Looks more like a lick to me. Fun photo anyway. A definite keeper!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 3:16:05 PM, you wrote:
R> There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
R>
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#51755
Yes, indeed. Her spotting you takes it from a nothing to shot to an
interesting shot.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 2:23:29 PM, you wrote:
PS> Came out of the coffee shop today, and before I could change the ISO
PS> on the camera, I spotted these ladies crossing the street
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: K20D & AF calibration data
>I am now officially curious and confused.
>
> Yes i know thats standard.:-).
>
> I have 4 nikons, the D1 had back focus issues, that Nikon said it di
> not have, but would fix if you sent it in.
> My
G'day All,
This is technically a terrible photo. It took a few goes to get the
lighting & composition right, and at some stage the focus got screwed
up. Which resulted in some heavy PS'ing.
However, I thought I'd share to help educate all you non singles as to
what it is us lonely losers get up t
Thanks Godders.
On Mar 9, 2008, at 12:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Excellent grab! Nicely done.
>
> Godfrey
>
> On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7032410
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/m
That should read: This is a pic I wouldn't have attempted wit the
K10D. Doh...
Paul
On Feb 29, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> That's good news. And congratulations on your D300.
> With just the television glow, this is a pic I wouldn't have
> attempted with the K20D. Simply not enoug
Thanks Tim. I'll second the enough of winter sentiment. Let there be
spring. By the end of next week we're supposed to get it. I hope that
holds true.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 11:59 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> Lovely shot.
>
> But I've seen enough winter pictures. Enough already -T
>
> On Sat, Mar 8
Yep. Were it not ugly outside, I wouldn't have time to play with
targets.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:08 PM, David Savage wrote:
> True.
>
> I suspect all this lens testing I'm reading about is due more to the
> fact that its winter & you guys up north have nothing better to do :-)
>
> I'm just h
I don't shoot weddings because I don't like weddings.
No other reason is needed.
That said, I would never shoot a wedding for a friend or relative. Ever.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit th
I never owned a leisure suit, but instead had a pair of bright orange pants
with an equally bright green blazer and a pale yellow shirt. I don't
remember the tie, but it was probably a bright paisley about 6 inches wide.
Thank the Lord no pictures, but I bet I looked like the great pumpkin.
Bill
Excellent grab! Nicely done.
Godfrey
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7032410
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Thanks Derby. A lot of tough ladies in Michigan:-).
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Came out of the coffee shop today, and before I could change the ISO
>> on the camera, I spotted these ladies crossing the street.
>> Fortunately, one of them spotted
Lovely shot.
But I've seen enough winter pictures. Enough already -T
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Rebekah.
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Rebekah wrote:
>
> > Nice, I love the movement - both hers and all the snow. What a
> > beautiful
Very nice. The foreground framing works well. An excellent shot.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:32 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Jack.
>
> I quite often try and frame my landscape shots with trees or branches.
>
> This, for me, works very well
>
> Dave
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Jack Davis <[EMA
I don't photograph weddings very often. If my favorite lab were to go out
of business than I probably will just quit doing them. I do teach a
wedding photography class through a community college. Everyone in my
class last spring shoot digital. They took the class because they were
not sure wha
No problem. I'm not pleased about the idea of getting at that debug
mode. And you folks have convinced me that the lens by lens adjustment
is the only way to go unless I've notice some serious problems. Given
the situations when I'm likely to use the FA 50 wide open (dark or
macro), I'm likely to
True.
I suspect all this lens testing I'm reading about is due more to the
fact that its winter & you guys up north have nothing better to do :-)
I'm just happy that my K20D's focus is more acurate than my K10D (BF
issues). I'm too busy taking photos, & I currently don't have the
patience or incl
David Savage wrote:
> In the late 70's I wore a nappy.
>
It's a good thing, too. You wouldn't have done Paul's leisure suits any
favors had you not been wearing one.
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Great stuff. I had three leisure suits. One green, one ivory a
Very sweet & a great B&W treatment.
Well done.
Cheers,
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
>
>
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5175511395924019
But it will apply to all your lenses. So if you make it right for the FA 50,
the FA 20-35 and the DA 40 will be off. Unless all your lenses are backfocusing
or front focusing, leave it alone.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I
In the late 70's I wore a nappy.
