> On 02 October 2017 at 16:21 Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> The only mushroom whose toxicity cannot be affected is "Death cap"
> (Amanita arochease); it has amatoxins.
> (This Wikipedia page for some strange reason mentions it being spread only
> in Latin America, while they are very frequent in E
> On 02 October 2017 at 16:21 Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> The only mushroom whose toxicity cannot be affected is "Death cap"
> (Amanita arochease); it has amatoxins.
> (This Wikipedia page for some strange reason mentions it being spread only
> in Latin America, while they are very frequent in E
Jostein,
That's interesting!
My father was a good mushroom "hunter", i.e. he knew when, where and how
to find them. But in a way, we were "snobbish": we focused primarily on
some "elite" mushrooms that we liked and ate. And we were not taking some
of those that other people around us would g
Igor,
they have been moved to a different genus in the same botanical family,
but are definitely related. In Norway we use kantareller as a common
denomination for all the mushrooms carrying their spores on what looks
like branched ribs rather than tightly packed lamellas (gills?) (eg. the
a
I didn't even know those ones were also called chanterelles.
I am looking at the images posted on the web for "Craterellus tubaeformis"
and for most of those, - I would never have called them "chanterelles" .
And we were not gathering/eating them.
By the way, - the wikipedia page mentions "chan
Den 02.10.2017 17:21, skrev Igor PDML-StR:
Jostein,
very nice photo showing lots of detail!
Thanks! I was trying to convey how they blend in with the fallen leaves.
I was confused by grayish-brownish (darker) color on top, which was
reminiscent of some spices of Lactarius. I am more used t
Jostein,
very nice photo showing lots of detail!
I was confused by grayish-brownish (darker) color on top, which was
reminiscent of some spices of Lactarius. I am more used to more
yellow(ish) color throughout. So, I was wondering if that was a
regional variation an effect of weather?
Chant
Chanterelle is the name I was trying to pull out of my brains data
bank...I have eaten them but over here we have something called a JAck
O-Lantern which -could- be mistaken for them and those are poisonous -
those are
close to looking like what you have photo'ed. There is a brightly
colored C
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 30, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> As I said on FB, that is a fascinating image of a fascinating fungus.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
>>
>> Apropos mushr
Thanks Ann,
Actually this is another of the safe species. The cantarella-ribs under
the hat that tapers off down the stem, is a definitive characteristic.
-At least for Norwegian species.
Jostein
Den 30.09.2017 17:40, skrev ann sanfedele:
Lovely composition... wondering if those are edible
Thanks Dan!
Jostein
Den 30.09.2017 16:38, skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
As I said on FB, that is a fascinating image of a fascinating fungus.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
Apropos mushrooms,
Here's one shot from the
Lovely composition... wondering if those are edible or faux.. I'm
thinking they are a variety that you better know well or let it be...
ann
On 9/30/2017 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
Apropos mushrooms,
Here's one shot from the local forest today, made with the K-5 and a
DA 10-17 fisheye on a 2X T
As I said on FB, that is a fascinating image of a fascinating fungus.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
> Apropos mushrooms,
>
> Here's one shot from the local forest today, made with the K-5 and a DA
> 10-17 fisheye on
Apropos mushrooms,
Here's one shot from the local forest today, made with the K-5 and a DA
10-17 fisheye on a 2X Tamron TC. Lit by a small flash on camera,
diffused with some polyethylene foam bag (IIRC, a small pocket of
protection foam received with an order from RRS a good while ago).
htt
Thanks for comments!
You are probably right about background and about ends of bulbs being
too bright.
The funny thing is: there is almost no precessing of the photo!
I had white balance corrected, cropped (slightly) and dialed vibrancy
down a little.
It was the first time I tried to use wide lens
On Feb 24, 2009, at 08:10 , Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
Here is
C&C welcome!
Thanks,
--Sasha
I enjoy the three dimensionality of the image, and the colors. I would
think that you processed this to be artistic as well as documentary.
The ends of t
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:10:54 -0800, "Sasha Sobol"
said:
> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
> Here is
> C&C welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> --Sasha
>
I think I agree with Jack on this. It also seems to be over-processed.
But maybe that's the look you were after.
Cheers
Brian
+++
Well chosen poppy, but its position and the busy background, detract.
If you're willing and able to substantially softened the background, I'd sure
try it!
Jack
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Sasha Sobol wrote:
> From: Sasha Sobol
> Subject: PESO - wide angle
> To: "
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
> Here is
> C&C welcome!
>
Those colours are amazing.
Wonderful photo!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
Here is
C&C welcome!
Thanks,
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
20 matches
Mail list logo