I am not totally sure but I believe a hot pixel will render white and a dead
pixel will render black.
As far as dust, most dust spots will cover more than one pixel and tend to
show as oof blobs, sometimes quite large. That is where the blower bulbs are
really handy.
I have had to clean both
Dust specks are shadows, they show dark but usually have a soft edge
that spans several pixels.
Hot pixels are pixels which are always lit, they show up bright.
There are also dead pixels, which show up dark.
G
On Mar 2, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, again. Walter.
While I
Thanks, Godfrey. My spot fits your dust description, thankfully, and
I'll be going for the squeeze bulb.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dust specks are shadows, they show dark but usually have a soft edge
that spans several pixels.
Hot pixels are pixels which are
This one is a rather dark soft edged blob. I have a bulb and will
give it a try.
Appreciate all your help.
Jack
--- Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not totally sure but I believe a hot pixel will render white and
a dead
pixel will render black.
As far as dust, most dust spots
.
the 5.0 and Premier 3.0 elements was $149 reduced to $119 with rebate.
5.0 seemed to be too much for me anyway... I'm not doing animation or
making videos, etc.
of course, if all I had to pay was $59 I would have gone for it.
ann
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 06/12/06, ann sanfedele
think I really need 5.0 but maybe I'm wrong
I'm most intereseted in being able to convert Raw in photoshop elements and
that the way I'm working in 2.0 doesn't change to much - that is,
aside from
adding features.
TIA
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
rebate is a little cheaper, though you have to
wait for the rebate check.
I don't think I really need 5.0 but maybe I'm wrong
IIRC, Elements 5.0 added raw support. Which is a good reason to upgrade.
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
I have Elements 3.0 and it supports Raw conversion.
I don't use it tho. I found it too cumbersome, as I have to open every
image in ACR to convert it to JPEG (i.e. No batch processing).
I've been using RSE for Raw conversion, altho I've just downloaded a
copy of silkypix for conversion to see
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:43:11PM -0500, Dave Kennedy wrote:
I have Elements 3.0 and it supports Raw conversion.
I don't use it tho. I found it too cumbersome, as I have to open every
image in ACR to convert it to JPEG (i.e. No batch processing).
Odd - I've got Elements 3.0, and find
Kennedy wrote:
I have Elements 3.0 and it supports Raw conversion.
I don't use it tho. I found it too cumbersome, as I have to open every
image in ACR to convert it to JPEG (i.e. No batch processing).
Odd - I've got Elements 3.0, and find it very useful for batch processing.
In fact if I've
Thanks John, I'll have to check that out... Should have known there
would be a better way to do it.
Much Appreciated.
dk
On 12/6/06, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:43:11PM -0500, Dave Kennedy wrote:
I have Elements 3.0 and it supports Raw conversion.
I
On 06/12/06, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well what I can pick up at Staples is a package with both 3.0 and 5.0 in it
Ann, are you sure you don't mean a package with _Premiere_ 3.0 and Elements 5.0?
http://www.adobe.com/products/psprelements/
Just wondering?
Eric.
--
PDML Pentax
Are you sure that isn't Photoshop Elements 5.0 bundled with
Premiere Elements 3.0? I can't see any reason why they would
bundle two different versions of Photoshop Elements together.
The Photoshop/Premiere bundle normally sells for $149, so
the price you saw certainly sounds like a good deal
Yeah that was it
however - it turns out that the sales clerk was mistaken on the price. -
The $89 (with a rebate bringing it to $59) was only for 3.0
which is really all I wanted anyway.
the 5.0 and Premier 3.0 elements was $149 reduced to $119 with rebate.
5.0 seemed to be too much for me
) was only for 3.0
which is really all I wanted anyway.
the 5.0 and Premier 3.0 elements was $149 reduced to $119 with rebate.
5.0 seemed to be too much for me anyway... I'm not doing animation or
making videos, etc.
of course, if all I had to pay was $59 I would have gone for it.
ann
Eric
Were they shot in DNG?
Thanks,
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Off the bat, Photoshop Elements 5.0 will not open the RAW files I
shot.
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/23/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any of the few who have received their K10D, opened RAW
Not shot as DNG. Will try that next. Regards, Bob S.
On 11/24/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were they shot in DNG?
Thanks,
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Off the bat, Photoshop Elements 5.0 will not open the RAW files I
shot.
Regards, Bob S
Jack,
On further checking, Photoshop Elements 5.0 will open DNG files.
On average, the raw files are 10-12 meg.
The DNG's are 15 megs.
The jpg's are 4-5 megs.
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/23/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Off the bat, Photoshop Elements 5.0 will not open the RAW
Excellent! Thanks for the good news.
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
On further checking, Photoshop Elements 5.0 will open DNG files.
On average, the raw files are 10-12 meg.
The DNG's are 15 megs.
The jpg's are 4-5 megs.
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/23/06, Bob Sullivan
Have any of the few who have received their K10D, opened RAW in
Elements 5?
Jack
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Well the GX10 with v0.2 firmware from Photokina produced DNG which
were readiliy readable with Lightroom beta. SO yes, DNG should be
readable, at least b Adobe products.
2006/11/23, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have any of the few who have received their K10D, opened RAW in
Elements 5?
Jack
Now back to my world. Will Elements 5 support K10D DNG RAW? I take it
that you are saying yes in a techese. ;-)
Thanks!
Jack
--- Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well the GX10 with v0.2 firmware from Photokina produced DNG which
were readiliy readable with Lightroom beta. SO yes, DNG should
Yes it will. You'll have to wait for K10D PEF support.
Note that Elements 5 and CS2 use the same plugin for RAW support, so
compatibility is the same (as long as you're running the latest ACR
version, at least for formats other than DNG).
_Adam
Jack Davis wrote:
Now back to my world
Adam, when you get a moment, please tell me how I would know if I'm
running the latest ACR version of E5.
Thanks,
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it will. You'll have to wait for K10D PEF support.
Note that Elements 5 and CS2 use the same plugin for RAW support, so
,
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it will. You'll have to wait for K10D PEF support.
Note that Elements 5 and CS2 use the same plugin for RAW support, so
compatibility is the same (as long as you're running the latest ACR
version, at least for formats other than DNG
T were readiliy readable with Lightroom beta. SO yes, DNG should be
T readable, at least b Adobe products.
T 2006/11/23, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have any of the few who have received their K10D, opened RAW in
Elements 5?
Jack
] wrote:
Yes it will. You'll have to wait for K10D PEF support.
Note that Elements 5 and CS2 use the same plugin for RAW support,
so
compatibility is the same (as long as you're running the latest
ACR
version, at least for formats other than DNG).
_Adam
Jack Davis wrote:
Now back to my
Davis wrote:
Adam, when you get a moment, please tell me how I would know if I'm
running the latest ACR version of E5.
Thanks,
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it will. You'll have to wait for K10D PEF support.
Note that Elements 5 and CS2 use the same plugin
if
I'm
running the latest ACR version of E5.
Thanks,
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it will. You'll have to wait for K10D PEF support.
Note that Elements 5 and CS2 use the same plugin for RAW
support,
so
compatibility is the same (as long as you're running
Jack,
Off the bat, Photoshop Elements 5.0 will not open the RAW files I shot.
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/23/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any of the few who have received their K10D, opened RAW in
Elements 5?
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Elements 5.0
As of this morning, Tuesday, September 26, 2006, they have changed the
estimated availability date
Finally got it downloaded and have played with it about 30 minutes.
Curves are much easier to use that in PS 7. The convert to BW is cool.
There are several options as to whether it's a portrait, scenic or urban
snapshot BW with adjustments for more or less red green and blue in the
final BW
A couple of weeks ago, I pre-ordered PhotoShop Elements 5.0. It was showing
as being available for download today, Sep 25. It apparently still not
available, and calls to Adobe are met with either nothing or 20-30 minutes
of so called music. Anybody else having problems with getting
On Sep 25, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I pre-ordered PhotoShop Elements 5.0. It
was showing
as being available for download today, Sep 25. It apparently still
not
available, and calls to Adobe are met with either nothing or 20-30
minutes
of so called
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Shell
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 3:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Elements 5.0
Thanks Bob,
I finally got through and they more or less confirmed what you said. It
should
Bill, I ordered E5 on 9/20, also, with the understanding it would be
available today. Your post has reminded me of the fact.
I'll give it a try.
Jack
--- Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I pre-ordered PhotoShop Elements 5.0. It was
showing
as being available
At this point, only for Windoze, though :-(
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just announced:
Elements 5.0 adds several new tools including Black
and White conversion,
Curves (at last!) and lens distortion correction.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091202adobeelements.asp
Just announced:
Elements 5.0 adds several new tools including Black and White conversion,
Curves (at last!) and lens distortion correction.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091202adobeelements.asp
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Also, not available for upgrade download until Sep 25. Ordered my copy
already.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Womer
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 1:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Adobe Photoshop Elements
Had a couple scans done awhile back that turned out to be 16-bit. As a
result, I found the Elements 4 tool bar largely unusable.
