Re: [Pdl-devel] [Perldl] Perldl list moving to sf.net

ail from the Sourceforge lists. In addition, the lists are archived at The Mail Archive at - <http://www.mail-archive.com/pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/> - <http://www.mail-archive.com/pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net/>. Regards, - Zaki Mughal On 2015-02-16 at 15:17:28 -0600, Zaka

[Pdl-devel] Code review: branch travis-ci-more [Travis-CI changes and build improvements]

View code: - Sourceforge: - GitHub: CI: - Build #25 Summary: 1. @mohawk2 has worked on incorporating the code for the pre-req report f

[Pdl-devel] PDL v2.008 milestone

Hello everyone, In anticipation for PDL v2.008, Ed and I were looking over the current bugs in SourceForge and it was getting rather difficult trying to triage them by hand. I tried on several occasions and ran out of tuits. So what I've done is added all the currently open bugs on SourceForge to

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: [pdl:bugs] #372

On 2015-03-05 at 20:51:56 +0100, kmx wrote: > Some time ago I have reported a bug "2.007_11 fails on MS Windows > 64bit" (not a big issue itself). > > The interesting point is that I have received two notifications 1/ > from github; 2/ from sf.net (I have reported the bug at sf.net) > > I might h

Re: [Pdl-devel] push PDL-2.007_12 this PM

On 2015-03-05 at 14:55:19 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote: > All- > > Thanks for all the progress. I would like to push another CPAN Testers > release from the current git master this evening. Is everyone good with > that? In the IRC, we were discussing how to get all the feature branches with fix

Re: [Pdl-devel] final merges pre-PDL-2.007_12

On 2015-03-05 at 18:05:42 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote: > As mentioned previously, I would like to push a new PDL-2.007_12 > CPAN developers release. If you have any fixes, merges, etc. to be > included, please do so. > > As for status of a PDL-2.008 release, here are the remaining bug > tickets w

Re: [Pdl-devel] final merges pre-PDL-2.007_12

On 2015-03-05 at 18:29:57 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote: > The fixes need to be in master before the CPAN developers release. I'm just pointing them out in case you want to merge them in or should I do it now? Regards, - Zaki Mughal > > --Chris > > On 3/5/2015 18:26, Za

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-porters] all I want for PDL-2.008 is my two...

On 2015-03-06 at 13:39:11 -0700, Douglas Hunt wrote: > Chris: I'm sorry, I have not had time to look at PDL::Graphics::PLplot, > and now I'm on vacation out of the country for 3 weeks. If anyone else > would like to have a crack at it, go ahead. Otherwise I'll look at it in > late March. I took

[Pdl-devel] Feature branch rebasing

Hello all, I wanted to write out a short explanation of rebasing feature branches. Many projects prefer to use git rebasing when incorporating changes from branches because it helps keep history easy to read (i.e., linear). I have a feature branch that fixes the bug [SF#332 "isn't numeric in null

[Pdl-devel] PDL v2.008: almost ready?

Hello, ## Issues Looking at the last remaining blockers for the PDL v2.008 release in the bug tracker, it looks like only two are still not in the master[^1]: > SF#332 "isn't numeric in null operation" warning could be more helpful This one is patched in the `pdl-eq-with-string-warning` branch

Re: [Pdl-devel] Feature branch rebasing

ttp://devblog.nestoria.com/post/98892582763/maintaining-a-consistent-linear-history-for-git>. See more at <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13846300/how-to-make-git-pull-use-rebase-by-default-for-all-my-repositories>. Regards, - Zaki Mughal On 2015-03-09 at 15:41:18 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote:

Re: [Pdl-devel] Feature branch rebasing

On 2015-03-09 at 16:47:27 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > There is also a way to enforce that master does not use merge commits > using a server-side Git hook from Nestoria (a Perl shop!) > <http://devblog.nestoria.com/post/98892582763/maintaining-a-consistent-linear-history-for-git&

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL v2.008: almost ready?

