I really don't think a fast macro lens would fit into the Limited
philosophy of small light lenses. If they did a Limited macro it
would be shorter and slower, more like a 62mm f/3.9.
I have been thinking the same too.
If its not a macro, it'll either be in the 100-150 range, f/2.8 or
Hi,
On 14 Mar 2002 at 22:35, Paul F. Stregevsky wrote:
Odd as it seems, there's no way to get all of the following, new or used,
in a single Pentax 300/4 or 300/4.5 lens:
- PK mount
- manual focus
- tripod collar
F and FA lenses can be focused manually... ;-)
To my knowledge, the only
In a message dated 17/03/02 06:57:52 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The guy on the counter was totally dumbfounded that anyone would want to
pay
$20 for an old sign. I wonder what it would be worth if it said Leica? :-)
Their other major piece of advertising is a giant Ricoh
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alan Chan wrote:
Something like 100-109/2.8-3 will do.
An 80-200/2.8 without the power zoom would be good. Hmmm, how about a
77-150/2.0. Make a nice portrait length.
dave
--
dave o'brien - http://www.diaspoir.net
Suddenly, Professor Liebowitz realizes he has come to
In a message dated 18/03/02 00:47:56 GMT Standard Time, Alex writes:
I have seen here some discussion of the financial results of Asahi
compared
to Nikon and Canon, but I do not find them on the web. Where can I find the
Annual Report of Asahi ? Or is it a privately owned company ?
We used to only get them in the states on their way up and down, but they
found things to their liking and have become year round residents of most
north central and northeast states. Every park and lake has a flock.
However there numbers seem to be kept somewhat in check, probably by
hunters.
Joseph wrote:
My, my, they are diversified, aren't they? I guess that allows them to
indulge in making 35 mm. equipment that they don't make much effort to
sell.
I wonder if Asahi Intelligence Service Co. Ltd. monitors this group.
Asahi is a common name in Japan. The link give the results of
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 04:06 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
How do you overcome the ennui?
Jobo.
Hey, Wheatfield, great minds etc etc etc, right?
-Brother Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi,
John Coyle wrote:
Never do owt for nowt, an' if tha doos, do it for thisen.
Which should have been prefaced with:
Hear all, see all, say nowt.
Eat all, sup all, pay nowt.
Most of the natives I have met are proud of this saying, which
reveals a lot about our largest county
mike
-
OH.I see what you mean.I will definetly try that.I don't see any foam on the
inside of the body so i could be a loose back(ever so slightly)Another
Pentax owner friend of mine suggested it might have leaked in through the
view finder/prisim,it was a fairly bright sunny day.
Dave
- Original
I'll bite:
97/2.1
and I'll throw in a 49mm-52mm step up ring.
Christian Skofteland
So far we have
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
Chris Brogden - 113/2.3- 1 roll Portra 100T
Joe Tainter - 31-77/2.2 - the
Aaron,
I'll do one of two things... ;-)
Either I'll start developing the film myself as per your suggestion,
or I'll let Downtown Camera tell their external lab (Bayview), to switch the
developer their using for my negs. :-)
Hence the reason for pulling back on the film.
I`ll guess a 21-43/3.8
I roll of Supra 400 to the pot.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:41 AM
Subject: Limited Lens Pool
So far we have
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll
Those remote accessories just turned up.
Along with:
(JCO - this one's for you, bud) Power Pack 70008
30384 Wide Angle Flash Adapter (s) for AF400FTZ
30319 Tele Flash Adapter (s) for ??? certainly smaller than a 400FTZ, but
larger than the AF200T
and a few 52mm front lens caps (31511)
SOLD!
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Since I want another black MX, this chrome one has got to go to make
room on the shelf. It had a CLA about a year or so back, and it's in
good shape. Everything works as it should, the meter seems accurate (I
say seems because I've not had it checked or
Read this on another board, and cant answer as I dont know the camera.
I will reply to the guy if anyone can help? I have also recommended he
sign up here...