Is there a way around this short of converting to 8-bit?
Certainly must not be the case with CS2.(?)
Thanks.
Jack
On 9/11/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a couple scans done awhile back that turned out to be 16-bit. As a
result, I found the Elements 4 tool bar largely unusable.
Is there a way around this short of converting to 8-bit?
You've got it right. You either have to convert to 8 bit
Elements 4 only allows a subset of functions and filters in 16bit per
channel mode. CS2 allows a much larger set, with only a subset
restricted to 8bit mode.
The strategy to go with if you want to continue using Elements is to
do the large transformational edits (levels, curves, sharpening
I'll have the patience to wait for the next
de-bugged version.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elements 4 only allows a subset of functions and filters in 16bit per
channel mode. CS2 allows a much larger set, with only a subset
restricted to 8bit mode.
The strategy
Very Nice. Enjoyed the blog and the picture of Sami. If you wanted to
work on it some more, you might remove some of the background
distractions behind the type. Use your clone tool and extend the grass,
the pavement and the trees to cover the blue, yellow and green
thingamajiggies that are
/mypics/698154
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: photoshop elements 3.0 and opacity.
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:21:38 -0400
Very Nice. Enjoyed the blog and the picture of Sami. If you
I am trying to adjust the opacity on some pictures in adobe photoshop
elements. 3.0. I have been at this for over an hour now and all I seem to
be getting are little squares over my picture to make it lighter. Can I
adjust the opacity with out the darn little squares that take away from my
to adjust the opacity on some pictures in adobe photoshop
elements. 3.0. I have been at this for over an hour now and all I
seem to
be getting are little squares over my picture to make it lighter.
Can I
adjust the opacity with out the darn little squares that take away
from my
picture
BTW, my instructions are for PhotoShop, but I think elements is the
same. The little boxes are always due to not flattening the image.
Paul
On Aug 26, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Sandra Hermann wrote:
I am trying to adjust the opacity on some pictures in adobe photoshop
elements. 3.0. I have been
Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: photoshop elements 3.0 and opacity. Date: Sat, 26 Aug
2006 20:57:42 -0400
After opening your image, go to the layers window and double click on
the background layer. Another box will ask you to name the layer. You
can just leave it as layer 0 and click
- Original Message -
From: Sandra Hermann
Subject: OT: photoshop elements 3.0 and opacity.
I am trying to adjust the opacity on some pictures in adobe photoshop
elements. 3.0. I have been at this for over an hour now and all I
seem to
be getting are little squares over my picture
On 8/27/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sandra Hermann
Subject: OT: photoshop elements 3.0 and opacity.
I am trying to adjust the opacity on some pictures in adobe photoshop
elements. 3.0. I have been at this for over an hour now and all I
://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: photoshop elements 3.0 and opacity. Date: Sat, 26 Aug
2006 20:57:42 -0400
After opening your image, go
I'm inching my way through Bruce Fraser's book and
about 1500 RAW images from our Germany trip. I have
PE4, which comes with Camera Raw 3.3.
Question: Fraser's book shows tabs for Curves, Lens,
and Calibrate in the image control window that I don't
have. Is that because those tabs only appear
At 09:46 PM 25/07/2006, you wrote:
Question: Fraser's book shows tabs for Curves, Lens,
and Calibrate in the image control window that I don't
have. Is that because those tabs only appear if one
is running Photoshop CS? Or is there something hidden
I haven't found?
Curves, Lens, and Calibrate
On Jul 25, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Question: Fraser's book shows tabs for Curves, Lens,
and Calibrate in the image control window that I don't
have. Is that because those tabs only appear if one
is running Photoshop CS? Or is there something hidden
I haven't found?
Yes, you
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:53:44PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
At 09:46 PM 25/07/2006, you wrote:
Question: Fraser's book shows tabs for Curves, Lens,
and Calibrate in the image control window that I don't
have. Is that because those tabs only appear if one
is running Photoshop CS? Or is
don't
have. Is that because those tabs only appear if one
is running Photoshop CS? Or is there something hidden
I haven't found?
Apparently, it is hidden. This is specific to Elements 3, but it
might be worth a look.
http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/photoshop-elements-curves.html
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:25 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:53:44PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
At 09:46 PM 25/07/2006, you wrote:
Question: Fraser's book shows tabs for Curves, Lens,
and Calibrate in the image control window that I don't
have. Is that because those tabs
?
Apparently, it is hidden. This is specific to Elements 3, but it
might be worth a look.
http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/photoshop-elements-
curves.html
Rick's talking about the Camera Raw tabs for Curves, Lens and
Calibrate, not the similar but different tools used in editing post
Thanks, everyone. Looks as though I'll have to save
my pennies for either CS2 or Lightroom.
Rick
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:53:44PM +0800, David
Savage wrote:
At 09:46 PM 25/07/2006, you wrote:
Question: Fraser's book shows tabs for Curves,
Lightroom is currently available as a free beta from Adobe.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, everyone. Looks as though I'll have to save
my pennies for either CS2 or Lightroom.
Rick
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:53:44PM +0800, David
Savage
Not for Mac, though.
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lightroom is currently available as a free beta from
Adobe.
-Adam
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
Mac and Windows both. It was Mac only until last week. Available as a
Universal binary too.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Not for Mac, though.
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lightroom is currently available as a free beta from
Adobe.
-Adam
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
Weird. The item on adobe.com said Windoze only. But
Google led me to the Mac version.
Rick
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mac and Windows both. It was Mac only until last
week. Available as a
Universal binary too.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Not for Mac, though.
---
The most recent release was windows only, because the Mac version had
been out for over a month.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Weird. The item on adobe.com said Windoze only. But
Google led me to the Mac version.
Rick
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mac and Windows both. It was
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML pdml@pdml.net; Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:13 AM
Subject: OT: Managing all these RAW files with Photoshop Elements 4.0
2nd try, 1st didn't make it to the list. Bob S.
-- Forwarded message --
From
... :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML pdml@pdml.net; Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:13 AM
Subject: OT: Managing all these RAW files with Photoshop Elements 4.0
2nd try, 1st didn't make
for import into Elements.
5. Rename raw file directory to 'archive_x-x'. x is the
image number.
6. Copy Directory to CD-R.
7. When the enough files accumulate, copy again to DVD. Store offsite.
8. Delete Raw files from Hard Drive.
This gives me CD-R and DVD backups of my Raw files
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what do you all do? Convert them all in a batch and just save
the converted versions as high quality photoshop files? Do you put the
RAW originals away somewhere, out of Elements 4.0?
Just an amateur...
I convert all and put them in a structured
, out of Elements 4.0?
==
Didn't see original post so not sure what you are asking, exactly.
But I can tell you what I do and why. I use mainly Elements 3 to manage my
photos. Even though I also have PS CS, I am not that conversant with it yet.
And
I like some of the photo management stuff
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML pdml@pdml.net; Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:13 AM
Subject: OT: Managing all these RAW files with Photoshop Elements 4.0
2nd try, 1st didn't make it to the list. Bob S
On Jun 20, 2006, at 12:11 AM, Jostein wrote:
Folder structure is the basic element of my solution. All the
RAW-files goes into one folder structure The names of the folders and
the organisation is down to personal taste, of course. I prefer a
simple date-based setup like this:
RawFiles
2nd try, 1st didn't make it to the list. Bob S.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 19, 2006 8:09 PM
Subject: OT: Managing all these RAW files with Photoshop Elements 4.0
To: pdml@pdml.net
So now that you have me shooting RAW files, how do I
I have seen this program memtioned here in reference to using with Pentax
Raw files. Another program was also mentioned, Adobe Camera Raw. Am I
correct in assuming that ACR is included with the Elements 4.0, or is it a
seperate program I must purchase?
I am ready to buy a new computer system
ACR is, indeed, part of Photoshop Elements 4.0
ACR is also a separate module that undergoes frequent updates, and which
can be downloaded from the Adobe store free of charge. It is compatible
with Elements as well as Photoshop.
While it's most likely Elements is using a version of ACR
On 20/3/06, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have seen this program memtioned here in reference to using with Pentax
Raw files. Another program was also mentioned, Adobe Camera Raw. Am I
correct in assuming that ACR is included with the Elements 4.0, or is it a
seperate program I must
Note that ACR only provides basic functionality in Elements. All the
advanced features work in CS2 only. But you can do quite good RAW
conversions with only the basic featureset.
