Thanks Jack.
On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Completely delicious!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot this last night under somewhat dim tungsten lighting in the
kitchen. K10D, FA 50/1.4, f8 @ 1.100th, ISO 1000.
I just use the Pentax software for viewing, thats about it.
Dave
On 7/9/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
.. I just can't seem to make it look any better by fiddling with
the other
controls. ..
The question is:
If you
Have not got to the kids yet, and driving seems to be going well.
Because my Dr put down on the physical a few of my obvious flaws, the
paper work that should have been proccessed right away at Laidlaw(if
no flaws mentioned) will now go to our Transport Ministry, and those
guys make the call if i
I was originally going for a one a day entry, but i'm boring, so its
about once a week. Gives me time to think of something.:-)
I live in the country, no streetcars to write about.
Just kidding Frank.:-)
Dave
On 7/9/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
graywolf wrote:
I just setup
Hi all.
I have looked into the help section on this and tried to follow the
instructions but cannot seem to get this to work.
I uploaded into library, the indoor whistle off photos that had a gold
tint to them. I did some adjustments and got the tint out and wanted
to apply the correction to the
Hi David
I use the sync button to do this. Just make sure you have the images
you wish to paste settings onto selected and the master image (with
the adjustments you wish to apply) the most selected (will have the
brightest surround) before you hit the sync button. Then check the box
with the
Scott Loveless wrote:
I started blogging a little over a year ago. One entry. Go figure.
So
today I decided to spruce up the blog a bit, made some changes, and
added an entry. I'm going to give it another shot.
http://fivetoedsloth.blogspot.com/
I like it!
I like your About Me profile,
OK I don't know if this is exactly what your want but here goes (this
is for LR on the PC).
- Adjust the first photo in Develop
- Go back to Library, right click on the adjusted photo, and under
Develop Setting... click on Copy Settings..., A menu will pop up
that lets you select which setting
That's a good idea, Mark.
Love that oak and vine pic, btw. Looks like one of the sceneries from
the elf forest in Lord of the Rings, or maybe from World of
Warcraft...
Jostein
2007/7/10, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Scott Loveless wrote:
I started blogging a little over a year ago. One
AlunFoto wrote:
That's a good idea, Mark.
Love that oak and vine pic, btw. Looks like one of the sceneries from
the elf forest in Lord of the Rings, or maybe from World of
Warcraft...
Thanks! I'm really proud of that photo. It took a lot of work to make
it look just the way I wanted but it was
Mark Roberts wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
That's a good idea, Mark.
Love that oak and vine pic, btw. Looks like one of the sceneries from
the elf forest in Lord of the Rings, or maybe from World of
Warcraft...
Thanks! I'm really proud of that photo. It took a lot of work to make
it
Mark Roberts wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
I started blogging a little over a year ago. One entry. Go figure.
So
today I decided to spruce up the blog a bit, made some changes, and
added an entry. I'm going to give it another shot.
http://fivetoedsloth.blogspot.com/
In a message dated 7/9/2007 7:19:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shot this last night under somewhat dim tungsten lighting in the
kitchen. K10D, FA 50/1.4, f8 @ 1.100th, ISO 1000.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6178464
===
Nice shot. That's
Thanks Marnie. Yep. It's hard not to like chocolate. However, I can pass on
that prepackaged pudding. A rather bland affair.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 7/9/2007 7:19:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I need to get into a password protected Win2K computer.
Unfortunately, I have almost no chance of aquiring the password from the
former owner of the machine.
Does anyone know of a back door that will allow me to get into the system?
Thanks
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Looks OK on my calibrated monitor.
Some mystery there...I wonder what she was looking at.
-p
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.tiny.cc/FcsDb
So, this is my first attempt at taking a RAW file out of my *istD,
doing stuff in photoshop (a bit of sharpening, correcting the horizon
(for Paul
http://www.tiny.cc/FcsDb
So, this is my first attempt at taking a RAW file out of my *istD,
doing stuff in photoshop (a bit of sharpening, correcting the horizon
(for Paul g), resizing it and converting to a jpeg. I'm somewhat
disappointed because on my New Computer (a laptop) the colours looked
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 08:51:13 -0600, William Robb wrote
Hi,
I need to get into a password protected Win2K computer.
Unfortunately, I have almost no chance of aquiring the password from
the former owner of the machine. Does anyone know of a back door
that will allow me to get into the system?