Having just acquired a P30N and being a bit of a novice I wondered if
some of you Pentax experts might be willing to give me a bit of
**update**
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
Chris Brogden- 113/2.3- 1 roll Portra 100T
Joe Tainter - 31-77/2.2 - the lens itself
Chris Skofteland - 97/2.1 - 49mm-52mm step up ring
Steve Larson -
Coming to this late. What's happening and how does it work?
tom wrote:
**update**
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
Chris Brogden- 113/2.3- 1 roll Portra 100T
Joe Tainter - 31-77/2.2 - the lens
Take a look at this
http://www.thkphoto.com/catalog/hoya.html
It's the Hoya online catalog, they show the info you want.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
tom,
All, right - 144/2.5 and I'll throw in a roll of Konica Impressa 50.
Bruce Dayton
Monday, March 18, 2002, 5:41:40 AM, you wrote:
t So far we have
t Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
t Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
t Chris Brogden - 113/2.3- 1
There might be a new limited lens introduced at an upcoming Japanese camera show.
We're betting on what it'll be.
Again, when is the show? Alan?
tv
On 18 Mar 2002 at 7:15, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Coming to this late. What's happening and how does it work?
tom wrote:
**update**
I ran an example set last year for a seminar I was teaching. If
you like, I could try to find the results and post them for you.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: Filter effects
Anyone know of a site that displays
the various results of using the
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Steve Larson wrote:
I`ll guess a 21-43/3.8
I roll of Supra 400 to the pot.
OK, I'll revise my earlier guess to a 77-143/2.0 with a prize of a cheesy
postcard from Hong Kong. (Or maybe a roll of [checks freezer] Kodak Portra
400BW.)
dave
--
dave o'brien -
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
30319 Tele Flash Adapter (s) for ??? certainly smaller than a 400FTZ, but
larger than the AF200T
There is one called (I think) AFW-1, which can be used on the
AF280/200T and (again, I think) the 400T.
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
These pics on my website are coded to load as a percentage of window size.
In other words they get bigger as you browser window gets bigger. The
question is do they work at the res they are. I feel that they are the
maximum size jpegs that will load reasonably fast. Do the degrade too much
when
They work fine in Opera. I'm running 1600x1200 and the pictures don't seem
to degrade at all.
Christian
On Monday 18 March 2002 10:48, T Rittenhouse wrote:
These pics on my website are coded to load as a percentage of window size.
In other words they get bigger as you browser window gets
Hi Kevin,
I too have been looking for a good bag to my gear and I don't carry much.
Just one body with lens attached to it, one more zoom a flash and some film.
I feel these timbak2 look interesting. Which particular model you are
using ? Did you buy it from the store or you got it
Pat.
Nice to here you had a good 'vacation'?I enjoyed our
gathering thet Saturday and tried to listen to all
the tech talk going on at once.Just confused meg
Made me realize just how much i 'thought i knew'
but did not and how much is still to learn.
Thanks
Dave
Just got back home to Victoria,
500 pictures of our equine friends leeping over large
obstacles.tired grin
The farm we board the horse(soon to be horses??)have
3 ponds,hundreds of pooping Canadian Geese,some ducks and
a pair of Trumpeter Swans(breeding yearly)The Swans do
not take kindly to the geese in mating season(ducks do
Seems to be fine (I'm running at 1024x768 on a 17 Viewsonic).
Good to see another Canon GL QIII user :)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of T Rittenhouse
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Pentax Discussion Malling List
Tom wrote:
There might be a new limited lens introduced at an upcoming Japanese
camera show.
We're betting on what it'll be.
Actually, I have no idea if it will be shown on friday at Photo Expo in
Tokyo. Personally, I doubt it and my guess would be Photokina in the fall.
Such a date fits
Tom wrote:
Again, when is the show? Alan?
The show starts on Friday. Again, don't have too high hopes that it will be
shown there.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
I have indeed signed up. Mr Brigham helpfully pointed me in the direction
of the P30 manual which has explained the ML/meter locking
Thanks
Rob
Original Message:
Read this on another board, and cant answer as I dont know the camera. I
will reply to the guy if anyone can help? I have also
You know that I can get thrown off of Road Runner for even reading these
posts? On second thought considering the problems RR is having around here
that ain't much of a threat.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
On 18 Mar 2002 at 17:26, Pål Audun Jensen wrote:
Tom wrote:
Again, when is the show? Alan?
The show starts on Friday. Again, don't have too high hopes that it will be
shown there.
Ok, thanks.
