Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder what the Sigma EX 28mm f1.8 would do reversed on the front of
that F100? It has a 77mm filter size. H.
This actually works: http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/display/6476072
:-)
One issue you might run into with the 28mm is vignetting,
On 19/07/2012 09:34, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder what the Sigma EX 28mm f1.8 would do reversed on the front of
that F100? It has a 77mm filter size. H.
This actually works: http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/display/6476072
Well
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:01:16 -0500 Darren Addy wrote:
It appears that male to male ring will find what I'm looking for on
that infernal auction site, but in the process I'm afraid that
Google's profile of me just changed in a rather inaccurate way. You
may also add the word macro or coupling to
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:01:16 -0500 Darren Addy wrote:
It appears that male to male ring will find what I'm looking for on
that infernal auction site, but in the process I'm afraid that
Google's profile of me just changed in a rather inaccurate way. You may
also
add the word macro or
On 7/18/2012 3:23 AM, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
But I digress... My point is that experiments are required to find optics that
fit well together for stacking. One can be very positively surprised with
results from what one already has lying around!
That's a very striking shot and
On 7/19/2012 8:43 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
I am not even sure where I got the two rings I own, probably by
rumaging through close-out sales of shops going out of business ...
I got mine at a local camera store - they had them loose in a drawer for
a couple bucks each. Bought 10 rings to cover
On Jul 18, 2012, at 18:01, Darren Addy wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply Jostein.
It appears that male to male ring will find what I'm looking for on
that infernal auction site, but in the process I'm afraid that
Google's profile of me just changed in a rather inaccurate way. You
may also
Mark's macro work has been and is good inspiration.
But you make it sound as if I bought equipment for the sake of besting him...
:-)
I think it was around 2006 I started to play with the 645 optics for macro.
IIRC, Mike Wilson has a picture of me applying gaffertape to couple two lenses
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:23 AM, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne
p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
Mark's macro work has been and is good inspiration.
But you make it sound as if I bought equipment for the sake of besting him...
:-)
I don't see anything wrong with a good competition between two friends
that
That's a terrific shot, Jostein. I appreciate your sharing it as well
as your set-up (and opinions/reasonings).
Also, I agree that John Shaw's Close-ups in Nature is an excellent,
excellent book.
Dumb question. What are the connector rings called that allow you to
thread a reversed lens into the
That's actually a very _good_ question...
I've seen many different descriptions. Reversal ring, reversing ring, reverse
adapter, male-male stepring, reverse coupling ring...
It's a complete mess. Most of the time, the thing people have in mind is an
adapter with a filter thread on one side and
Thanks for the quick reply Jostein.
It appears that male to male ring will find what I'm looking for on
that infernal auction site, but in the process I'm afraid that
Google's profile of me just changed in a rather inaccurate way. You
may also add the word macro or coupling to your search.
I just
Very impressive, Jostein. I like that a lot.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
There was some exchange on the list about macro photography and extension a
few days ago. Personally I prefer to use stacked lenses for magnification
beyond 1X. Here's one I
Technique aside, this is marvelous photograph, Jostein. Although you
seem to have affinity to (for?) this kind of macro photography at least
since 2006 when as I remember you were gearing up towards competing ;-)
with Mark Cassino on his snowflake photography.
On 7/15/2012 7:03 PM, Jostein
You are within stereomicroscope territory!
Lovely image with perfect detail, by the way...
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
Excellent
Dave
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
The image is severely cropped, but the motif gives you an idea of the
possibilities in the field with this kind of setup.
Image only: http://turl.no/kz3
In blog:
That's excellent - your setup worked well and you captured a great moment.
Mark
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
There was some exchange on the list about macro photography and extension a
few days ago. Personally I prefer to use stacked lenses for
Super shot, Jostein.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2012, at 8:52 PM, Mark C wrote:
That's excellent - your setup worked well and you captured a great moment.
Mark
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
There was some exchange on the list about macro photography and
Yeah, that's an amazing photo, Jostein.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Bulent Celasun bulent.cela...@gmail.com
Sent: July 16, 2012 7/16/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
What Mark said. Amazing detail. Cheers, Christine
On Jul 16, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
That's excellent - your setup worked well and you captured a great moment.
Mark
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
There was some
There was some exchange on the list about macro photography and extension a
few days ago. Personally I prefer to use stacked lenses for magnification
beyond 1X. Here's one I took today, using the 645D, and a 150mm lens stacked
with a reversed 75mm. The magnification of this combo is 2X. That's
I really like this, but I do tend toward insect macros.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
There was some exchange on the list about macro photography and extension a
few days ago. Personally I prefer to use stacked lenses for magnification
beyond 1X.
22 matches
Mail list logo
