ReMessage: 4, Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:35:20 -0500, From: Bob Sullivan <rf.sulli...@gmail.com>, To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>, Subject: Re: Geso Horicon Marsh,Message-ID:,

Thanks Bob S for the look & comments. Before I got there, I had no idea the marsh was so large and so important in the migration scheme. So glad I went. On 6/28/16 7:31 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 4 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:35:20 -0500 From: Bob Sullivan <rf.sulli...@gm

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Glad that you are back, Bob! On 5/10/2016 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. --- This email has been checked for viruses

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Class year at MIT?? Otis '64 On 5/10/2016 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Gonz <rgonz

Re: Bob Sullivan?

ugh I'm going to have to change my settings so I canread what GONZ wrote.. ann On 5/10/2016 1:18 PM, Gonz wrote: I did. Don't think it went through... On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: Gonz, try posting a new message from gmail using the

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Maybe it's Gmail that's gone wrong instead of you? On 5/10/2016 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:24

Re: Bob Sullivan?

This is in plain text, the previous one was not. Also posted one in formatted text a while back. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gonz wrote: > I did. Don't think it went through... > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Doug Brewer > wrote:

Re: Bob Sullivan?

I did. Don't think it went through... On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Gonz, try posting a new message from gmail using the default formatting, > if you don't mind. > > > On 5/10/16 10:24 AM, Gonz wrote: > >> He's prolly having the same problem

Re: Bob Sullivan?

I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Gonz wrote: > He's prolly having the same problem with posting that

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Gonz, try posting a new message from gmail using the default formatting, if you don't mind. On 5/10/16 10:24 AM, Gonz wrote: He's prolly having the same problem with posting that I do. You have to make sure that you select "Plain Text" from the drop down menu before composing your email. On

Re: Bob Sullivan?

He's prolly having the same problem with posting that I do. You have to make sure that you select "Plain Text" from the drop down menu before composing your email. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Rick Womer wrote: > I emailed Bob and replied that he is alive and "mostly"

Re: Bob Sullivan?

I emailed Bob and replied that he is alive and "mostly" well. He says he's been having some trouble getting gmail to play nicely with the list, so a few attempts at posting have been in vain. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Igor PDML-StR

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Bob last submitted to February PUG: http://pug.komkon.org/16feb/slides/BS-8IMGP3018_ed-1.html But his last posting to the list is dated October 27, 2015. Ghm... Mon May 9 16:20:43 EDT 2016 Larry Colen wrote: Interesting, I also recently realized that we hadn't heard from him in a while.

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Interesting, I also recently realized that we hadn't heard from him in a while. On May 9, 2016 1:06:37 PM PDT, Mark Roberts wrote: >Rick Womer wrote: > >>Has anyone heard from him? >> >>Usually he's an enthusiastic early adopter, and the K-1 has been out a >>few days

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Rick Womer wrote: >Has anyone heard from him? > >Usually he's an enthusiastic early adopter, and the K-1 has been out a >few days without a peep. I was wondering the same thing. This is the first year he hasn't sent in a photo for the book. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia

Bob Sullivan?

Has anyone heard from him? Usually he's an enthusiastic early adopter, and the K-1 has been out a few days without a peep. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

ATTN Bob Sullivan

Bob, I have sent you couple of messages of the list. Could you please have a look? Or may be they ended up in the spam folder... Thanks. Boris Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: ATTN Bob Sullivan

Hold your horses Boris. I just haven't replied yet. And have an old friend's funeral tomorrow AM. Bob On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Bob, I have sent you couple of messages of the list. Could you please have a look? Or may be they ended up in the spam

Re: ATTN Bob Sullivan

I am sorry to hear such sad news... :-(... I will wait. Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On February 22, 2014 6:45:11 AM Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Hold your horses Boris. I just haven't replied yet. And have an old friend's funeral tomorrow AM. Bob

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Thanks to Bob, I own a number of fine lenses ;-). I salute you, Bob! Boris On 5/29/2010 2:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH. ETA is Wednesday. Rick

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Boris and Rick, Just trying to do my part for Pentax. Regards, Bob S. On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Bob, I own a number of fine lenses ;-). I salute you, Bob! Boris On 5/29/2010 2:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On 5/30/2010 1:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Boris and Rick, Just trying to do my part for Pentax. Regards, Bob S. As long as you get your royalties, Bob, sir ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

No royalties here,,, :-) Not even loaner lenses! On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/30/2010 1:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Boris and Rick, Just trying to do my part for Pentax. Regards,  Bob S. As long as you get your royalties, Bob, sir

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On 5/30/2010 2:26 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: No royalties here,,, :-) Not even loaner lenses! Well, I reckon I offered you to use some of the lenses that you so generously enabled me with ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Ha! I got the bends I got when I traded up from my *ist-D to the k-7 last fall!Enjoy! -c -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH. ETA is Wednesday. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