Hi everyone, I just wanted to post some updates. First, updates on old changes: On 2015-03-09 at 16:11:44 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > Hello, > > ## Issues > > Looking at the last remaining blockers for the PDL v2.008 release in the > bug tracker, it looks like only tw

Re: [Pdl-devel] ready for feature freeze

On 2015-03-15 at 20:28:36 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > All- > > It appears we are at a good point for feature freeze. Please confirm > that you have completed your priority PDL-2.008 fixes and I'll push a > PDL CPAN developers release to check the final changes. The following > release shoul

Re: [Pdl-devel] branch clang_warnings

On 2015-03-18 at 15:25:05 -0600, Derek Lamb wrote: > I just created a branch clang_warnings that is focused on squashing > the sometimes nit-picky warnings clang generates when PDL is compiled. > In fact, probably >90% of the warnings have already been squashed. > Before rebasing onto master, I wou

Re: [Pdl-devel] push PDL-2.007_13 devel release

On 2015-03-21 at 12:31:44 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > All- > > It looks like some final fixes are still in the works for PDL-2.008. > In the interest of marking progress, I plan to make a CPAN > developers release this afternoon with the current git master. > That will put another stake in the

Re: [Pdl-devel] branch clang_warnings

On 2015-03-18 at 18:07:27 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > On 2015-03-18 at 15:25:05 -0600, Derek Lamb wrote: > > I just created a branch clang_warnings that is focused on squashing > > the sometimes nit-picky warnings clang generates when PDL is compiled. > > In fact,

Re: [Pdl-devel] push PDL-2.007_13 devel release

On 2015-03-21 at 16:57:33 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > On 2015-03-21 at 12:31:44 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > > All- > > > > It looks like some final fixes are still in the works for PDL-2.008. > > In the interest of marking progress, I plan to make a CPAN

Re: [Pdl-devel] push PDL-2.007_13 devel release

the "branch clang_warnings" thread <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.pdl.devel/6384>. All is well! Regards, - Zaki Mughal > > Ed > > -Original Message- From: Zakariyya Mughal > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:57 PM > To: Chris Marshal

[Pdl-devel] Delete old version of PDL from PAUSE (it will still be on BackPAN!)

Hi, As PDL 2.008 is coming up for release, it would be a good idea to delete all the old versions of PDL from PAUSE. This way users will not be confused by decade-old versions. Additionally, `cpanm --dev PDL` will work properly and install the latest dev release of PDL. Thankfully, Perl users ca

Re: [Pdl-devel] PAUSE indexer is happy with PDL-2.009

On 2015-05-30 at 14:42:46 +0100, Ed wrote: > Chris, > > Great work! > > Now to press towards “splitting the iceberg”. I have a branch already that > will make a PDL::Core release 2.010, which consists of the current Basic/ and > Doc/. I am very keen to release PDL::Core 2.010, and then straight

Re: [Pdl-devel] PAUSE indexer is happy with PDL-2.009

er. As for removing Alien::* files, I have been using <https://metacpan.org/release/App-pmuninstall> and it works nicely. Cheers, - Zaki Mughal > > Cheers, > Chris > > > On 5/31/2015 16:27, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > >On 2015-05-30 at 14:42:46 +0100, Ed wrote

[Pdl-devel] Two PRs to review: branches changesfix, test-cleanup-3

Hello, I have been working on two branches in preparation for the next release and they are now ready for review. I'd appreciate your comments on the changes. --- +87 −640 The first PR proposes moving to a standard Changes format so that it is both hum

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL::IO::GD has a List::MoreUtils dependency

On 2015-06-05 at 23:43:08 +1000, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote: > Hi, > > Courtesy of not having already installed List::MoreUtils in my (MS Windows) > perl-5.22.0 builds, I found that PDL/IO/GD.pm wants to load that module. > > But I couldn't find any mention of List::MoreUtils as a PREREQ_P