I'm on my work computer, which is not caliibrated, but I know it's just a wee
bit too bright in comparison to my calibrated monitor at home. And your shot
looks just a wee bit too bright. In other words, it appears to be well
rendered. Interesting shot as well. God work.
Paul
--
On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:51, William Robb wrote:
Hi,
I need to get into a password protected Win2K computer.
Unfortunately, I have almost no chance of aquiring the password
from the
former owner of the machine.
Does anyone know of a back door that will allow me to get into the
system?
You've got a couple of good suggestions already.
Another alternative is to pick the HD out and install it in a working
PC as an additional drive.
2007/7/10, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I need to get into a password protected Win2K computer.
Unfortunately, I have almost no chance of
The look alright on my machine, I use Adobe's adjustment software by eye
so you can't judge too much by me.
As an aside for some reason my spell checker now thinks that theriault
should be diphtherias...
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.tiny.cc/FcsDb
So, this is my first attempt at taking
Good shot. :-) Looks fine here too.
Godfrey
On Jul 10, 2007, at 7:46 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.tiny.cc/FcsDb
So, this is my first attempt at taking a RAW file out of my *istD,
doing stuff in photoshop (a bit of sharpening, correcting the horizon
(for Paul g), resizing it and
Another option, if you just need to access the data, is to download a
Knoppix ISO and burn it to a CD. When you boot from the CD it will run
a Linux variation off the CD and you can access any data on the HD.
http://www.knoppix.net/
-p
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:51,
Sorry!! Sent you to the wrong page...try this one. If it comes up in
German, just click the language flag in the header.
http://www.knoppix.org/
-p
Another option, if you just need to access the data, is to download a
Knoppix ISO and burn it to a CD. When you boot from the CD it will run
On 7/7/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah. I really didn't want to waste pixels on this, but they insisted.
You're such a gentleman to accede to their wishes, Paul.
Like many others, I like the one with the girls holding the sign. All
are fun shots; they were having a good time,
On 7/7/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
One more.
These mares were were helping each other find scratch that itch they
couldn't reach.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP3552.jpg
K10D, DA 50-200mm @ 187mm, f5.6 @ 1/500, ISO 200
Lovely shot, Dave!
On 7/8/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from my trip (~170kb):
Kananaskis Country, Alberta, Canada.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP4086.jpg
K10D, DA 16-45mm @ 45mm, f10 @ 1/100, ISO 400
Beautiful!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Paul Sorenson wrote:
Sorry!! Sent you to the wrong page...try this one. If it comes up in
German, just click the language flag in the header.
http://www.knoppix.org/
-p
Another option, if you just need to access the data, is to download a
Knoppix ISO and burn it to a CD. When you
Paul Stenquist wrote:
No art here:-). Just high school girls washing cars. Hey, they asked
me to take some pics. Who am I to refuse?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=744203
You're a dirty, nasty, beautiful old man, Paul. What wouldn't I give to
be 17 again. (Not that
On 7/7/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was investigating locations to do some bridal portrait shots this
evening and took a couple of shots because of the great light.
Pentax K10D, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, Handheld
ISO 800, 1/30 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4835.htm
Good shot. Lots of activity, but it holds together well. Again, I'd guess it's
just about right, since it looks just a wee bit bright on my crappy work
monitor:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yet another one that looks
On 7/7/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from my trip. This one makes me smile every time (~115kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP3509.jpg
K10D, DA 50-200 @ 180, f5.6 @ 1/2000, ISO 400.
Is that one of the dreaded Western Canadian
Thanks Scott. Yeah, I think I want to be reincarnated as a 17 year old blonde
athlete with a nice car.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Stenquist wrote:
No art here:-). Just high school girls washing cars. Hey, they asked
On 7/8/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is one unexpected catch I got Up North. One that I'm none the
less quite proud of.
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/displayimage.php?pos=-73
Certainly no more than documentation, but with the Eagle Owl being on
the Red List of endangered
Yet another one that looks much better on my laptop at home than at my
(uncalibrated) work computer. Hope you like. Let me know:
http://www.tiny.cc/JCYtx
Comments always welcome. Thanks in advance.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:02:58PM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
The Prologue Stage is often held outside France. That's what's being run
in England as part of Le Tour. All the other stages are in France.
