sounds really
Enrique Erne wrote:
just out of curiosity: ~.pd, ~.pd, sgn~ and what else in zexy are
already pd-vanilla abstractions (some of them are both abstractions
and externals for performance reasons); is there an advantage in
collecting these things in yet another arbitrary (as opposed to
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 03:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jamie Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Hi Jamie
It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
you'll find
gt~.pd (~)
lt~.pd (~)
sgn~.pd
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:37 +0300, hard off wrote:
my diy library (work in progress) is not all pure pd, but fair chunks
of it are. it shouldn't be too hard to rip the dsp guts out of some
abstractions for your purposes.
http://www.m-pi.com/DIY2.zip
or
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 13:47 -0400, patrick wrote:
jamie, what do you mean by providing a reference to purepd
implementations, rather than holding them in their repository. we use
goto10 svn server, this way we don't need a pd-dev account to maintain
pdmtl.
I guess (maybe) what i'm talking
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 02:52 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
snip
the svn purepd patches contain some abstractions that confuse me a bit.
actually i would like to contribute to purepd. (i.e. why is there moses
and clip?)
Yes, me too! Maybe H-C intends it to be a 'turtles all the way down' Pd
jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm
more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Quoting hard off [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm
more than happy for you to do whatever and use it.
each and every piece of software has a licence.
just because you haven't manually assigned a license, doesn't mean
that you have
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 15:08 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Anton Hörnquist wrote:
In my view jon~ is open source so feel free to use it in any way. I'm
not sure how to... well.. document this. What's the best and simplest
way? Should I write something about it in the help patch? What license
hi,
pdmtl is compatible with the last release of pd-extended (0.40.3). only
xsample / py (flext stuff) are not included in pd-extended. the sad
thing is that people need to edit the lib to load tof and iemmatrix. i
don't know why tof and iemmatrix are not in the list of loaded libs... hans?
Quoting Jamie Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Hi Jamie
It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
you'll find
gt~.pd (~)
lt~.pd (~)
sgn~.pd
http://www.netpd.org/eni/purepd/
That's great actually, and I'd love to
Hi everyone,
I'm looking self-contained DSP abstractions that only use Pd - no
externals. Things like reverbs, different types of filters, delays, a
pitch shifter, harmonizer -- a kind of basic 'FX' toolbox.
I'm thinking very much along the lines pdmtl/fx.* but without the
external
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Hi Jamie
It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd.
you'll find
gt~.pd (~)
lt~.pd (~)
sgn~.pd
http://www.netpd.org/eni/purepd/
That's great actually, and I'd love to contribute back into this.
However, if
Hi,
I'm looking self-contained DSP abstractions that only use Pd - no
externals. Things like reverbs, different types of filters, delays, a
pitch shifter, harmonizer -- a kind of basic 'FX' toolbox.
The jon~ reverb abstraction I posted to the list does not require any externals:
Anton Hörnquist wrote:
In my view jon~ is open source so feel free to use it in any way. I'm
not sure how to... well.. document this. What's the best and simplest
way? Should I write something about it in the help patch? What license
should I use - GPL? Any hints about this are appreciated.
23 matches
Mail list logo