Cheers,
Dave
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great stuff. I had three leisure suits. One green, one ivory and one baby
> blue. I also had several floral shirts and a sheer white shirtwith puffy
> sleeves that was open to the navel.
If you roll back the firmware to an earlier version you can do it via
the debug mode.
Cheers,
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel your pain.
>
> I have shot 99+% of my K10D photos with the FA 20-35 and the DA 40. I
> really hadn't noticed
Gawd, this keyoard sucks:-). Fill in the lanks. (I'm using my daughter's
laptop.)
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Film is basically batch processed. In printing, some control is exercised,
> the
> amount of which varies in proportion to how much
I was wondering whether it was the keyboard or the
downstairs bar and Elvis's company...
;-)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gawd, this keyoard sucks:-). Fill in the lanks. (I'm
> using my daughter's laptop.)
> -- Original message
> --
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I'm sure many of you have already seen this image:
http://www.panix.com/~johnf/gallery/images/wedding.jpg
(explanation at http://www.panix.com/~johnf/)
P.S. FWIW, curently in the DVD player is "Life On Mars".
I lived in Manchester in 1973, so I'm definitely
experiencing 1
Great shot! Nice BW conversion.
I hope they continue to enjoy each other's
company--mine didn't until they both went off to
college.
Rick
--- Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss
> from a drooling baby...
>
>
>
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2p
Film is basically batch processed. In printing, some control is exercised, the
amount of which varies in proportion to how much one pays. With digital, each
frame is processed individually and prints or print files can e fine tuned. The
last two weddings I shot were digital, and I was ale to rod
Yeah, I see what you mean. ;))
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Love
>
>
> > Well...maybe a BABE.(?)
>
> Or a puppy...
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/pages/_IGP0954.html
>
>
> William R
I photographed one wedding using a Canon D60 digital. Yes, it was great
to be able to see the results on the display. No, it wasn't fun looking
at the results on my computer and tweaking them to make me satisfied with
the results. When I shot with film, I knew what I would get because I
had d
damn, looks like I escaped by a decade. phew!
rg2
On 3/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have many photos either, but I have a few. And I have vague memories
> that keep trying to push through the haze. Maye they're just flashacks.
> Paul
> -- Original m
very interesting, I'd have to say it sounds like something worth
agreeing to to me. It certainly seems difficult to tell the little
differences, and I've seen a lot of arguements with very convinced
people on both sides of whatever fence they're divided by. All I can
say about my 50 is how much
I don't have many photos either, but I have a few. And I have vague memories
that keep trying to push through the haze. Maye they're just flashacks.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Swede boots? That's a turnip for the books! Are you
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why i don't shoot weddings.
>I have the same question. Digital takes much of the stress out of wedding
>shooting, because the
>photographer has complete control. Not true with film.
Or it can add to the stress because you k
Swede boots? That's a turnip for the books! Are you sure they're not
Abba boots?
I managed to get through the 70s with absolutely no photographs of
myself at all, so I have no idea how bad I looked.
>
> Ok i admit. I had a set of green swede Beatle boots.
>
> Dave
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I have the same question. Digital takes much of the stress out of wedding
shooting, because the photographer has complete control. Not true with film.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you mean that you shoot no film except at we
Nicely composed and rendered. I like the camera angle and perspective. Well
done.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks, Jack!
>
> --- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Crisp graphic style shot. Like it!
> >
> > Jack
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I'm embarrassed to be a product of the 70s
> Do you have photos?
None that I'm showing to you, loverboy.
WW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Love
> Well...maybe a BABE.(?)
Or a puppy...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/pages/_IGP0954.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUB
Do you mean that you shoot no film except at weddings,
=or= that your wedding shoots are exclusively film?
If the latter, why?
Rick
--- Jim Apilado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a lot of amateur photographers who make
> the jump to
> "professional" wedding photographer. I've done
>
Thanks, Jack!
--- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Crisp graphic style shot. Like it!
>
> Jack
> --- Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Moving along from the flute... this is a view of
> my
> > son't old trumpet.
> >
> > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7032000
> >
> >
Well...maybe a BABE.(?)
One for the album.
Jack
--- Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling
> baby...
>
>
>
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5175511395924019618
>
>
> Shot with an *ist D, M 1:1.4 5
Do you have photos?
