On 24/11/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
The iron bats really break up the leave pattern.
Indeed. It's a new departure.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Lovely dog(s)
She looks happy already.:-)
Dave
On Nov 24, 2007 6:59 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to being turned towards the dark side
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/fellas/chyna/chyna1.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
They are a very handsome breed.
Congrats on the addition.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 25, 2007 8:59 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to being turned towards the dark side
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/fellas/chyna/chyna1.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
G'day All,
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
Large (1195x800, ~190kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_lrg.jpg
K10D, DA 10-17mm f3.5-4.5 FE @ 17mm, 30 seconds
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
The first being pretty much what I had expected to see,
The second was certainly out of season
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Almost has a painting feel to it.
nicely done
Dave
On Nov 25, 2007 8:26 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
Large (1195x800,
Good lighting and composition on both Ann. I'm partial to number 1.
Dave
On Nov 25, 2007 8:42 AM, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
The first being pretty much what
Like it David. You hit the exposure dead on for a dramatic uniquely
toned effect.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
Wow! Beautiful color. Nice composition. I like the foreground
diagonal and the placement of the lighthouse. Excellent work.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2007, at 8:26 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
I like the first one the most. The rich color of the fallen leaves is
very pleasing.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2007, at 8:42 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
The first being pretty much
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Geso: An addition to the family
Great looking dogs Bill.
Makes me want one...
Regards, Bob S.
I can probably arrange for delivery of the gray one if you are
serious...
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Handsome folks. Dogs is good people. :-)
Two Belgians and a Rotie? That's a lot of dog to deal with. Good luck!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Been idling around long enough, so am putting up a several year old
film shot of Oregon's Yakuina Head Light. Someone else posted an image
of this light awhile back, but from a more dramatic perspective.
Just to put a toe back in the game.
Thanks for any comments.
Jack
Quite nice overall, although I would prefer to correct the
rectilinears... :-)
G
On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:26 AM, David Savage wrote:
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
Large
Thanks Paul and Dave -
yeah - the first one is much better as a photo in itself for sure
I may or may not have a better shot of the forsythia, which I mainly put
up to show the
oddness of it's appearance on the scene. Just a few days of too warm
weather here (about an hour north of NY)
made
Hi troops.
Wednesday we had some snow in the area. I really get a kick out of how
the news stations play up 1-2 cm of snow these days.
I know when we worked up north, unless they were calling for over a
foot, nothing was ever mentioned, as its always snowing up there.
Small snowfall and well
David Savage wrote:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
Large (1195x800, ~190kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_lrg.jpg
I'm just going to add a me, too to say that's a beautiful shot, very
well executed. It
I seem to being turned towards the dark side
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/fellas/chyna/chyna1.html
That puppy isn't very people-friendly, is she? :-)
Good looking hound. I'll have to consider Turvurens if I ever get a
home where I have room to keep one.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
The first being pretty much what I had expected to see,
The second was certainly out of season
Hmmm. The first one doesn't do all that much for me,
Jack Davis wrote:
Been idling around long enough, so am putting up a several year old
film shot of Oregon's Yakuina Head Light.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=261
Nice shot, Jack, though I think it might profit by tightening it up a
little on the top and a little more on
Did a bunch of software updates on the ibook last night.
Now i find my gmail has lost all of its email address in memory. I
used to just hit the first letter and a list would come up, now
nothing.
Argg
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Thanks, Doug! A bit of top crop certainly wouldn't hurt. I sort of like
he inclusion of the bird concentration on the left, even though of
marginal impact.
Jack
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Been idling around long enough, so am putting up a several year old
so far I only contributed some text to this list;
thought it could be nice to show some pics,
even though I must say that the photos
I have seen on this list are pretty humbling... :-)
I decided to not be bothered by that :-)
and collect a few shots of last half year
since I got digitally enabled
http://www.kenko-tokina.co.jp/camera/430965.html
Seems Nikon and Contax/Yashica version available too ...
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML
Welcome, Axel. You've posted some nice work here. Be confident that
you'll have no trouble fitting in with this group photographically.
Jack
--- Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so far I only contributed some text to this list;
thought it could be nice to show some pics,
even though
On 25/11/07, Axel Belinfante, discombobulated, unleashed:
some shots could probably benefit of some cropping;
these are straight from the cameras.
