>Another BRIT! :-)Nive one Geoff. C'mon then, tell us what sort of kit you
have. Be ye >a 67 chap, 645 or good ol' 35 mil ?? Not those bloody old
spotties, now?You wouldn't >happen to have an LX, hm?If you don't, you
should.
Yes, another Brit (well Cornish actually
but I've been in Brist
Well, I don't have a website, so I thought I'd give it a try. What is the way
to post a picture to the list, wise guy?
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gall
>Welcome to the PDML, Geoff. Pull up a chair and make yourself comfortable.
Thanks for your warm welcome Don.
Geoff
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http:/
Hi Geordie, I'm in Victoria too! Every time I've used a Kodak Picturemaker
(once in Toronto, twice at Lens and Shutter) a staff person has operated it.
I don't mind, they use it every day and are more likely to get the print right
the first time. At L&S, I was in a hurry to get a 5x7 print and h
Ha Ha! You tried to send an attachment to a list! Ha Ha!
Regards,
Bob...
"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls
for
Brendan, here's a picture I shot last summer with a 500-watt halogen worklight
(to camera right) and two 150-watt garden floodlights (to camera left) with,
if I recall correctly, a 100-watt garden spotlight to rear left as a
hairlight. It's filtered with an 80A and the model's hair and skin is
so
Perhaps they need the higher price on eBay to cover the eBay
commission. But 10% is such overkill. These are the kind of
folk who want to make a buck at every turn.
Regards,
___
Tonghang Zhou ("Zhou" is pronounced like Joe)
On Wed
I recently watched a clerk at Lens & Shutter (one of Victoria's largest
camera shops) do all the work for a woman who wanted an enlargement from
that Kodak machine.
Yes. They have this thing in one of the high end camera shops. Hm. At
that very moment I realized that this store has no choice
David Dixon wrote:
>
> (snip)
> If however you get the same banding when scanning without the
> transparency lid, (i.e. prints), it sounds more serious.
>
> David
>
Alas, then it is serious. I haven't used the slide stuff
since September.
Thanks for more info.
ann
-
This message is from the Pe
This is all excellent advice. Only thing I'd ad is that I bought my
first 1p from Beach. The transaction went fine. When I looked around to
buy a second about a year ago, Beach was out of them.
The FA 28-105 power zoom (as Robert recommended) is great and balances
well on the 1p (for which it was
- Original Message -
From: Tonghang Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: What Kodak can do: film scanners in Walmart
snip, snip...
> Wouldn't be wonderful if the machine could scan negative
> and slides as well? Imagine you sh
I use the Kodak Picture Maker at my local one hour store. It has an extra
attachment to scan slides and negatives at ridiculous resolution. I've
printed many 8x10 from slides (the largest available) prints on that amazing
printer and have been totally blown away by its quality.
I think the reas
RRRG! That one was supposed to be MINE!
Cory Waters
didn't quite have the fifty bucks just now.
- Original Message -
From: "John Glover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: 280T
> I picked one up from KEH about two we
I have a friend in the program that takes dilantin(sp?) to prevent
depression from reoccurring. After many years flipping from "normal" into
near catatonic depression, the docs finely found out (somewhat by accident)
that what was sending her into depression was a form of epilepsy -
apparently in
On 8 Jan 2002, at 17:29, Norman Baugher wrote:
> I'm feeling that enablement pang in the pit of my stomach. I think I'm
> going to be about USD750 poorer in the near
> future...aaagggmust...fightit... I don't know about you guys,
> but since I've had the 6x7, I find my 35mm stuff gat
I had fun shaving my head this weekend!
After 3 years of having long hair I said "Enough!"
The locks are being donated to local wig maker,
who makes wigs on behalf of the BC Cancer Society
for cancer or burn victims.
(Actually, I set up the strobes and the backdrop, and
handed the camera to a fr
On 8 Jan 2002 at 18:43, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> They are also made of
> brass, which some people think is better than aluminum. I can't really
> see a difference between the metals, except weight.
Apparently the brass threads don't bind like aluminium can.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTR
Hi - I completely missed any information on this lens! I must have not
noticed the press releases or the lens on display or Photokina, I guess?
Has anyone used it, and could I get some information on actual results?
Pro's\ Con's
Thanks,
Oliver
It shows heart and a depth of personality amongst other things--- some of
the many excellent characteristics that make this forum interesting as well
as informative. Now if we could spread a few seeds of
understanding...
