In a message dated 5/16/2006 10:37:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the mouth look unnatural? Photoshopped? The teeth seem excessively
white for a wild carnivore. The head is pointed down, yet the upper gum
is much exposed. I dunno, but it looks almost like someone
Don't know about the lens but his legs are extremely long. His legs
are even longer because his feet are hidden. And his ears look like a
teddybear. The expression in eyes doesn't match his teeth. Exif
information is missing in the jpg.
Canis photoshopus maybe? At least a very strange beast.
It's a very unfriendly dog, and I hope it's a l-o-n-g
lens!
Rick
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got any ideas how long was the lens used for
this shot?
And what the heck is it?
From:
Subject: Re: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
William Robb wrote:
Anyone got any ideas how long was the lens used for this shot?
And what the heck is it?
From the depth of field, not very long - even if it was on a
microdigital format box. So the photographer was not very far away from
it, which might explain the threat display. If
http://michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/roadahead/lg/12lg.jpg
On second glance, this has got to be photoshopped. The legs have been
lengthened, and not well at that. Look at the ratio of femur to tibia in
the rear leg (upper bone to lower) compared to the ratio of humerus to
ulna in
I meant to send this to the list. Mind not working this morning.
Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fw: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:22:31 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michaelyon-online.com/media
Canis photoshopus maybe?
My initial reaction also.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Don't know about the lens but his legs
.
It probably resembles the original dog, pre domestication.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message - From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Don't know about the lens but his legs
16, 2006 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Canis photoshopus maybe?
My initial reaction also.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Strange
Beautiful smile though, reminds me of my first girlfriend Gretchen. Ah, but
that was years ago
Norm
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Canis photoshopus maybe?
My initial reaction also.
http://michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/roadahead/lg/12lg.jpg
Even stranger looking:
http://www.arfra.org/thylacines.html
Australians, don't bother looking.
Joe
On 5/17/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even stranger looking:
http://www.arfra.org/thylacines.html
Australians, don't bother looking.
Whoops...I looked.
Dave S
It's creepy, whatever it is. 0_0
Mike
Anyone got any ideas how long was the lens used for this shot?
And what the heck is it?
From:
Subject: Re: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
http://michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/roadahead/lg/12lg.jpg
William Robb
13 matches
Mail list logo
