Looks lovely, spend the money on restoration not lawyers.
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 22/12/16 4:57 pm, David Mann wrote:
We went to the cheesemongers this morning but the shop was super busy so it
wasn't a good idea for us to bring the baby's stroller in. While my wife
We went to the cheesemongers this morning but the shop was super busy so it
wasn't a good idea for us to bring the baby's stroller in. While my wife
queued for cheese I took my darling daughter for a walk and ended up in
Cathedral Square.
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1033/#peso
I shot
https://flic.kr/p/PSQqcA
K1 with Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art
--
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
and again :-)
ann
On 12/21/2016 1:02 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Many happy returns, Mister J :-).
All the way to 120 and beyond!
Boris
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hope you have a great day. Buy yourself a few lenses!
Paul via phone
--
For me, it's the same photograph.
On 12/21/2016 9:40 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
How about an all time favorite photograph rather than one's best? Not
the same of course. The first is easy for me; the latter would be
difficult.
Paul via phone
On Dec 21, 2016, at 9:18 PM, John
I like it. I'm 67.
On 12/21/2016 7:22 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
I say lets vote on it. Like or dislike but each vote must be
accompanied by the voter's age.
I like it...66
On 12/21/2016 1:28 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
Couldn’t disagree more.
m
On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:45 PM, Ken Waller
Excellent capture, Jack. Which one of these do you think it is?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_eagle
I see our Fish Eagle & your Bald Eagle are in there too.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 11:59 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Peso-Sac. Eagle
Well, there's still Snap-On Tools
On 12/21/2016 2:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
The calendars are instantly collectible works.
By who? I've never seen them any place but in garages.
I don't think I've ever seen a Pirelli calendar in the flesh. Over the
years I've seen
Do they sell the calendars? I thought they were a promotional give-away
item?
On 12/21/2016 1:23 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
You have to ask yourself what are they trying to do Promote their
tires, sell calendars or cater to older women.
The photos are obviously well done but I bet they don't
I solved that problem by printing on Epson's best paper almost all the time
(premium luster).
But I would use photo black all the time.
Paul via phone
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:01 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> If you don't want to keep going back and forth between photo
On 12/21/2016 7:35 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
Here is another impressive young woman.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BMcbCnZDntQ/?taken-by=maegenwellsguitars
kind of her story in a nutshell. Would love one of her creations.
Beautiful photography on her website. www.maegenwellsguitars.com
On
If you don't want to keep going back and forth between photo black and
matte black on the R2400 (or the like) is it less harmful to print
something on matte paper with the photo black cartridge in or glossy
paper with the matte black in?
The r2400 knows which and doesn't offer a paper setting
I have about 100 photos I'd say that I'm really quite pleased with
(that sounds rude, but I have taken well over 200,000 photos) I could
no more pic ONE favorite photo of mine than I could pick one favorite
food or one favorite filmor one favorite place or one favorite book or
even one
You could even crop it more -- s sharp!
ann
On 12/21/2016 4:59 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
This AM at the Sac. Ntl. Preserve.
45% of the frame.
At, maybe, 100yds?
150-450 hand held.
Chilly, fairly stiff breeze.
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1141
--
PDML
ditto
ann
On 12/19/2016 4:10 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
That's a real beauty, Ken.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Taken late August on a dewey morning in Seney National Wildlife Refuge in
the Upper Peninsula of Michigan with a K-3 and a 200mm f4.0 ED
How about an all time favorite photograph rather than one's best? Not the same
of course. The first is easy for me; the latter would be difficult.
Paul via phone
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 9:18 PM, John wrote:
>
>> On 12/21/2016 12:36 AM, David Mann wrote:
>>> On Dec 21,
On 12/21/2016 12:36 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
How about submitting one image that the photog feels is the very, very best of
their work.
I'd never be able to decide. And I'd probably find it was taken with another
brand.
Thanks, Dan!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Very nice!
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
"Sac" ls an abbreviation of Sacramento.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016, at 08:59 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>> This AM at the Sac. Ntl. Preserve.
>> 45% of the frame.
>> At, maybe, 100yds?
>>
>>
Thanks, Brian!
I cropped that based on the much touted "rule of thirds." A rule often
demanded by those seemingly offended by an image not adhering
to such.
I basically agree with you.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
>>
On 12/20/2016 5:51 AM, Carlos R wrote:
Very sorry to hear that, Bill. Nice dog and nice photo too.
Thanks Carlos.
Carlos
2016-12-18 17:39 GMT+01:00 Bill :
Five weeks ago, my Rottie was diagnosed with lymphoma. We had him put to
sleep last Tuesday.
