knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
It certainly rubs me the wrong way. I just don't know what she's up
to (other than to make money - not that there's anything wrong with
that).
It's late and I'm not so articulate just now. Perhaps I'll sleep on
it and come up with a pithier response tomorrow.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Supposedly K mount and a K-5 quality sensor:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/hot-pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-coming-soon/
More...
Interesting and fascinating. I love the tone and the composition.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA70mm, 1/250s, f/11, ISO100.
Black with yellow leather? The Bumblebee model? I'm in! ;-)
It looks like they leaned toward functionality. Now the problem might
be the other side, i.e., if it's too big not to just buy the DSLR.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19,
On 19/1/12, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Red Rocket is what we call our streetcars. I think the name started
off as being somewhat derisive, but it stuck and is now used with
great affection. Here's one under the Queen/Dufferin underpass:
On 1/19/2012 23:38, Kenneth Waller wrote:
What's next? Will she produce BW images from someones color prints?
Seems wrong to me. she should go out and produce some original work of her own !
I think I'm in this camp too... Remember the film colorization mess a
few years back??
I think
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
I found it hard to believe. so what is going on here? I think
this guy used a projector to project a photo he took (the first
one I might find
At least it was his own photograph that he painted. This is
interesting because photography, before they discovered silver and
hypo, was simply taking a camera obscura and using it as a tracing
tool.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
So on the Scrabble
This shot *really* works for me, Frank. I like how much lines dominate
this scene, the motion blur, and the way the blurs and shake make for
a softness that neatly abstractifies [*] this image.
The only suggestion I'd make would be to burn, perhaps blur or
otherwise reduce the contrast of the
Hmmm - a techie version of paint by numbers?
-p
On 1/20/2012 7:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
I found it hard to believe. so what is going on here?
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's doing.
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: So wrong
On 1/19/2012 23:38, Kenneth Waller wrote:
What's next? Will she produce BW images from someones color prints?
Seems wrong to me. she
Like the red color the pedestrian and the two bars across the top of
frame. Everything says color in motion.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Red Rocket is what we call our streetcars. ?I think the name started
off as being somewhat derisive, but
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
I doubt it. I would assume either she has permission or the copyrights have
expired. She's doing it very publicly. And very well IMO. Quite Obviously, a
lot
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Hmmm - a techie version of paint by numbers?
-p
My, the list is judgmental today.
Painting with a projector and a photograph is nothing like painting by numbers.
More accurately, it could be considered a contemporary version of the camera
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
What say you guys?
I can't really get into it, either. I wrote a bit when I first learned
of his work:
Great shot. Good colours and excellent motion to this one.
Dave
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:49 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Red Rocket is what we call our streetcars. I think the name started
off as being somewhat derisive, but it stuck and is now used with
great
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/hot-pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-coming-soon/
More...
http://m.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-revealed-in-february--1056080
--
Bong Manayon
http://bong.manayon.net
If true, does anyone else have a bit of a
I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
Seriously a lot of the same arguments against coloring photos could be made
against photos as art, rather than painting.
Did Dylan get upset when the Byrds or Hendrix did better versions of his songs?
If someone colorized my van when it was
I can see a few reasons.
The kx is right on the verge of pocketability, the k5 is slightly too large. A
little smaller and a better shape could make a big difference.
Face recognition on focus
It could be cheaper to build
Manual focus in low light
The k5 doesn't have a lot of gaps in its
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is required to achieve
the
results she's accomplished.
Nope. It's very easy to do
Tom C wrote:
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Bong Manayon
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Supposedly K mount and a K-5 quality sensor:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/hot-pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-coming-soon/
More...
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me to sell my gear and
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is required to achieve
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
On Jan 20, 2012, at 07:55 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
I doubt it. I would assume either she has permission or the copyrights have
expired. She's doing it
It makes some sense if the new EVIL body is a smaller, lighter body
with K5 innards and this is accompanied by the release of a new DSLR.
The new line has a lower end model which is mirrorless and the
higher spec model which is a DSLR. Effectively, this new mirrorless
model is replacing the K-r
No one seems to know if it has a built in EVF, aside from the LCD.