Otis
Andy Vu wrote:
> I really feel sympathy for Thomas's famil
Heliopan's have one great advantage: they are thin, but still have an
outside thread. Thus you can put one on the FA 24-90 or the Tamron
24-135 and still attach your lens cap. They are not as thin as a special
thin filter, but thinner than most other filters. They are also made of
brass, which som
I picked one up from KEH about two weeks ago, BGN condition for $49. Overall in good
shape but the Pentax logo across the front was a bit worn. Just adds character though
as the flash works flawlessly. You'll love the AF280T.
John
- Original Message -
From: "David Brooks" <[EMAIL P
I looked over a lady at a local Walgreen drug store, printing
some 8x10 photos on a self operated Kodak photo scan/print
machine, you know, one of those vertical yellow machines
with a touch screen on top. These machines are in
Walmart as well.
The print quality from the print scan was surprisi
Marc,
On the surface, this isn't a bad way to go. There are a few things I'd be
careful of, though. One trick I've seen is that there is a substantial
extra charge for something that is already included with the camera: "You
want the eyepiece? That's $xx more." Another trick is of course t
I like 110. I like to use my 110 Pentax Super camera occasionally. As for
APS, I have liked this format eversince it came out in 1996. I wonder if
Kodak could have made an APS using the 35mm format? Would we all be moving
up to medium format because of APS 35mm?
Jim A.
> From: Tonghang Zhou
HAR! (But you knew that )
Len Paris wrote:
> Glad you could arrange the loan of the lens. You should like
> it. The addition of a Sto-Fen Omnibounce will cover its whole
> field of view, too. A powerful flash won't hurt. :)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.n
Some of us stop in at Wendy's for burgers when we are out using
our Pentax cameras.
Len
---
> I really feel sympathy for Thomas's family, but I just wonder
what does
> this do with pentax ???
> Andy
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
Heliopan are about equal to B+W, and both are a notch below Pentax SMC
filters.
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> I've never used a Heliopan filter before. How are they?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Hits home a bit over here, too... Dave was the owner of the Tim Horton's
chain.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
One 'ex-employee' is trying harder than most to destroy them:
Kodak Camera Is A Scam
Just found this by someone who rang Kodak this morning.
This offer is not genuine. Confirmed by Kodak this morning. They are in
the process of calling all who ordered them.
Kodak is in the process of callin
On Tuesday, January 8, 2002, at 11:29 AM, Norman Baugher wrote:
> I'm feeling that enablement pang in the pit of my stomach. I think I'm
> going to be about USD750 poorer in the near
> future...aaagggmust...fightit...
Norm, if you fight it, you'll be depriving yourself of the glorio
I really feel sympathy for Thomas's family, but I just wonder what does
this do with pentax ???
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of dick graham
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dave Thomas -- Wen
>They sell film, and yet every few years they come up and some
stupid (IMHO) contraptions to make film photography less and less
interesting to the mass population.
Well, while I agree with some of your statements I think you misread what Kodak is all
about.
Kodak was, at its very inception, a
Hey, you're forgetting the 1970's sensational Disc Camera!
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 110, APS, and the $10 disposable cameras. Look how popular they
> are these days, and how bad the results are.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdm
> Don't feel bad -- I didn't know either, and had
> to look up an obit to
> find that item.
Here's an AP article about Dave:
http://www.salon.com/people/wire/2002/01/08/wendys/index.htm
l
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow t
I've been quite happy with the Rodenstock filters I've purchased
lately. I was discussing them with someone this afternoon, and he said
that as far as he could tell, they are made for Rodenstock by Heliopan,
to Rodenstock's specifications.
I've never used a Heliopan filter before. How are th
Tonghang,
Perhaps they have been working hand in hand with the Pentax marketing
department. :-)
Bruce Dayton
Tuesday, January 08, 2002, 2:52:49 PM, you wrote:
TZ> Speaking of Kodak, I think it's pretty rare to see a company
TZ> that throughout the years has been doing all it can to destroy
I just got it today, thanks again to Collin. It seems like it is a
pretty decent one, although the shade is kind of beat up. You also
solved the mystery of how you knew so much about mpexs stock beyond
what they post on their site. I am sorry to hear about Dave Thomas it
sounds like he was th
I guess they can now scrap their telephone development plans?
First radios, then telephones, what's next?
