Excellent!,
Thank you Paul.
Angel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To expand on my previous answer, one of the toughest parts of wedding
photography is preserving texture in the white wedding gown without
relegating the groom's black tux to shadow hell. I haven't had a lot of
problems with this in
Is the extended dynamic range active for raw files or is it part of
the processing for a jpg?
Some of us suspect that it is just a one-stop underexposure combined
with a histogram adjustment.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Some of us have seen that it works very well shooting RAW. Obviously, it's
something rather simple, but it's quite functional.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the extended dynamic range active for raw files or is it part of
To Roman's point about extended dynamic range. I shoot in that mode
almost continuously. About the only time I turn it off is if I need
ISO 100 or 6400, and those times are rare. I've noticed considerably
improvement in dynamic range over the K10D, but I was still surprised
to see sky
Spot metered on Grace, or matrix and trusting the flash to overcome her
silhouette?
Jack
--- On Sat, 6/21/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: K20D Extended Dynamic Range
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Saturday
?
Jack
--- On Sat, 6/21/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: K20D Extended Dynamic Range
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 6:25 AM
To Roman's point about extended dynamic range. I
That being the case, the dynamic range is even more impressive.
Jack
--- On Sat, 6/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: K20D Extended Dynamic Range
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, June 21
Paul -
Is the extended dynamic range active for raw files or is it part of
the processing for a jpg?
Thanks, gs
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Roman's point about extended dynamic range. I shoot in that mode
almost continuously. About the only time
It's active for RAW files. You can select it in the ISO function screen. It
limits the range of choices, eliminating ISO 100 and ISO6399. This apparently
has something to do with using that capacity to exend the range.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: George
Paul,
If you were doing or work in weddings would you use this function or you
would use the camera in nomal mode?
Angel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's active for RAW files. You can select it in the ISO function screen. It
limits the range of choices, eliminating ISO 100 and ISO6399. This
Sorry. Should say:
. . . use the camera in normal mode?
Angel
Angel Ramos wrote:
Paul,
If you were doing or work in weddings would you use this function or you
would use the camera in nomal mode?
Angel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's active for RAW files. You can select it in the ISO
Sure. I'll use it for wedding. I'm shooting one in about three weeks. The
ceremony will be outdoors with sky background. Indoors, i'll shoot at 400
anyway No reason I know of to turn off the EDR.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Angel Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To expand on my previous answer, one of the toughest parts of wedding
photography is preserving texture in the white wedding gown without relegating
the groom's black tux to shadow hell. I haven't had a lot of problems with this
in the past, but EDR will be a plus in this regard.
Paul
13 matches
Mail list logo