This is exceptionally good
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5136363574982092466
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
I love the Google language translation
*Virile black body PENTAX K lens mount compatible machine*
Thibouille wrote:
http://www.kenko-tokina.co.jp/camera/430965.html
Seems Nikon and Contax/Yashica version available too ...
--
The difference between individual intelligence and group
Hi Axel -
There are some pretty interesting shots in that group. Keep shooting
and keep posting.
GS
http://georgesphotos.net
On Nov 25, 2007 11:04 AM, Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so far I only contributed some text to this list;
thought it could be nice to show some pics,
even
Axel, welcome! There are some really nice shots
there. I especially like the second bubble pic, and
the bee. When you get around to some modest
processing you'll have lots of lovely stuff.
Rick
--- Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
so far I only contributed some text to this list;
These are lovely, Dave! The barn shot is a real
classic, with the geese really adding a lot.
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi troops.
Wednesday we had some snow in the area. I really get
a kick out of how
the news stations play up 1-2 cm of snow these days.
I know
A slight tightening would be good; it also seems to
have a magenta cast. Really nice shot, though.
Rick
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Been idling around long enough, so am putting up a
several year old
film shot of Oregon's Yakuina Head Light.
Thanks, Dave. That's what attracted me, too. There
are lots of iron fences in the neighborhood, and I
would be embarrassed to say how many pix I've taken of
them; but I think this is the first I have posted.
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this one Rick. The iron
In a message dated 11/25/2007 5:36:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G'day All,
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
Large (1195x800, ~190kb)
Last night while shooting some products with the K10 I
had the camera freeze up on me. Fully charged
batteries and the camera in manual mode with the pop
flash as a controler for two 540's. I went to fire the
camera and the mirror went up and that was it. The
mirror stayed up and the camera froze.
I realize it has a magenta cast and, strangely, due to that (explained
the buyer) I sold a 13x20. The only 'tightening' I might consider would
be to take a little off the top, as suggested by Doug.
I relate to this as a compromise shot that's looking for an excuse for
being..so to speak. :-)
In a message dated 11/25/2007 9:52:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Axel, welcome! There are some really nice shots
there. I especially like the second bubble pic, and
the bee. When you get around to some modest
processing you'll have lots of lovely stuff.
Rick
In a message dated 11/25/2007 5:49:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
The first being pretty much what I had expected to see,
The second was certainly
I seem to recall you had other issues with this K10D prior to this... ?
I would recommend calling Pentax service and have it in for a
checkup, immediately.
Godfrey
On Nov 25, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Last night while shooting some products with the K10 I
had the camera
On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:42 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
I like this, a nice composition and good tones, colors, etc.
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
This seems rather too busy.
Godfrey
--
PDML
A pleasant scene. You might try cropping out a large measure of sky.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Been idling around long enough, so am putting up a several year old
film shot of Oregon's Yakuina Head Light. Someone else posted an image
of this light awhile back, but
Probably the smart play.
Actually, this is the first real issue I've
encountered so far.
I should get it checked out.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall you had other issues with this K10D
prior to this... ?
I would recommend calling Pentax service and
Thanks, Paul. Seems to be a popular suggestion.
If I were to crop the top, I'd still leave a generous amount of sky
above the light. A little too close and the effect tends to be one of
pinching off the scene at such a point.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A pleasant scene.
I've had that happen once or twice, although I believe the batteries
were low. It seems to be something akin to a computer crash. Had it
happen with the D as well. But again, it was with low batteries.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Probably the smart play.
thanks for the kind words, also to the others that responded.
