On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, keller.schaefer wrote:
> Yes, no doubt. But there still is room for further development. There already
> are 5MP sensors 7.2x5.3mm large. An APS sized sensor with this pixel density
> would have 46 MP. So a good quality 10+ MP APS sensor is nothing unthinkable,
> right?
The noi
On 9 Jan 2004 at 16:56, keller.schaefer wrote:
> Yes, no doubt. But there still is room for further development. There already
> are 5MP sensors 7.2x5.3mm large.
They are poor performers relative to sensors the density of the *ist D, they
also start becoming unsharp from f11 due to diffraction e
Yes, no doubt. But there still is room for further development. There already
are 5MP sensors 7.2x5.3mm large. An APS sized sensor with this pixel density
would have 46 MP. So a good quality 10+ MP APS sensor is nothing unthinkable,
right?
Sven
Zitat von Dag T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is.
>
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, mapson wrote:
> What zoom lens (wide-ish angle) would you recommend for istD?
>
> I have 'regular' Pentax17-28mm, Pentax 28-70 f4 and Tokina 28-70 f2.6/2.8
> but, as you all well know, they suddenly got 'narrower' with the purchase
> od the digital camera. Hence I need something
There is.
Such things as noise/sensitivity considerations and diffraction limits.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 15.00 skrev keller.schaefer:
A full frame DSLR would just not fit into this picture - and there is
no reason
to believe that APS sized sensors cannot be developed further to
achieve high
Of course I don't 'know' what will happen - but wouldn't this be a big, big
surprise, given that they have stopped developing their full frame DSLR in
favour of the *ist D and have started developing and selling lenses with a
smaller image circle?
To me this looks like a complete change of directio
"keller.schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Zitat von Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> This one time, at band camp, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> There is always the digital only 16-45 that is coming out. You didn't
>>> mention whether you needed it to work on a film ca
This one time, at band camp, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert,
>
> There is always the digital only 16-45 that is coming out. You didn't mention
> whether you needed it to work on a film camera or not.
As I understand, the lenses made for the *istD are to suit the smaller sized
I could not rank them. Wouldn't you have to test/try them to do that?
Of the bunch, I have tried the Sigma 15-30 (Nikon Mount on D100),
Phoenix 19-35 and Tokina 19-35. I ended up purchasing the Tokina. I
would expect the Pentax 16-45 and 20-35 to be better, but they are
more than 2X the price.
9 matches
Mail list logo