-Adam
Not so. In fact the very first stage, run on Sunday July 8th, (the stage Bob
Hi team,
Can someone please give me a rundown on the difference between a linear
and a circular polarizer? If you place a linear polarizer in front of
your lens and rotate it, will that alter the reflections etc like a
circular polarizer will?
Many thanks.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
On 7/10/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi team,
Can someone please give me a rundown on the difference between a linear
and a circular polarizer? If you place a linear polarizer in front of
your lens and rotate it, will that alter the reflections etc like a
circular polarizer will?
I
I searched the archives and haven't seen anything recent.
For those not printing at home, who are you using for printing online?
I'm not looking for high price, large format, but rather print sizes
4x6 up to 11x16. Something with quality good enough to frame for
myself without breaking the
Very sharp and great wood detail.
Dave
On 7/9/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070709090614
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Thanks Dave and Alastair.
Yes thats what i want to do, but thats not quite how it was worded in
the help centre, but that makes more scense now.Once i get this
weekends horse photos completed and on my site i'll try that.
Dave
On 7/10/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK I don't know
The only problem with a linear polarizer is if the functioning of your
camera depends on a semi-silvered mirror, (most do these days). If the
meter is behind it, (Pentax LX OM2/4 etc.), you'll get inaccurate meter
readings. If your autofocus sensors are behind it you'll get inaccurate
or no
Perfect expression
Dave
On 7/9/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot this last night under somewhat dim tungsten lighting in the
kitchen. K10D, FA 50/1.4, f8 @ 1.100th, ISO 1000.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6178464
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Interesting.
I found my self really having a hard look at the whole photo.
Is the fish pattern like that or didi you move the camera to add more
fiqures in the extra frames.
Dave
On 7/7/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An experiment with 4-frame multiple exposure and the DA40
I don't remember there being girls like that when I was that age...
Scott Loveless wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
No art here:-). Just high school girls washing cars. Hey, they asked
me to take some pics. Who am I to refuse?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=744203
Crimes Against Fashion is a superb photo. Come back in a few years and
that's the only one anyone will be interested in. that's not to knock
the rest, but human interest wins every time.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions for choosing a white balance when
photographing fireworks with a K10D ? I always used film before (Kodak
100Tungsten negative), and did some test with city lights a few days ago,
and was surprised with the results when comparing
On 7/10/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please give me a rundown on the difference between a linear
and a circular polarizer? If you place a linear polarizer in front of
your lens and rotate it, will that alter the
To tell the truth, I don't either. When I was that age, all the girls were VERY
MATURE and VERY INTIMIDATING :-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't remember there being girls like that when I was that age...
Scott
Thanks Dave. In truth, she was tired, and I had to wait quite a while for a
good look. I think I shot about a dozen frames.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perfect expression
Dave
On 7/9/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL
http://www.13wham.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=ed1f56c4-07c2-41bf-8b25-09a2f2eb6b1drss=102
Anyone know what buildings 9 and 23 were used for?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You don't like Geese yet you seem to like Pigeons...
Nice shot by the way.
frank theriault wrote:
Yet another one that looks much better on my laptop at home than at my
(uncalibrated) work computer. Hope you like. Let me know:
http://www.tiny.cc/JCYtx
Comments always welcome. Thanks in
Little bit of burnt high lites as seen on my laptop, but i like the
shot. Every ones seems drawn into those damn :-) pigeons
Dave
On 7/10/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another one that looks much better on my laptop at home than at my
(uncalibrated) work computer. Hope you
Interesting effect. Well rendered.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting.
I found my self really having a hard look at the whole photo.
Is the fish pattern like that or didi you move the camera to add more
fiqures in
Scott Loveless wrote:
http://www.13wham.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=ed1f56c4-07c2-41bf-8b25-09a2f2eb6b1drss=102
Anyone know what buildings 9 and 23 were used for?
Rather, it looks like they came down this last weekend.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/
--
PDML
On 7/10/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another one that looks much better on my laptop at home than at my
(uncalibrated) work computer. Hope you like. Let me know:
http://www.tiny.cc/JCYtx
I'm liking this Frank with a calibrated monitor thing. I see a few
blown-out
I don't get it. I know several others here have had there photos 'pinched'
from the web and used by others as if they were the photographer. What kind
of person does that? Why would they even get any pleasure when credited for
something they did not do?
I was browsing the nature section of
looks pretty good to me - it's a very good picture. it's probably your
work computer.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of frank theriault
Sent: 10 July 2007 15:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - The Red Hat
On 7/10/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
looks pretty good to me - it's a very good picture. it's probably your
work computer.
