Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-25 Thread keller.schaefer
I fear manufacturers development departments are not good at thinking 'outside of the box' and the short product cycles have cut down available time to let foreigners test prototypes - to make the developers aware of things they just did not 'see'. If we leave behind the 'film based' thinking,

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-25 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
ein Neither my Nikon D100 nor my Nikon D1H display ISO in any of the ein normal displays. It'd be real tempting to say manufacturers didn't ein anticipate the desire to see the freely-changeable ISO number in ein the normal displays of a digital camera, except that my Nikon F5 Even the D1H?

*istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
We were talking a lot about *istD improvments that could be done via firmware. And if Pentax USA is to be direct Pentax subsidiary soon we could put together our wishes and send them a letter which hopefully would travel to Pentax design headquarters in Japan too. What do you think? Is there

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 14:14, Nenad Djurdjevic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but if your wishlist is for the ISO value to be displayed in the viewfinder then I didn't think it could be done because the LCD display has nowhere it can display the set ISO value. The only

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Nenad Djurdjevic
I wrote earlier: However I suppose ISO value could be displayed it instead of the remaining number recordable images. Depends whether you are willing to lose one viewfinder indicator to gain another. Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and remaining number

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 14:27, Nenad Djurdjevic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't be done. That's no problem :-) It is enough that you would see 16 or 32 for

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Nenad Djurdjevic
I wrote: Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't be done. Sylwek replied: That's no problem :-) It is enough that you would see 16 or 32 for 1600 or 3200 respectively + h

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't ND be done. Ugh Ogh. How about 1.6K or 3.2K ? Is it too hard to understand ? ;-) Or similar... I don't think though trash would be the

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Steve Desjardins
Maybe something like hold this button down and press the shutter release This would instantly fire the shutter no matter the focus state. I'm not sure I want it any simpler than this as I don't want to be accidently changing the WB. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/24/04 07:37AM Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Anders Hultman
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote: ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't ND be done. Ugh Ogh. How about 1.6K or 3.2K ? Is it too hard to understand ? ;-) Or

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Steve Desjardins
I would like to see ISO displayed somewhere all the time (the top LCD panel is OK) since I have changed it and forgotten. I don't need it in the viewfinder , though. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread keller.schaefer
That really is a bright idea! If I had a menu option Do you want 'ISO' or 'remaining pictures' displayed in the finder? I would certainly go for ISO! And then being able to adjust it (as you described) while looking through the finder - brilliant. Sven Zitat von Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 15:04, Nenad Djurdjevic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I would be willing to put up with a less than perfect display. All too often I forget to reset ISO and find I have taken some shots in good light at an unecessarily high ISO. If there was some sort of indication in the

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread keller.schaefer
16h and 32h would work fine for me... Sven Zitat von Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote: ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 15:09, Frantisek Vlcek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think though trash would be the best button for it. One could easily forgot he is in PLAY mode and try to change ISO there... Perhaps one of the four PLAY mode buttons? trash button is not bad as it is easy to access by

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 15:14, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe something like hold this button down and press the shutter release This would instantly fire the shutter no matter the focus state. I'm not sure I want it any simpler than this as I don't want to be accidently changing

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Nenad Djurdjevic
Anders Hultman wrote: 1.6K and 3.2K still are four symbols, but 1K6 and 3K2 may fit. If the display isn't figures only, and actually can show a K at all... I had a look and I don't think the display can do a 'K'. I believe it can do an 'H' however - if that's any use ;-)

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 15:19, keller.schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I had a menu option Do you want 'ISO' or 'remaining pictures' displayed in the finder? I would certainly go for ISO! And then being able to adjust it (as you described) while looking through the finder - brilliant. Exactly -

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 15:24, keller.schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16h and 32h would work fine for me... And it is easiest to implement as I suspect that this display has only 3 digits of 7-segment type. -- Pozdrowienia Sylwek

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Anders Hultman
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, keller.schaefer wrote: 1.6K and 3.2K still are four symbols, but 1K6 and 3K2 may fit. If the display isn't figures only, and actually can show a K at all... 16h and 32h would work fine for me... Ah. Excellent solution! Three symbols and possible to show on a 7-segment

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread ernreed2
Nenand said, among other things: I guess I would be willing to put up with a less than perfect display. All too often I forget to reset ISO and find I have taken some shots in good light at an unecessarily high ISO. If there was some sort of indication in the viewfinder that would reduce

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Nenad Djurdjevic
Steve Desjardins wrote: I would like to see ISO displayed somewhere all the time (the top LCD panel is OK) since I have changed it and forgotten. I don't need it in the viewfinder , though. Once again, I had a look at my *istD and the top display only has numeric values for shutter speed,

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Rob Studdert
On 24 Jun 2004 at 11:39, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: We were talking a lot about *istD improvments that could be done via firmware. And if Pentax USA is to be direct Pentax subsidiary soon we could put together our wishes and send them a letter which hopefully would travel to Pentax design

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 24.06.04 15:36, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had my little list up for a while, it's probably due for some updates :-) http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/Pentax_digi_wish-list/ Well, our list is getting longer ;-) Good, the more we send them the better chances to

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Nenad Djurdjevic
ERN wrote: Does this camera indicate in the viewfinder what f-stop and shutter speed it's going to use to make the exposure? and, if so, could you not develop the habit of looking at those numbers to see whether they imply that you are using an unnecessarily high ISO? I understand what

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Sarbu Alexandru
Yes, that seems the best solution imho. In fact, you don't really need that 'h' letter - because the ISO starts from 200, so you can have 2,4,8,16 and 32. But the 'h' can tell you if you're looking at the remaining picture indicator or at the ISO setting. Alex Sarbu --- Anders Hultman [EMAIL

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Frits Wüthrich
On Thursday 24 June 2004 11:39, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: FJW We were talking a lot about *istD improvments that could be done via FJW firmware. And if Pentax USA is to be direct Pentax subsidiary soon we could FJW put together our wishes and send them a letter which hopefully would travel FJW to

Re: *istD firmware wishlist (open letter?)

2004-06-24 Thread Peter Loveday
I don't know if it can be done through firmware, but I vote for improved flash TTL control. Indeed. This would be nice. On the ISO stuff, I'd be happy enough to always have ISO in the viewfinder and frames on the top. But a menu to choose would be fine too. Either way, it has to be clear