> On 12 April 2017 at 13:25 "P. J. Alling" wrote:
>
>
> Now we have the internet...
>
> http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/11/hubble-just-spotted-something-massive-coming-out-of-uranus-6567896/
Nearly, but not quite, as good as.
Congratulations. Sound good. My 2880 is still humming along, but I think Ill
eventually go for a P800. Would like to make some 16x 20 prints.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 12:27 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>
> My P600 arrived today!
>
> It’s true—the black and
My P600 arrived today!
It’s true—the black and white prints do pop—as do the color. I printed both
color and black and white on the Epson metallic glossy paper, and it really
looks nice. I just finished printing some black and white Velvet Fine Art in
both letter and 13 x 19 inch paper.
I've owned Pentax cameras (with one exception) since 1968, and have never had
cause to complain.
Like all mechanical or electronic items, they can break and need repairs, but
I've only once had to
send a Pentax camera in for repair! I expect to be using my current crop
(MZ-S, *ist-d, K5ii-s,
The whole proposition falls apart for people like me who under-share!
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman
Sent: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 11:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Endgame for
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:30:17PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> P. J. Alling wrote:
> > IT looks like the mirror image of a Pentax lens, so either they did
> > something stupid in post production, or there's a manufacturer who used
> > and exact mirror image for their bayonet lens mount.
>
>
I heard a promo for Dana-Farber on an NPR program I was listening to a
couple of days ago.
On 4/11/2017 16:40, Mark Roberts wrote:
By the way, I just had a meeting this afternoon with Irini Albanti
from the Global Health Initiative this afternoon. She's sent me some
material on the activities
Bummer. Blocked in Oz due to copyright issues. But I love "Time Team",
even if Baldrick does get a bit hyperactive at times
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, at 07:44 AM, John
FWIW - Ricoh seems to deny the rumor:
http://www.ricoh.com/info/2017/0412_1.html
On 4/12/2017 12:23 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
This came in today to my Inbox:
http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Ricoh-may-close-shutter-on-personal-camera-business
The end of Pentax - Ricoh coming near??
P. J. Alling wrote:
IT looks like the mirror image of a Pentax lens, so either they did
something stupid in post production, or there's a manufacturer who used
and exact mirror image for their bayonet lens mount.
Nikon?
The actual mounting damn near works, but it goes on backwards.
On
Who knows, Japanese companies are notoriously cagey about such things.
I expect that they make the most money on the higher sales price items.
The problem is Ricoh needs to produce an entry level camera that's good
enough to hook users and lure them into higher profit upgrades.
I suspect
You make that sound like it's a bad thing.
On 4/12/2017 13:09, Gonz wrote:
Exactly! No camera, so I guess the software has to imagine what you look like!
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:58 AM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
With your mind...
On 4/12/2017 12:32 PM, Gonz wrote:
They're touting "Content Aware Fill" from Photoshop CS4.
My experience with "content aware fill" has been that it doesn't work as
well as the video suggests.
On 4/12/2017 10:58, Gonz wrote:
Wow, that article is about close to the dumbest I've ever read, lol.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:47 AM,
The article makes me think Ricoh is downsizing, but not getting out of the
camera business completely.
Which camera lines does Ricoh make the most money on? Which lines the least?
On 4/12/2017 16:26, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ricoh is probably not still building K-3II cameras but they are still
Everyone discriminates against poor old farts!
On 4/12/2017 12:41, Alan C wrote:
Someone always discriminates against poor old farts.
Alan C
-Original Message- From: Gonz
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:12 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Stunning News for Pentax - Ricoh
On 4/12/2017 10:55, Stanley Halpin wrote:
Not panicked yet…
stan
Well, that's certainly not the PDML way!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
IT looks like the mirror image of a Pentax lens, so either they did
something stupid in post production, or there's a manufacturer who used
and exact mirror image for their bayonet lens mount.
On 4/12/2017 5:44 PM, John Francis wrote:
I was just watching Time Team S17-E11 (Litlington,
I was just watching Time Team S17-E11 (Litlington, Cambridgeshire)
[available on youtube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAgN1GIT5Us]
and I have a possible Pentax sighting.
At 3:26, one of the archaeologists is using a reversed lens as a loupe,
and to me it looks very much like a fairly
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:07 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> NIkon is cutting back too.
>
>
> The Megapixel race has become pointless, image quality is now better than
> good enough, and has been for two generations of camera sensors, and anyone
> who's had to pour over
Ricoh is probably not still building K-3II cameras but they are still
officially in production. Even with Ricoh owning the Pentax name,
Pentax was and is a small player and I doubt that they can build more
than two different models at the same time. The K-1 and K-P are
currently being built.
When I see a sickly looking impala, there is usually rust involved.
On April 12, 2017 9:39:52 AM PDT, Alan C wrote:
>Thanks, Dan.
>
>You made my day.
>
>Alan C
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel J. Matyola
>Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:30 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss
On April 12, 2017 10:55:01 AM PDT, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>Google can remember it for you wholesale.
>
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Can_Remember_It_for_You_Wholesale
Doing it that way would be a Dick move.