The betting window closes Wednesday at noon US EST.
tv
-
This message is from the
Put me down:
95/1.4 One roll of Acros
--
---
Get over it.
Dr. Laura
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
In a message dated 18/03/02 16:40:05 GMT Standard Time, Mike writes:
There is one called (I think) AFW-1, which can be used on the
AF280/200T and (again, I think) the 400T.
As we had to order these end of line items unseen, I was rather hoping that
they would be AFW1/AFW2 (latter 400T).
Gianfranco,
My wife and I think your pictures are consistently among
the best on the PUGs we've looked at.
Wifey said something like dammit, he did it again
when she saw the shot. She was envious and delighted
at the same time.
-Lon
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.schneideroptics.com/filters/filters_for_still_photography/
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi Brendan.I don't have much experience doing what
you are trying,but i remember seeing some pictures
taken during a test run,of a freinds wedding last fall.
He took our friends out to several areas in 'old Markham'
and used settings in a park,under an old maple shade tree
with some of the
welcome, I hope you get as much out of the list as I have. I also hope
you can keep up with the amount of mail you are just about to receive!
Even if you cant, I recommend at least checking it online, or getting
the condensed version.
Glad you sorted your queries...
-Original Message-
okay, I'll play...
133/2.2
one roll of RG25
Doug
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
WHERE!! In Old Markham!!! I'm thinking of using Cherry
Beach and Edwards Park next time since there are lots
of trees and nice florals I can use. Actually hey Dave
want to bring the d1 next time :-)
--- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brendan.I don't have much experience doing what
I'm in too: How about 117/1.8? I realize that puts it at a 67mm diameter
opening (okay, technically it's 65mm), but 117/2.0 @ 58mm is just too boring,
and 117/1.9 @ 62mm, well...Pentax doesn't make that filter size.
Oh, and I'll throw in a roll of slide film, either Provia, E100S or E100VS.
I'll
173/2.5
One roll of Ektachrome 100VS
Paul Stenquist
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Peter wrote: 30319 Tele Flash Adapter (s) for ???
They are for the AF240T, see:
http://www03.bhphotovideo.com/default.sph/FrameWork.class?FNC=ProductActivat
or__Aproductlist_html___41621___PETAAF240FT___REG___CatID=0___SID=ECE21CED64
0
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the
On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 02:19 PM, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Collin, do you mean solidly-built as that it will survive a fall from
average flying height ;-) ?
I'm certain that I've told the story before of a local aerial
photographer who dropped his 6x7 out of a plane while shooting,
141mm f3.14285714285714285714 etc.
I think it's in keeping with the Limited spirit that the maximum aperture
be an irrational number! (and perhaps the focal length should 141.42135623730950488
etc. millimeters)
One Kodak disposable camera offered into the pot.
--
Mark Roberts
Hi,
Could you take a look and comment this photo: http://fototok.art.pl/photo.php?p=7081
The writings on the wall are important to the meaning of the photo and as they are in
Polish, Iet me translate them for you.
The sculptured woman is the personification of one of the (classic) Arts -
With or without flash?
Christian
On Monday 18 March 2002 12:40, Mark Roberts wrote:
141mm f3.14285714285714285714 etc.
I think it's in keeping with the Limited spirit that the maximum aperture
be an irrational number! (and perhaps the focal length should
141.42135623730950488 etc.
1- You must choose JUST ONE Pentax brand body of any era and format.
2- You must have personal experience with it, no matter if you own it,
owned it, borrowed it, rented it. You must have used it (it's not a wish
list).
3- Again, you must choose JUST ONE.
4- Send the answers OFF-LIST, TO ME, to
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list, right to me.
2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color
and b
and w)
3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc).
4 - You must have personal experience with it.
WINNER by now: Tri-X
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other
members,thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started
this way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly
in your
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be
included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak, K,
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/limited.html
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
131mm f/2
And working MZ-Dn pre-production model, with a release date for later
this year.
Maybe.
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
Why Not??
It think it will be a:
129mm f/2.4
One roll of Fuji Superia Reala.
Regards,
--
Jose R. Rodriguez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pflugerville, TX
__
Voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
-
This message
I have the old-style LowePro MiniTrekker. This weekend, I had the 67
with the 75mm attached at the top and the ME Super on the winder ME II
with the A* 200mm f2.8 attached at the bottom, with the 67's 105mm,
helicoid extension tube and my Sekonic 308 down one side and three 67mm
filters in
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 02:44 PM, William Robb wrote:
I have a MiniTrekker that does well for my 35mm gear (it holds
an amazing amount of equipment), but I don't think it is deep
enough to take the 6x7 body with prism and lens.
I don't know about the new version, but the old
I thought pi was closer to: 3.1415926535605
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Limited Lens Pool
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mark Roberts wrote:
141mm f3.14285714285714285714 etc.
We have waited a good while for the new 18mm that was rumored a while
ago. It was then said not to be part of the Limited series, but that's
where I'll place my bet anyway:
One roll of Kodak E100VS in either 120 or 35mm says:
18mm f/2.1
Jostein
http://oksne.net
- Original Message -
Anyone got an extra of the one and need one of the other?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hi,
my family's from Yorkshire, and I lived and worked up there for a few
years. One of my colleagues, who was very, very Yorkshire once told me
the following story from his childhood. Those of you unfamiliar with
the Yorkshire accent, think The Full Monty.
He was about 4 or 5 years old, and
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 01:11 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Darn, I wish you would compare the two 300's. I am still trying to
decide between them. For me, the close focusing is really the big
issue.
Me too. I mean, the significant improvement to the 75mm's close focus
on the new
Hi,
I'm fairly certain that Minox makes them. Minox was taken over by
Leica a few years ago and that's when the first dinky little bijou
mini Leica IIIf-ette appeared.
http://www.minox-web.de/english/news/news_nr8_00_aug.html
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, March 18, 2002,
Humm I'll Buy the F from you but I kinda need my Fg
still :(
--- Lindamood, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got an extra of the one and need one of the
other?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
I have placed the 28mm I have for sale on my web page on Ebay. Here's your
chance to decide what it is worth.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1340397944
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
-
What a sad story. Having lived the first half of my life like that, I can
tell you it sucks (with no appologies for that word in this case). Parents
like that need to have their nuts cut off just below the chin.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
Hey - I love the idea of even more new limited lenses - but let me go big for a
moment
In addition to introducing the new 97 1.9 FA* IF AL, our friends at Asahi Optical have
something way-cool up their sleeves
Why mess around with the limitations of an old lens mount? Following rumors
Tom, a Lite-Tite is a Manfrotto accessory used to attach a flash and/or umbrella to a
lighting stand. It's in two pieces, with a through-bolt in the middle, so you can
adjust the angle of the flash and/or umbrella. The bottom piece has a 5/8 hole with
set-screw to match most lighting stands,
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone uses this enlarger and can tell me whether you use
both condensors for all printing or do you go to one when doing medium
format (645)? I've read different things on various internet sites and
thought I'd turn to the group for verification.
Thanks,
Delano
-
This
Oops! It's a Konica. Mark Dalal also wrote to the seller and evidently knew the right
questions to ask.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
-
This message is from the
I'll guess 110mm/f2.0 lens. And I'll contribute one roll Portra, any flavor
the winner likes.
--Mike
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Was waiting for me on our return from Virginia. With the exception of a
missing eyecup (what's new?), a very small scratch on the prism housing and
some corrosion in the battery holder/compartment is appears in excellent
shape. Will let you know more after I shoot a couple of rolls
Bill
On 18 Mar 2002 at 13:23, Pat White wrote:
Tom, a Lite-Tite is a Manfrotto accessory used to attach a flash and/or umbrella
to a lighting stand.
I think that's just the thing I'm looking for.
Thanks.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi, Bob,
It may be that Minox made a Leica sub-mini reproduction, but the ones I'm thinking
about are made
by a Japanese company called Sharan - I poked around today looking for something about
them:
http://www.subclub.org/shop/sharan.htm
There's not too much more, 'cause it seems that most
Hmmm, I expected f/3.1415926535897932384626433832795...
Regards,
Bob...
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mark Roberts wrote:
141mm f3.14285714285714285714 etc.
I think it's in keeping with the Limited spirit that the maximum
aperture
be an irrational
Yes, but Pi are square, and that might provide some ugly bokeh.
A lens with an aperture of pi would be hilarious. :)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html
-
This message is from the
And...
My pi is bigger than your pi! It's baked correctly, too!
Regards,
Bob...
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm, I expected f/3.1415926535897932384626433832795...
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mark Roberts wrote:
141mm
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes, but Pi are square, and that might provide some ugly bokeh.
*groan*
We really have to stop giving these formulaic answers to questions... :)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
And...
My pi is bigger than your pi! It's baked correctly, too!
I prefer my pi to be half-baked... easier to fudge the results that way.
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Humm Aaron? you got one sitting in your shop any
ideas?
--- Delano Mireles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone uses this enlarger and can
tell me whether you use
both condensors for all printing or do you go to one
when doing medium
format (645)? I've read different
Sid bets: 1 roll afga apx 25
my prediction: limited zoom, 21-131 f3.5-4.5
tom wrote:
So far we have
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
Chris Brogden - 113/2.3- 1 roll Portra 100T
Joe Tainter - 31-77/2.2 - the lens
I've gathered a half-dozen prices from online dealers; as I recall, all are $150 to
$225. I'll sell the lens for perhaps $20. I suppose you mean I overpaid because it's
from an individual, with a no-return policy on top of that. Basically, I'm taking the
seller's word that he had a shop check
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:28:47 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes, but Pi are square, and that might provide some ugly bokeh.
Pi _are_ _not_ square. Pi are round. _Cornbread_ are square.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Limited Lens Pool
Yes, but Pi are square, and that might provide some ugly
bokeh.
No, pie are round. Lasagna are square.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
I believe the company that makes them is called Sharan. I had someone on
askme.com ask me about the Rolleiflex 2.8F copy they made. I think BH sells
at least the Leica and Rollei copies. I prefer usable toys :)
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann
Actually pie are round, cornbread are square. (With respect to all the
residents of Hooterville)
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
No, pi are round. Brownies are square.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but Pi are square, and that might provide some ugly bokeh.
A lens with an aperture of pi would be hilarious. :)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Joe,
I may be interested in this as a backup parts body.
No problems with the metering in the body?
Do you have pictures you could send me?
I live in Canada. Any problems shipping here?
Thanks,
Allen Murray
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
No, pi are round. Brownies are square.
Not according to a lot of Boy Scouts...
;)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
I have an Omega B22. It's now equipped with a zone vi cold head, but I used it
with the condensers for many years. For 6x6 I used the two large condensers
with the curved sides facing each other and an 80mm lens. For 35mm, I added
the smaller supplemental condenser on top of the upper condenser
Ah... never heard of the word scam? :)
regards,
Alan Chan
Coming to this late. What's happening and how does it work?
tom wrote:
**update**
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
Chris Brogden- 113/2.3- 1
Of course I mean it - because I'll be the winner.
Joe
So far we have
Bill Robb - 127/2.4- 1 roll b+w processing
Tom Van Veen - 123/2.3- 1 roll velvia
Chris Brogden - 113/2.3- 1 roll Portra 100T
Joe Tainter - 31-77/2.2 - the lens itself
I'm guessing Joe
P.S. On second glance I agree with Bill and Jerome. As the image came up
(top to bottom) I thought the flare was the subject. But if the
inscription is the subject, then the flare is a distraction. And
placement a bit off-center would help.
Alternatively, you could crop off the pedestal, and
On 18 Mar 2002 at 16:52, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Of course I mean it - because I'll be the winner.
You hear that clanging sound? That's Big Joe walking down the street
Okay, the question that truly separates the pros from the
point-and-shooters: what will your imaginary lens weigh?
I
Photo 1: Shel's got the crop.
Photo 2: Maybe include just a bit of the horizon? To me that would
convey vast space better.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
I look back and want to kick myself in the head ( back lit shots what
was I thinking!
I didn't think that was so bad ... I thought it had potential!
I'll preface this to note that I photograph railroad equipment, animals,
buildings and other non-people subjects most of the time; portraiture
That's an easy one. Just go to http://www.classic-enlargers.com/
They have parts for all Omega enlargers. However I think the condensers are fairly
pricey. If the price is too high, check with me again. I suppose I could sell you
mine, although I thought maybe I should keep them in case I ever
why am I hanging out on the list when I just got two new Pentax lenses?
Bye,
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo