On 7/23/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruce ...
I've got to disagree with you wrt context in general. Not everything has
to be spelled out or shown (like the difference between listening to the
radio and watching TV). She could be crying, have an irritation, or
perhaps
We met Stella while testing lenses in San Francisco last week. She was
sitting beside us. A conversation ensued, and a few pics were taken.
Here's one I liked.
http:/home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/stella1.html
This was one of the first pics i took using the istds. Unfortunately, it
was shot
We met Stella while testing lenses in San Francisco last week. She was
sitting beside us. A conversation ensued, and a few pics were taken. Here's
one I liked.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/stella1.html
This was one of the first pics I took using the istds. It was shot at 3200
and in
Shel, At the resolution you've posted it doesn't look that bad. The
skin tones are good and artifacts
are not particularly visible. It might be difficult to get an
acceptable 8x10 or 9x12, but seems perfectly
acceptable for the web.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
We met Stella while testing lenses
Hello Shel,
For me, I think a little more context would help. She is rubbing her
eyes for some reason - just can't figure out what. Don't know if she
is crying or has some irritation or what, but it makes the photo
incomplete. If there is no context to show - no reason for the eye
rub, I would
Hi Bruce ...
I've got to disagree with you wrt context in general. Not everything has
to be spelled out or shown (like the difference between listening to the
radio and watching TV). She could be crying, have an irritation, or
perhaps she's crying because I'm irritating her ;-))
Shel
6 matches
Mail list logo