I kind of hate myself for overlooking/forgetting about
the 1600 iso setting there - at iso 100 the reflection
in the bubble likely would have contained much more detail.
oh well. lesson (hopefully :-) learned...
thanks again, to all,
The soap bubbles and the following one:
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5136169219122013602
are really nice. On the other hand, on this one:
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5136358678719374946
you can see K10D's poor sharpening algorithms (the black
Yes, interesting posts by the engineer who started that thread. The conclusion
is that ultrasonic motors CAN be faster, it's just that Pentax have chosen a
poor implementation (SDM) which doesn't make full use of the technology, and
thus it's results are far from optimal (they should have
I've heard people claiming that a large, heavy camera may be better at
controlling blur caused by handshake, since a light one is too easy to move. Is
this true or complete nonsense? (A heavy camera should require more effort,
therefore it should cause muscle fatigue and shake - at least
It's simple physics, all things being equal, it's harder to impart
movement to a larger mass. However too heavy a camera will cause
fatigue which will cause the photographer to be more prone to shake,
(among other things). Its a balancing act that depends on the
photographer and his
The soap bubbles and the following one:
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5136169219122013602
are really nice.
small pool of water pic was taken with the optio w30
(had never realized how much fun it can be to just
have a camera in your pocket for when you 'see' a shot -
Is that a Cosina? Or is Kenko trying to do a Cosina?
On Nov 26, 2007 1:22 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love the Google language translation
*Virile black body PENTAX K lens mount compatible machine*
Thibouille wrote:
http://www.kenko-tokina.co.jp/camera/430965.html
- Original Message -
From: Inner Focus
Subject: Light or heavy camera to diminish shake?
I've heard people claiming that a large, heavy camera may be better at
controlling blur caused by handshake, since a light one is too easy to
move. Is this true or complete nonsense? (A heavy
- Original Message -
From: Inner Focus
Subject: Re: Sigma HSM lenses for Pentax KAF mount
Yes, interesting posts by the engineer who started that thread. The
conclusion is that ultrasonic motors CAN be faster, it's just that Pentax
have chosen a poor implementation (SDM) which
On 25/11/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's simple physics, all things being equal, it's harder to impart
movement to a larger mass. However too heavy a camera will cause
fatigue which will cause the photographer to be more prone to shake,
(among other things). Its a
Thanks Rick.
I have shot that barn and pond before, but each year something seems
to attract me back.
Dave
On Nov 25, 2007 12:55 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are lovely, Dave! The barn shot is a real
classic, with the geese really adding a lot.
Rick
--- David J Brooks
William Robb wrote:
I seem to being turned towards the dark side
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/fellas/chyna/chyna1.html
William Robb
Love that second shot - are furs back in for the smart lady?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Top cropped by popular demand.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=262
Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
- Original Message
From: Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 11:31:40 PM
Subject: Re: Geso: introduction pics
[...]
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5136358678719374946
you can see K10D's
Dave _ I agree with Rick on this.. thats definitely my fave of them
although the gravestones are really strong -
I'd rather look at barns :)
my eyes are really going -- I didn't know those geese were geese...
just saw them as dark forms...
couldn't see a way to enlarge the photo but did
Ok, i took the 300 and the tele out today for another test. Its bright
and sunny aswell.
It worked great, at first, everything looked nicley focused.
There is a *tiny* amount of play withthe tele on the camera, there was
aswell on the istD IIRC. After i wiggled the tele back and forth, i
started
IS is cheating...
Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's simple physics, all things being equal, it's harder to impart
movement to a larger mass. However too heavy a camera will cause
fatigue which will cause the photographer to be more prone to
Thanks Ann.
This is the first time i have ever seen any geese on the pond. It is
actually the back end of a golf course, they may have a summer program
to keep them off.
Dave
On Nov 25, 2007 6:27 PM, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave _ I agree with Rick on this.. thats definitely my
Wow, that is interesting. I had just charged both
batteries.
Well, it hasn't failed since. I'll keep an eye on it.
I just shot a Christmas card (5 minutes ago) for my
sis-in-law and it worked flawlessly.
scratching head
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had that happen
Dave,
It's a classic shot, why not return to it.
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 25, 2007 5:19 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rick.
I have shot that barn and pond before, but each year something seems
to attract me back.
Dave
On Nov 25, 2007 12:55 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele
Subject: Re: Geso: An addition to the family
Love that second shot - are furs back in for the smart lady?
Yup, but in deference to animal activists, we aren't killing the animals
first.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: Re: K10D mirror/shutter issues
Wow, that is interesting. I had just charged both
batteries.
Mark your batteries in case you have a bad one. If the problem repeats, mark
which battery was in use at the time.
William Robb
--
Back to Baylands today to eat
my lunch by the water.
Gulls flocked to wait for crumbs.
Steel gray sky on water.