-- Original message --
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: Re: I'm embarrassed to be a product of the 70s
>
>
> > sheer white shirtwith puffy sleeves that was o
Crisp graphic style shot. Like it!
Jack
--- Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving along from the flute... this is a view of my
> son't old trumpet.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7032000
>
> K10D, DA 16-45, f/22 @ 1/6, ISO 800, RAW via LR and
> PE4 (to get a colored splodg
Yes, it's a Frank cornet. I wanted to look like Harry James if I
couldn't sound like him, but I had mentioned to my music teacher that I
had decided to get a new trumpet. With that, he virtually 'insisted' I
get a cornet. "Much richer tone", he would admonish. As it turned out,
I did.
Thanks much
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I'm embarrassed to be a product of the 70s
> sheer white shirtwith puffy sleeves that was open to the navel. A chick
> magnet! :-))
I wear one of those into the show ring if I know the judge is queer.
William Robb
--
PDML
I feel your pain.
I have shot 99+% of my K10D photos with the FA 20-35 and the DA 40. I
really hadn't noticed focusing issues. When I did mess with the FA 50
1.4 I did notice some back focus. It is funny (in a tragic sort of way)
watching you folks carefully adjusting something I have no cont
I slogged through deep mud in the orchard right after heavy rains. I
thought several times I was going to go down and probably should have
taken a tripod, or something, to help me pull my boots out of the mire.
I couldn't find a rest and couldn't hold it well enough to sharpen the
foreground trees
Thanks Rebekah.
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Rebekah wrote:
> Nice, I love the movement - both hers and all the snow. What a
> beautiful picture...
>
>
> rg2
>
> On 3/8/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We got lucky this time on the snow. We're on the trailing edge of the
>> storm.
Nice, I love the movement - both hers and all the snow. What a
beautiful picture...
rg2
On 3/8/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We got lucky this time on the snow. We're on the trailing edge of the
> storm. Just an inch or two. But it was nasty. Way below freezing with
> a lot of
Love it. The second one is my favorite. I just want to see the whole
instrument. It has such character. Is it a coronet? It looks too fat
and short to be a trumpet.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:42 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Yes, it is daylight. Actually it was glare from a bright day (helped
> sligh
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Came out of the coffee shop today, and before I could change the ISO
> on the camera, I spotted these ladies crossing the street.
> Fortunately, one of them spotted me as well, and that made the shot.
> This is cropped to about 50% of frame. K20D, DA 50-200, 200mm, ISO
Thanks much, Dave!
Jack
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good angle and lighting.
>
> Good job Jack
>
> Dave
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I think my horn has the most "character" of any of those
> instruments
> > shown so far.
Great shot, Rebekah. A perfect moment.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Rebekah wrote:
> There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling
> baby...
>
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-
> i05p28o#5175511395924019618
>
>
> Shot with an *ist D, M 1:1.4
Yes, it is daylight. Actually it was glare from a bright day (helped
slightly by the silver side of a 32" reflecter) passing through a
slider which had been tinted a very pale blue by the previous
homeowner.
Thanks, Rick
Jack
--- Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer the second one to
Yep. DA 50-200. I was adjusting the focus point. It was pretty close
to right on. Tried to do the DA 12-24 tonight. Wide open at 24mm it's
pretty much in focus throughout the range. Hard to see any difference
between -4 and +4, so it stays at 0.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:45 PM, David J Brooks
We got lucky this time on the snow. We're on the trailing edge of the
storm. Just an inch or two. But it was nasty. Way below freezing with
a lot of wind.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:38 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Thats a great shot Paul.
>
> You call that snow.:-)
>
> Dave
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 20
Super shot.
True love.
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
>
>
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5175511395924019618
>
>
> Shot with an *ist D, M
Jack.
I quite often try and frame my landscape shots with trees or branches.
This, for me, works very well
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was shot at least 20 yrs ago, but could have been done this AM.
> Greenery and almond blossoms are doing
There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5175511395924019618
Shot with an *ist D, M 1:1.4 50mm
rg2
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thank god no Cormorant shots.
LOL
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got a real chuckle out of this series of pix. If at first you don't
> succeed...
>
> http://www.xpotting.com/feb/feb13/05/tabla10.htm
>
> -p
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
>Thats because you had a birds eye view.
It's true, I'm sure the pictures were im-peck-able ;)
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Evan Hanson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heh, my brother-in-law loves the photos I took at his wedding wit
There looks like a lot of shadow detail any way, for any adjustments.,
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like under exposing things :-)
> http://www.islandlight.ca/index.php?image_id=552
>
> Cheers,
> Francis
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ken Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My head hurts.
>
> Maybe its compressed?
If only
Dave
>
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: more K20D aut
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Ken Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: K20D focus adjustment
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Evan Hanson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh, my brother-in-law loves the photos I took at his wedding with my
> seagull. The real photographers pictures were just passable.
Thats because you had a birds eye view.
Dave
>
> Evan
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:22
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Ken Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice composition, but I prefer my snow white.
Thanks Ken
It looks like i have to stop doing my Paws etc on the ibook. Snow
looks white to moi.:-)
Dave
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
>
> - Origina
Theirs look pretty crappy
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So.. whose were reversed? 8-)
>
> har! I wish I could say mine, so Costco would suck less. Alas,
> theirs were the reversed ones. ;)
>
>
>
>
> rg2
>
> On 3/8/08, mike wilson <[EMAIL
Ok i admit. I had a set of green swede Beatle boots.
Dave
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great stuff. I had three leisure suits. One green, one ivory and one baby
> blue. I also had several floral shirts and a sheer white shirtwith puffy
> sleeves that was open to
A little while ago, Boris asked my opinon on fast 50mm lenses. I don't
think I helped him much by saying there wasn't that much between them. I
certainly can't tell the difference. I like all of the 1.2s for the
bokeh so super sharp results aren't high on my priorities.
The A, cost a little mo
I am now officially curious and confused.
Yes i know thats standard.:-).
I have 4 nikons, the D1 had back focus issues, that Nikon said it di
not have, but would fix if you sent it in.
My other 3 have no problems. I and others have noticed problems with
the K10D and now all of a sudden Pentax is
Thanks Bruce
I'm snowed in tonight, i think i'll play with pictures
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice angle on it. I think B&W might be better for your stated goal.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Saturday, March 8, 2008, 3:17:04 AM, y
I prefer the second one too, though both are very
good.
Is that daylight?
Rick
--- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think my horn has the most "character" of any of
> those instruments
> shown so far.
> Many a cadenza passed through these tubes during my
> school/college
> years.
> So
Good thing you have thin Elvis, he might not have fitted at 50mm,:-)
Noise is more than acceptable.
I'll assume you meant 50-200.??
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I was testing lenses in my basement, Elvis told me he wants a
> K20D. I gue
Well, it asked me very nicely if it could be in a
portrait orientation, just this once, and I said
okay...
Actually, my compositional intention was to emphasize
the valves by using the vertical format.
Thanks for looking and commenting!
Rick
--- Ken Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice im
Thats a great shot Paul.
You call that snow.:-)
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Came out of the coffee shop today, and before I could change the ISO
> on the camera, I spotted these ladies crossing the street.
> Fortunately, one of them spotted
Good angle and lighting.
Good job Jack
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think my horn has the most "character" of any of those instruments
> shown so far.
> Many a cadenza passed through these tubes during my school/college
> years.
> Some years
Came out of the coffee shop today, and before I could change the ISO
on the camera, I spotted these ladies crossing the street.
Fortunately, one of them spotted me as well, and that made the shot.
This is cropped to about 50% of frame. K20D, DA 50-200, 200mm, ISO
1600, f5.6, 1/4000th.
http
Nice image capture, but having the image horizontal with a portrait
orientation seems to clash for me. The subject wants to be in a landscape
orientation
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer"
Subject: Re: "Quickie" Mac screen calibration software which seems to work
>
> Calibrating a monitor with software is like measuring
> a car's speed by licking a finger and sticking it out
> the window.
Well, not quite, but it does take a well t
I think my horn has the most "character" of any of those instruments
shown so far.
Many a cadenza passed through these tubes during my school/college
years.
Some years back it had been displayed on the wall of our family room
'til my wife got tired of dusting it. Was reminded by the recent
instrum
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Battery Charger for K10D
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ken Waller"
> Subject: Re: Battery Charger for K10D
>
>
>> Thanks Bil
Amazing Paul,
He hasn't aged a day! In fact, he looks a bit younger, also shorter
than I remember...