>
>On 12 Apr 2017, at 17:33, Gonz
I know where you live. ;) No worries, I'll leave the K-1 and some
wonderful glass behind.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Dream on!
>
>> On 12 Apr 2017, at 19:49, Gonz wrote:
>>
>> I'll just take all your Leica gear, much
Perhaps it was intended to be an April Fools prank but was delayed getting to
publication…
G
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 7:58 AM, Gonz wrote:
>
> Wow, that article is about close to the dumbest I've ever read, lol.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hmmm, cat's out of the bag, so damage control? At least there's no
twitterstorm with a Pentax shooter being dragged around and beat up.
Well, not yet.
I wonder whether the K-1 has been profitable. It certainly sounded
last year that it was a popular enough DSLR.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:17
Dream on!
> On 12 Apr 2017, at 19:49, Gonz wrote:
>
> I'll just take all your Leica gear, much easier.
>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> You'll just have give it back and let them keep the money.
>>
>>> On 12 Apr 2017, at
I'll just take all your Leica gear, much easier.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> You'll just have give it back and let them keep the money.
>
>> On 12 Apr 2017, at 14:56, Gonz wrote:
>>
>> Well that sux. I just spent > $4K on
For night photography you want the k1, For action, find a k3ii
On April 12, 2017 11:04:38 AM PDT, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>Am 12.04.17 um 16:55 schrieb Stanley Halpin:
>> I believe various EU and other jurisdictions stipulate that sellers
>need to have a two year supply of
Am 12.04.17 um 16:55 schrieb Stanley Halpin:
I believe various EU and other jurisdictions stipulate that sellers need to
have a two year supply of spare parts after an item ceases production?
Noblex (Dresden, Germany, EU) stopped their panoramic camera production
without any advance warning
Google can remember it for you wholesale.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Can_Remember_It_for_You_Wholesale
On 12 Apr 2017, at 17:33, Gonz
> wrote:
The funny part is that they say, you could take selfies and then
insert your image into the
Thanks, Dan!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Very Nice!
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
You'll just have give it back and let them keep the money.
> On 12 Apr 2017, at 14:56, Gonz wrote:
>
> Well that sux. I just spent > $4K on K-1 and lenses
>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
>> This came in today to my Inbox:
>>
What a day this is to be alive! I don't want to fart on this planet any more..
> On 12 Apr 2017, at 13:26, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> Now we have the internet...
>
> http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/11/hubble-just-spotted-something-massive-coming-out-of-uranus-6567896/
>
>
I asked Ricoh about this latest sky-is-falling article and they
responded here ...
<<< Today there was an article saying that RICOH considers to shrink
the camera business and withdraw from consumer products. This article
is not based on RICOH's official announcement.
RICOH is focusing its
Exactly! No camera, so I guess the software has to imagine what you look like!
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:58 AM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> With your mind...
>
>
> On 4/12/2017 12:32 PM, Gonz wrote:
>>
>> The funny part is that they say, you could take selfies and then
With your mind...
On 4/12/2017 12:32 PM, Gonz wrote:
The funny part is that they say, you could take selfies and then
insert your image into the fake image when "taking" the picture.
Question is, how the hell do you take selfies?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
True, but with the current situation the biggest competition for the
newest camera is it's previous generation.
A lot of people who didn't live through the Camera Craze of the 1970s
when SLR technology made it possible for everyone who wanted one to have
a semi pro level SLR, at prices that
Very Nice!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Haven't dug this out for awhile, but since it's spring once again..
> Shot on film while laying on my back allowing the larger upper center
>
Someone always discriminates against poor old farts.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Gonz
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:12 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Stunning News for Pentax - Ricoh
There will always be demand, the question is what will be the steady
state
She looks quite stern!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Especially for those who prefer their glamour pinup ladies with more
> curves, here's local pinup hottie Holly Harlott, styled by
Thanks, Dan.
You made my day.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:30 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Fw: PESO: Decontamination
Well seen and captured, Alan.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On
Remote + Tripod?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Gonz
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:32 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Endgame for cameras...
The funny part is that they say, you could take selfies and then
insert your image into the fake image when "taking" the
A kind of auto troublemaker?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Endgame for cameras...
In essence, your phone would identify where you are and send you and image
of a postcard of that
That is super cute!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Bill wrote:
> Duh, wrong link, though Rollie, the one on the right, was giving a good
> example of the look.
>
> Here's the correct link:
>
>
The funny part is that they say, you could take selfies and then
insert your image into the fake image when "taking" the picture.
Question is, how the hell do you take selfies?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> In essence, your phone would
Well seen and captured, Alan.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alan C wrote:
> A sickly looking, tick infested Impala Ewe besieged by 6 Red-billed
> Oxpeckers.
> Scroll right to see a healthy Impala Ram. Both at Sable
Thanks, Jack and Paul.
I haven't downloaded and edited many of my Normandy images yet. Every
evening after all that walking and photographing, I went to dinner, and the
wait staff on board kept filling my glass with wine until I was unable to
much except stumble to my cabin and fall in bed.
