Hi Scott
Quoting Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey, gang. I have stacks upon stacks of handwritten and typed
pages
that I'd like to digitize. My scanner came with some OCR software,
Omnipage SE, I think, but I've lost the CD. Do any of you use OCR
software and can you recommend
I've wanted to do a trip as supercargo on a freighter for years. I
wonder if it's still even possible.
G
On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:47 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I've always wanted to do a Transatlantic crossing on one of the old
liners (notice, I didn't say cruise and I didn't say cruiseship.
At 02:18 PM 12/03/2008, Boris Liberman wrote:
Derby, it is fashion advice ... Now, the question begs to be asked -
and what? ;-)
Back waxing is my guess.
Cheers,
Dave
Derby Chang wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_03/08_03_fashionadvice/01.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Brilliant. Seriously, I like it a lot. The motion blur of the
foreground figure combined with the static cropped image of the fat
man in the background tells a story. Very good. When I first clicked
it open, my initial reaction was negative, but within a few seconds
the concept registered,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Trying some of my manual lenses with the K20D. I shot this with the
K85/1.8. ISO 1600, f2.8, 1/125th. Love this lens. I use it with a
metal hood from the Super Tak 200/4 on a step up ring. Makes a nice
unit, and of course even that long hood won't vignette on the
A group of local photographers got together last Sunday for
a couple of hours spent in downtown San Jose. Rather to my
surprise I seem to have ended up with a few people shots:
http://www.jfwaf.com/DownTown/
This one:
http://www.jfwaf.com/DownTown/image.php?name=image4
had several
Yep, the smile makes it work. Good grab.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The smile is good. The tone of that entire photo would lean toward dark
and gloomy and that little smile flips the entire mood.
frank theriault
funny how skaters exercise the world over i see the same kind of
attitudes everyday in Paris when I walk across Place de la
Bastille ... the photo is fantastic ! he seems so engrossed in his
activity ... that's exactly IT congrats...
dominique
Le 12 mars 08 à 08:00, John Francis
It is.
Cheers,
Dave
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've wanted to do a trip as supercargo on a freighter for years. I
wonder if it's still even possible.
G
On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:47 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I've always wanted to do a
Timber wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love this
lens? :D
.timber
That's it. You just made my list.
Just kidding. That's a lovely photograph.
--
Scott Loveless
Doug Brewer wrote:
On Mar 8, 2008, at 1:31 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2008/3/8, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
General thoughts? It must be confusing to be a baboon. Brightly
coloured face, brightly coloured arse. It would be very easy to get
the 2 mixed up.
Truly confusing. Especially since it's not a
I like it a lot, for the mood, I believe.
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 23:00 schrieb Struan Donald:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The smile makes it work. To niggle a bit, it would be
nice if three of their four feet hadn't been
amputated.
I'd have been happier if we could see all their feet, too.
;-)
I got one other pic of them, about 1/2 way
On 11/3/08, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I like it. It's great that you're posting more
photos!
Whadya think about cropping out the sapling, so that
the pic is about the two trees and two crosses?
I tried it but the upper branches stray in, and also to me, it looks
like an old man
When did Mark lose his hair?
Christine Aguila wrote:
Scott, nice photos of some nice guys on the list. Mark, you know, you look
a little like Ron Howard in this photo. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks Scott. I should use that lens more. I think I'll get out the
K135/2.5 this weekend.
Paul
On Mar 11, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Trying some of my manual lenses with the K20D. I shot this with the
K85/1.8. ISO 1600, f2.8, 1/125th. Love this lens. I use
Nice pics. Many of our American Robins don't migrate. We just see
more of them in the spring when there are earthworms for them to
feast on.
Paul
On Mar 11, 2008, at 11:13 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
A harbinger of spring. I went for a walk in Hammonasset state park
hoping that a few of the
Mike: I thought the translation/writing/transcription (?) read awkward as
well. Still, I did think the piece was interesting. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:57 AM
Excellent shot. I would pump up the midrange brightness a bit.
Somewhat dark on my calibrated monitor.
Pauul
On Mar 12, 2008, at 3:00 AM, John Francis wrote:
A group of local photographers got together last Sunday for
a couple of hours spent in downtown San Jose. Rather to my
surprise I
I like it as presented. However, I might clone out that tombstone
that intersects the tree. But Frank would not:-).