From what I've seem with other companies, not mentioning the EVF means
that it's not built in and is only an add-on if it exists at all.
OTOH, who knows the nature of this rumor? I always wonder if the
company floats these rumors
What Paul said.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: New Pentax EVIL rumor, with specs
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C
On 20/1/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can live without the mirror, but without a viewfinder it's no use to me.
I never thought I'd say this but I agree with John Sessoms.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On 20/1/12, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
I never thought I'd say this but I agree with John Sessoms.
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 20/1/12, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
My, the list is judgmental today.
MARK.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
If Mark included every I never thought I'd agree with ... quote there
wouldn't be room in the list for anything else.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 20/1/12, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
I never thought I'd say this but I agree with John Sessoms.
Mark.
--
I find Bruce's comment bothersome. (Sorry Bruce.) Pentax would never
abandon the SLR format completely, but I'm not so sure about Ricoh. I
hope they would at least run both for a while before completely
converting to mirrorless.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
I find Bruce's comment bothersome. (Sorry Bruce.) Pentax would never
abandon the SLR format completely, but I'm not so sure about Ricoh. I
hope they would at least run both for a while before completely
converting to mirrorless.
The assumption seems absurd, even for Ricoh.
What seems more a
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
It makes some sense if the new EVIL body is a smaller, lighter body
with K5 innards and this is accompanied by the release of a new DSLR.
The new line has a lower end model which is mirrorless and the
higher spec model which is a DSLR.
I'm hoping for this. I'd really like to see Pentax try a plastic
version of what Fuji just released (the X Pro 1) with a built in EVF.
I think Fuji is going after the M9, but I don't' think Pentax has the
mojo for that.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is required to achieve
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what
The very nature of performing arts means that works are often interpreted by
someone other than the writer/composer. The performers are artists in their own
rights. Works are interpreted and presented from the unique perspective of the
performer(s).
The visual arts are such that a finished
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:08 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
The very nature of performing arts means that works are often interpreted by
someone other than the writer/composer. The performers are artists in their
own rights. Works are interpreted and presented from the unique perspective
From: Larry Colen, l...@red4est.com (From Droid) l...@red4est.com
I can see a few reasons.
The kx is right on the verge of pocketability, the k5 is slightly too large.
A little smaller and a better shape could make a big difference.
Face recognition on focus
It could be cheaper to build
If there is no mirror, it's pretty hard to have an optical viewfinder.
Unless you are talking about it being a rangefinder (which I don't
see Pentax doing), without a mirror, it's going to be an EVF.
I doubt that Pentax has anything to do with these rumors. People love
to speculate.
On Fri,
Tom C wrote:
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me to sell my gear and
go to Nikon.
Paul
I never thought I'd agree with
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
My biggest issue with this is that shelterisland isn't a real word!
-Charles
--
Charles
on 2012-01-20 12:45 Steven Desjardins wrote
I find Bruce's comment bothersome. (Sorry Bruce.) Pentax would never
abandon the SLR format completely, but I'm not so sure about Ricoh. I
hope they would at least run both for a while before completely
converting to mirrorless.
in ten years or
on 2012-01-20 12:53 Collin Brendemuehl wrote
*Make the camera a real computing device* and not just a PC peripheral. That's
my plan. Why won't they listen to me?
that age is upon us, just not in the DSLR realm yet
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
she replaced all the various grays with color elements of different tonal
values.
Look at the color detail she created in the Times Square buildings.
Not easy by any stretch of the imagination.
Layers. Displacement masks. Blend modes.
That should be displacement *maps*,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54:03AM -0700, Tom C wrote:
If true, does anyone else have a bit of a problem understanding this strategy?
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5? And likely without
the
Somehow missed this thread, but just read the interview.
This quote is interesting to me:
If you look purely at what we're hearing from customers, there's a
lot of demand for longer focal lengths. Something like 300mm f/2.8,
something like that. As far as what's on the road map, it's not
Where will all this end?
The next thing you know people will be calling sculptures of Brillo
Boxes and screen prints of Campbell's Tomato Soup cans art!
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
Black white cats painted ginger, perhaps.
Seriously a lot of the same arguments against coloring photos could be
made against photos as art, rather than painting.
