On 30 March 2011 22:15, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Naked Cormorant/
Dan
I think you get the PDML prize for this, Dan :-D
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
--
PDML
Oh come on now. That's the same web site that breathlessly reported this...
http://k-rumors.com/k3-samsung-ready-to-drop-a-bomb-new-mirrorless-fullframe-camera-to-be-announced-in-december/
God knows what Pentax will do with a mirrorless concept camera, but I
doubt that the Samsung rumor will
http://k-rumors.com/first-pictures-of-the-pentax-nc-1-system/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I think April fool's, too. That's not an EVIL/MILC but an
interchangeable lens PS. Why would anyone in their right mind spend
money for a system camera where sensor IQ is the limiting factor?
2011/3/30 Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com:
For the same reason people think m43 is too big (at least in current
incarnations).
But, as you point it out, it brings problems inherent to sensor size
(noise and DOF).
It may get a market though. I know I wish my LX3 could change lens.
Even with its small sensor (bigger than the 1/2.33 chosen
This system has been rumored for a while, so it may not be a 4/1 one. ;-)
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/pentax-mirrorless-system-with-ultratiny-sensor-5x/
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
For the same reason people think m43 is too big (at least in
Pentax is also supposed to be working on a bigger (m43 or APS-C) Milc.
However, I suspect that Hoya is a more clever company and sees a
profit from a retro system like this, especially in the Japanese
market. After all, it will be really small and in the high end PS
market it is a nice little
Well, the sensor IQ on my little Canon S90 is astounding given how
small it is. Something that small that could be both a pocket cam
and, when you need it, take a telephoto or F1.4 or whatever, would be
a compelling package. I guess you'd need a k-adapter, although the
thought of one of my heavy
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:10:18PM +0200, eckinator wrote:
I think April fool's, too. That's not an EVIL/MILC but an
interchangeable lens PS. Why would anyone in their right mind spend
money for a system camera where sensor IQ is the limiting factor?
Name one system where sensor IQ is not the
On 30/03/2011 14:10, eckinator wrote:
I think April fool's, too. That's not an EVIL/MILC but an
interchangeable lens PS. Why would anyone in their right mind spend
money for a system camera where sensor IQ is the limiting factor?
2011/3/30 Jaume Lahuertajlah...@yahoo.com:
On 30/03/2011 14:10, eckinator wrote:
I think April fool's, too. That's not an EVIL/MILC but an
interchangeable lens PS. Why would anyone in their right mind spend
money for a system camera where sensor IQ is the limiting factor?
2011/3/30 Jaume Lahuertajlah...@yahoo.com:
What's funny is that even though we all know the cropping factor is
what gives equivalent focal length, you have still jammed a whole
bunch of pixels into a tiny area. If you have decent light, its like
a tiny center crop of a stupidly high MP FF sensor, about 400 MP using
rough numbers. If you
I just received an e-mail from Pentax HQ and they told me they're
still working on what NC will stand for. These are some of the
options they have in mind:
No Comment
Niche Camera
Not Crap
Nifty Compact
Nadie Compra (for the Spanish-speaking market)
Nice Compromise
Never Crop
Need Cash
I think
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jaume Lahuerta
http://k-rumors.com/first-pictures-of-the-pentax-nc-1-system/
pitched squarely at the pimp market.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
If only. That market has money and buys stuff.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jaume Lahuerta
http://k-rumors.com/first-pictures-of-the-pentax-nc-1-system/
I just received an e-mail from Pentax HQ and they told me they're
still working on what NC will stand for. These are some of the
options they have in mind:
I'll wait for model NC-1701
At that point I will make a trek to my local vendor.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I just received an e-mail from Pentax HQ and they told me they're
still working on what NC will stand for. These are some of the
options they have in mind:
I'll wait for model NC-1701
At that point I will make a trek to my local
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:44:12PM +, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I just received an e-mail from Pentax HQ and they told me they're
still working on what NC will stand for. These are some of the
options they have in mind:
I'll wait for model NC-1701
At that point I will make a trek to my
Miserere wrote:
I just received an e-mail from Pentax HQ and they told me they're
still working on what NC will stand for. These are some of the
options they have in mind:
No Comment
Niche Camera
Not Crap
Nifty Compact
Nadie Compra (for the Spanish-speaking market)
Nice Compromise
Never Crop
Naked Cormorant/
Dan
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Miserere wrote:
I just received an e-mail from Pentax HQ and they told me they're
still working on what NC will stand for. These are some of the
options they have in mind:
No Comment
20 matches
Mail list logo