Paul
On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:34 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 11/3/08, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I like it. It's great that you're posting more
photos!
Whadya think about
Paul's right, not just this one, they'd all benefit from just a tiny mid
tone enhancement.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Excellent shot. I would pump up the midrange brightness a bit.
Somewhat dark on my calibrated monitor.
Pauul
On Mar 12, 2008, at 3:00 AM, John Francis wrote:
A group of
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/10 Mon PM 04:46:13 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Technique
Trying something different.
Would have been more impressive if it had appeared two days _before_ you posted
it, instead of two days after.
I plan to be there with PDML West.
CW
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:42 AM
Subject: GFM 2008
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
Two pesos, actually. Two lamp pictures. Both with the K20D and the DA
50-200. Both are at ISO 320. The first is at 160mm focal length, f5.6
at 1/500th. The second is at 138mm focal length, f13 @ a/160th.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7047512
My guesses in-line below.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 3:46 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: PESO - Technique
Trying something different. Have a look at this:
Except that, when you get your K20D (admit it, it's
almost inevitable!) the file size will go up, and then
you'll have only 2-3 years' capacity.
Murphy's and Moore's Laws never sleep.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 500G capacity is holding about 4 years work at
I like the top one; interesting lamp and nice use of
DOF. I'll bet you could get a great pic of it at
dusk.
The background on the bottom pic is distracting and
provokes head-scratching. What is it?
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two pesos, actually. Two lamp pictures. Both
That's a good idea, Boris. I have a couple of other
trumpet pix to post, and then I may do that.
Rick
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick, you obviously should post the whole series on
one neat web page. I
saw your previous images, and now this one - they
obviously fit in the
for an example, look at my completed auction item photos:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=230231132247
This isnt spam, the auction is already over.
These item photos were all taken with the
SMC-A 24-50, istDS @ISO200, built in flash,
and at 4MP jpeg setting. Manual exposures
Peter,
Nothing really grabs my attention in this pic. Maybe
some severe cropping would help, or a higher-contrast
rendering.
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I didn't. I was a bit heavy handed on the
highlight contrast
in RSE. New version is in the same location.
Thanks Rick. The background on the second pic is the copper canopies above the
lamps.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like the top one; interesting lamp and nice use of
DOF. I'll bet you could get a great pic of it at
dusk.
Crisp renderings of pleasing shapes.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two pesos, actually. Two lamp pictures. Both with the K20D and the DA
50-200. Both are at ISO 320. The first is at 160mm focal length, f5.6
at 1/500th. The second is at 138mm focal length, f13 @
Or if I get very busy and my annual file accretion doubles... etc.
That would be the best reason to require more storage space! Right now
I have no particular need or desire to buy any more camera
equipment ... what I've got is doing very good work.
Godfrey
On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:22 AM,
I think one of the guys that was on the Saturday SF Zoo outing went to
the SJ Sunday outing, John. He mentioned it to us but I already had
other plans.
http://www.jfwaf.com/DownTown/
http://www.jfwaf.com/DownTown/image.php?name=image4
Nice bunch of photos. I like the skater shot too,
Pretty much my feeling accept 'more contrast' was a particular problem
with the first version.
Jack
--- Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Nothing really grabs my attention in this pic. Maybe
some severe cropping would help, or a higher-contrast
rendering.
Rick
--- P. J.
Thanks, Tim.
I really like the DA 40, too. Today I picked up a DA* 50-135 and will
see how far that and the DA 40 will get me. By the time I know if I
really need a wide angle I'll hopefully also know how the K200D
performs at higher ISO settings, so then I can decide wether the extra
Paul,
Nice pictures. I wish the iron hanger above the lamp on the first
picture was more separated from the background. The dark iron seems
to blend in to the background on the right. I really like the
geometry in the second photo. I suppose the very top of that first
lamp was not in a good
On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:22, Rick Womer wrote:
Except that, when you get your K20D (admit it, it's
almost inevitable!) the file size will go up, and then
you'll have only 2-3 years' capacity.
Don't know if you've been paying much attention to which gear
Godfrey's been using for most of his
Godfrey,
Your camera equipment is doing very good work indeed!