They got nothing.
Made a few photos.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48b.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Godfrey,
Don't care much for the out of focus ones...
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 25, 2007 6:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to Baylands today to eat
my lunch by the water.
Gulls flocked to wait for crumbs.
Steel gray sky on water.
They got nothing.
Made a few photos.
Thank you for your comment.
Can you be more specific? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
G
On Nov 25, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Godfrey,
Don't care much for the out of focus ones...
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 25, 2007 6:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:54 AM 26/11/2007, David J Brooks
wrote:
Did a bunch of software updates on the ibook last night.
Now i find my gmail has lost all of its email address in memory. I
used to just hit the first letter and a list would come up, now
nothing.
Are you using the web mail interface, or your
Hmm... the blank verse message and the photo indicate
you were feeling a bit low.
Anyway... I like the composition, but the photo would
be a lot stronger if everything were within the DOF.
The OOF thick stick, in particular, is distracting.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thank you for your comment.
Can you be more specific? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
G
Godders - he means the out of focus reed in the background - top right
bothered me, too.
I liked your little free verse intro , though
ann
On Nov 25, 2007, at 6:08
I can maintain a steady hand better with a heavier camera. But it may
be an individual thing.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Inner Focus wrote:
I've heard people claiming that a large, heavy camera may be better
at controlling blur caused by handshake, since a light one is too
easy to
Grace and I went to the nature center today, hoping to shoot some
wild deer. No deer, but did get a few shots of my dear granddaugther.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6676844
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
From this afternoon's hike:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6676858
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks for the clarification!
It's interesting ... that's three comments on this list preferring
more DoF. Comments from other lists haven't mentioned it at all.
I photographed this scene both at f/3.5 and at f/11 as it was hard to
tell in the viewfinder or LCD which one would do what I
The thick, out-of-focus stick is distracting, but bringing it into focus
doesn't help. It's the thickness of it that makes it seem ungainly among
the reeds.
Cheers,
Paul
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification!
It's interesting ... that's three comments on this list preferring
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/25/2007 5:49:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
The first being pretty much what I had expected to
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele
Subject: Re: Geso: An addition to the family
Love that second shot - are furs back in for the smart lady?
Yup, but in deference to animal activists, we aren't killing the animals
first.
William Robb
Har! I
Thanks, Paul.
I liked it because of its thickness and weight ...
But it might be overmuch. You've given me ideas for alternative
renderings. :-)
Godfrey
On Nov 25, 2007, at 9:15 PM, Paul Crovella wrote:
The thick, out-of-focus stick is distracting, but bringing it into
focus
doesn't
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification!
It's interesting ... that's three comments on this list preferring
more DoF. Comments from other lists haven't mentioned it at all.
They aren't as smart as we are :)
seriously - the darkest thing in the photo is blurry - and it is on the
I find the thick black stick is too distracting whether OOF or not.
Tried getting rid of it and cropping a little off the top. Results are
here...
http://tinyurl.com/2mdtx3
Removed in 24 hours, sooner if you like.
-p
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification!
It's interesting
Based on your and Paul's responses, and studying the photo a bit
further, what I think works is to soften the intensity of the large
dark twig by a bit to reduce its weight in the scene. That achieves
the idea I had in mind.
I've replaced the original with a revision...
Thanks for your thoughts.
I tried that mod and am not particularly fond of it, it loses the
balance that I want. It's an elusive balance that I'm looking for,
and the contrast of thin and thick are part of it. This particular
photo just might not make it, but I'm having fun working it. :-)
That works for me.
Cheers,
Paul
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Based on your and Paul's responses, and studying the photo a bit
further, what I think works is to soften the intensity of the large
dark twig by a bit to reduce its weight in the scene. That achieves
the idea I had in mind.
IMO this probably a Cosina/vivitar/etc body, of course.
On Nov 26, 2007 12:01 AM, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that a Cosina? Or is Kenko trying to do a Cosina?
On Nov 26, 2007 1:22 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love the Google language translation
*Virile
http://www.kenko-tokina.co.jp/camera/430965.html
Seems Nikon and Contax/Yashica version available too ...
Hey look! It has a 24x36 senso... oh wait.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
86 matches
Mail list logo
