In a message dated 7/19/2006 10:41:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comments and suggestions welcome. Technical details available by
clicking the i icon.
Cheers
Brian
To me the correction looks pretty good. But I am no expert on that.
Nice shot! Lovely
Doing perspective corrections with software is cheaper than buying a shift
lens or a view camera.
After reading your post last night I had a go correcting a shot of mine
with converging verticals using PTGui. After placing a few control points
to define the verticals horizontal's, here's what
Hmmm.
Think I'll quit while I'm behind. I'm going cross-eyed with this
image :)
I think I need a drink.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't think it's your imagination, it does
Hi David
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Doing perspective corrections with software is cheaper than buying
a shift
lens or a view camera.
A shift lens? Does anyone still make them? Not that I could ever
afford one, much less justify the purchase
After reading your post
G'day Brian
At 04:32 PM 21/07/2006, Brian Walters wrote:
A shift lens? Does anyone still make them? Not that I could ever
afford one, much less justify the purchase
Canon still lists them. Hartblei make some for 35mm as well I think.
With this sort of image I think the converging
Looks great. Good work.
Paul
On Jul 21, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Paul. Here's another attempt.
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/IMGP2987.jpg
I think the centre vertcal is more or less straight now. I tried
stretching the image vertically but (of
On 20/07/06, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But...is it possible to correct perspecive without
distorting other parts of the picture?
I always get the same effect as Brian, I correct the
perspective (with the Photoshop feature) but the
building doors are squashed vertically.
Is
David Savage wrote:
G'day Brian
At 04:32 PM 21/07/2006, Brian Walters wrote:
A shift lens? Does anyone still make them? Not that I could ever
afford one, much less justify the purchase
Canon still lists them. Hartblei make some for 35mm as well I think.
Nikon does as well.
I took a few pictures of Svinhufvud's* summer cottage yesterday. Its on
the way to our land some 50 kms from here. I squeezed the lower part of
the picture with Perspective instead of expanding the top and it works,
in this case at least, better than when I tried the top.
*One of Finland's
On Jul 21, 2006, at 7:15, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 20/07/06, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But...is it possible to correct perspecive without
distorting other parts of the picture?
I always get the same effect as Brian, I correct the
perspective (with the Photoshop feature)
Those by Canon Nikon are Tilt Shift lenses. Much more useful than a shift
lens.
Pentax made a shift lens you'll occasionally see one for sale. Not worth
it IMHO.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: An exercise in perspective
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:15:17PM +1000, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 20/07/06, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But...is it possible to correct perspecive without
distorting other parts of the picture?
I always get the same effect as Brian, I correct the
perspective (with the
On 22/07/06, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, as Paul suggested, simply stretch the image vertically
after you've applied the perspective adjustment transform.
The problem is that the perspective correction only stretches
the image horizontally (by different amounts depending on how
Hi Rob,
Welcome back. You're probably the list expert in the area of
perspective control. Can you elaborate?
Paul
On Jul 21, 2006, at 10:49 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 22/07/06, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, as Paul suggested, simply stretch the image vertically
after
On 22/07/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rob,
Welcome back. You're probably the list expert in the area of
perspective control. Can you elaborate?
Hi Paul,
With the appropriate tools it's possible to execute perspective
control, rotation and distortion compensation (including
Thanks Rob
I'll have another go at adjusting my image. I'm determined to get a
result that I like. Could take some time
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 20/07/06, Jaume Lahuerta
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 01:12:38PM +1000, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 22/07/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rob,
Welcome back. You're probably the list expert in the area of
perspective control. Can you elaborate?
Hi Paul,
With the appropriate tools it's possible to
What program did you sue to make the correction?
Don
John Francis wrote:
It looks as though you've squashed it a little vertically
in the process of correcting the perspective.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:38:11AM -0500, Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
I quite liked this photo of afternoon
But...is it possible to correct perspecive without
distorting other parts of the picture?
I always get the same effect as Brian, I correct the
perspective (with the Photoshop feature) but the
building doors are squashed vertically.
Is there another way to do it?
Thanks,
Jaume
--- John Francis
Op Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:52:08 +0200 schreef Jaume Lahuerta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But...is it possible to correct perspecive without
distorting other parts of the picture?
Actually, the perspective is correct in the original picture, I think? The
low point-of view results in a vanishing point
I have CS and there seems to be no perspective correction filter -- only
funny stuff. I think Paintshop Pro had one.
Don
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
But...is it possible to correct perspecive without
distorting other parts of the picture?
I always get the same effect as Brian, I correct the
It is not a filter:
Menu: Edit-Transform-Perspective
see:
http://www.outbackphoto.com/workshop/PSPerspectiveCorrection/PhotoshopPerspectiveCorrection.html
--- Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I have CS and there seems to be no perspective
correction filter -- only
funny stuff. I
Hi Don
I'm using Photoshop Elements 1. I tried the Perspective tool but
couldn't get it to look right so I ended up using the Distort
tool.
Cheers
Brian
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
Quoting Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What program did
Yes - I noticed that too. However, trying to stretch it vertically
tends to lose the top spire.
Thanks for the comment, John.
Cheers
Brian
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
Quoting John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks as though you've
Brian,
You appear to have done a fine job at something I haven't even tried.
Wonderful lighting nicely framed.
Jack
--- Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I quite liked this photo of afternoon light on the sandstone walls of
an old church in western Sydney. Unfortunately it
Nice shot and generally good work. But the center vertical isn't quite
straight. That throws it off if you're going for perfect alignment. If elements
has the Edit/Free Transform tool use this to rotate the image before you
correct the perspective. You might find that the perspective tool works
I find trying to correct perspective in Elements a little tricky;
you end up with an image that's either squashed or stretched
horizontally (or, alternatively, stretched or sqashed vertically).
If you think of the perspective correction as distorting your
original rectangle into a trapeziod, you
Thanks for the tips, Paul. Here's another attempt.
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/IMGP2987.jpg
I think the centre vertcal is more or less straight now. I tried
stretching the image vertically but (of course) the whole image
stretched, not just the tower and it didn't look right.
Hi John
Thanks for the comments. Another attempt is here:
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/IMGP2987.jpg
When I said that part of the image was lost, I was referring to the
use of the distort tool. However, I found that by increasing the
size of the canvas first, this problem is
Is it my imagination, or does the belfry now look fatter at the top?
Don
Brian Walters wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Paul. Here's another attempt.
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/IMGP2987.jpg
I think the centre vertcal is more or less straight now. I tried
stretching the image
I don't think it's your imagination, it does look fatter at the top.
It's better to have a little convergence than a little divergence when
correcting for perspective.
Don Williams wrote:
Is it my imagination, or does the belfry now look fatter at the top?
Don
Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
I quite liked this photo of afternoon light on the sandstone walls of
an old church in western Sydney. Unfortunately it suffered from
converging verticals so I had a go at correcting the perspective.
It looks OK but perhaps it could have been done better.
The adjusted image is at the
It looks as though you've squashed it a little vertically
in the process of correcting the perspective.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:38:11AM -0500, Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
I quite liked this photo of afternoon light on the sandstone walls of
an old church in western Sydney. Unfortunately
33 matches
Mail list logo