This was
On 12/21/2016 9:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
It's coffee o'clock ...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that makes it
safe enough, no? :)
645z, dfa645 55mm/2.8, f/4, 1/15th sec, 800 ISO; handheld.
5' gridded
Very nice!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> This AM at the Sac. Ntl. Preserve.
> 45% of the frame.
> At, maybe, 100yds?
>
> 150-450 hand held.
> Chilly, fairly stiff breeze.
>
> J
>
>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016, at 08:59 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> This AM at the Sac. Ntl. Preserve.
> 45% of the frame.
> At, maybe, 100yds?
>
> 150-450 hand held.
> Chilly, fairly stiff breeze.
Very nice - love those birds.
I think I'd crop a bit off the right - seems to be a lot of blank space
Yes, and it was a "must have."
Thanks, Ken!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Waller"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:38:50 PM
Subject: Re: Peso-Sac. Eagle
Nice crisp capture. You must have a good lens !
Nice crisp capture. You must have a good lens !
-Original Message-
>From: Jack Davis
>Subject: Peso-Sac. Eagle
>
>
>
>This AM at the Sac. Ntl. Preserve.
>45% of the frame.
>At, maybe, 100yds?
>
>150-450 hand held.
>Chilly, fairly stiff breeze.
>
>J
>
Happy groundhog day ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
This AM at the Sac. Ntl. Preserve.
45% of the frame.
At, maybe, 100yds?
150-450 hand held.
Chilly, fairly stiff breeze.
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1141
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Awww. Thanks guys!
Will do something about that lens thing. :-)
Jostein
Den 21.12.2016 19.36, skrev Marco Alpert:
What he said Paul said!
- Marco
On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hope you have a great day. Buy yourself a few
That paragraph beginning "So it gets critical acclaim..." is not what I wrote,
but what I quoted. Somehow the quoting gets lost in the journey to or from the
server.
As I said, I quite like Lindbergh's style, and I like these pictures, but let's
not get confused about their purpose.
B
> On
Yup. Except I think you are a little over the top in your criticism.
It is an art piece and a collectible, a part of what Pirelli does to foster the
brand. Whether it appeals to you or not is a matter of personal decision. Lots
of people collect them, and collect books printed as collections
The calendar is a marketing gimmick. If they had stuck to standard garage wall
fare nobody would pay any attention at all.
Several decades ago some smart ad man realised they could get an annual burst
of cheap global publicity by confounding expectations. They do this by giving
carte blanche
Reading, drinking coffee and waiting for her laundry to dry, all at the same
time? More than any man could achieve...
B
> On 21 Dec 2016, at 16:07, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Nice shot, but don't think it is multitasking
>
> ann
>
>
>> On 12/21/2016 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker
Not at all. - I also had to look him up. Interesting to see that Louis de Funes
had an early uncredited appearance in the film.
> On 21 Dec 2016, at 14:57, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> It's actually a quartet to my eye... but I like Larry adding "Apterian trio"
> to our lexicon
Ken Waller wrote:
The calendars are instantly collectible works.
By who? I've never seen them any place but in garages.
I don't think I've ever seen a Pirelli calendar in the flesh. Over the
years I've seen countless calendars of conventionally pretty girls
holding tools in such a manner
LMAO. My thoughts exactly.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Are these the images? Really??
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> Peter Lindbergh shot this years Pirelli Calendar without using
The calendars are instantly collectible works.
By who? I've never seen them any place but in garages.
Perhaps they're venturing into something other than tires - snark, snark
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey
I agree with Marco.
The Pirelli calendar is a piece of marcom collateral that serves the dual
function of promoting Pirelli (not necessarily their tires) as a company that
supports the development of art and the humanities as well as provides a venue
for photographers to exhibit their works.
What he said Paul said!
- Marco
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Hope you have a great day. Buy yourself a few lenses!
>
> What he said!
>
>>
>> Paul via phone
>>
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on
And their tires aren't as good as Michellin's- so there !
-Original Message-
>From: "P. J. Alling"
>Subject: Re: Pirelli goes natural
>
>Not really, they lost their way with last years calendar, now they're
>wandering around in an open field trying to cater
You have to ask yourself what are they trying to do Promote their tires,
sell calendars or cater to older women.
The photos are obviously well done but I bet they don't sell as many calendars
as in years past - a lot of non car people have never seen/heard of the Pirelli
calendar.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hope you have a great day. Buy yourself a few lenses!
What he said!