You won't be sorry. No comparison between the K7 and both the K20 and K10. I'd say the K7 is the most underrated Pentax digital produced to date. It's an excellent and accurate tool. Paul On May 28, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

100% total agreement. Did I say I agree? Oh, well I do. Tom C. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:00 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: You won't be sorry. No comparison between the K7 and both the K20 and K10. I'd say the K7 is the most underrated Pentax digital produced to date. It's

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On May 28, 2010, at 18:53, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH. ETA is Wednesday. Leaps and bounds, man. Leaps and bounds above the K10D. I look at my

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH.  ETA is Wednesday. Rick Congrats. The school bus driver on this list

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Sorry Rick. I was introduced to one at GFM last year and couldn't resist. The K20D is sitting on the shelf unused since the K-7 arrived. Life is short. You won't regret it. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: There I was, generally content

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Huh. You're not +really+ sorry, are you??? (neither am I!) Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Fri, 5/28/10, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry Rick. I was introduced to one at GFM last year and couldn't resist. The K20D is sitting on the shelf unused since the K-7

Re: PESO: Chicago - Central Camera (Bob Sullivan)

On Tue May 18 1:25 , Bob Sullivan wrote: Jay, That's the Central Camera I know and love. Did you catch it at open or close? It is such a funky location under the 'EL' tracks, and your colors compliment that uniqueness. I hope you went inside as well. Regards, Bob S. Thanks Bob, Unfortunately

To re-order photos in Lightroom 2.5 PDML Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15 To Bob Sullivan.

Hello, I'm not absolutely certain about it but when you create a special collection of your photos in Lightroom 2.5, Library module, you can easily change the order in the filmstrip after that. Hope this help, Gaetan Message: 9 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:12:37 -0600 From: Bob Sullivan

Re: To re-order photos in Lightroom 2.5 PDML Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15 To Bob Sullivan.

photos in Lightroom 2.5, Library module, you can easily change the order in the filmstrip after that. Hope this help, Gaetan Message: 9 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:12:37 -0600 From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com Subject: Simple Lightroom 2.5 question To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Message-ID

YO: Annsan and Bob Sullivan

Make sure you check out the Chicago pics in the Cushman collection that Lassie cited. It includes pics from both South Shore (Annsan) and Morton Arboretum (Boib). http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/cushman/index.jsp Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: YO: Annsan and Bob Sullivan

Thanks Paul, 2,300+ pictures of the arboretum starting 2 years before I was born! Regards, Bob S. On Feb 11, 2008 10:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make sure you check out the Chicago pics in the Cushman collection that Lassie cited. It includes pics from both South Shore (Annsan) and

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:10:53 -0400, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get the same tag on messages from you, Frank. Perhaps it's the bunny ears? Yeah, someone else mentioned the same thing to me off-list. I guess G-mail is all confused about this list thing, because when that other

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

Looks like what you guys have going on is you are both on Gmail. So when the message is forwarded by the list server it comes back to Gmail with a Gmail sender on it. Gmail knows it is incoming rather than local and thinks maybe it is a spoof, so it gives you a heads up on it. Pretty smart

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

frank theriault mused: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:10:53 -0400, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get the same tag on messages from you, Frank. Perhaps it's the bunny ears? Yeah, someone else mentioned the same thing to me off-list. I guess G-mail is all confused about this list

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

I get the same tag on messages from you, Frank. Perhaps it's the bunny ears? -Mat On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:48:01 -0400, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Warning: This message may not be from whom it claims to be. Beware of following any links in it or of providing the sender with any

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

Frank, and what do you think I've saw on top of your posts? grin Alex Sarbu On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:48:01 -0400, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just reading another thread, and noticed a post from Bob, now on G-mail, and singing it's praises. I couldn't help noticing Bob's

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:11:42 +0200, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank, and what do you think I've saw on top of your posts? grin Who's this frank guy you talk about? -frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

Frank, Well, I don't know what to say. I'm sure that I'm me. I can probably produce a photo of you from GFM with those famous ears. Positive proof, if you will... Beyond that, I have no idea why they don't like me. Regards, Bob S. On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:15:28 -0400, Peter J. Alling [EMAIL

OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

I was just reading another thread, and noticed a post from Bob, now on G-mail, and singing it's praises. I couldn't help noticing Bob's post, because at the top of it, inside a big yellow banner, screamed the words: Warning: This message may not be from whom it claims to be. Beware of following

Re: OT: Exactly Who Is Bob Sullivan?

Yes Frank you should be afraid, very afraid... frank theriault wrote: I was just reading another thread, and noticed a post from Bob, now on G-mail, and singing it's praises. I couldn't help noticing Bob's post, because at the top of it, inside a big yellow banner, screamed the words: Warning: