Thanks, Dennis! Didnt know there is such a nice list! I`ll subscribe to that right
away.
Reijo Riikonen
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
The Swedish Pentax office says that the Black Limited Lenses version of
FA43/1.9 and FA77/1.8 is not planned for the European market. Ref
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2000/200037.html
Arnie
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and
Thanks, Dennis! Didnt know there is such a nice list! I`ll
subscribe to that right away.
Reijo Riikonen
---
It not so good - next version will be much more useful.
Den
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 22:12:21 +0100, Carlos Royo wrote:
Yes, it does. I have the Z-1 and the grip strap for the Z1-P fits
perfectly.
Great, thanks for the info!
Later,
Gary
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the
In fact, there was once a discussion about this list being like a pub where
Pentaxians gather to yak. Some really liked this, others were uncomfortable
with it. We appear (at least in the past) to strike a medium with some folks
on both ends of the pure on- topic business Vs pub discussion not
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other members, thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started this
way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly in
KEH in March 2000 catalogue had one in ex+ for $919 with caps and case. The
recent catalogue only shows a new one for $1058. KEH ex+ would probably not
have scratches anywhere so the auction item is probable ex or ex-. I would
think if you got it for $800 or less it would be a deal.
-
Just an extra note. Several of my "ancient" flashes recommend similar
techniques for forming the capacitor.
The AC electric ones as well as the strictly DC battery ones suggest
forming the capacitors for a length of time. One hour is common for the AC
types, but several minutes is all I
Hi Folks.
just quick one to the ever present all knowing ones
I'm thinking of going for a metx 60ct-4, and I was wondering what SCA
adaptor to buy.
I want to use it on lx and z-1p bodies. Looking at metz' website, it seems
that there are two choices - analog (SCA 372) or digital (SCA
Like a woman. :-) I have wished they would make it in powdered form, that
way I could just covertly sprinkle it on with the steak seasoning, or
dissolve it in a cup of coffee. It would be a REAL sweetener.
Sorry this is so OT.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Treena Harp [EMAIL
You will lose functions with the analog adapter and the PZ-1p. If you
go to the Metz site, http://www.metz.de, choose English, and then look on
the page for adapter selection, you'll see which ones to use. If you want
to keep all of the PZ-1p flash functions you need to use the SCA 3000 and
Interesting .sig :-)
Norm
From: Jon Hope
There's an AK47 on the dashboard and mercy just left town.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
"Peifer, William [OCDUS]" wrote:
This first message is sent in MIME format, but with the "Plain Text"
option explicitly specified. Do you see any HTML? Do you see an
1864-byte JPEG thumbnail attached below?
This one I see HTML, the other one I didn't. :)
This one I see the moon just as
This one looks like a plain text, although checking the source of it, it doesn't
specifically say so. The picture again showed the way it should.
Good luck,
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09,
Hi William,
This one came through as a HTML-formatted message. The jpg attachement appeared as it
should. (I guess you know, for later, that any attachements to your mail is a big
no-no too on this list. :) )
Good luck,
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]"
Hi !
As far I know , SIGMA 28/1,8 II is not a new lens - it`s from last
generation and has some buildding problems , but the optical resolution is
good. I tryed it before buying FA* 24/2 . For technical information check
out http://www.photodo.de lens tests or SIGMA section.
Jon Hope wrote:
At 15:28 9/01/01, SETH wrote:
I'm not saying that these things don't merit discussion. They do.
It's just that these questions would be better handled in a
different forum. I'm glad this list hasn't degenerated into
discussing relative merits of tuna packed in oil vs
I received both messages perfectly without any "extras". Maybe it is because I use
Outlook Express and download the newast version as soon as there is a new one.
BTW - the your picture of half-moon reminds me of somthing no so uaual: the lunar
eclipse started 20 min ago. Must hurry...
Reijo
Test Message #1 -
formatted colored text (HTML) w/ an "icon'ed" attachment
Test Message #2 -
plain text w/ a displayed jpg attached inline
Summary: Use method #2 (but w/o attachments, of course ;^)
Bill
Oh, isn't that what this is??? ;)
annsan
jeepgirl wrote:
why don't we have a PDML chat room?
som
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
-
This message
The original email didn't have an attachment, but was not written in plain
text, it was in Rich Text format. Perhaps that has resulted in that
behaviour on your email client?
Frits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would anyone outside the US buy a MZ-5n when they could
buy a MZ-3?
All
(Ooops, hit the SEND button too soon the first time)
Folks,
Thanks to all who helped me troubleshoot this HTML/Outlook 97 problem. This
message should now appear as plain text, with no attachments, and no
embedded HTML code. (And no blue characters on yellow background at Shel's
computer
Hi , me again !
I think I gave You wrong ( http://www.photodo.de) address , right one is
http://www.photozone.de .
SHAME ON ME !!
Raivo
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Gerald Wang escribi:
Is this accessory readily available and how much would does it usually
sell for?
Yes, it is, and I find it quite useful when using heavy lenses on my
Z-1. It is avaliable new, but I really don't know the price as I bought
mine second hand, although in "like new"
A chat room is usually real-time interactive. I prefer the mailing list
myself it gives more people a chance to respond.
--Tom
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Oh, isn't that what this is??? ;)
annsan
jeepgirl wrote:
why don't we have a PDML chat room?
som
-
This message is from the
- Original Message -
From: "ToddEStan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax SMC Filters Get Kudos
I have always wondered why Pentax doesn't market their filters
more. The
SMC ones seem quite good, and they could make a
Saunders. They stay square.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Jackie Meeks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: 4 blade easels
I'm thinking of purchasing a 4 blade easel for making prints up
to 11 x 14. Does
I agree with your comments on the list. Very helpful and educational with a
sprinkle of good entertainment thrown in for good measure.
As to exchange rates. Your comments on exchange rates and all brought to mind
that it took nearly 1.5 USD purchase 1 AUD back in the mid seventies as I began
ToddEStan wrote:
I believe the SMC-A 35-105mm F3.5 has a 67mm filter, but don't quote me on
that. I don't have that lens (yet).
I believe you are right on that one.
The A 20mm f2.8 and the FA 28-70 f2.8 both take a 67mm filter. I am sure
of those because I have both.
My memory,
I have the Pentax 28 but it is so new I have not seen enough results. I have
heard though that it is a very good lens.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's a 400 - 400 mirror - ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Robert Harris
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 8:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67mm Hoya 1B (skylight)
ToddEStan wrote:
I believe the SMC-A 35-105mm F3.5 has a
Why are you not happy with the Pentax 28 ?? I had a Sigma 24 and was not
happy with it and now have the 24 F2.0 FA lens.
I have the 28 mm but have not received enough back from using it to have an
opinion.
Peder
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
And you guys are talking about camping up there in winter - ugh MOTEL 6
where are you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Bill Owens
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 6:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GF Mtn Nature Weekend
Oops, I forgot Flavio
Flavio Minelli is the guy who makes sure we are doing our jobs
correctly.
Bill
The PUG gallery team now consists of: Alin Flaider, Thomas
Van Veen, Jostein Oksne, Sid Barras, Gary L. Murphy, Michael
Bromm, Delano Mireles, and William Robb.
-
This message is
At 23:54 9/01/01 -0800, you wrote:
Why are you not happy with the Pentax 28 ?? I had a Sigma 24 and was not
happy with it and now have the 24 F2.0 FA lens.
It does some strange things to photographs. An example can be garnered from
one of my submissions to the PUG, a photograph of the city of
De tails are the part of de animals dat wag, swish, or shoo away flies. So
details of horses, details of dogs (except some amputee types), details of
cats, etc. etc. are considered fair game. De tails of monkeys, prehensile
or otherwise, are also OK.
OK, OK, I'm sohhh-rr.
What do we
36 matches
Mail list logo
