What about image quality? Some claim that the images of the ist D are
rather soft compared to the ist DS.
Peter
I'm checking out the ist Ds and comparing it to my ist D. Just in case
anyone is considering both cameras, here are my impressions:
At first glance, the deeper handle seems odd, kind
On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Start saving. Disregarding the good bit (;-) the Canon is 5.2KGBP.
5.2 kilo-giga-billion pixels? Where can I buy one?
g
- Dave (waiting for a 24x70mm sensor with a Pentax 67 mount in front of
it)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On 26 Jan 2005 at 8:34, Michael Heim wrote:
You're quite pessimistic...
How many pictures do you store on your pc? There's a lot more other
stuff going on your computer than just mp3.
I've worked in the computer industry long enough to know how things like this
break. My server contains over
On 25 Jan 2005 at 23:56, John Celio wrote:
I've gotten a lot of stubborn, crotchety old photographers (usually men) in my
shop who dislike body-controlled aperture when they come in, but love it once
they've had a chance to really try it out in the real world. Something tells
me
you're the
Something tells me you're the rare type who just
won't be happy with anything new, even if it's actually better. I'd
suggest giving this new stuff a try, but somehow I doubt you'll take
it into consideration.
I doubt that I'd last long in my present job if I didn't give new stuff a try
Har, they'll try to wear you down. Next you'll be told that the new
zooms perform as well as primes (unfortunately even some of the new
digital primes aren't that spectacular in performance)
Yeah it's all a little sad really, I expect a compromise in a zoom lens but
there's really no excuse
Hi,
Have you heard about Opemus enlargers? The only thing I know is
they're russians :(
I want to buy one - I'm just starting with that stuff, so I think it
should be OK; but I'd like to hear your oppinion first.
That's if you ever heard of such things.
10x,
Alex Sarbu
On 26 Jan 2005 at 8:42, Michael Heim wrote:
Question from switzerland: what's a pom?
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?dym=0cid=1222455417method=6
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu a écrit :
Hi,
Have you heard about Opemus enlargers? The only thing I know is
they're russians :(
Czech Republic, not russians:
http://www.meopta.cz/index.php?set_lang=en
Rob Studdert wrote on 26.01.05 10:59:
I've had my *ist D for over a year and shot over 10k images with it and I
still
don't like the body based aperture control. Granted I use it but I can't see
one reason that it's so much improved over lens ring based controls that I'd
love it? How is it
fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
To me, a photograph presented as the truth is always a lie, since
it always represents the photographers personal representation of
something.
This
OK. It seems under estimated your fighting while taking pictures... ;-).
If you have your harddisk (and the arcos isn't much larger than a pack of
cigarettes) in a good photo bag, it shouldnt crash on a rock.
Michael
On 26 Jan 2005 at 8:34, Michael Heim wrote:
You're quite pessimistic...
Yup - you're right.
I managed to find the meopta.com site (after I've posted)... I don't
understand anything, but those enlargers seems nice for a beginer like
me :)
So... have you used them?
Alex Sarbu
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:29:10 +0100, Michel Carrère-Gée
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the additional link,
Do you think it only fixes (read changes) Extra-long exposure times,
or do Pentax slip other modifications of code in hoping that nobody will
notice?
Also, has anyone encountered the problem of green noise in an image when
noise reduction is turned on?
Happy
Must hold... tongue...
Nope, can't do it.
Q. What's the difference between a Pom and a 747?
A. A 747 stops whining at the airport
:-)
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 January 2005 3:42 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
And another question - what would be a fair price for it? (I don't
know yet the model; just how much do you think I sould pay for it). If
it's model no 6/7 or similar it should also work with medium format
film (negatives up to 60 x 60 mm or slides up to 5 x 5 cm) - which
would be nice, even if
The same thing is true of airline pilots.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 6:06 AM
Subject: RE: New Member
Must hold... tongue...
Nope, can't do it.
Q. What's the difference between a Pom and a
In RAW I would guess they are identical. With in-camera processing of
jpegs, there may well be a difference.
Paul
On Jan 26, 2005, at 2:59 AM, Peter Smekal wrote:
What about image quality? Some claim that the images of the ist D are
rather soft compared to the ist DS.
Peter
I'm checking out the
possibly. i usually need f11 for adequate DOF in my landscapes. OTOH, the DA
16-45 is consistently sharper in my use and i use the same range of
apertures most of the time.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday,
LOL
Hadn't heard that one before.
Dave
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:06:47 +0800, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must hold... tongue...
Nope, can't do it.
Q. What's the difference between a Pom and a 747?
A. A 747 stops whining at the airport
:-)
Simon
Funny. I've recently bought an old MX on Ebay, and I find it very
difficult to change shutter speeds while metering through the viewfinder.
I really miss the little wheels for shutter and aperture on the Z1-P and
the *ist D.
People who claim the old ways are best usually haven't given the
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:56:32 -0500, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank, i agree with you 99%, wxcept this part, which i find a bit
strange
(strange that someone has this kind of expectations of the second oldest
profession)
This is my part,
Quoting Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
portraits?
50mm?
FA 28-70 f/4
zoomed according to whether I want a head-shot of one person or something
more.
ERNR
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:15:56 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and he was nominally a lawyer as well.
Biting tongue, biting tongue...
vbg
Isn't anyone who went through law school supposed to come out thinking like
a LAWYER! or
i thought that professional mother, that is someone who is paid
for giving births, by a third party, is a pretty recent invention.
i would say, it's the second oldest hobby :)
best,
mishka (father of one, no memberships whatsoever)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:06:16 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the alternative, and without prejudice to the foregoing, if it is
determined that the image in question is not a PS fake, but is in fact
a geniune unretouched photo (which is not herein admitted, but is
specifically denied), then I state, and the
On 26 Jan 2005 at 11:58, John Forbes wrote:
Funny. I've recently bought an old MX on Ebay, and I find it very
difficult to change shutter speeds while metering through the viewfinder. I
really miss the little wheels for shutter and aperture on the Z1-P and the
*ist
D.
People who
Thninking long and hard about trying to go this year. The April Vegas thing is
not as
expensive as i first
thought it would be,so looks good.(brain is still in $0.60 Canadian dollar:-))
I'm submitting my prefered days off for 2005 to the boss this week.
Frank,if we go down as a team,when did
On 25/1/05, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
But, what about the implied offense of comparing Humans and Chimps to
journalists...
No problem.
A whinge of reporters.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Fred Widall wrote:
Yes, I do. It came as the kit lens with my MZ-7.
I've never done any testing of it, but I find it just fine for my needs.
Popular Photography reviewed it back in August 2002.
http://www.popphoto.com/article.asp?section_id=2article_id=362
OK. Thanks.
So, have you tried any of
On 26/1/05, Bill Owens, discombobulated, unleashed:
How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
Sadly impossible for me. Moving house.
2006 is a certainty though !
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I can appreciate that in your case the old way was better. But for the
right-eyed majority, the little wheels are markedly superior once you get
used to them, IMO of course.
John
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:32:43 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 26 Jan 2005 at 11:58, John Forbes
On 25/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Cotty's gonna get me for anything, it'll be that hairpiece comment
I made on the weekend. Compared to that, this is small potatoes.
V busy at work, just dipping in and out at the mo - revenge on hold ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Quoting Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some of you might remember that a few weeks ago I said that my gf was
thinking about getting a digital Rebel...
Well, she just received her istDS with 18-55 from Adorama today.
It is always good when we can prevent a fellow human from going over
On 26 Jan 2005 at 13:01, John Forbes wrote:
I can appreciate that in your case the old way was better. But for the
right-eyed majority, the little wheels are markedly superior once you get
used
to them, IMO of course.
Sorry if I came across a little gruff but I'm a little over being
A year late and a dollar short (my usual), I'm seriously
considering it. Be gentle...
Stephen Moore
- Original Message - From: Bill Owens Subject: GFM?
How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
- Original Message -
From: Peter Smekal
Subject: Digital wide angle lens
Has anyone used the K or A 15/3.5 as an ultra-wide lens on the *ist
D or
DS? Maybe it's a too 'nose-heavy lens-camera combination' (?)
Peter
A15/3.5. It isn't particularly ultrawide on the istD.
It's nose heavy,
Actually, the consensus on Stan's Pentax site seems to be that this
(the 28-70 AL, not the FA28-90) is a rather good lens, but there
were also some horror stories about elements coming apart or
something, a while back on the list...
Optically rather good, build is very light. I've had one
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And another question - what would be a fair price for it? (I
don't
know yet the model; just how much do you think I sould pay for
it). If
it's model no 6/7 or similar it should also work with medium
format
film (negatives up to 60 x 60 mm or
Has anyone used the K or A 15/3.5 as an ultra-wide lens on the *ist D or
DS? Maybe it's a too 'nose-heavy lens-camera combination' (?)
