OK, it seems an International warranty card is of no problem at all
(see Godfrey's link)
Of course warranty would be one year instead of two in Europe but
better than nothing, for sure.
About VAT, well yes in theory :)
AFAIK the toll (both out US and into Europe) do not bother much as far
as you
Hoya outlines Pentax camera plans
/Chris Cheesman/
Pentax camera plans
Hoya has hinted at plans to cut digital camera production costs as part
of restructuring needed after completion of its bid for Pentax - a
process which formally begins today, July 3rd.
In a statement spelling out the
- Mensaje original
De: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: martes, 3 de julio, 2007 21:32:18
Asunto: Re: New Carl Zeiss lenses for Pentax K mount!
They way I understand the last paragraph on the web page, the lenses
will indeed be KA
On Jul 3, 2007, at 6:20 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I guess we've all been bitten by the failed to back-up bug at
some stage. I'm paranoid about loosing data. I've got everything
on an external hard drive and two DVDs but I still worry about it.
My data is backed up to about the same
Dusting off an oldie ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
why is there no A setting on the aperture ring then?
Alastair
On 7/4/07, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Mensaje original
De: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: martes, 3 de julio, 2007 21:32:18
Asunto: Re: New Carl Zeiss
good to see you back!
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: 04 July 2007 09:58
To: PDML
Subject: Indepemdence Day
Dusting off an oldie ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
The end of the picture caption says (...), like this Planar 85 mm f1.4 for
Nikon
So the picture shows a Nikon mount lens, not Pentax KA.
- Mensaje original
De: Alastair Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: miércoles, 4 de julio, 2007
Because lens on the photo is in Nikon F mount! :-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
On 04.07.2007, at 11:12 , Alastair Robertson wrote:
why is there no A setting on the aperture ring then?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks
Lots of local vendors had burger stands set up. These were the Lions i think
Dave
On 7/3/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/WhistleOff/
Just a few quick shots. I made a Jalbum to show the
Welcome back, Shel.
Paul
On Jul 4, 2007, at 4:57 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Dusting off an oldie ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hey...good to see you posting again.
-p
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Dusting off an oldie ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
Before breaking my arm, I managed to spend an evening and a day
cycling and photographing in West Dorset. The only time I knelt in any
of these little churches was to steady the camera on the back of the
pew. Maybe there's a reason why I broke my arm...
On 04/07/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wholly owned must mean something different over there. Here you need 100% of
the shares. Controlling interest which is what they seem to be talking about
is somewhat different.
It's a loose interpretation I guess, the latests Pentax press
Wholly owned must mean something different over there. Here you need 100% of
the shares. Controlling interest which is what they seem to be talking about is
somewhat different.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Between translation, and differing business methods, (and Romans
penchant for posting old news), I don't think we have any idea of what
the hell is really happening.
graywolf wrote:
Wholly owned must mean something different over there. Here you need 100% of
the shares. Controlling interest
De listing a company with large numbers of shares outstanding borders on
theft. Doing that may not be legal in some places.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 04/07/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wholly owned must mean something different over there. Here you need 100% of
the shares.
Skipping nimbly across the pond, here is a shot from
my day of shooting in Oxford in May.
ttp://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155646
K10D, DA 10-17 fisheye, 1/10 @ f/5.6, ISO 1600, RAW,
via Lightroom and PE4.
Comments appreciated!
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:45, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Here is a selection of that evening off:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/smith07e.htm
Nicely done! Well... it may not have been a Pro camera but those
are certainly professional-quality results. Thanks for sharing.
-Charles
--
Charles
On Jul 4, 2007, at 2:16, Thibouille wrote:
AFAIK the toll (both out US and into Europe) do not bother much as far
as you don't move with 20 of those. I'll see with my friend.
If I were in that scenario I can see slinging the camera over my
shoulder and then (gasp!) scuffing parts of it a bit
Very interesting shot, Frank.
Looks like both you and Claire got an eye...:-)
Jostein
2007/7/3, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Actually, she's no waif, she's my daughter Claire. We were on our way
home after a long hard day treking through The Royal Ontario Museum
(aka the ROM) here in
Welcome back, Shel.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for posting, Bob. Very interesting collection.
I see too few of that kind of pics.
Jostein
2007/7/3, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6260858.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Spent five hours trying to pan flying puffins a week ago, with a hit
rate like one in 30 or 40 or so. :-(
Thanks for sharing, George.
Jostein
2007/7/3, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I needed more demonstration photos for my photography class, so I
spent a few hours at the local zoo.
These
When I first read this I thought Jostein was Pan Frying Puffins...
Probably easier than his real intentions.
AlunFoto wrote:
Spent five hours trying to pan flying puffins a week ago, with a hit
rate like one in 30 or 40 or so. :-(
Thanks for sharing, George.
Jostein
2007/7/3, George
It's a good catch nonetheless.
Ever thought of processing at home and then bring them along on a USB stick? :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
2007/7/3, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=uyIEbvPYJ7
Okay, it's not perfect. I've got a couple of better shots (no
Here is a selection of that evening off:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/smith07e.htm
Thanks for any comment, being it OK or KO.
Dario
-
Dario, your Romans Celts page is a lot of fun. Where was that shot?
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have a PUG shot from what must be the pub next door, I think it's
called the Yacht Club or something.
http://pug.komkon.org/00dece/millenium.html
Jostein
2007/7/4, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it's the Cutty Sark pub - you've almost certainly been in it.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
LOL.
Probably.
Jostein
2007/7/4, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I first read this I thought Jostein was Pan Frying Puffins...
Probably easier than his real intentions.
AlunFoto wrote:
Spent five hours trying to pan flying puffins a week ago, with a hit
rate like one in 30 or 40 or
...but otherwise they're nice!
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wings are blurred...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just hum along!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701618.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701630.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701633.jpg
A couple
The wings are blurred...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just hum along!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701618.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701630.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701633.jpg
A couple of weeks after GFM, my SO and I went back down to NC just to
hang with our friends
STUPID STUFF. SECURITY ET AL HAVE LOST THEIR MINDS THESE DAYS.
But darn good photos anyway. ;-) Thanks for posting them.
G
On Jul 4, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
So I was there, shooting Patti with slow-sync to balance available
light
mood and good sharpness, when I was told by
that first one, without the feeders, is superb.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: 04 July 2007 17:29
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: If you don't know the words...
Just hum along!
Thanks, Doug.
I enjoyed them thoroughly.
Jostein
2007/7/3, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm working my way through photos, and threw some together. There is no
theme, just some photos. Enjoy.
http://photos.drivingtheflies.com/index.php?page=list.5
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This one's nice too. I think it's hard to rate one over the other.
Jostein
2007/7/4, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One last shot of the Senate Office Building stairwell:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155544size=lg
Comments welcome!
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
I agree, both ways. Sure this isn't the Fonz, though?
http://www.dariobonazza.com/smith/patti03e.htm
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 04 July 2007 18:54
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO
I really like this one Rick. I think the lighting is absoulutely fabulous.
Jostein
2007/7/4, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Skipping nimbly across the pond, here is a shot from
my day of shooting in Oxford in May.
ttp://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155646
K10D, DA 10-17 fisheye,
Mat Maessen wrote:
I finally got around to installing and playing around with Lightroom
on the Big Mac (TM) tonight. This is the first shot I tackled with it.
Nothing really special, but I got a bit of practice with the new
curves adjustments, and with adding some fill light.
Great stuff. Number 1 is my favorite.
I sent a thank you email, but i'm not sure if he got it.
Dave
On 7/4/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just hum along!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701618.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701630.jpg
I remember that. The Yacht, next door to the Trafalgar, and about 200
metres upstream from the Cutty Sark pub, where I was.
http://ultimatepubguide.com/images/pubs/292_1.jpg
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of AlunFoto
Sent:
Indeed but I remember one of the last updates from Pentax stated that
Pentax and Hoya agreed Hoya wouldn't necessarily buy 100% but only
more than 50%.
Of course Hoya wants to be as much near 100% as possible.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t
Lens with aperture ring on chich you can read two writing for each
aperture value are Nikon lens (yeah Tamron Adaptall2-K adapter had
that too for aperture in the viewfinder trick).
2007/7/4, Alastair Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why is there no A setting on the aperture ring then?
Alastair
Well done. Great shots, Mark.
Do you use the flash attached to the camera, or do you have some
contraption near the front of the lens?
Jostein
2007/7/4, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just hum along!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701618.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d701630.jpg
I have a Pentax 10-17mm fisheye zoom for a bit, trying to figure out
what to do with this odd lens. So the other evening in San Francisco,
I started doing pans ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/29b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/29c.htm
Larger versions
That's probably what I will tell him to do.
My SMC-F 35-70 will do the trick. I will give it to him before he goes
over there and will ask him to buy a little Extreme3 2GB at the same
time :)
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Having read this brief, I am just as much in the dark as to what Hoya
plans to do with Pentax as I was before I opened it.
There's no information of any use there...
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
sad but true.
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Thibouille wrote:
That's probably what I will tell him to do.
My SMC-F 35-70 will do the trick. I will give it to him before he goes
over there and will ask him to buy a little Extreme3 2GB at the same
time :)
Tell him to get a pair of Transcend 150x 2G cards
Here is a second attempt at the Caladium.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Caladiums-II.jpg
Not as much contrast and color curve tweaking this time and also showing all
the leaves.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Walter Hamler wrote:
Here is a second attempt at the Caladium.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Caladiums-II.jpg
Not as much contrast and color curve tweaking this time and also showing all
the leaves.
Walt
MUCH better than the other -- which had looked like you had
From:
Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jul 3, 2007, at 8:18 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Any views on Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 glass vs the Pentax version(s)?
Or the Zeiss 25mm f/2.8 vs. Pentax SMCP-A 24mm f/2.8?
Having had the Pentax-A lens, and based on the stuff I've seen with
the Zeiss, I'd take the Zeiss.
OOOPS
Don't know how this happened and no reflection on your shot Mat :)
But I meant my comments for Cory's portfolio on smugmug...
probably pretty obvious
I'm even more scatterbrained than usual today
ann
ann sanfedele wrote:
Mat Maessen wrote:
I finally got around to installing and
What Ann said.
Still great colours, too. :-)
Jostein
2007/7/4, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is a second attempt at the Caladium.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Caladiums-II.jpg
Not as much contrast and color curve tweaking this time and also showing all
the
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Having read this brief, I am just as much in the dark as to what Hoya
plans to do with Pentax as I was before I opened it.
There's no information of any use there...
There's a thread about it on the DP Review Pentax forum. On which I
posited that this press release
http://pages.ca.inter.net/~brooksdj/WhistleOff/
New link, i was running out of space at the other one and i have a
show this weekend.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Rick Womer wrote:
This one is for Godfrey...and I think it works well
(though I'm no champ at BW conversion!):
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155564size=lg
Nice. The BW look suits this photograph. I can rarely get good color
results with mixed lighting (which I think is what's
Bob W wrote:
that first one, without the feeders, is superb.
Thanks Bob. I despise hummingbird feeders, at least in my photographs.
Unfortunately, humingbirds seem to prefer them to flowers (more food
with less effort would be my guess). Next time I'm down there I may try
loading a couple of
AlunFoto wrote:
Well done. Great shots, Mark.
Do you use the flash attached to the camera, or do you have some
contraption near the front of the lens?
I don't have a telephoto Fresnel flash attachment, if that's what you
mean. I've considered getting one but I'm not sure how often I'd use
it.
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jul 3, 2007, at 8:18 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Any views on Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 glass vs the Pentax version(s)?
Or the Zeiss 25mm f/2.8 vs. Pentax SMCP-A 24mm f/2.8?
Having had the Pentax-A lens, and based on the stuff I've seen with
the Zeiss,
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:38 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Besides, you can't buy an SMC Pentax-A 24mm f/2.8 new anywhere that I
know of.
If I didn't already have it, that might be a consideration.
But since I *do* already have one, I'm more interested to know if
there's sufficient blow your socks
Not a lot of hummingbirds up here in the Frostpit...:-)
I was actually thinking of some kind of telephoto flash bracket, like
this one from ReallyRightStuff:
http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/rrs/items.asp?Cc=FlashTeleiTpStatus=0Tp=Bc=
But you've already answered my question, really. :-)
Cheers,
hehehe...
Never thought of that, Frank.
And to all of you; Frank, Jack, Mark, BobW and TomC, thanks for
looking and commenting.
There may come more PESOs from the same planet later, but I will have
little time for raw processing the coming days. :-(
Cheers,
Jostein
2007/7/3, frank theriault
On 7/1/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibouille wrote:
How is that lens on digital (K10D) and whatwould it worth?
I could probably get one optically perfect but not very good state
otherwise for about 400 euros. I'm short on budget so I really do not
want to regret t in any
How long did you have to wait. I think i was about 1 1/2 hours before
i got mine.
Dave
On 7/4/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
that first one, without the feeders, is superb.
Thanks Bob. I despise hummingbird feeders, at least in my photographs.
Unfortunately,
Yes i like version II better. Good colours and more to look at
Dave
On 7/4/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Ann said.
Still great colours, too. :-)
Jostein
2007/7/4, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is a second attempt at the Caladium.
On 7/4/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I first read this I thought Jostein was Pan Frying Puffins...
What's it taste like. It tastes like bloody albatros.:-)
I like the one looking through the fisheye portal.
Dave
Probably easier than his real intentions.
AlunFoto wrote:
That got yer attention.
Actually no mystery. Just no K1D.
Yawn ;-)
Meanwhile, a happy 4th of July to our American listers. It's an
important day for them and I respect that. Wish I could pop over for a
BBQ somewhere. Post some pics eh.
Been v busy with work. Actually it's fun and they pay me
On 3/7/07, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
And your friend will probably have to pay VAT on the camera.
Prude!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 3/7/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
A small piece of geology with heavenly associations.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-37
:-)
Comments et. al. most appreciated.
It is easier for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, than a camel.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
On 3/7/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have added some crowd shots to the album. Still about 25 or so to
add. Wednesday i suppose, after driver training
I knew there was something not quite right Dave, when you took me up to
the Swinging Bridge car park at GFM in your
Thanks, Mark. It was daylight, fluorescent, and
incandescent. Godders is right, though, this one
needs some darkroom work that I don't have the time
or skill for.
Rick
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
This one is for Godfrey...and I think it works well
(though
On 3/7/07, Bertil Holmberg, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any views on Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 glass vs the Pentax version(s)?
Yeah, you can see through the Pentax version.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 4/7/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Skipping nimbly across the pond, here is a shot from
my day of shooting in Oxford in May.
ttp://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155646
K10D, DA 10-17 fisheye, 1/10 @ f/5.6, ISO 1600, RAW,
via Lightroom and PE4.
Comments appreciated!
Thanks, Jostein! Fortunately, one doesn't have to!
Rick
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one's nice too. I think it's hard to rate one
over the other.
Jostein
2007/7/4, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One last shot of the Senate Office Building
stairwell:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
that first one, without the feeders, is superb.
Ditto...
nice bokeh :)
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 3/7/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
One last shot of the Senate Office Building stairwell:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155544size=lg
Comments welcome!
I'd like it better if they were going down. Still, this is better than
the first one IMO. Good work.
--
Thanks, Jostein! It was a grey, dreary day, which
diffused the light nicely. Love that anti-shake, too!
Rick
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really like this one Rick. I think the lighting is
absoulutely fabulous.
Jostein
2007/7/4, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Skipping
David J Brooks wrote:
How long did you have to wait. I think i was about 1 1/2 hours before
i got mine.
I had to wait about 15 seconds ;-)
Seriously, there were about a dozen of them bombing each other and the
feeders constantly. I could just sit there and blast away.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
David J Brooks wrote:
What he said..
Dave
On 7/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cute. Love the way she's eyeing you.
Paul
-
Like _ Dad, do you HAVE to take this picture?
ann
- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It must be the week of the San Francisco Panning
Festival...
I like these. The arc that the background lights make
is especially intriguing.
I love that lens. My current Christ Church College
Cathedral PESO was taken with it, as was this
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5465563
AlunFoto wrote:
Thanks Bob,
It's indeed hard to imagine there being any truly primeval forest left
in Europe at all, not just UK.
The definition of ancient woodland is quite interesting, particularly
the first two bullet points:
# Ancient woodland is land continuously wooded since AD1600
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/3/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Indians, (Native Americans to the PC crowd), practiced slash and
burn agriculture. There wasn't nearly that much Virgin Forest.
It's unlikely that the Native American population in what is now North
America
Mark Roberts wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 7/3/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. Tell it to look for TIFFs. When it recovers everything, change
the
extensions from tif to pef.
Tif to Pef - check!
Soon grasshopper,
Doug Brewer wrote:
I'm working my way through photos, and threw some together. There is no
theme, just some photos. Enjoy.
http://photos.drivingtheflies.com/index.php?page=list.5
http://photos.drivingtheflies.com/index.php?page=album.5.32
Ruddy Duck? These are over here and, like grey
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
that first one, without the feeders, is superb.
Thanks Bob. I despise hummingbird feeders, at least in my photographs.
Unfortunately, humingbirds seem to prefer them to flowers (more food
with less effort would be my guess). Next time I'm down there
Cotty wrote:
On 3/7/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
A small piece of geology with heavenly associations.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-37
:-)
Comments et. al. most appreciated.
It is easier for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, than a camel.
AlunFoto wrote:
A small piece of geology with heavenly associations.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-37
:-)
Comments et. al. most appreciated.
Jostein
Do I really need to say excellent?
8-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lacus
Subject: Re: Indepemdence Day
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
I was hoping for flying saucers nuking the White House
Happy Fireworks Day to my good friends to the south.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Mark. It was daylight, fluorescent, and
incandescent. Godders is right, though, this one
needs some darkroom work that I don't have the time
or skill for.
You're t8ight, it can certainly be improved. But as long as you keep
the Raw file you can have another go any
Not sure why a rich man would want to enter a camel, but then...
-p
Cotty wrote:
On 3/7/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
A small piece of geology with heavenly associations.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-37
:-)
Comments et. al. most appreciated.
It is
Ditto..what Mark said.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
This one is for Godfrey...and I think it works well
(though I'm no champ at BW conversion!):
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6155564size=lg
Nice. The BW look suits this photograph. I
Well..the same to you, Cotty!
After all, I assume you chaps were graceful losers. ;-DDD
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That got yer attention.
Actually no mystery. Just no K1D.
Yawn ;-)
Meanwhile, a happy 4th of July to our American listers. It's an
important day for them and
Hum? I thought pretending to a title was a beheading offense?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 7/3/07, frank
Hi.
Today I detected a strange behavior with my K10D bought in Dec.2007
and with firmware version 1.20: the date and time are, always
2051/11/12 (yy/mm/dd) and 02:43.
When I correct the settings and press OK and return to the adjustment
menu the date and time are always 2051/11/12
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Red-White-Blue.jpg
It tastes great!!
Happy Fourth to all, including you great pdml'ers in other fine parts of the
world!
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 05/07/07, Pedro Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did someone notice this problem?
No not on the English language settings, I would re-flash the firmware
as a precaution.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Excellent. Well framed, and as Jostein noted, great light.
Paul
On Jul 4, 2007, at 2:03 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
I really like this one Rick. I think the lighting is absoulutely
fabulous.
Jostein
2007/7/4, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Skipping nimbly across the pond, here is a shot from
my
That's an even looser translation:-). You guys are a hoot.
Paul
On Jul 4, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 04/07/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wholly owned must mean something different over there. Here you
need 100% of the shares. Controlling interest which is what
On 05/07/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's an even looser translation:-). You guys are a hoot.
Pentax is no longer, and what 100% ownership actually means is that
all existing Pentax shares which have not been bought by Hoya will be
converted to Hoya shares. Hoot or not.
--
I put on 3 pounds just looking at the photo.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Walter Hamler wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Red-White-Blue.jpg
It tastes great!!
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
