Today I saw hundreds of ducks in a small ice free clearing and I
couldn't resist shooting another pano.
IstD with F 100-300mm, 17 shots. This lens is not that bad when you
remove CA in Adobe RAW (+45,-45%).
http://www.bmt.tue.nl/panorama/Goor_30dec2005/default.htm
I hopeyou like it, comments are
Hello,
Does anyone have hands-on experience with Novoflex rapid focus lenses
on a istD. I would like to know if the exposure button is mechanical
or electrical (if electrical I plan to replace the connector). I
already know (or guess) that the Novoflex uses a simple T-mount
adapter.
Merry
Fred,
Thanks! This is the information I was looking for. The specific
novoflex adapter is news for me. I need to add extra costs when
bidding.
Sharp in the center is exactly what I want.
Sorry to hear about your 9/11 tragedy.
With my current gear (russian 300mm Sniper) others allready suspect me
Pentax manuals are available online
http://www.pentaximaging.com/customer_care/manuals_literature
On 12/17/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have experience ordering printed manuals from Pentax? Do you
know if they are the original manuals or photocopies? If they're
Does anyone know how good or bad the Sigma APO 170-500mm F5-6.3 is on a istD.
Regards, Jack
I'm allergic to warnings.
Would the original PESO of Bob require a nudity warning? If yes my
allergy is really heavy.
Jack
On 11/26/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm allergic to smoked mackerel, so please let me know before I click any
links which depict the delicious creature.
--
Very nice pano.
The google hotspot links to a zip file. Maybe you need to embed the
mov file in a html file.
Jack
On 11/25/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enough talk, time for another Pano PESO, this one is a bit of an experiment
however. I hope I don't offend too many people but
could try the same shot
with zoomifyer.
http://www.bmt.tue.nl/pano/Panorama_strijperheg/Template.htm
Jack
On 11/23/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/05, Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, is it that bad? I have a 1 meter wide print on my wall. My
wife hates
what it is) on the
right divides the right 1/4 of the image from the rest
of it.
Rick
--- Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our local swamp: http://leende.dse.nl/peso.htm
I hope you like it.
Jack
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice
Rob,
Thanks, this works perfectly in ACR. No need for Pentax Raw anymore.
Jack
On 11/20/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Nov 2005 at 16:35, Jack Isidore wrote:
Rob,
I will try this. I should have a kodak grey card somewhere. I guess I
have to shoot this greycard under
Our local swamp: http://leende.dse.nl/peso.htm
I hope you like it.
Jack
I can't decide which RAW converter is the best. I have tried the
latest Adobe beta and Pentax.
Adobe has more options like noise and color fringing reduction. The
white balance settings drive me nuts. Only As Shot or Manual are
usable. Adobe RAW would be nice since it allows me to convert PEF to
in
the way they work
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Jack Isidore
I can't decide which RAW converter is the best. I have tried the
latest Adobe beta and Pentax.
Adobe has more options like noise and color fringing reduction. The
white balance
will
get what Adobe defines that to be. there isn't a standard for these presets,
although there is high similarity.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: Which RAW converter
Rob,
I will try this. I should have a kodak grey card somewhere. I guess I
have to shoot this greycard under controlled lighting with the
different camera white balance settings. Convert it to neutral gray in
Adobe RAW and save the profile. Correct me if i'm wrong?
Jack
What you are missing is
Has anyone mounted a Peleng 8 mm fisheye on a istD? Apparently the
mirror could be damaged (the rear part of the lens extends a lot).
Also I am looking for some sample jpg's of this lens on the istD.
Jack
On others brands it can damage/lock the mirror:
http://www.pauck.de/marco/photo/stuff/peleng_fisheye/peleng_fisheye.html
I don't have the peleng in my glass collection.
On 11/13/05, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, November 13, 2005, at 04:22 AM, Jack Isidore wrote:
Has anyone
Bertil,
Thanks for the info and the samples. a 3 or 4 shot pano with nadir and
maybe zenit would be enough for a 360x180 degree panorama with this
fov.
I think I want one for christmas :)
Jack
On 11/13/05, Bertil Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack, I don't have the *istD but I guess the DS
Fascinating pictures. You should click on the zoom button on the page
of the giant sequoia :)
On 11/13/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current issue of Sierra magazine, the magazine of the Sierra Club, has,
what is to me at least, a fascinating article on trees and how to
to watch it in 3D?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jack Isidore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. november 2005 21:26
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: PESO Library Pano
http://www.bmt.tue.nl/pano/BIB_2/zoomify/Template.htm
Tech: 13
This is called parallax error. A basic pano head is essential when you
start with pano's.
A simple bracket is good enough. Pentax SLR's have their tripod mount
in the lens axis. Any straight bracket will help you move the nodal
point above the tripod centre.
My first pano head and tripod was a
PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9 Nov 2005 at 16:11, Jack Isidore wrote:
Try dragging the moving triangle in the toolbar. I used the free
Zoomifyer EZ version. The Zoomifyer for Flash version includes the FLA
source which probably allows some tweaking.
I think the free EZ version does a nice job
I like it very much. Why not rotate it 90 deg cw and crop the black
triangle on top?
Jack
On 11/10/05, David Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious to know if anybody likes this shot.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/jumping.jpg
*ist D, ISO 800, FA50 macro @ f/4, 1/125, monopod.
, Jack Isidore wrote:
Try dragging the moving triangle in the toolbar. I used the free
Zoomifyer EZ version. The Zoomifyer for Flash version includes the FLA
source which probably allows some tweaking.
I think the free EZ version does a nice job displaying a 12800x3000 bitmap.
It's
PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting presentation.
One nit - the zoom control is way too fast. Is there a way to slow it down?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO Library Pano
http://www.bmt.tue.nl/pano/BIB_2/zoomify/Template.htm
Tech
.
You're the craftsman.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jack Isidore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 7. november 2005 18:50
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: flash issues with IstD and 500FTZ
I have an istD with 330FTZ, 400FTZ
-
Fra: Jack Isidore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. november 2005 20:36
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: flash issues with IstD and 500FTZ
I wonder if my old Metz CT-1 would damage the istD? It's the only
flash I have which does plain autoflash.
On 11/7/05, William Robb [EMAIL
Maybe the solution can found in this document:
http://www.fotografica.nl/batt-adapt-US.pdf
On 11/8/05, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
after my last buy of a very nice SMC Takumar 85mm 1.8 lens I got another
good deal today with a:
Ashai Pentax Spotmatic SP (with
I wonder if my old Metz CT-1 would damage the istD? It's the only
flash I have which does plain autoflash.
On 11/7/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Isidore
Subject: flash issues with IstD and 500FTZ
I have an istD with 330FTZ, 400FTZ
http://www.bmt.tue.nl/pano/BIB_2/zoomify/Template.htm
Tech: 13 shot portrait, IstD, 16-45DA, Kaidan panohead,
PanoramaFactory stitcher and Zoomify viewer,
Jack
I have an istD with 330FTZ, 400FTZ and 500FTZ flashes.
The camera is in green mode and I take flash shots at ISO 200, 400 and
800 ASA all from a tripod, the same subject and the flashes in
auto-TTL mode.
The 200 ISO shots are all underexposed, 400 ISO is more or less
correctly exposed and 800 ISO
I have seen this odd behavior also on the istD with the internal flash
in P-TTL mode.
If you have an older external TTL flash this could also be funny: Take
3 pictures in full auto mode with ISO 200, 400 and 800. 200 is
underexposed, 800 ISO overexposed! A TTL flash should expose the same
scene
32 matches
Mail list logo