As far as I'm aware, Elements 4 is Windows only currently, Elements 3 is
the Mac version, but that will work
PSE4 for Mac OS X has been released recently:
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopelmac/main.html
Godfrey
On Mar 20, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Note that ACR only provides basic functionality in Elements. All
the advanced features work in CS2 only. But you can do quite good
Quoting Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note that ACR only provides basic functionality in Elements. All the
advanced features work in CS2 only. But you can do quite good RAW
conversions with only the basic featureset.
As far as I'm aware, Elements 4 is Windows only currently, Elements 3
Thanks for the replies/input.
I was at Costco this AM and they have some new computers in. One is the new
G4 with gobs of bells and whistles and a big 22 LCD screen. 2000.00 in
round numbers! In the Microsoft world there was an Athalon 64 with a
sufficient amount of stuff for what I need and a
On Mar 20, 2006, at 5:59 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Thanks for the replies/input.
I was at Costco this AM and they have some new computers in. One is
the new
G4 with gobs of bells and whistles and a big 22 LCD screen.
2000.00 in
round numbers! In the Microsoft world there was an Athalon 64
So I took a picture in RAW and now need to process it.
I've got PSP 9.0 and PS Elements 3.0.
I thought I could use one of these, but have problems.
Anybody using either product with Pentax RAW.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:42:51PM -0600, Bob Sullivan wrote:
So I took a picture in RAW and now need to process it.
I've got PSP 9.0 and PS Elements 3.0.
I thought I could use one of these, but have problems.
Anybody using either product with Pentax RAW.
Regards, Bob S.
Elements works just
Bob
I use on my PC machine, PSEL3 and open Raw files fine with it.
You may need to d/l the latest ACR for your program.
It does work.:-)
Dave
Quoting Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I took a picture in RAW and now need to process it.
I've got PSP 9.0 and PS Elements 3.0.
I thought I
Hello all:
If someone has a Photoshop Elements for Windows, version 3 which doesn't
need and want to sell it, I am ready to buy it for a reasonable price.
My scarcely used Windows partition in my PC has Windows 2000 Pro SP4
installed, and can't run the latest Elements v. 4. I have donwloaded
On Nov 19, 2005, at 1:46 PM, William Robb wrote:
In absolute qualitative terms, small format digital is not up to
the standard that film is capable of, especially larger than 35mm
formats.
Small format film isn't quite up to the standard of larger than 35mm
formats either ;)
- Dave
the time to postprocess is an essential part of the production of a print.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Herb,
Forgive me, but I can't decide if you agree
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Herb,
Forgive me, but I can't decide if you agree with me or not.
I'm primarily referring to image resolution, once limited by the
optics. Doesn't mean, of course, every
]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Reads as though you understand exactly what I'm contending, thus
confirms our total agreement.
I've been reading again.
This time it's an article (What's New With Zooms) in the Dec '05
issue of Outdoor Photographer.
Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats, identifies
which have at least on element of Aspherical/Special Glass. An
article foot note explains that special
On Nov 18, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I've been reading again.
This time it's an article (What's New With Zooms) in the Dec '05
issue of Outdoor Photographer.
Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats,
identifies
which have at least on element of
N/A could very well mirror the delivery status, at least for
FA*80-200/2.8
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:29 PM
Subject: LD Elements
I've been reading again.
This time it's an article
Pentax's' Marketing Dept (I'm making a bold assumption here) must
become somewhat exercised at the publishing of such mis-information.
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on
a lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers of
technology and operator
PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:29 PM
Subject: LD Elements
I've been reading again.
This time it's an article (What's New With Zooms) in the Dec '05
issue of Outdoor Photographer.
Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Pentax's' Marketing Dept (I'm making a bold assumption here) must
become somewhat exercised at the publishing of such mis-information.
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on
a lessening
that only says the research ability of the author is not very competent.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:29 PM
Subject: LD Elements
I won't set down the complete article here, but in each
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on
a lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on a
lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers of
technology and operator ability seem to trump all else. In the optical dark
room, everything works off of the initial careful focus.
--
Hmmm. As
either,
mostly
having to do with color correction. better get used to it.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
To my other question, appears obvious
photoshop elements 2.0
and acrobat reader -
IF i send stuff up to cafe press for a book (we
are thinking, in effect,
son of Sign Language) they do the book pages in
real black and white -
and claim photos look good
I need to string together pages so they end up
printing back and front.
ideas
101 - 200 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
