> On 02 October 2017 at 16:21 Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> The only mushroom whose toxicity cannot be affected is "Death cap"
> (Amanita arochease); it has amatoxins.
> (This Wikipedia page for some strange reason mentions it being spread only
> in Latin America, while they
> On 02 October 2017 at 16:21 Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> The only mushroom whose toxicity cannot be affected is "Death cap"
> (Amanita arochease); it has amatoxins.
> (This Wikipedia page for some strange reason mentions it being spread only
> in Latin America, while they
Jostein,
That's interesting!
My father was a good mushroom "hunter", i.e. he knew when, where and how
to find them. But in a way, we were "snobbish": we focused primarily on
some "elite" mushrooms that we liked and ate. And we were not taking some
of those that other people around us would
Igor,
they have been moved to a different genus in the same botanical family,
but are definitely related. In Norway we use kantareller as a common
denomination for all the mushrooms carrying their spores on what looks
like branched ribs rather than tightly packed lamellas (gills?) (eg. the
I didn't even know those ones were also called chanterelles.
I am looking at the images posted on the web for "Craterellus tubaeformis"
and for most of those, - I would never have called them "chanterelles" .
And we were not gathering/eating them.
By the way, - the wikipedia page mentions
Den 02.10.2017 17:21, skrev Igor PDML-StR:
Jostein,
very nice photo showing lots of detail!
Thanks! I was trying to convey how they blend in with the fallen leaves.
I was confused by grayish-brownish (darker) color on top, which was
reminiscent of some spices of Lactarius. I am more used
Jostein,
very nice photo showing lots of detail!
I was confused by grayish-brownish (darker) color on top, which was
reminiscent of some spices of Lactarius. I am more used to more
yellow(ish) color throughout. So, I was wondering if that was a
regional variation an effect of weather?
Chanterelle is the name I was trying to pull out of my brains data
bank...I have eaten them but over here we have something called a JAck
O-Lantern which -could- be mistaken for them and those are poisonous -
those are
close to looking like what you have photo'ed. There is a brightly
colored
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 30, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> As I said on FB, that is a fascinating image of a fascinating fungus.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jostein
Thanks Ann,
Actually this is another of the safe species. The cantarella-ribs under
the hat that tapers off down the stem, is a definitive characteristic.
-At least for Norwegian species.
Jostein
Den 30.09.2017 17:40, skrev ann sanfedele:
Lovely composition... wondering if those are edible
Thanks Dan!
Jostein
Den 30.09.2017 16:38, skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
As I said on FB, that is a fascinating image of a fascinating fungus.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
Apropos mushrooms,
Lovely composition... wondering if those are edible or faux.. I'm
thinking they are a variety that you better know well or let it be...
ann
On 9/30/2017 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
Apropos mushrooms,
Here's one shot from the local forest today, made with the K-5 and a
DA 10-17 fisheye on a 2X
As I said on FB, that is a fascinating image of a fascinating fungus.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jostein wrote:
> Apropos mushrooms,
>
> Here's one shot from the local forest today, made with the K-5 and a DA
Apropos mushrooms,
Here's one shot from the local forest today, made with the K-5 and a DA
10-17 fisheye on a 2X Tamron TC. Lit by a small flash on camera,
diffused with some polyethylene foam bag (IIRC, a small pocket of
protection foam received with an order from RRS a good while ago).
On Feb 24, 2009, at 08:10 , Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
Here is
CC welcome!
Thanks,
--Sasha
I enjoy the three dimensionality of the image, and the colors. I would
think that you processed this to be artistic as well as documentary.
The ends of
Thanks for comments!
You are probably right about background and about ends of bulbs being
too bright.
The funny thing is: there is almost no precessing of the photo!
I had white balance corrected, cropped (slightly) and dialed vibrancy
down a little.
It was the first time I tried to use wide
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
Here is
CC welcome!
Thanks,
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
Here is
CC welcome!
Those colours are amazing.
Wonderful photo!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Well chosen poppy, but its position and the busy background, detract.
If you're willing and able to substantially softened the background, I'd sure
try it!
Jack
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
From: Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com
Subject: PESO - wide angle
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:10:54 -0800, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com
said:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/3155418225
Here is
CC welcome!
Thanks,
--Sasha
I think I agree with Jack on this. It also seems to be over-processed.
But maybe that's the look you were after.
Cheers
Brian
20 matches
Mail list logo