I really don't care how heavy it is but it's got the right mount and it
performs very well [...]
Gee, as the user of a number of larger-aperture and longer
Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
portraits?
I don't have a *istD or DS (YET!), but I suspect that I'll try using the A
50/1.4 nad the A 50/1.2, as well as the K 55/1.8.
However, since I do shoot a lot of (often candid) portraits at 85mm to
200mm indoors,
I've read either here or on DPReview or both that Pentax macros are better
than the best 3rd-party macros, including the Tamron 90 and the Sigma 105.
What about the K/M/A 100/4.0 Macro -- is it also better than the Tamron 90
and the Sigma 105?
I've had the chance to try many a 100-ish macro
Just a wee bit gruff! :-)
But I think I was just a wee bit dogmatic, so we're square.
John
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:30:33 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 26 Jan 2005 at 13:01, John Forbes wrote:
I can appreciate that in your case the old way was better. But for the
right-eyed
personally, I found the KA version less reliable, because often the
contacts were just a tiny bit off and didn't make proper contact. It
sure freaked me out when suddently I couldn't take a photo. I threw it
out afterwards. Having to rotate the lens a bit on/off to be able to
get a photograph
Well, I'll buy an used one (actually it wasn't used for about 10
years, as I've been told - so the model is certainly older than that).
I just doesn't feel good paying less than 50usd for it (and other
darkroom stuff)
Alex Sarbu
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:56:22 -0800 (PST), Gianfranco Irlanda
Regarding my other post about zoom lenses, how about the FA28-70 AL? I
mean, what experiences do you lot have with it? How does it compare to
that other lens I mentioned, i.e. the FA28-90?
Actually, the consensus on Stan's Pentax site seems to be that this (the
28-70 AL, not the FA28-90) is a
Thanks for the feedback - to some extent the tonality issues may be my
doing, since I had to adjust both scans to get them comparable.
I saw that the LS 9000 listed as backordered at BH, but assumed it would be
available somewhere else. Obviously - if it can't be found that would affect
my
ft maniplation should be allowed. A bit of dodging and burning,
ft cropping, that's about it. Even tilting is verboten, AFAIK.
Tilting? Does that mean that all of my PJ photographs (which are even
more tilted that all Kratochvil's g) are useless now :-( ?
Or did you mean some other tilting? :)
Hi Rob -
I've heard a lot of negatives about shallow DOF and an impractical film
holder with the LS8000. Of course - you never know if what you hear is
accurate or not.
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - -
Original message
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:30:33 +1000
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a little like
Tiptronic gears to me, adequate but not the same as having a
clutch and H
pattern stick in hand.
You have to try Ferrari/Maserati F-1 style paddle shifters...
:-)
Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 11:21:57 AM, Alexandru-Cristian wrote:
ACS Hi,
ACS Have you heard about Opemus enlargers? The only thing I know is
ACS they're russians :(
I don't want to sound like a patriot (which I am
definitely not), but they are made here, in Czech republic. And many
of them
However, since I do shoot a lot of (often candid) portraits at 85mm to
200mm indoors, and at up to 300mm outdoors,, I suspect I'd still be using
a lot of the same lenses. I expect that the 85's, the 135's, and the
28-135/4 (at the longer end) and 60-120/2.8 zooms will still work out
really
You're the second person I've heard saying that the DA14 isn't
particularly sharp. I'd love to see a solid lens test of this
lens comparing it against others.
I've taken a bunch of pictures with it and they're more than
just satisfactorily sharp, but then I don't have any other
Pentax mount
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a little like Tiptronic gears to me, adequate but not
the same as having a
clutch and H pattern stick in hand.
heheh... Yeah, the Tiptronic is faster shifting and doesn't
interrupt power flow.
(Hey, I drive a Land Rover Freelander with
Who's had a fair amount of experience with the
Super A/Program, has it proven trustworthy and
fairly consistent in it's performance?
I've once again got myself to the point that I have 20+
Pentax bodies and a number of lenses that need to
get sold one way or the other.
I've got 2 very nice Super
Motherhood is not a profession, nobody pays for that (grin). Generally the
oldest profession is considered to be prostitution, and the second oldest to be
spying. I guess I can see where reportage could be equated to spying. BTW,
prostitution is common amongst the other primates too.
graywolf
Peter
Not wider than A2.8/20mm: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/2695269/
This shot was taken with open aperture (f.1:2.8)
I'd love to have a SMC-A 3.5/15mm, but they are very expensive (800-1000
USD).
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig
Even with the 1.5x crop factor, I still like the 85 1.4, its bokeh is
beautiful.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
portraits?
50mm?
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer
the relationship
I have used one, a 6x6cm model, with a separate 35mm frame, and I even have a
color head for it. It is built very sturdy, I liked it a lot. I never use it
anymore, since I scan my films nowadays, or use my *istD. I should sell it.
Anyone interested?
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 11:21,
I thought they were Czech.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Hi,
Have you heard about Opemus enlargers? The only thing I know is
they're russians :(
I want to buy one - I'm just starting with that
Graywolf, taking his life in his hands, said,
Motherhood is not a profession, nobody pays for that (grin).
I'm guessing that you've never been married vbg. I've been paying a mom for
33 years, and she's worth every penny.
Yes, why not. My FA 1.4/50mm works great for portraits (and other stuff).
It's just a little short, though. 57mm equals 85mm, I believe. In fact, a
35-80mm or a 28-70mm can be quite useable too.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
That makes two of us.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Juan Buhler wrote:
As the subject says: I really like those thin leather straps that came
with Spotmatics.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Great. Now you can keep her. ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very, very nice shots. How the slides look will to some extend depend on the
light you see it through/send through it.
So judgemnet is somewhat subjective. Perhaps you could use a 5000 Kelvin
light box to view the slides. Add then there's the secreen and printer
I'm not an expert at all in
Wow, you give your wife a salary? Not to many do, usually just an allowance at
best. Do you deduct FICA and Taxes?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graywolf, taking his life in his hands, said,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
portraits?
50mm?
FA 28-70 f/4
zoomed according to whether I want a head-shot of one person or something
more.
ERNR
Marnie would have agreed with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the alternative, and without prejudice to the foregoing, if it is
determined that the image in question is not a PS fake, but is in fact
a geniune unretouched photo (which is not herein admitted, but is
specifically
Perhaps this was made for You:
http://www.charlottecamera.com/detail.asp?p=23721
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: arie07 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. januar 2005 15:08
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Scanning VELVIA
I use Eye One - with more or less success: http://world.i1color.com/Perhaps
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: arie07 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. januar 2005 15:08
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Scanning VELVIA
Graywolf wrote on 26.01.05 5:37:
OTOH, those who chose Canon instead of Pentax should be excommunicated (GRIN).
Thanks God I choosed Nikon ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Marcel Bourque wrote on 23.01.05 15:21:
Hi;
I'm considering buying a Canon 8400F scanner and wondered if any PDML
members had any experience with this scanner.
I use it. Nothing particulary great but not bad either. Good scan quality,
poor software, fair speed (about 2 minutes per 35 mm
Humm...? Bill's post has not show up here yet.
Those who plan on the nature photo seminars had better sign up quick as NPW is
likely to sell out early this year.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Stephen Moore wrote:
A year late
In its default setup, the *istDS has Vivid mode and sRGB color
space set. JPEG Fine mode images seem sharp and contrasty, with
no adjustments to the in-camera controls.
Set to Natural color rendering and AdobeRGB color space, a
much more neutral color rendering and more modest in-camera
I guess, I would like to know what folks here on the list consider a portrait.
Because I have never considered just one lens to be adequate )especially for
small format images where cropping is not so nice).
This is what I consider proper for 35mm (I could easly get by with just the
focal
Don
I have used Super A's for at least decade.
IMO it's one of the best cameras Pentax ever made. The user
philosophy/concept was later transfered to the PZ-1 (Hyper Modes) and later
to the MZ-S. (Turn the aperture ring - you have Aperture Priotity. Turn the
Time wheel to manual - you have
Paul Stenquist wrote:
In RAW I would guess they are identical. With in-camera processing of
jpegs, there may well be a difference.
Paul
If they used the same AA filter that is. I wonder if they did.
rg
On Jan 26, 2005, at 2:59 AM, Peter Smekal wrote:
What about image quality? Some claim that
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:59:29 +0100, Peter Smekal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about image quality? Some claim that the images of the ist D are
rather soft compared to the ist DS.
I guess I'll find out soon, as my gf starts using the camera. As she
plans to shoot RAW, I don't expect to see a
Thanks Jens, that what I 'wanted' to hear! ;-)
Love the look and feel of it, even have a Motor A.
I've just bought so many, and seen them on eekBay,
that have little problems.
Things like being intermittent, no readout, etc.
These two seem perfect, guess I'll have to keep at
least one of them.
And it has a very good handling with its attached MotorA :D
I will add that although it is not very efficient, there is also an
LCD illuminator so even in the dark, you can check shutter/aperture
settings :)
The only problem for me is that I do not own the little grip so it is
quite difficult to
Hi,
Well put, Bob W.
Thankyou.
I personally believe there is an ultimate truth, an
ultimate reality.
Well, I'm not sure what you mean by an 'ultimate' truth. I was talking
about external / objective reality / truth.
I'm informed that it's a common mistake to equate objective truth with
Who's had a fair amount of experience with the Super A/Program, has it
proven trustworthy and fairly consistent in it's performance?
Hi, Don. (I'm actually replying to the reply by Jens - I didn't receive
your original post.)
I've owned quite a few different Pentax bodies over time. Most
A few years ago, I tried a couple of Super Programs, but I think both
had been used fairly heavily and were a bit loose in feel and one had
begun to develop shutter problems. After venturing into
SF1n/PZ-1/PZ-1p territory for a while, I took a chance on another
Super Program offered for sale
My SuperProgram (SuperA) has never been anything but dead reliable.
Been thinking about buying a second one as a backup body for it. It
does seem to eat batteries faster than any of my other cameras, but I
think I can live with that.
-Mat
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:54:31 -0500, Fred [EMAIL
The ring movement was almost a reflex action in me,
Absolutely, it's instinctive. While I'm on the subject of niggles two of my
pet hates are:
1. Lenses whos focusing ring turns in the opposite direction to a genuine
Pentax lens. (Congrats to Sigma on the Syncho II lenses)
2. One touch zoom
Uninvited, but not really unwelcome. No one knew him, but he stayed
for a couple of beers and left.'
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3068150size=lg
Comments always encouraged. Thanks.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I've had four in total, three are totally reliable and I still own them, one
had an electrical fault that was traced to a bad data back, other than that
they've never given me any trouble. Great cameras.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:57:32 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ft maniplation should be allowed. A bit of dodging and burning,
ft cropping, that's about it. Even tilting is verboten, AFAIK.
Tilting? Does that mean that all of my PJ photographs (which are even
more tilted that all
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:06:16 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, if anything, I agree with Frank.
snip
I would have thought that agreeing with me is worth ~something~... LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Where WERE you?
A local bar...party...all friends/acquaintances or not?
This black fella with short fingers and no teeth is not the only
interesting participant, but he may well be the most outrageous... g
You sure DO find interesting places to frequent, Knarf! g
keith
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:00:44 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thninking long and hard about trying to go this year. The April Vegas thing
is not as
expensive as i first
thought it would be,so looks good.(brain is still in $0.60 Canadian dollar:-))
I'm submitting my
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:37:19 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, get back Monday?
No, actually that would be Tuesday...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:36:30 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
With no bus, I'd say leave Thursday, get back Tuesday(ish).
Sorry, get back Monday?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:41:35 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: GFM?
How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
Thinking about it.
William Robb
Never got the original post. Glad I saw all the
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:23:09 -0500, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
save a bunk for me at Central
No worries, Ann. We can share...
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:06:16 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, if anything, I agree with Frank.
However, I thought *motherhood* was the second oldest profession.
ERNR
mother of two
NPPA member
Eleanor,
NPPA? National Proud Parents' Association?
Thanks to all who replied, Jens, Mat, Thibouille, Fred
and Joe.
Now I just have to decide which one (or both?) to keep.
It was good to hear that they'll take some abuse and
still keep going.
I plan to put together a small kit to keep in the car
at all times, I've missed too many shots lately.
That
BTW: For 35mm I find my 3.5/70-150mm (Tamran Adaptall) brilliant.
Translated to digital (APS) this should be 47-100mm. I'd prefere a 2.0 or
2,8 40-105mm :-)))
Does something like this exist for digital?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig
I suppose by using the word 'ultimate', that I'm trying to say that if I
believe in an external objective reality, that I believe it to exist
everywhere. Maybe that was a given and I'm confusing the point by using the
wrong word.
Interesting discussion.
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:34:31 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where WERE you?
A local bar...party...all friends/acquaintances or not?
This black fella with short fingers and no teeth is not the only
interesting participant, but he may well be the most outrageous... g
You sure DO
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
