something only a few feet a way. The DOF difference
between 2.5 and 32 was pretty noticable focusing on the some point with the
same lens with an LX.
Steve
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: *ist-D K Mount Question
Message-ID: <[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:12 AM
Subject: *ist-D K Mount Question
> I was playing with an *ist-D and a K lens (the SMC 135 2.5). Shots made
wide
> open seemed to be exposed pretty well. If
Hi Steve,
on 03 Oct 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>Has anyone else noticed the same thing?
I did notice the same. Don't know how to explain that...
Cheers, Heiko
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: *ist-D K Mount Question
> I was playing with an *ist-D and a K lens (the SMC 135 2.5). Shots made
wide
> open seemed to be exposed pretty well. If I set the lens to a smaller
> aperture, I c
oing!
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne af David Brooks
Sendt: 31. marts 2002 16:04
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: M42 to K mount question
Thanks Jens.I just find it strange that with an
A or M lens on the K1000, i can get th
y,i'll see whats happens
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 20:49:14 +0100
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SV: M42 to K mount question
Hi
Hi Dave
I'm quite sure that the meter is normally not
aff
Emne: M42 to K mount question
Hi all.I tried out my new adaptor
yesterday,using a Super Tak 200 f4 on the
K1000.One thing i noticed was the light meter
was noticably slower moving with the 200 that
if the 35-80 or 80-200 was attached.
Is this a common thing.
Mind you the weather has been really c
Hi all.I tried out my new adaptor
yesterday,using a Super Tak 200 f4 on the
K1000.One thing i noticed was the light meter
was noticably slower moving with the 200 that
if the 35-80 or 80-200 was attached.
Is this a common thing.
Mind you the weather has been really cloudy and
windy lately.
T
"Tiger Moses" wrote:
>I think I need to clarify, I was wondering if there would be a chance we'd
>have the opportunity to buy a non-Pentax brand Digital body with a K-AF2
>mount on it?
Not the be rude, but don't hold your breath. If Pentax doesn't think there
is enough of a market to mak
Answer is somewhere between slim and none.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tiger Moses
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K-mount question
I think I need to clarify, I was
In a message dated 12/6/2001 2:30:36 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Ricoh, Casina, Vivitar, and ??? I guess if there would be a point in
history
>
> where Pentax wouldn't make any film based cameras anymore, there would
have
> no reason for other manufacturer
>Are there any current manufacturers licensed to produce K-mount camera?
>
>I ask because I am wonder once 24x36cm CCDs become common place, is there a
>3rd
>party (Phoenix) who could put out a body we could buy if the P_Gods haven't
>shown us the way?
Ricoh, Casina, Vivitar, and ??? I guess if
Are there any current manufacturers licensed to produce K-mount camera?
I ask because I am wonder once 24x36cm CCDs become common place, is there a 3rd
party (Phoenix) who could put out a body we could buy if the P_Gods haven't
shown us the way?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