Can your pots and pans cook too? :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now I have no particular need or desire to buy any more camera
equipment ... what I've got is
On 3/9/08, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Pentax Scene Modes vs. Raw
As far as I'm aware, only Canon does the utterly crippled scene modes
(No RAW, no ISO selection, etc).
My Canon using buddy found some sort of
REGARDING THE DIFFRACTION PROBLEMS AT SMALL FSTOPS : From what I have
read and found via experience to be pretty true, is that diffraction
limit of a good designed lens is roughtly 1600/f-stop. this means
that at F-16 with a really good lens, you can still resolve up to
approx 100 lines/mm which
Adam,
thank's for the explanation. Looks like I missunderstood something
there. Obviously, there are a lot of new things to learn after so many
years. ;-)
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 18:08 schrieb Adam Maas:
No, there's a fair difference between those two lenses. The 28 would
perform on
Thanks Bob. You're right the top of the lamp in the second pic was obscured by
a bracket, so I cropped accordingly. I can fix that separation of the bracket
on the first pic. Good suggestion. In fact, I may reshoot it at dusk with the
light switched on. It won't require much effort: it's on my
Hi!
It seems that AF of my K10D is slowly deteriorating. It started with my
new FA 43/1.9 Ltd that would not focus sometimes. That is, the lens
would be in focus, but electronics would not confirm - lost shot.
Today I went to the Jerusalem zoo with Galia's class. I took Tamron
28-75/2.8 -
No, but sometimes I feel like training them ... ;-)
G
On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Your camera equipment is doing very good work indeed!
Can your pots and pans cook too? :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
It seems that AF of my K10D is slowly deteriorating. It started with my
new FA 43/1.9 Ltd that would not focus sometimes. That is, the lens
would be in focus, but electronics would not confirm - lost shot.
To do a *full* system reset on the camera, pull the battery and let it
sit for two-three days. You'll know it has fully reset if when you fit
a battery and turn it on it comes up asking for you to set the date.
Other possibles: dirty AF sensors or a poor electrical connection
between lens
The second image really does it for me. Well done !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Lamps
Two pesos, actually. Two lamp pictures. Both with the K20D and the DA
50-200. Both are at ISO 320. The
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
To do a *full* system reset on the camera, pull the battery and let it
sit for two-three days. You'll know it has fully reset if when you fit
a battery and turn it on it comes up asking for you to set the date.
Other possibles: dirty AF sensors or a poor
Thanks Ken. I should put it in my Woodward folder. It's the clothing store on
the corner of Woodward and Merrill.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The second image really does it for me. Well done !
Kenneth Waller
Before taking the camera in for repair, I would first test under controlled
conditions. If you're using the multipoint autofocus a lot of different things
can throw it off, particularly monochromatic scenes. Center point is good so
long as you have somthing contrasty to point at. Test with
On Mar 12, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
To do a *full* system reset on the camera, pull the battery and let
it
sit for two-three days. You'll know it has fully reset if when you
fit
a battery and turn it on it comes up asking for you to set the date.
Godfrey, in a nutshell you're telling me, that my K10D is perfectly
normal and that except, may be cleaning (last cleaned by local service
almost a year ago), it requires no special attention at all.
That's what I've been thinking but this is the very first time since
2002 (when I bought my
I am disappointed that I left the Bay area before BART was
operational. Never have been back to try it out.
The Metro in DC was nice to ride when I was there, especially to go in
to the museums, etc.
Great shot.
Walt
On 3/11/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, I rode BART
Hello everyone. This is my second post. I am not used to it, so excuse
my mistake if there is some. This one is about a lovely hummingbird
caught with a Pentax K10D, 100 mm macro lens, at the balcony with red
flowers just in front of country cottage, Lake Vaudray, Quebec,
Canada. I intend
I must be living in the past. I sent this out days ago and it just
arrived at my inbox.
P. J. Alling wrote:
Click the larger button on the navigation bar, (below the picture).
Cotty wrote:
On 9/3/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Unless they are visibly crudded up, I'd just polish them gently with a
microfiber cloth at first.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, in a nutshell you're telling me, that my K10D is perfectly
normal and that except, may be cleaning (last cleaned by local service
almost a year ago), it requires
Nice exposure. While the wing is blurred as is more or less expected
the bird itself looks a little over sharpened, like you were trying to
over come subject movement with too much USM. I think it would look
better if thats the case if you had let the bird be a little soft from
it's
Yes, same thought here. Maybe a little drop of denatured alcohol on
the cloth.