Did Dylan get upset when the Byrds or Hendrix did better versions of
his
On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
What say you guys?
I can't really get into it, either. I wrote a bit when I first
Those earlier pics from the work area with the vertical interference line ...
Looking @ the images again ...
the sensor apparently has a number of frozen/hot (red/green) pixels.
Well, we took back the K7 and got a new Kr.
Today I took it out to the same area.
No pixel issues. No vertical
I missed it too the first time around, thanks for the heads up. I had to
search for the link. If anyone else missed it
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2012/01/12/imaging-resource-interviewjohn-carlson-pentax
On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Somehow missed this thread,
on 2012-01-20 06:40 Ann Sanfedele wrote
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
hyperrealism is an established movement in painting; the artists do usually
work from photos, but i don't
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-
steve-mills/
What say you guys?
I can't really get into it, either. I wrote a bit when I first learned
of his work:
http://scotchtape.ductwhisky.com/2011/06/on-photorealism.html
all modern art is an ongoing
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not wrong or
immoral.
Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same thing
right?
ann:-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-
steve-mills/
I found it hard to believe. so what is going on here? I think
this guy used a projector to project a photo he took (the first
one I might
On 1/20/2012 15:36, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
My biggest issue with this is that shelterisland
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not
wrong or immoral.
Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same thing
right?
ann:-)
Immoral is where the Royal Family go for Scottish holidays. Wrong
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not wrong or
immoral.
Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same thing
right?
I see the smiley, but
on 2012-01-20 13:36 Charles Robinson wrote
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
My biggest issue with this is that shelterisland
Interesting. I like what he said about long, fast glass for the APS-C cameras.
And based on that interview, it certainly doesn't sound like DSLRs are going
away.
Paul
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I missed it too the first time around, thanks for the heads up. I had to
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Darren Addy
I'm all for competition (and a lower priced product) but some of the
COMMENTS on this page give me reason to pause...
On 1/20/2012 15:52, Bob W wrote:
I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
Black white cats painted ginger, perhaps.
ohoh, you've been looking at graphic arts gallery.
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Graphic-Design/Anns-design-work/3346046_7HfWvF/1/1158685402_HS4MX/Medium
But it is
MARK!
cheers,
frank, just kidding, but I couldn't resist.
:-)
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Sent: January 20, 2012 1/20/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New Pentax EVIL rumor, with specs
If Mark included every I never thought I'd agree
Too funny, Bob. Thanks! I'm at a meeting waiting for it to start, so thanks
for the giggle. Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not
wrong
Listed the flash on ebay
http://www.ebay.com/itm/190629059884?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
ebay was annoying me trying to get me to add item specifics for this
but their item specific thingy said this was for a CANON... however, it
stayed up.
still have sundry filters
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:52, Bob W wrote:
I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
Black white cats painted ginger, perhaps.
ohoh, you've been looking at graphic arts gallery.
On 1/20/2012 16:25, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not wrong or
immoral.
Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same
I guess I agree with Paul, but I have to say it would break my heart to see the
K5 to go away with no upgrade to follow. I'd probably use my Pentax gear until
I couldn't any more, then switch. Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I have Corel to thank for becoming a huge fan of Framemaker.
My wife and I were fully invested Ventura Publisher users until not
too long after Corel bought it. They screwed it into the ground. We
settled on Framemaker after that and still use it to this day. I'm
very unhappy that Adobe
Let's hope for this one:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/i-hope-marc-newson-can-make-a-better-pentax-k-design-than-that-one/
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
I guess I agree with Paul, but I have to say it would break my heart to see
the K5 to go
If you want words for Scrabble play, use Dave's posts as a reference! :-)
There is also apiece I havent read yet
Or your own… :-)
On Jan 20, 2012, at 13:21 , Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:36, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the
The same source reported, on March 30 2011, that the Pentax K-mount APS-C
mirrorless would be released in the summer of 2011.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Let's hope for this one:
Like she said.