Thanks everyone for your comments. Sounds like I can trust my home
computer rather than my monitor at work; that's good to know.
Not that I didn't trust Mark to
frank theriault wrote:
Yet another one that looks much better on my laptop at home than at my
(uncalibrated) work computer. Hope you like. Let me know:
http://www.tiny.cc/JCYtx
Comments always welcome. Thanks in advance.
cheers,
frank
Kinda too much going on here... I think it would
Ed Keeney wrote:
I searched the archives and haven't seen anything recent.
For those not printing at home, who are you using for printing online?
I'm not looking for high price, large format, but rather print sizes
4x6 up to 11x16. Something with quality good enough to frame for
myself
On 7/10/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Little bit of burnt high lites as seen on my laptop, but i like the
shot. Every ones seems drawn into those damn :-) pigeons
Of course, I don't know how to use things like histograms and stuff,
but on my laptop at home those highlights don't
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To tell the truth, I don't either. When I was that age, all the girls were
VERY MATURE and VERY INTIMIDATING :-).
They still are...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave. In truth, she was tired, and I had to wait quite a while for a
good look. I think I shot about a dozen frames.
Paul,
You know that if you train the camera in her direction, sooner rather
than later you'll get a perfect
Frank -
I like the pix - it's an interesting slice of life.
I don't know what ISP tiny.cc is that you're using to shorten the URL,
but it always opens and wants me to go to some porn sites before it
re-directs to your image. You may want to try
www.tinyurl.com
instead.
-p
frank theriault
Great shot Paul.
If it were mine I'd crop out some of the foreground table cloth, a little
distracting to me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Chocolate Ecstacy
Shot this last night under somewhat dim tungsten lighting in the
I know what you mean Tom.
I have seen pictures of mine, from shows, printed 8x10 and framed and
hanging from the sitting stall at a horse show, with my water
mark/copyright stillplastered on the centre of the photo.
Go get him
Dave
On 7/10/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get it. I
I like the subject orientation, but the merge with the shore misc lines
are a distraction to me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO -- Cat at Rest.
One last PESO for a while. (I'm going to re-vamp my web site. Been
planning
Lots of Google hits to photos and videos of the
implosions.
Apparently Building 9 housed late manufacturing and
packaging for photographic paper, and Building 23
housed design and engineering offices.
Kodak Park is a vast area on the northwest edge of
Rochester, extending into the suburbs. The
Sutle around the bright spots and great detail.
Dave
On 7/7/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was investigating locations to do some bridal portrait shots this
evening and took a couple of shots because of the great light.
Pentax K10D, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, Handheld
ISO 800, 1/30 sec
On 7/9/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot to mention before:
The basics of digital RAW format and how it differs from JPEG can be
found in a pair of white papers on the Adobe website, Understanding
digital raw capture and Linear gamma, both written by Bruce
Fraser. Being
Can i follow you around one weekend.:-)
Dave
On 7/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No art here:-). Just high school girls washing cars. Hey, they asked
me to take some pics. Who am I to refuse?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=744203
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 7/10/07, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank -
I like the pix - it's an interesting slice of life.
I don't know what ISP tiny.cc is that you're using to shorten the URL,
but it always opens and wants me to go to some porn sites before it
re-directs to your image. You may want
Local hardware store should have a good selection of sledghammers i would think.
Dave
On 7/10/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to get into a password protected Win2K computer.
Unfortunately, I have almost no chance of aquiring the password from the
former owner of the
On 7/7/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An experiment with 4-frame multiple exposure and the DA40 lens,
Pentax K10D:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/29e.htm
A larger version is available by clicking the image on that page ...
and might be needed for this one. ;-)
I like this shot a lot. Very nice!
Tom C.
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Light
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:08:23 -0400
Sutle around the bright spots and great detail.
Dave
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:05:42 -0400, David J Brooks wrote
Local hardware store should have a good selection of sledghammers i
would think.
Dave
Nope, only applies to Vista AFAIK 8)
John
Well, she was eight months old when her mother packed her up and flew home. I
took my first picture of her that day. So in many ways, she has grown up here.
And she's very comfortable with a camera in her face. I hope that doesn't
change.
Paul
-- Original message
Rick Womer wrote:
I give Kodak =lots= of credit for taking the buildings
down.