Paul via phone
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Great subject/pose, very nice lighting... What's not to like?
-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Walker
>Subject: PESO - Multitasking
>
>It's coffee o'clock ...
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>
>90% SFW. There's a sliver of
Many happy returns, Mister J :-).
All the way to 120 and beyond!
Boris
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Hope you have a great day. Buy yourself a few lenses!
>
> Paul via phone
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
>
I think I could help her multitask more. ;)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> It's coffee o'clock ...
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>
> 90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that makes it
>
Nice shot, but don't think it is multitasking
ann
On 12/21/2016 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
It's coffee o'clock ...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that makes it
safe enough, no? :)
645z, dfa645
On 21/12/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's coffee o'clock ...
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>
>90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that makes it
>safe enough, no? :)
>
>645z, dfa645 55mm/2.8, f/4, 1/15th sec, 800 ISO;
It's coffee o'clock ...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b so that makes it
safe enough, no? :)
645z, dfa645 55mm/2.8, f/4, 1/15th sec, 800 ISO; handheld.
5' gridded stripbox, camera right.
Dane Halo, model,
I agree with your nitpick. :) Sadly, I didn't have any better frames
from the sequence.
Thanks, Paul.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Paul in MKE wrote:
> Very nice. Nitpicking a little though...The position of her left foot
> bothers me. There's no definition between
It's actually a quartet to my eye... but I like Larry adding "Apterian
trio" to our lexicon
A nit - trim the bottom a smidgen and the right-hand side - I found the
blur a bit distracting..
had to look up mr grock, which will probably disappoint Bob W
ann
On 12/21/2016 1:41 AM, Marco
I appreciate that, Dan.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Very nice portrait in all respects.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Bruce Walker
> wrote:
>
Thank you, Paul!
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Paul Stenquist
wrote:
> Beautiful. Wonderful light and a great look from the model.
> Paul
>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>> Just Wow ! Very inviting.
>>
>>
>>
Thank you very much, Ken.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Just Wow ! Very inviting.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: Bruce Walker
>>Subject: PESO - keeping warm
>>
>>A seasonally (north of the equator, anyway)
What no Liver, Fava Beans and Chianti?
On 12/21/2016 9:46 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/laurasilver/a-photographer-has-recreated-all-the-last-meals-of-prisoners?utm_term=.ytzD11e2b_medium=email_campaign=News%20-%201221%20Wednesday_content=News%20-%201221%20Wednesday+CID_403127c9fff187be4f70bcd128970d1f_source=BuzzFeed%20Newsletters#.gq9500W3d
Dan Matyola
What Marco said
ann (a partly Scottish girl)
On 12/20/2016 2:04 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
Really lovely.
- Marco
On Dec 20, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Gonz wrote:
Trying out a Cosina 50mm 1.2. Has a warmer cast than the Pentax
equivalent, but I really like the bokeh.
wide
I never got beyond the phrase "emotional nakedness."
Too "artsy" for me.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Sorry but the new calendar just doesn't cut it for me.
> I much prefer the earlier
Hope you have a great day. Buy yourself a few lenses!
Paul via phone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Not really, they lost their way with last years calendar, now they're
wandering around in an open field trying to cater to their new art
constituency. Too bad it doesn't really exist.
It's a pinup calendar, the women in it aren't supposed to be real,
They're either a fantasy or idealized,
Here is another impressive young woman.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BMcbCnZDntQ/?taken-by=maegenwellsguitars
kind of her story in a nutshell. Would love one of her creations.
Beautiful photography on her website. www.maegenwellsguitars.com
On 12/20/2016 9:38 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Just
I say lets vote on it. Like or dislike but each vote must be
accompanied by the voter's age.
I like it...66
On 12/21/2016 1:28 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
Couldn’t disagree more.
m
On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:45 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Sorry but the new calendar just doesn't
thanks all, refomatted
Dave
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Philip Northeast
wrote:
> I always reformat, why add complications?
>
> Philip Northeast
>
> www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
>
>
> On 21/12/16 4:23 pm, David Mann wrote:
>>
>> Yep, I'd also say to reformat.
Thanks much, Malcolm!
Look forward to more contacts on
the other side. Best!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 1:53 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
> For some reason, most of my outgoing e-mail seems to be either delayed or
> simply not going out at all, today
For some reason, most of my outgoing e-mail seems to be either delayed or
simply not going out at all, today seems a better day.
We have family over until the new year, and so I'll wish you all the best
for the holidays and the new year now, and have a go at sorting this problem
out early next
64 matches
Mail list logo