Otis
"Frits J. Wüthrich" wrote:
> http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/020107/n0733085_3.html
> Lucent has Pat Russo back, as she left Kodak after nine months. Would you
> think Kodak will
I believe Wendy was his granddaughter's nickname.
DG
At 09:20 PM 1/8/02 +, you wrote:
> >That is sad. I never knew they guy, and never ate at his restaurants,
> >but I always enjoyed his light-hearted TV commercials. There was one in
> >which he said, after touting one of his hamburgers, "
Speaking of Kodak, I think it's pretty rare to see a company
that throughout the years has been doing all it can to destroy
its own baseline business.
They sell film, and yet every few years they come up and some
stupid (IMHO) contraptions to make film photography less and less
interesting to the
Bac> Frantisek,
Bac> Very nice work. Don't you just love the 100vs film! It really
Bac> brings out the color in the leaves and it picks up the golden
Bac> highlights hitting the trees. It is my favorite slide film. I
Bac> like the composition in your photos. All four seem to lift the
Bac> eye towa
Overall not a bad way to go. If you decide you want better, you can
probably sell the lenses for at least as much as you "paid".
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Schlotthauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: PZ-1P kits
Way to go, Cotty!
If Geoff does have Spotties, now you've gone and scared him off!! ;-)
Don't worry, Geoff, if it is Spotmatics that you have, be proud! There are
enough of us afficionados here that you'll have many allies.
BTW, welcome to the list!
regards,
frank (Toronto, Canada)
Cotty wr
Greetings -
I'm trying to find the catch here...some of these bare-bones discount camera
mail order places are offering deals like the PZ-1p plus the Pentax 28-105 and
the Pentax 100-300 zooms for around $600.00. I know these zooms probably aren't
the best optically, but heck, to get the PZ-1p a
Interestingly enough, depression is not neccessarily purely a mental
problem. Mine was caused by a physical problem (attrial fibrilation) once
that got taken care of the depression mostly went away. Have you friend get
a thorough phyical if he (or she) has not done so.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTE
2.3x Bill, not 4x.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: Scanner help
> Now that I've taken the plunge (albeit cheaply) in MF, I'm interested in a
> scanner
It's a far better lens than its price would seem to indicate. I
use mine quite frequently. I'll use it a lot more when the
Pentax interchangeable lens digital camera makes it's appearance
on the shelves. Unless the Pentax digital can only use FA
lenses. That would be a pity, but not insurmount
I've had this problem with an Epson 1200 photo when scanning negatives.
The transparency unit has a narrow window above the main scanning area
which is kept clear and used to calibrate the CCD before scanning to
minimise any banding. If a piece of dust or hair got in here, I ended
up with a verti
NB> I'm feeling that enablement pang in the pit of my stomach. I think I'm
NB> going to be about USD750 poorer in the near
NB> future...aaagggmust...fightit... I don't know about you guys,
NB> but since I've had the 6x7, I find my 35mm stuff gathering dust (Paul might
NB> be able to r
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/020107/n0733085_3.html
Lucent has Pat Russo back, as she left Kodak after nine months. Would you
think Kodak will survive?
Frits Wüthrich
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Cotty wrote:
> Now I'm really confused. What has this poor departed chap got to do with
> the delightful Wendy?
In 1969, when he opened the first of what became a large chain of
restaurants, he named it after his daughter -- Wendy.
Don't feel bad -- I didn't know either, and had to look up a
On 8 Jan 2002 at 10:54, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> OK, this is very helpful stuff, and put forth in a way that I can
> understand it. Thanks! Combined with all the other input and articles,
> I believe I'm finally getting a grasp on this.
I'm coming into this late (I have to sleep sometime you kn
On 8 Jan 2002 at 6:41, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> What's to prevent me telling the operator not to do that?
Hi Shel,
It should be that easy but it seems that many operators have set there systems
up just so and insist that the output is what will be most beneficial according
to their experienc
Mark (and all),
You've made my point exactly. If you define what your number means, then
there is no opportunity for ambiguity or error. Unfortunately, very few
spec sheets for consumer products actually do this
Shel, consider yourself lucky that you shoot lots of B&W. Color managemen
>That is sad. I never knew they guy, and never ate at his restaurants,
>but I always enjoyed his light-hearted TV commercials. There was one in
>which he said, after touting one of his hamburgers, "You want fiber? Eat
>a sweater." Cracked me up. Did you know him, Collin?