The city of Rochester is giving them lots of credit for it too - tax
credit: Kodak's doing it because they'll have to pay less property tax
on the land if there's no building on it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
P. J. Alling wrote:
The only problem with a linear polarizer is if the functioning of your
camera depends on a semi-silvered mirror, (most do these days). If the
meter is behind it, (Pentax LX OM2/4 etc.), you'll get inaccurate meter
readings. If your autofocus sensors are behind it
They both do essentially the same thing, although I understand the linear
polarizers are a bit more effective. If your camera has polarized sensors you
need to use a circular polarizer, otherwise either will work.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot
Seems a little light on my calibrated monitor. I like the shot, you
have managed to get a whole group with the same focused attention.
Nice shot.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 10, 2007, 10:58:31 AM, you wrote:
ft Yet another one that looks much better on my laptop at home than at my
ft
Thanks Ken. Yes, I might just take a bit off the bottom and the left.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great shot Paul.
If it were mine I'd crop out some of the foreground table cloth, a little
distracting to me.
Kenneth
mike wilson wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
The only problem with a linear polarizer is if the functioning of your
camera depends on a semi-silvered mirror, (most do these days). If the
meter is behind it, (Pentax LX OM2/4 etc.), you'll get inaccurate meter
readings. If your autofocus
On 7/10/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Go get him
Yeah!
My sentiments exactly.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Depends on where you want to use it, really.
One is cirkumpolar, the other is more longitudinal.
Jostein
2007/7/10, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi team,
Can someone please give me a rundown on the difference between a linear
and a circular polarizer? If you place a linear polarizer in front
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To tell the truth, I don't either. When I was that age, all
the girls were VERY MATURE and VERY INTIMIDATING :-).
They still are...
;-)
Courage, mon brave! take a lesson from Leonard:
Memories
Frankie Lane, he was singing
Christian,
Thanks - will give them a try.
I like http://www.mpix.com. Great service, quality and turnaround times.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
Thanks!
Ed
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I don't know what my options are. I should likely simply hope they are
quietly removed. These were on Fuji Provia transparency film, so I have the
1st gen images to prove it.
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss
The world seems largely made up of devious credit grabbers and finger
pointers attempting to escape rightful blame.
Lack of pride of accomplishment is replaced by a slobbering orgasm
gained from getting something for nothing.
I accidentally come across a couple of my local images on the home page
Cotty,
Peter has it right. The circular polarizer is functionally no
different from the linear polarizer to your eye, but the linear may
not be so satisfactory with your camera's sensors. The reflections
(or whatever) may be polarized away, but the autofocus or exposure
metering or whatever may
I forgot to add that shortly thereafter, I checked the CU's site and it
had been completely redone.
Was a satisfying feeling.
Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The world seems largely made up of devious credit grabbers and finger
pointers attempting to escape rightful blame.
Lack
Dave,
You've got to approach those people and say,
Why that's a nice picture of your horse, but all that writing spoils it.
You should realy get one without the copywrite on it.
You know, they do that just to spoil the picture for you.
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/10/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just logged on to see how the last batch of upload had fared, and was
met with the below text.
Anyone picked up news about this before?
Jostein
=== Quote start =
As an accepted artist of the PENTAX Photo Gallery you have the ability
to help in the image selection process. Only
Bob W wrote:
Crimes Against Fashion is a superb photo. Come back in a few years
and that's the only one anyone will be interested in. that's not to
knock the rest, but human interest wins every time.
Thanks Bob. That's a great compliment coming from you.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
If the offending content is on a website, one avenue you can pursue is to
send a DMCA Takedown notice to the company that hosts the website. The
hosting company is required by law to remove the offending material when
they receive a takedown notice. To get the website back up, the website
On 7/10/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Crimes Against Fashion is a superb photo. Come back in a few years
and that's the only one anyone will be interested in. that's not to
knock the rest, but human interest wins every time.
Thanks Bob. That's a great compliment
On 10/7/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only problem with a linear polarizer is if the functioning of your
camera depends on a semi-silvered mirror, (most do these days). If the
meter is behind it, (Pentax LX OM2/4 etc.), you'll get inaccurate meter
readings. If your
Unfortunately copyright must be enforced by the copyright holder.
Additionally it's hard to enforce if you don't know about a violation.
A reputable site should take the shots down once they're informed.
Tom C wrote:
I don't know what my options are. I should likely simply hope they are
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
