sues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
> What a load of BS. I just explained to you how I use LF
> to do seascapes wi
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
> What a load of BS. I just explained to you how I use LF
> to do seascapes with boats and why pan and stitch wont
> work a
tibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
>
> Yes, I state
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
>
> Yes, I state facts matter of factly. If you don't like what I say
>
On 23 Sep 2004 at 15:46, Alan Chan wrote:
> I am with Rob. Though I don't have the *istD, but the accuracy of the
> aperture at 'A' setting has been questioning for years. The difference could be
> between less than 1/3 to 2/3EV depends on the lens/camera combination.
Exactly, and experiencing v
context.
>
> JCO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
> what a great camera!)
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
> You must be spoon fed everything like a little baby.
> If you are down near the lower limit of the meter cells
> and you
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Even more compatibility issues again! (WAS: RE: istDs -
what a great camera!)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Su
JCO
BIG DIFFERENCE - read my last post. When they abandoned M42
in favor of K mount there was a huge gain, much better and
faster lens mounting. With the *istD abandoning the K/M aperture
setting, THERE IS NO GAIN. ALL LOSS.
REPLY:
Thats debatable. Some prefer screw mount. I don't think the gain
9 matches
Mail list logo