>
>Collin Brendemuehl wr
>Having lurked and viewed the digest for some time, I'm now trying to post to
>it (can't be that difficult) - looking forward to getting a bit more
>involved.
>
>Regards,
>Geoff Stevens
>Bristol, UK
Another BRIT! :-)
Nive one Geoff. C'mon then, tell us what sort of kit you have. Be ye a 67
c
Slide film may have less dynamic range than print film, but it's also likely
to be more dense and have greater contrast. A scanner with a higher dynamic
will benefit slides as well.
If someone hasn't mentioned it already, as has been done from time to time,
an excellent online resource to get som
> Any comments welcome!
Frantisek,
Very nice work. Don't you just love the 100vs film! It really brings out the color in
the leaves and it picks up the golden highlights hitting the trees. It is my favorite
slide film.
I like the composition in your photos. All four seem to lift the eye towar
Now that I've taken the plunge (albeit cheaply) in MF, I'm interested in a
scanner with a transparency adapter that will scan 120 film. Any
suggestions? Also, wouldn't 1200 dpi in MF be about the equivalent of 4800
dpi in 35mm, or am I having a senior moment?
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Th
Shel,
Here are some simple dynamic range formulae: The analog/digital converter
(ADC) in a scanner puts out an integer. For a 16-bit converter, the range
is between 0 and 2^16-1 (65535). This range is typically linear, which
means that, for example, a value of 100 is twice as bright as 50.
Hi,
I have finally got around to scanning some of my slides of the
autumn season. Please see and comment at
www.volny.cz/fotof/kraje/autumn/index.html
Any comments welcome! All of the slides taken on Kodak Ektachrome
100 VS, mostly with 20mm lens (Zeiss Flektogon). Camera of cours
And I won a Yashica 635 on ebay. Hopefully I'll receive it late this week.
Anybody have any tips or hints? Anybody have a 35mm adapter for it?
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directi
I'm feeling that enablement pang in the pit of my stomach. I think I'm
going to be about USD750 poorer in the near
future...aaagggmust...fightit... I don't know about you guys,
but since I've had the 6x7, I find my 35mm stuff gathering dust (Paul might
be able to relate).
Norm
Aaron
>From what I have read, DMAX 4.0 is the theoretical limit or the
>calculation scale, not the limit of a particular film.
The *theoretical* maximum DMAX depends on the bit depth of the scanner.
For a 48-bit scanner, the theoretical maximum is 4.8, for a 36-bit scanner
it's 3.6. How close the *ac
If I knew the answer I'd not have asked the question . Thanks for
the pointer - that was very helpful. Information on one of the scanners
is being printed as I type.
Rob Brigham wrote:
>
> I think you know the answer...
>
> >From what I have read, DMAX 4.0 is the theoretical limit or the
> ca
I think that manufacturers' claims (for film, scanners, whatever) are
always a post-modern moment. Meaning is relative.
Slide film has less dynamic range than C-41. I don't know about B&W. I
once saw someone throw out 3.6 for C-41, and 3.2 or 3.4 for E-6 - but
don't know if those figures were lit
I think you know the answer...
>From what I have read, DMAX 4.0 is the theoretical limit or the
calculation scale, not the limit of a particular film. Therefore
anything above 4.0 is definately not using the standard scale, or is
just made up.
There is no way to tell other than reading reviews
We can look forward to more of this. See today's Washington Post article,
"Telescope Technology May Yield Images of Extra-Solar Planets" at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10958-2002Jan7.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m
We can look forward to more of this. See today's Washington Post article,
"Telescope Technology May Yield Images of Extra-Solar Planets" at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10958-2002Jan7.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m
More than likely a bit of grot on the CCD or mirror.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:23 AM
Subject: more scanner problems...
Ok, so I got the Epson 1640su photo in August - this is only
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Wright"
Subject: Re: Dip and Dunk C41 processing
Do you think standard PVC
glue would hold the submerged cap in place or would
the chemicals eat through it? If they would eat it up
what type of adhesive should I use? Thanks!!
PVC cement forms a weld be
Hello all,
I guess I should wait for "for-sale" Friday to post this, but I may
be too busy this week, so I'm posting this now. I can post it again
Friday, maybe on the Spotmatic group, if I have no takers.
I have a near-mint chrome Honeywell Pentax H3 for sale or trade. It's
in truly beautifu
OK, here are a few questions for the digital gurus on the list: It's
been stated here, sometimes quite emphatically, that the dynamic range
available to film is 4.0 - maybe that's a particular type of film, like
slides. The specs on a couple of well regarded scanners claim a dynamic
range of 4.
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cheeky answer is to use plastic tanks.
> PVC plumbing pipe in the appropriate size would work
> well, PVC
> is what modern film processor tanks are made of.
I almost can't believe that I didn't see this solution
staring me in the face. I have
So, what's wrong with being within the grain structure of the film? I
must be missing something (which is not hard for me to do). When making
big enlargements using a regular darkroom, the grain is evident in the
final print, and that can be used to good creative advantage.
I suppose using a la
Hi,
Rob Studdert wrote:
> The unfortunate thing that I have found
> with drum scans is that the scanner
> software (and operator) tend to apply
> post processing of the image that renders
> it suitable for printing to press but bad
> for photographic purposes. Images
> generally tend to suffe
On Tuesday, January 8, 2002, at 04:26 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
> You're not sleeping with it, are you?
Vanessa puts up with a lot, but that would get me kicked out of bed for
sure.
It stays on my bedside table instead. :)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubs
Probably Kalimar. It looks like one of the standard k1000 clones like the
ricoh's, vivitar's and sear's knock-offs.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anyone have any idea who makes the Kalimar K-90 that just sold on ebay?
>
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw
Anyone have any idea who makes the Kalimar K-90 that just sold on ebay?
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1316856936&r=0&t=0&showTutorial=0&ed=1010458117&indexURL=0&rd=1
--
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Km
Cory, there must be something about berries covered in snow. I have almost
the exact same shot.
Evan
From: "C or B Waters"
> Here are a couple of the snow shots with some football (American) for good
> measure.
> These are not my scans. Not that I'm much better than Snapfish is BUT
>
> Co
Ann, What a bummer! I feel kind of responsible since I talked you
into getting that scanner. I would call Epson and send it back.
Best of luck,
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Janua
Cotty
Wow. Thanks. It's a great flash isn't it. I think I prefer it to my 330FTZ.
Regards
Jim
>
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:21:16 +
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Help with AF280T manual settings
>
>
> Hey Jim,
>
> This from the AF280T manual: (my comments in parentheses
What about us M42 guys???LOL
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:23:31 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Extra-dolar Planet Imaged Optically
But is there a K-mount adapter available?
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Thoug
Thank you Rob
That bodes well for the assessment :)
I felt the image was somewhat overshadowed in the excellent PUG this month,
so big thanks for the mention!
Regards
Jim
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:31:31 -
> From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Pug Comments
>
> Waiting for t
Thanks Gianfranco.
Must try the M setting on my ME super (and MV1) to see whether I can slow
sync.
Regards
Jim
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 03:28:41 -0800 (PST)
> From: Gianfranco Irlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Help with AF280T manual settings
>
> Hi Jim,
> The two MH and ML settings a
> "Gardenia - Early Sunday Morning" Brent Hutto--Nice shot, Brent. Very luminous
The light was amazing for a few minutes that morning. It was my ninth
roll of film when I first got my camera and 50mm lens. Now it is three
years later I still haven't taken a better flower portrait. You gotta have
Thanks Dan. It was one of those fortunate situations where I was able to shoot
someone on the street without being noticed. A big crowd and a long lens helped.
Paul
Dan Scott wrote:
>
>
> A *few* of my favorites from this month's gallery:
>
> "A Song for his Lady" Paul Stenquist--superb! I bet t
43mm zoom, so that means it zooms from 43mm to 43mm,
right ;)
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He wants a zoom for travel. He can always use my
> 43mm if he's so
> inclined. You're probably right about the
> quality difference.
> Thanks!
>
> Clive Williams wrote:
Send FREE vi
Hi,
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> Right, like I would ACTUALLY let this lens out of my sight...
You're not sleeping with it, are you?
m
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Ann,
I don't know if this will help at all, but...awhile back I started to
develop a lighter band on the upper third of the scan. I am using an
Minolta Scan Dual II. I tried cleaning and all sorts of things. I
was very unhappy thinking I might have to send it back to the
manufacturer for repai
Jody hits her forehead and exclaims "Doh".
She kicks herself for not thinking of this.
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with your LX wasn't really a problem.
> You just had the
> shutter speed dial set to "A," aperture priority
> mode. When you
> depressed the shutter r
91 matches
Mail list logo
