On 28/09/12 12:48, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I'm referring to what Hans wrote:
For me, apt-get install pd-arraysize is far easier than trying to
remember that [expr] trick. And thankfully we can write externals,
so we can have choice. :-)
exactly ...
Not exactly-- you were
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
On 28/09/12 12:48, Jonathan Wilkes wrote
On 09/28/2012 12:57 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back
- Original Message -
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
On 09/28/2012 12:57 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message -
From
On 29/09/12 00:57, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
So if you think the debian repos are the first place to look, then you would
agree
they are the first place I look for a file I am missing, so if someone referred
to [arraysize] I'd check if I have it available by:
$ apt-file search arraysize.pd
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
On 29/09/12 00:57, Jonathan Wilkes wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
If someone wants to write patches that work on vanilla anywhere, then
there is a point. If people are already using Pd-extended or Debian then
I honestly don't see the point, arraysize is already there, like many
other externals.
For me, apt-get
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:03 PM
Subject: arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry to further complicate this -
I'm now trying to design a multipurpose object array for pd
vanilla that would allow one to say [array size] and use table or
data structure arrays intercahngeably.
I think though, that rather than marking arraysize as obsolete one
could simply note that it has
From: Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at; pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
Sorry
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
Sorry to further complicate this -
I'm now trying to design a multipurpose object array for pd
vanilla that would allow one to say [array size] and use table or
data structure arrays intercahngeably.
Interesting
Sounds like a good complication :). I think a general array toolkit
would be very useful. I'm not a fan of expanding the use of Tcl syntax
in Pd tho (i.e. commands with subcommands).
Pd syntax is nice and simple with always the first word being the
command and the rest being the args. [list
- Original Message -
From: Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at; pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
On Thu
Hmm... I agree there's bad confusion between array and table in Pd
nomenclature. I've tried to use table for a specifically floating-point
array, and array for the more general thing, but I think I've been
less than consistent (case in point, the array menu which creates what
I would call a
- Original Message -
From: Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu
To: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
Hmm... I agree there's bad confusion between
The [table] object could be vastly extended: [table foo] would be equivalent
to [tab define foo] and you could say for instance,
[tab define foo -struct my-struct -save -range 0 100]
If you're not requiring the user to name the array z and requiring
z to have a float field y then you
On 28/09/12 03:23, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
And who is this mythical user that looks to the Debian repositories
to figure out how to do something in a programming language?
(Hm, I'm not getting audio output, let's open up Synaptic and search
20,000 mostly non-related packages for a solution...)
- Original Message -
From: Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at; pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
The [table] object could be vastly extended: [table foo] would be
equivalent
to [tab define foo] and you could say for instance,
[tab define foo -struct my-struct -save -range 0 100]
If you're not requiring
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
On 28/09/12 03:23, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
And who is this mythical user that looks
On 28/09/12 11:38, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wisesimonzw...@gmail.com
And who is this mythical user that looks to the Debian repositories
to figure out how to do something in a programming language?
(Hm, I'm not getting audio output, let's open up
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] arraysize WAS apt.puredata.info is back!
On 28/09/12 11:38, Jonathan Wilkes wrote
22 matches
Mail list logo
