Re: OT u4/3

Larry, you seem to have forgotten. When we met, earlier this year, I had my OM-D EM1 on me. I think I have it for like 5 or 6 years now. It is a good camera, has all the controls and looks like a small DSLR. These you can find really cheap these days. You can also look for EM1 mk2 - it is a bit

Re: geso walkers mill, fall version

Nice set. Glad you got out again. Unpleasant weather is upon us. Paul > On Nov 22, 2020, at 2:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > > Our club did a walk in this forest trail area back in Aug but we went back > Friday for a fall walk and probably one of our last for the time being > > Some fall

Re: geso walkers mill, fall version

Nice Gallery! Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 2:41 PM David J Brooks wrote: > Our club did a walk in this forest trail area back in Aug but we went back > Friday for a fall walk and probably one of our last

geso walkers mill, fall version

Our club did a walk in this forest trail area back in Aug but we went back Friday for a fall walk and probably one of our last for the time being Some fall floor fotosohttp:// www.caughtinmotion.com/2020-walkers1/album/index.html K-5 Sigma 17-70 some minor LR6 adjustments Dave -- Documenting

Re: OT u4/3

I have two mFT cameras at present: the Olympus E-M1 (purchased in 2013, just when it came out) and the Panasonic GX9 (purchased a couple of months ago). I had an E-PL1 in the past, a cheapo that I got from Ebay at under $75, but it eventually locked up the IBIS and wasn't worth repairing. I

Re: OT u4/3

I have two OMDs - the original E-M10 and the EM-5II. I like them a lot, so much so that I rarely fire up my K-5 any more. The EM-10, despite being about 6 years old is still my favourite of the two because of its compact size & light weight. It loses very little in comparison with the 5. The 10

Re: Comparing Sony A7C to Pentax K-1 II

Thanks for posting that. It's an interesting read, though the article is largely confined to comparing the cameras' handling/ergonomics and autofocus. Personally I don't see an large difference between DSLR's and mirrorless bodies. If the core feature set is equivalent, both can do a good job

Re: PESO: harrier portrait

thank you Larry, and everyone else who looked or commented. appreciate it On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 01:33:49 -0800 Larry Colen wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2020, at 1:25 AM, Subash Jeyan > > wrote: > > > > all i've got to show for a saturday morning's birding: > > > >

Re: OT u4/3

On 21/11/20, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >I know that there are a few folks on this list that also have u4/3 >systems I'm curious about the most cost effective u4/3 body that handles >like a real camera, and how much it would set me back. I expect that it >would be something used to

Re: OT - Printer ink fails to dry completely for a long time.

>With R2880, I am also spoiled, and not waiting for long, if at all. Sadly, I could only realize its strengths after killing it. :( Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/

Re: Printer ink fails to dry completely for a long time

Thank you, Ralph for sharing your experience. >There used to be hot-air and infrared dryers for RC photo paper in the days of >analog photography. Oh no! No more gadgets in the... bathroom! :) Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr

Re: Printer ink fails to dry completely for a long time

Bipin, Thank you for sharing your experience and advice. My inks are declared to be pigment type and understand that this might have something to do with my problem. I think I will be looking for different papers first. While refilling, I will certainly consider non-Epson ones as well. >A

Re: PESO: harrier portrait

> On Nov 21, 2020, at 1:25 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote: > > all i've got to show for a saturday morning's birding: > > http://something-feathered.in/2020/11/21/harrier-portrait/ That’s nice, but that Indian Roller shot is amazing. > > montagu's harrier (female)... > > k3ii and sigma 150-500

Re: OT u4/3

On 22 Nov 2020, at 02:34, Larry Colen wrote: > > […] > I know that there are a few folks on this list that also have u4/3 systems > I’m curious about the most cost effective u4/3 body that handles like a real > camera, and how much it would set me back. I expect that it would be > something