I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No lens and
it has a grid focussing screen. It is local so I can pick it up. It is
currently at AUD 142.50 with 30 minutes to go. That is really cheap. I'm
torn though...do i bid or do I wait and go with a 645? They both have
At 01:55 PM 5/10/2006, J and K Messervy wrote:
I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No lens and
it has a grid focussing screen. It is local so I can pick it up. It is
currently at AUD 142.50 with 30 minutes to go. That is really cheap. I'm
torn though...do i bid or
-
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
At 01:55 PM 5/10/2006, J and K Messervy wrote:
I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No lens
and
it has
My thinking is if you're going to go medium format, get the bigger one.
Agreed! From my experience scanning and printing from my own 6x7 negs and
6x4.5 negs from a former coworker, the 6x7 negs produced much better BIG
enlargements. Of course, not many people print really really big, so it
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:55 PM, J and K Messervy wrote:
I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No
lens and
it has a grid focussing screen. It is local so I can pick it up.
It is
currently at AUD 142.50 with 30 minutes to go. That is really
cheap. I'm
torn
On 05/10/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17 medium
format panoramic camera. THAT would be awesome!
Problem is if you need to digitize it's a PITA to scan the frames,
170mm is too long for most of the dedicated MF desktop
On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:20 AM, John Celio wrote:
My thinking is if you're going to go medium format, get the bigger
one.
Agreed! From my experience scanning and printing from my own 6x7
negs and
6x4.5 negs from a former coworker, the 6x7 negs produced much
better BIG
enlargements.
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 05/10/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17
medium
format panoramic camera. THAT would be awesome!
Problem is if you need to digitize it's a PITA to scan the
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 09:26:45 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
On 05/10/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17 medium
Quoting J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I decided not to rush things. Tempted as I was, I let it go. It went for
$229.50 Aus...that is a real bargain for someone!
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration. In the
end, I suspect I'll get whichever I can get the
On 05/10/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are in the market for a 6x17, the word digitise [or even digitize
8-)] is probably not in your vocabulary.
Usually they are drum scanned, even ten years ago more people were
scanning 6x17 than enlarging to chemical print.
--
Rob
Naw, everyone (except me) has a 5x7 or bigger enlarger? Bet they would
look nice as 2.5x7.5 contact prints though.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On
Any 5x7 film scanner should work fine GRIN. BTW, can you really call a
2.25 x 7 inch negative medium format? Roll Film, yes; but medium format?
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Digital
On 10/5/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
...lets roll the video
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 05/10/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any 5x7 film scanner should work fine GRIN. BTW, can you really call a
2.25 x 7 inch negative medium format? Roll Film, yes; but medium format?
My flatbed :-)
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%20V700/page_1.htm
--
Rob Studdert
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem
On 05/10/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
The P645 has less again, and my M7 has none :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
On 10/5/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
Last year Bill graced us
On 10/5/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/10/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any 5x7 film scanner should work fine GRIN. BTW, can you really call a
2.25 x 7 inch negative medium format? Roll Film, yes; but medium format?
My flatbed :-)
Yah, but my Universal Press, had a 2.8 lens and shot 6x9 trannies as
well as 6x7 negs and 3.25x4.25 Polaroid. Sigh, I miss that beast.
Vibration? An eight pound camera with a leaf shutter, you have to be
kidding.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
Sure it does, Bill, all those people on the internet, who have never
even held one of the cameras, can not be wrong. Besides, even they
admitted that it was only at slow speeds on a flimsy, for that camera
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
Last year Bill graced us with a little quicktime movie he made
featuring a coin balanced on the focusing screen of his 67. I
borrowed the movie
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:38:06 -0600, you wrote:
From: Scott Loveless
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
Last year Bill graced us with a little quicktime movie he made
featuring a coin balanced on the focusing screen of his 67. I
borrowed the movie for a discussion on another camera
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17
medium
format panoramic camera. THAT would be awesome!
Problem is if you need to digitize it's a PITA to scan the frames,
170mm is too long for most of the dedicated MF desktop scanners, so
you have to stitch or scan with a
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:34:43 +0800, you wrote:
On 10/5/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
...lets roll the video
At GFM
On 06/10/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At GFM this year Bill confessed that trying the experiment with the
coin rotated 90 degrees from the orientation shown in the video yields
very different results.
Still a cool video.
I might do the same text with my Mamiya 7 supported on a
Interesting...I'd love to get my hands on an example of both the 67 and 645
to test them out.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
On 10/5
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:34:43 +0800, you wrote:
At GFM this year Bill confessed that trying the experiment with the
coin rotated 90 degrees from the orientation shown in the video yields
very different
William Robb wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:34:43 +0800, you wrote:
At GFM this year Bill confessed that trying the experiment with the
coin rotated 90 degrees from the orientation shown in the video yields
very different results.
Still a cool video.
I wasn't at GFM this
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Problem is if you need to digitize it's a PITA to scan the frames,
170mm is too long for most of the dedicated MF desktop scanners, so
you have to stitch or scan with a high res flatbed film scanner which
sort of defeats the advantage.
31 matches
Mail list logo