I have a mirrorless camera - the PEN EP-L2. Like most compact cameras, it is
designed to be held at arms length in front of you while you try to obtain
sharp focus on an LCD screen made unreadable by glare. And/or by presbyopia. It
has a clunky add-on EVF which works reasonable
On 1/20/2012 18:04, Joseph McAllister wrote:
If you want words for Scrabble play, use Dave's posts as a reference! :-)
There is also apiece I havent read yet
Or your own… :-)
yeahyeahyeah :-)
ann
On Jan 20, 2012, at 13:21 , Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:36, Charles
I suspect Paul knows this, but in case other people don't...
A few years ago, a physicist Charles Falco in collaboration
with David Hockney (artist and art historian), has demonstrated
that a lot of renaissance artists were using lenses and mirrors
to project images - so that they can paint
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Igor Roshchin
I suspect Paul knows this, but in case other people don't...
A few years ago, a physicist Charles Falco in collaboration
with David Hockney (artist and art historian), has demonstrated
that a lot of
Well that's depressing.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's hope for this one:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/i-hope-marc-newson-can-make-a-better-pentax-k-design-than-that-one/
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Christine Aguila
Hi all,
just a short one to let you know that I'm still alive.
I have just ordered a K-r. Not for myself but for MIchael who had been
using my K10D since I got the K-7. Unfortunately the K10D has developed
an electronics problem and after the OK button stopped working months
ago (Pentax quoted
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Hi all,
just a short one to let you know that I'm still alive.
I have just ordered a K-r. Not for myself but for MIchael who had been
using my K10D since I got the K-7.
Very cool. The K-r is really a sweet little camera.
Who is
Thanks. I missed it too. Cheers , Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I missed it too the first time around, thanks for the heads up. I had to
search for the link. If anyone else missed it
You have to do better than that, Christine. To which depressing thing
are you referring? ;-)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Well that's depressing.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's hope for this
Good to hear, but there's nothing like a good despair to clear the nasal
passages:-). Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Interesting. I like what he said about long, fast glass for the APS-C
cameras. And based on that interview,
A few lines from one of my fave movies, Burn After Reading, come to
mind here ...
CIA Superior: What did we learn, Palmer?
CIA Officer: I don't know, sir.
CIA Superior: I don't fuckin' know either. I guess we learned not to do it again
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Christine Aguila
Well, I think that's a butt ugly camera. Cheers, Christine :-)
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
You have to do better than that, Christine. To which depressing thing
are you referring? ;-)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Christine Aguila
I have 3 sticks of 2 gigabyte memory which was displaced when I upgraded
my PC's ram last weekend.
They are labelled Kingston KVR1333D3E9S/2G - 6 gigs total of matched
RAM. Matched as in bought together - same production run etc. 9 chips on
each stick.
They work fine. It does not look like
From: Paul Stenquist
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me
From: Steven Desjardins
It makes some sense if the new EVIL body is a smaller, lighter body
with K5 innards and this is accompanied by the release of a new DSLR.
The new line has a lower end model which is mirrorless and the
higher spec model which is a DSLR. Effectively, this new mirrorless
The specs look like it's going to be one of those hold it out at arms
length squint at the little TV screen on the back cameras.
From: David Parsons
If there is no mirror, it's pretty hard to have an optical viewfinder.
Unless you are talking about it being a rangefinder (which I don't
see
From: Darren Addy
Somehow missed this thread, but just read the interview.
Haven't seen it in the digests prior to your reply.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
I've been on this list for about 11 or 12 years now and I've seen variations of
this thread more times than I can count. They all start with a rumour. Then we
wail and gnash our teeth:
Pentax is abandoning the enthusiast market!
I'll have to sell or get rid of my valueless Pentax gear and buy
On 2012-01-20 22:22, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been on this list for about 11 or 12 years now and I've seen variations of
this thread more times than I can count. They all start with a rumour. Then we
wail and gnash our teeth:
If nothing else, a couple of years of mandatory
Heh, that's why I respond to any rumor with: I'll believe it when I see it.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org wrote:
On 2012-01-20 22:22, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been on this list for about 11 or 12 years now and I've seen
variations of this
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Well, I think that's a butt ugly camera. Cheers, Christine :-)
Naw.
Now THIS is a butt ugly camera:
http://www.pacificrimcamera.com/pp/omega120/omega120.htm
Obligatory Pentax content: One man's opinion -
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