In essence, your phone would identify where you are and send you and image
of a postcard of that scene.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> This is rather extreme but for some reason my news
There will always be demand, the question is what will be the steady
state demand? And at that demand rate, what will be the price? If
the scale is much smaller, then the prices will be much higher to
justify the lines and design efforts. The hobby may end up being
relegated to rich old
NIkon is cutting back too.
Canon may be fatally wounded, though like the conceptual dinosaurs of
the 19th century, (which they still taught when I was in school), it's
too big to know it's dead yet.
Digital cameras whether DSLR, Mirrorless or Old Fashioned RF, have
reached the level of
Too bad I can't get a refund on my time. :)
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:36 AM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> It was free, so I guess you got you're money's worth.
>
>
> On 4/12/2017 10:58 AM, Gonz wrote:
>>
>> Wow, that article is about close to the dumbest I've ever read,
It was free, so I guess you got you're money's worth.
On 4/12/2017 10:58 AM, Gonz wrote:
Wow, that article is about close to the dumbest I've ever read, lol.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
This is rather extreme but for some reason my news
Yeah, I don't know, why wait till shit starts breaking and your
equipment loses value steadily? If the sky truly is falling, then
maybe its time to sell all and start over. Maybe Nikon will buy the
patents for the in body image stabilization, that is certainly a
valuable technology.
On Wed,
And photojournalism will have a significant leap. :-D [Facecrime]
It would be even easier to create #RealFakeNews...
... and to "rectify".
2+2=5!
Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:40:39 -0700 wrote:
One step closer to the Virtual Panopticon, I guess.
G
On Apr 12, 2017, at 6:47 AM,
Wow, that article is about close to the dumbest I've ever read, lol.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> This is rather extreme but for some reason my news aggregator app thought t
> was worth it...
>
> The endgame for cameras is having no camera at all:
Do they have a just-in-time stocking model for camera and lens spare parts? Or
do they plan ahead for expected demand several years out? If the latter, (which
makes sense in terms of batch orders of limited run items from suppliers) then
we should be ok for a while. I believe various EU and
... that sells complicated ("universal") plates that look like
mini-version of bread-board optical tables, i.e. with many wholes, IIRC,
of different sizes, most likely some threaded...
I remember somebody here posted a link several years ago, but I don't
remember the company/brand name...
One step closer to the Virtual Panopticon, I guess.
G
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 6:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> This is rather extreme but for some reason my news aggregator app thought t
> was worth it...
>
> The endgame for cameras is having no camera at all:
>
Yeah, here's hoping. But if something goes wrong, the spare parts
department might be in a bind...
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Your K-1 and lenses will still work great after Ricoh turns out the lights.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Apr 12, 2017,
Notice the word "may" in the headline. That's a feature of the 11th
commandment, Cover thy ass. With that headline the writer and editor
are admitting that they have no idea what Ricoh is actually going to do.
Admittedly it's not good that the imaging division is having resources
moved to
Your K-1 and lenses will still work great after Ricoh turns out the lights.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Gonz wrote:
>
> Well that sux. I just spent > $4K on K-1 and lenses
>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
Well that sux. I just spent > $4K on K-1 and lenses
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> This came in today to my Inbox:
>
> http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Ricoh-may-close-shutter-on-personal-camera-business
>
> The end of Pentax - Ricoh coming
> On Apr 11, 2017, at 10:43 PM, William Robb
> wrote:
>
> It's all Mark and Doug. I get sent a link and some quiet expectation that I
> will make acerbic comments about the pictures.
> This year I almost made it to the finish line until my eyesight was cruelly
>
This is rather extreme but for some reason my news aggregator app thought t
was worth it...
The endgame for cameras is having no camera at all:
http://news360.com/article/398182387
Seems eerily rrelated to most recent news about Ricoh.
You know, in my opinion, what really is killing the cameras
Wow! Sad if true. Hopefully, something can be worked out.
Cheers, Christine
> On Apr 11, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> G'day all
>
> I came across this item a couple of hours ago. I don't know how
> authoritative it is but it doesn't sound good:
>
>
Now we have the internet...
http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/11/hubble-just-spotted-something-massive-coming-out-of-uranus-6567896/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Interesting...
On 11/04/17 03:48, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Or, maybe it was a lizard rain...
If it can rain frogs, it could rain lizards, perhaps...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rain_of_animals
http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/storms/rain-frog.htm
Igor
Bob W-PDML
On 11/04/17 05:14, Ken Waller wrote:
Maybe his warranty ran out! (;-)
Of course :-)
- T
-Original Message-
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: PESO - Lizard(s), passed on?
Hi,
There seems to have been a number of "what is this" PESOs lately, and I
think I'll post one,
P. J. Alling wrote:
Sigma hasn't been able to build a general purpose camera to save their
life.
RIcoh has a history of just shuttering divisions that don't make money.
They folded their own SLR production before. Let's hope they don't do
that again.
What would Sigma do if they bought the
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:36:30PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Bipin Gupta wrote:
> > This came in today to my Inbox:
> >
> > http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Ricoh-may-close-shutter-on-personal-camera-business
> >
> > The end of Pentax - Ricoh coming near??
>
> Well that could
70 matches
Mail list logo