It's certainly possible that it does need some sort of service. But
likely it is simply either just a little dirty or you are noticing
these quirks more.
I don't abuse my camera equipment, but I don't treat it
There was some discussion of this nautical term a while back. I knew I
had taken a photo of an interesting looking bollard, nothing special,
more a record shot than anything else, but pretty much a classic
bollard. So here it is.
Sorry to screw up anyones sorting system.
P. J. Alling wrote:
There was some discussion of this nautical term a while back. I knew I
had taken a photo of an interesting looking bollard, nothing special,
more a record shot than anything else, but pretty much a classic
bollard. So here it
BH is listing them for $1299.95 and 999.95 respectively. Hard to resist at
those prices. I expect I'll need the 300/4 early on, as a 300 prime has long
been a gap in my lens lineup. Neither is in stock as of yet.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I can resist at those prices.
Jim A.
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BH is listing them for $1299.95 and 999.95 respectively. Hard to
resist at those prices. I expect I'll need the 300/4 early on, as a
300 prime has long been a gap in my lens lineup. Neither is in
On Mar 9, 2008, at 11:48 AM, William Robb wrote:
...It seems to me that using a scene specific shooting mode, and
then outputting to raw
is somehow defeating the purpose of the scene modes. ...
I've never used them.
To me, the notion of scene modes ought to be as progam pre-sets for
Compared to what the equivalent FA lenses sell for on ebay they're a
just a bargain.
However I think I'm happy enough with the A*300 f4.0, (if only it
focused just a little closer).
Jim Apilado wrote:
I can resist at those prices.
Jim A.
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, Adam. I did notice it, but it never occured to me, that this was
something special, which it actually is, I guess :-)
Regards
jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Adam Maas
Sendt: 12. marts 2008 02:25
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
The prices are good. Whether I need them or not is all that is in
question ... and at present, I can't say that I need such long lenses
at all.
G
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BH is listing them for $1299.95 and 999.95 respectively. Hard to
resist at those
I do, Peter. But I guess I only a couple of lenses without an aperture ring.
I own loads of old Pentax lenses, which I really love a lot :-)
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af P.
J. Alling
Sendt: 12. marts 2008 03:59
Til:
Cool. I poked around a little bit and found several shipping lines
offering supercargo transport fares. Not cheap, but could be an
interesting way to travel and gain some photo opportunities.
Godfrey
On Mar 12, 2008, at 1:12 AM, David Savage wrote:
It is.
Cheers,
Dave
On Wed, Mar 12,
Thanks, Jim - I'm embarased to say I didn't know :-)
Regards
Jens
(PS Sorry guys about the name confusion - I use my girlfriends (Susan) email
until we move into our now home sometime in April).
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jim
King
:-)
Thanks, P.J.
Jostein
2008/3/12, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was some discussion of this nautical term a while back. I knew I
had taken a photo of an interesting looking bollard, nothing special,
more a record shot than anything else, but pretty much a classic
bollard. So
If I had the A*300/4, I would probably be content as well. But I haven't had a
300 since I sold my SMC Tak 300/4 a few years back. And since I shoot both cars
and nature, I'd like a lens in that focal length. Sometimes my A 400/5.6 is
just too long. That extra stop is great to have as well. If
I hav used the smc DA* 50-135mm/2,8 ED [IF] SDM on a single occation. It
seems to be an excellent lens for portratis and such. It would be a nice
supplement for the 40 mm.
Regards
jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Marcus A. Hofmann
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
I love SR. This is hand held, 16mm, 1/8s, 1:2.8 and ISO400.
Comments are welcome.
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
P. J. Alling wrote:
There was some discussion of this nautical term a while back. I knew I
had taken a photo of an interesting looking bollard, nothing special,
more a record shot than anything else, but pretty much a classic
bollard. So here it is.
I ordered one today. I have a wedding coming up, and I struggle with the DA
50-200 indoors. Just too slow. It's fine for outdoor ceremonies, but low light
work is asking too much of it. Even with the expanded low-light capabilit of
the K20D I feel it's too much of a compromise. I got away with
and very nice bollards they are too.
Actually, *extremely* nice bollards. They have the authentic 'used', rusty
look. Just a pity about the green hose - it sort of spoils the mood.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
Wow! Great shot. I love it. Wouldn't change a thing.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
I love SR. This is hand held, 16mm, 1/8s, 1:2.8 and ISO400.
Comments are welcome.
I thought so too when I first took the shot. However on reflection I
find it adds a bit of modernity, so this isn't actually an attempt to
record a bygone era, but an attempt to record the present.
Brian Walters wrote:
and very nice bollards they are too.
Actually, *extremely* nice
Believe I'd prefer it without the water hose. I very much like every
thing else.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to screw up anyones sorting system.
P. J. Alling wrote:
There was some discussion of this nautical term a while back. I
knew I
had taken a photo of an
Have I mentioned that I hate you?
DagT wrote:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
I love SR. This is hand held, 16mm, 1/8s, 1:2.8 and ISO400.
Comments are welcome.
DagT
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry Pournelle
--
Paul, 99% of the times it works correctly. I mean, it works no different
as it used to work before. It is just that these seemingly malfunctions
appear more often and they become more and more annoying.
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before taking the camera in for repair, I would first test
I didn't have much choice, it was there and cloning it out was more
work, (and a bigger alteration to the story), than I was willing to
continence.
Jack Davis wrote:
Believe I'd prefer it without the water hose. I very much like every
thing else.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* at 11/03 18:24 -0600 William Robb said:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so cropped square to hide the originally
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One from a walk today.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic47.html
R-D1 + 28mm Ultron 2.8
handheld ISO400 1/15th at f8
PS CS with Power Retouche mono conv.
Comments and corpses welcome.
Beautiful
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love this
lens? :D
Beautiful!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the list. A nice pic and a good start.
You could straighten the horizon a little more with a bit of
clockwise rotation. I realize the path the girl is on is slightly
uphill, but the horizon isn't quite
Thanks!
DagT
Den 12. mars. 2008 kl. 22.04 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wow! Great shot. I love it. Wouldn't change a thing.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
I love SR. This is
It´s been a while so I don´t remember, but thanks anyway .-)
DagT
Den 12. mars. 2008 kl. 23.15 skrev P. J. Alling:
Have I mentioned that I hate you?
DagT wrote:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
I love SR. This is hand held, 16mm, 1/8s, 1:2.8 and ISO400.
* at 11/03 22:01 -0400 Paul Stenquist said:
Welcome to the list. A nice pic and a good start.
Thanks
You could straighten the horizon a little more with a bit of
clockwise rotation. I realize the path the girl is on is slightly
uphill, but the horizon isn't quite aligned. I'd also burn
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have I mentioned that I hate you?
I'm quite certain we've hated him for a long time.
cheers,
frank
ps: great shot, Dag. I hate you, too.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and very nice bollards they are too.
Actually, *extremely* nice bollards. They have the authentic 'used', rusty
look. Just a pity about the green hose - it sort of spoils the mood.
I still think it's a green
On 3/12/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Scott. I should use that lens more. I think I'll get out the
K135/2.5 this weekend.
I love the K135 2.5.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Wow. Hard to believe that's moonlight! Nice pic!
Rick
--- DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
I love SR. This is hand held, 16mm, 1/8s, 1:2.8 and
ISO400.
Comments are welcome.
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Den 12. mars. 2008 kl. 23.10 skrev frank theriault:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have I mentioned that I hate you?
I'm quite certain we've hated him for a long time.
Oh well, so I guess I´m doing some good, somewhere...
ps: great shot, Dag. I
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Imperfect tools, imperfect perceptions... but by and large all the kit
I have works well enough that I'm the weak link in the system.
You know the word.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe I'd prefer it without the water hose. I very much like every
thing else.
Jack
Looks like braided nylon rope to me...
I like the pic a lot, BTW. Very nautical. I likes nautical.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Good to see they're tied down so as not to escape.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bollards
There was some discussion of this nautical term a while back. I knew I
had taken a photo of an interesting
Very nice capture.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:42 PM
Subject: PESO - winter moon
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011
Thanks Jack.
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crisp renderings of pleasing shapes.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two pesos, actually. Two lamp pictures. Both with the K20D and the DA
50-200. Both are at ISO
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