[Pdl-devel] PDL's Big Split

Hello everyone, I wanted to get your opinions on the following plan for the split: 1. A quick review of the test cleanup branch at . It has many changes, so before splitting, it would be good to get that in. 2. We will to create a PDL-Core dist

[Pdl-devel] ATTN: Force push on master for PDL 2.012; may require action

Hello everyone, I'd like to bring to your attention the force push on master for PDL v2.012. Due to the indexing problems brought up in , we had to make a new release of PDL 2.012 . However,

Re: [Pdl-devel] ATTN: Force push on master for PDL 2.012; may require action

An addendum: On 2015-06-14 at 17:16:35 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > and in the editor window that pops up, delete the following 4 lines > > pick 9129b36 Update VERION to 2.011_01 for more development > pick 2d7c932 Let PDL::DiskCache::sync accept an argument of which e

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL's Big Split

An update: after discussion with Chris and Ed on IRC and GitHub, we discovered that we also needed to 1. Make sure indexing of PDL 2.012 is correct. We need a stable release that can be installed while we test out future changes. 2. Make sure that the pdldoc DB is updated post-split. Ed has c

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

On 2015-06-17 at 21:10:31 +0100, Ed wrote: > Please please please could one of you turn the example into a *.t file which > we can use to permanently constrain PDL behaviour going forward? I have written some tests and commented further on the SF bug tracker. Hopefully the SF bug tracker accepts

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

Hi all, I have done further investigation into SF#390 on the sf390 branch . I rewrote the BadCode PP code in `ops.pd` specifically for comparison operators (==, >, <, etc.) since, with the previous code, the semantics for what to do when only one of the

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

wever, compiling with `BADVAL_PER_PDL` might be a good idea since there isn't a PDL::Logical subclass. If there was, allowing the user to set the badvalue of PDL::Logical to 0 or 1 should throw a warning, since that messes with a lot of assumptions. > > -Original Mess

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Re: [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

I had a discussion with Chris last weekend on IRC and we decided that the way forward was to: First, create a warning for when a comparison op has *_badval ∈ {0, 1}, then merge that into master & do a full release. Then, once that is out, we can change the output type for comparisons to `byte` (t

[Pdl-devel] Code review request for the branches `unmerged-to-master-drop-2.011_01` and `sf390`

Hello all, I was wondering if I could get a code review on these two branches: - unmerged-to-master-drop-2.011_01 - sf390 You can comment directly on the diff on GitHub if you see anything that needs w

Re: [Pdl-devel] Code review request for the branches `unmerged-to-master-drop-2.011_01` and `sf390`

ase of Perl5 breaking all of CPAN. Also, it will become difficult to handle all the new dists post-split if quick dev releases can not be released and tested. Regards, - Zaki Mughal On 2015-07-27 at 15:27:29 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > Hello all, > > I was wondering if I could

Re: [Pdl-devel] Code review request for the branches `unmerged-to-master-drop-2.011_01` and `sf390`

On 2015-07-28 at 12:51:48 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Zakariyya Mughal > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I know we're all busy, but if the code just sits in a branch, it isn't > > being tested and that increases t

Re: [Pdl-devel] Code review request for the branches `unmerged-to-master-drop-2.011_01` and `sf390`

On 2015-07-28 at 12:51:48 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Zakariyya Mughal > wrote: > As mentioned on #pdl, I think I may have an idea to improve > the flow of PDL releases without breaking PDL for new users. > At the moment, we're in a hol

Re: [Pdl-devel] Code review request for the branches `unmerged-to-master-drop-2.011_01` and `sf390`

On 2015-07-28 at 19:50:47 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > On 2015-07-28 at 12:51:48 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Zakariyya Mughal > > wrote: > > As mentioned on #pdl, I think I may have an idea to improve > > the flow of PDL releas

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] Weird behaviour of stats with bad values

On 2015-06-16 at 11:04:07 +, Marek Gierliński wrote: > I have recently encountered a weird problem with stats (or statsover) using > bad values. The resulting numbers have a strange property, they always > return true in comparisons. There is now a possible fix for this in a dev release of PDL

[Pdl-devel] Continuous integration on Windows using Appveyor CI

Good localtime()! I have added Appveyor support to PDL so now all commits and pull requests will be built on Windows automatically (under Strawberry Perl) in addition to the Linux builds on Travis-CI[^osx]. You can see an example on the test-cleanup-3 branch PR

Re: [Pdl-devel] Continuous integration on Windows using Appveyor CI

t; On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Zakariyya Mughal > wrote: > > > Good localtime()! > > > > I have added Appveyor support to PDL so now all commits and pull > > requests will be built on Windows automatically (under Strawberry Perl) > > in addition to the Linux builds

Re: [Pdl-devel] SciPDL-2.013 anyone?

On 2015-08-18 at 07:51:35 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > I was looking at the sf.net downloads and noticed > there were still a number for older PDL releases > including PDL-2.4.10. All of those were for the > SciPDL release. > > It would be nice to have a SciPDLfor the current > PDL-2.013 and ev

Re: [Pdl-devel] Faster PDL Development Cycle---But How?

On 2015-08-24 at 23:48:51 +, Chris Marshall wrote: > PDL Developers- > > With the addition of two active and highly motivated PDL developers > (Zakariyya Mughal and Guggle "Ed" Worth) we've made significant progress > in cleaning up the PDL distribution itse

Re: [Pdl-devel] Faster PDL Development Cycle---But How?

nd-paste. Cheers, - Zaki Mughal > > On 08/25/2015 07:42 PM, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > > On 2015-08-24 at 23:48:51 +, Chris Marshall wrote: > >> PDL Developers- > >> > >> With the addition of two active and highly motivated PDL developers > >&g

Re: [Pdl-devel] Problems with current master in git?

On 2015-09-28 at 11:34:00 -0600, Craig DeForest wrote: > I just cloned the master branch from > "https://github.com/PDLPorters/pdl.git”, and it won’t compile on MacOS > — several argument type errors kill the compilation. Is this a known > issue? Should I still be using sourceforget instead? H

Re: [Pdl-devel] Problems with current master in git?

;PDL_Anyval' from incompatible type 'int' > >> result=0; > >>^~ > >> 2 errors generated. > >> make[2]: *** [pdlsections.o] Error 1 > >> make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 2 > >> make: *** [subdirs] Error 2 > > > &g

Re: [Pdl-devel] sourceforge

On 2016-06-14 at 02:25:13 +, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > I would say ‘too little too late’ > > Since we are already developing on github (many of whose nice features are > reminiscent of the old SF) I say cut the cord! What will we do with the mailing list, website, issue tracker, and wiki? Fo

Re: [Pdl-devel] Question on the constructor

Hello all, I have a proposed pull request that fixes the remaining cases of the badval configuration . I'd like if y'all could review it. One thing to note is that the comparison used for checking badvalues here must also take into consideration NaN, si

Re: [Pdl-devel] Question on the constructor

prefixed with something like `pdl_` or `_pdl_` purely for namespacing reasons. Cheers, - Zaki Mughal > > cheers, > Derek > > > On Jul 10, 2016, at 5:50 PM, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have a proposed pull request that fixe

Re: [Pdl-devel] Question on the constructor

OK, since the tests are passing under the CI, I'll go ahead and merge it in. Cheers, - Zaki Mughal On 2016-07-16 at 21:28:58 -0600, Derek Lamb wrote: > > > On Jul 16, 2016, at 9:07 PM, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > > > > On 2016-07-16 at 17:07:53 -0600, Derek Lamb wrote

Re: [Pdl-devel] [perl #128620] http://pdl.perl.org Vulnerable to XSS

On 2016-07-27 at 20:59:14 -0400, David Mertens wrote: > I know nothing about PDL's web pages. The most recent work I know of on > them was back in 2013, when Joel Berger was trying to port things over to > github. At the time, Joel had produced an interesting XSS testing example > using the documen

Re: [Pdl-devel] ready for SciPDL 2.017?