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I was testing lenses in my basement, Elvis told me he wants a
> K20D. I guess I'll have to buy hi
While I was testing lenses in my basement, Elvis told me he wants a
K20D. I guess I'll have to buy him one since he's been paying the
bills for more than thirty years now.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7032306&size=lg
DA50-400 at 50mm. f4@ 1/30th, ISO 1600, slight crop
--
PDML Pen
Hello Jack,
Yeah, it is full frame. I do think I might try a tight crop on the
face as you suggest. Thanks for commenting.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 4:57:35 AM, you wrote:
JD> Bruce, if this is full frame, then no I wouldn't crop. If you have
JD> cropped the right side
>So.. whose were reversed? 8-)
har! I wish I could say mine, so Costco would suck less. Alas,
theirs were the reversed ones. ;)
rg2
On 3/8/08, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2008/03/08 Sat PM 08:54:21 GMT
> > To: "Pentax-D
I noticed front focus on my FA 50/1.4 when I first got the K20D and I
was playing around shooting bottles on my bar at f2. I focused on the
label of my Scotch bottle and it was out of focus, but the closer
water faucet handle was in focus. That was the lens that called for
the most correcti
Thanks Ken. I'm equally amazed. I finally got out a flash today and
shot some low ISO pics of Grace playing. I had also used the flash at
high synch when shooting birds. I'm very pleased with the P-TTL
performance. Looks good so far.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Wonde
>
> From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/03/08 Sat PM 08:54:21 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Costco slide scanning
>
> yes, some of them were from costco and some from my own scanning, and
> I labled them underneath "Costco scan" and "my scan" so that a
> compari
yes, some of them were from costco and some from my own scanning, and
I labled them underneath "Costco scan" and "my scan" so that a
comparison could be made. :)
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/CostcoOrNo?authkey=GjfBMt1vHyM
rg2
On 3/8/08, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > F
Great stuff. I had three leisure suits. One green, one ivory and one baby blue.
I also had several floral shirts and a sheer white shirtwith puffy sleeves that
was open to the navel. A chick magnet! :-)) In the late sixties I had a pair of
bell bottom jeans witth "LOVE" embroidered on the zipper
>
> From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/03/08 Sat PM 02:21:36 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Costco slide scanning
>
> >Whose are back to front?
>
>
> wait, what?
>
> rg2
The link is gone from the post now but your gallery index link appeared to show
a numbe
Heh, my brother-in-law loves the photos I took at his wedding with my
seagull. The real photographers pictures were just passable.
Evan
On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jim Apilado wrote:
> Back before I knew better, I took my Yashicamat camera to a wedding
> of a co-worker. I took pictures at
This was shot at least 20 yrs ago, but could have been done this AM.
Greenery and almond blossoms are doing their thing right now.
The foreground trees, under which I was shooting, have since been
replaced by a housing development. Also, there is now a huge water tank
on the hill where you see the
IMO the K-1 was just only a code name.
They may want or not to reuse a code name as an actual product name.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Penta
Moving along from the flute... this is a view of my
son't old trumpet.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7032000
K10D, DA 16-45, f/22 @ 1/6, ISO 800, RAW via LR and
PE4 (to get a colored splodge out of the background).
Shot under a light box covered with a layer of tissue
paper.
Rick
Well at least they got the small white car our of the water...
eventually...
Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Got a real chuckle out of this series of pix. If at first you don't
> succeed...
>
> http://www.xpotting.com/feb/feb13/05/tabla10.htm
>
> -p
>
>
>
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a les
On Mar 8, 2008, at 13:13, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Got a real chuckle out of this series of pix. If at first you don't
> succeed...
>
> http://www.xpotting.com/feb/feb13/05/tabla10.htm
>
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/crane.asp
(Last photo is faked)
But even without the last photo, it is
Love it.
You get some, er, interesting results if you click on Back to Main
Page, by the way. Not office friendly, but it may involve a certain
angular similarity to the cranes.
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Sorenson
>
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: Battery Charger for K10D
>I don't know Bill.
> You currently sound pretty charged up about it.
> Are you alternating between positive and negative about this mantra?
> Stop resisting an go with the flow!
Now Bob, when have you know
Got a real chuckle out of this series of pix. If at first you don't
succeed...
http://www.xpotting.com/feb/feb13/05/tabla10.htm
-p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
