Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread alex wetmore
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people > haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk > about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear > and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen > any of

OT - Dynamic links (was:Re: PAW: Too Much PAW)

2004-02-24 Thread Cotty
On 24/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: >Why not make the URL to your site more noticeable by making >it, what do you call it, a dynamic link ... y'know, with the >"http" in front of it. Will this make a difference? In my plain text email application (Powermail 4.2), anything beginning with 'www

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi, Why not make the URL to your site more noticeable by making it, what do you call it, a dynamic link ... y'know, with the "http" in front of it. I agree about the community feel to this list. shel Cotty wrote: > I haven't participated because I have a web site with galleries on it, > and th

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Cotty
On 23/2/04, SHEL disgorged: >I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people >haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk >about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear >and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen >any of those good, high-t

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! Shel, I agree with you - "The Spice Must Flow!" Boris

RE: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread frank theriault
eeing the work of others who I don't see much from! I say, keep PAW alive!! cheers, frank "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Rob Studdert
On 23 Feb 2004 at 17:59, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment > that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going > to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said > anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his > decision .

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread brooksdj
Party Poopers:-) I think this is great. A new rush so to speak has happened.I can finally show some of my Nikon and Yashica Mat camera pic's that i like, that cannot go on the PUG.Others have shown pic's from film and digi cameras that are non Pentax too. I find this very refreshing. The

PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I say. The pics should come as the mood strikes you, when you have a good one you want to share, or when you have one you're looking for comments about. And why just on