On 2016-09-28 at 10:34:13 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > Hi Karl- > > We're heading for a PDL 2.017 release on 10-Oct-2016. There are many > bugs fixed and all the warning messages seem to be gone. Will you be > ready for a new SciPDL release by the 10-11th Oct? Hello Chris and Karl, Karl, I

[Pdl-devel] Play with PDL in IRC

Hey y'all, I just wanted to let you know that we have `perlbot` in #pdl on irc.perl.org which now supports interacting with PDL in IRC ( aka "multiplayer notepad" :-P ). ``` > eval: use PDL; $x = sequence(10); $y = $x / $x->nelem; "$y" [perlbot] [0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Re: [Pdl-devel] Play with PDL in IRC

On 2021-04-16 at 23:56:07 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote: > Hey y'all, > > I just wanted to let you know that we have `perlbot` in #pdl on irc.perl.org > > So now we can use that for teaching and testing out PDL collaboratively. > > Cheers, > - Zaki Mughal In part

Re: [Pdl-devel] P::G::Gnuplot 2.017

On 2021-08-10 at 17:57:35 -0500, Luis Mochan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having some trouble with PDL::Graphics::Gnuplot, which is behaving > strangely lately. Consider: > > mochan@yapaque:~$ pdl > perlDL shell v1.357 > ... > pdl> use PDL::Graphics::Gnuplot > pdl> $x=zeroes(50)-

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL::Graphics::Simple

On 2022-02-11 at 10:49:12 +0100, Ingo Schmid wrote: > Hi, > > the other mail made me aware of P:G:S, now I was doing > > #> sudo cpanm PDL::Graphics::Simple > > on Debian testing and during make test I received this error after the > label plot is shown: > > Gnuplot error: "QStandardPaths: XDG_

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL::Graphics::Simple

f using “sudo” to install Perl modules off CPAN, that is a > >> sign of poor practice. > >> > >>   > >> > >> Another benefit of this strategy is that because you install > >> modules as your normal user, it has access to all your normal > >

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL::Graphics::Simple

7;ve had where I had installed a newer version of library and my collaborator had an older one. The code changed between versions and we were getting different results. I had to track this down by looking at changes in the upstream code. > > Best regards, > Ed > > From: Zakari

Re: [Pdl-devel] replace very small numbers

On 2022-05-05 at 10:57:53 -0300, Guillermo P. Ortiz wrote: > Hello, > somebody know if there are a quick way > to set all very small number to zero into a ndarray? Hello, If I understand correctly, I believe that you can achieve this using the `where` function

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] strange bug in gnuplot

On 2023-06-01 at 13:10:39 -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > I have a strange bug in PDL::Graphics::Gnuplot. Consider the following > program: > > use PDL; > use PDL::Graphics::Gnuplot; > use IO::Prompter; > $title="A title with many useless letters"; > gplot({title=>$title}, with=>"

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.082 vs 2.083, slowdown in one particular case

On 2023-07-11 at 00:01:32 -0400, Peter Ratzlaff via pdl-devel wrote: > Hello, > > I've pasted the code below, since I'm not sure attachments will make it to > the list. I have a program that does something similar to this. Obviously > not as simple, but using the same concept: an inner loop using

Re: [Pdl-devel] Fwd: Debian 12 "-t experimental" install of PDL

On 2023-09-18 at 14:37:54 +0200, ng0...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > wrt to the error below, this issue > https://sourceforge.net/p/freeimage/discussion/36111/ is filed but unlikely > to get an answer. > > Question: does anyone have a working PDL environment with "use > PDL::IO::Image" working -

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL::IO::Image

hat the PDL Book I have uses is the built in `PDL::IO::Pic` which works with the NetPBM package. That should work for your image. The functions that you want are either `rim` or `rpic`. Cheers, - Zaki Mughal > > Thanks, Thomas > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:41 PM Zakariyya Mughal