On 8/11/15, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>All these naked ladies wear me out. Gotta take a break from them
>sometime,
MARK.
Nothing like a quote taken out of context :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
I actually had an entry -- shot it last Sunday -- but this was such a
crazy week with three 5-hour themed photoshoots, that I completely
forgot to enter it.
http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/image/132829964102
K-3, DA* 16-50/2.8, 26mm, f:11, 1/125th sec, 100 ISO
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
...the PDML is everything that a naked lady is not
YO... MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Walker" <bruce.wal...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PESO ~ On Two Wheels -- whoops, missed the November PUG
dea
On 8/11/15, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I actually had an entry -- shot it last Sunday -- but this was such a
>crazy week with three 5-hour themed photoshoots, that I completely
>forgot to enter it.
>
>http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/image/132829964102
>
>K-3, DA* 16-50/2.8, 26mm,
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 8/11/15, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I actually had an entry -- shot it last Sunday -- but this was such a
>>crazy week with three 5-hour themed photoshoots, that I completely
>>forgot to enter it.
>>
Well, hey, if Paul Stenquist can get away with it in his PUG entry, then ... :)
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:17 PM, knarf wrote:
> Way more than 2 wheels there, dude...
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
>
> On November 8, 2015 6:06:07 PM EST, Bruce Walker
>
Way more than 2 wheels there, dude...
She was on wheels? I never noticed.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "knarf" <knarftheria...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PESO ~ On Two Wheels -- whoops, missed the Novemb
Way more than 2 wheels there, dude...
Cheers,
frank
On November 8, 2015 6:06:07 PM EST, Bruce Walker wrote:
>I actually had an entry -- shot it last Sunday -- but this was such a
>crazy week with three 5-hour themed photoshoots, that I completely
>forgot to enter it.
>
That is ~so~ pandering for a "Mark!"
:-)
Cheers,
frank
On November 8, 2015 6:53:31 PM EST, Bruce Walker wrote:
>All these naked ladies wear me out. Gotta take a break from them
>sometime, and the PDML is everything that a naked lady is not.
--
"Sharpness is a
I'm heading out of town this afternoon. Should be home tomorrow or
Friday. I'll leave the December submit form open until then. Once the
gallery is put together, I'll get the new themes for next year up at
komkon and pdmlpug. Happy Thanksgiving!
David Savage wrote:
As someone who usually
I managed to get one in this time.
Dave
On Nov 21, 2007 2:48 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm heading out of town this afternoon. Should be home tomorrow or
Friday. I'll leave the December submit form open until then. Once the
gallery is put together, I'll get the new themes
On 21/11/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I managed to get one in this time.
As the bishop said to his bike.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Nov 21, 2007 3:30 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/11/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I managed to get one in this time.
As the bishop said to his bike.
I'd like to register a complaint.
Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On Nov 21, 2007 4:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:32 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
I managed to get one in this time.
As the bishop said to his bike.
I'd like to register a complaint.
About the bishop, the bike, or getting one in?
I won't play
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:32 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
I managed to get one in this time.
As the bishop said to his bike.
I'd like to register a complaint.
About the bishop, the bike, or getting one in?
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Quoting David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 21, 2007 3:30 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/11/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I managed to get one in this time.
As the bishop said to his bike.
I'd like to register a complaint.
Dave
Presumably about
As someone who usually forgets I thought I'd post a reminder while I
remember :-)
Decembers theme: Happy Feelings
Later dudes,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
I'm cutting it off in about 3 hours.
Scott Loveless wrote:
PUG deadline is about a day away. I'll probably cut it off sometime on
the 22nd (EST) unless a few of you just need an extra day or so. Lemme
know.
Also, I've had a few off-list email messages from submitters asking if
it went
Isn't that extremely painful? No wonder they call you loveless...
Scott Loveless wrote:
I'm cutting it off in about 3 hours.
Scott Loveless wrote:
PUG deadline is about a day away. I'll probably cut it off sometime on
the 22nd (EST) unless a few of you just need an extra day or so
Yes, please.
Bong :-)
On 6/21/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PUG deadline is about a day away. I'll probably cut it off sometime on
the 22nd (EST) unless a few of you just need an extra day or so. Lemme
know.
Also, I've had a few off-list email messages from submitters asking
That would be helpful.
Scott Loveless wrote:
PUG deadline is about a day away. I'll probably cut it off sometime on
the 22nd (EST) unless a few of you just need an extra day or so. Lemme
know.
Also, I've had a few off-list email messages from submitters asking if
it went through
P. J. Alling wrote:
That would be helpful.
Thanks for the replies. Two for two said yes. Any future submissions
will generate a confirmation email to the address supplied.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Could you send one if it did.nt go through:-)
Dave
On 6/21/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
That would be helpful.
Thanks for the replies. Two for two said yes. Any future submissions
will generate a confirmation email to the address supplied.
--
Yes, please.
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I've had a few off-list email messages from
submitters asking if
it went through. Would you like to receive a
confirmation email when
you submit an image? It's a simple setting and will
take about 2
seconds to turn on.
David J Brooks wrote:
Could you send one if it did.nt go through:-)
Unfortunately, that's a bit more difficult. If the photo you upload is
too big or has the wrong file extension you'll be notified right away.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Would you like to receive a confirmation email when you submit an image?
Yes, thank you.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PUG deadline and submission question
PUG deadline is about a day away. I'll probably cut it off sometime
In a message dated 6/21/2007 9:43:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would you like to receive a confirmation email when you submit an image?
That would be good.
Marnie
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email,
PUG deadline is about a day away. I'll probably cut it off sometime on
the 22nd (EST) unless a few of you just need an extra day or so. Lemme
know.
Also, I've had a few off-list email messages from submitters asking if
it went through. Would you like to receive a confirmation email when
Thanks P.J., I managed to get a photo uploaded, but with great difficulty.
It seems that no matter what I did when resizing a pic from the K10 that was
shot in JPEG Fine down to the required pixel size and then saving with a new
name, the file size was just barely exceeding the 75k size limit.
On 4/22/07, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks P.J., I managed to get a photo uploaded, but with great difficulty.
It seems that no matter what I did when resizing a pic from the K10 that was
shot in JPEG Fine down to the required pixel size and then saving with a new
name, the file
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler
Subject: PUG Deadline tomorrow!
Thanks P.J., I managed to get a photo uploaded, but with great difficulty.
It seems that no matter what I did when resizing a pic from the K10 that
was
shot in JPEG Fine down to the required pixel size
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 01:38:20PM -0400, Walter Hamler wrote:
Thanks P.J., I managed to get a photo uploaded, but with great difficulty.
It seems that no matter what I did when resizing a pic from the K10 that was
shot in JPEG Fine down to the required pixel size and then saving with a new
I just thought I'd remind everyone since I got mine in on time.
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It's that time of the month again folks.
The theme: Abandoned
Cheers,
Dave (Bugger, I forgot again I don't have anything suitable in my archives)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:25:24 +0800, David Savage wrote:
The theme: Abandoned
Cheers,
Dave (Bugger, I forgot again I don't have anything suitable in my archives)
Of course you have Dave!
It is just a matter of some creativity and imagination :-)
Regards, JvW
: November PUG Deadline Reminder
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:36:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:25:24 +0800, David Savage wrote:
The theme: Abandoned
Cheers,
Dave (Bugger, I forgot again I don't have anything suitable in my
archives)
Of course you have Dave!
It is just a matter of some
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: November PUG Deadline Reminder
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:36:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:25:24 +0800, David Savage wrote:
The theme: Abandoned
Cheers,
Dave
: Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: November PUG Deadline Reminder
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:36:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:25:24 +0800, David Savage wrote:
The theme
ACK
I was looking at nov 2005 subject -- good thing I saw it before I sent something
that would have had you all scratching your heads...
however I certainly have plenty of stuff that would suit...
hope I can make up my mind which to send before midnight :)
ann
Jan van Wijk wrote:
On Fri, 20
It's that time of the month again folks.
The theme: Abandoned
anybody have any pictures of JCO?
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
He's not abandoned yet, sorry to say. Scores of
messages (that I delete without reading) indicate that
people continue to feed the troll.
Rick
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's that time of the month again folks.
The theme: Abandoned
anybody have any pictures of JCO?
The theme: Abandoned
anybody have any pictures of JCO?
Or an aperture simulator ?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: November PUG Deadline Reminder
It's that time of the month again folks.
The theme: Abandoned
anybody have
On 10/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The theme: Abandoned
anybody have any pictures of JCO?
Or an aperture simulator ?
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/IMGP5596.jpg
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
of old K or M lenses lying around pell-
mell with a
lenseless *ist D facing them.
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: November PUG
And I still have nothing to submit for architecture! ;-(
Buncha crap, but nothing good.
Between the 100 gegree days, storms and doing 2 peoples jobs
there hasn't been much opportunity for photography.
Still have today though, always did work better under pressure. ;-)
Don
--
PDML
:05
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
Yes editing is far harder than taking the photograph originally. I
typically take a look my results and let it rest for a week
or so and look
again.
Critical objectivity is hard but necessary. I find I
initially may like
On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:14 AM, Norman Baugher wrote:
Feel free to add more...
Kittens
:))
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 21/6/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
And what about subsequent years? I only recall one request for suggestions.
Maybe you should read more posts ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I second that, Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Waller
Sent: 22 June, 2006 6:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
FWIW, I submit to the PUG whenever I remember have an image worthy
I have requested, and suggested, more PUG comments on a number of
occasions over the last few years, but comments, and participation,
has continued to decline.
On 6/22/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/6/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
And what about subsequent years? I
I like hubris too, it's really good with flat bread...
Norm
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi .
What gives you, or anyone else, the hubris to judge me?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Aren't Space Aliens Cotty redundant?
Dave
At 09:14 PM 22/06/2006, Norman Baugher wrote:
From: Bob W
Another important reason for this is that frankly I find the themes
rather unchallenging and unimaginative. Themes like What is it?
Askew Geometrical and Patterns strike me as utterly
From: Bob W
Another important reason for this is that frankly I find the themes
rather unchallenging and unimaginative. Themes like What is it?
Askew Geometrical and Patterns strike me as utterly trite and
unlikely to encourage good photography
Bob, I couldn't agree more! I'll suggest a few
On 6/22/06, Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob, I couldn't agree more! I'll suggest a few interesting ones:
Dirty Socks
Space Aliens
Hangovers
Cotty
Spare Ribs
Baby Pigeons
Feel free to add more...
Norm
How about sluts of the mountain?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:56:55 -0500
I have requested, and suggested, more PUG comments on a number of
occasions over the last few years, but comments, and participation,
has continued to decline.
On 6
to do that, the sooner they
will see their quality improve.
Tom C.
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:23:19 -0500
Tom,
And what are Shel's PESO's or Paul's?
Perhaps the best of what they are shooting
I think the word you were looking for was unsettling rather than
interesting, especially number 4...
Norman Baugher wrote:
From: Bob W
Another important reason for this is that frankly I find the themes
rather unchallenging and unimaginative. Themes like What is it?
Askew Geometrical and
I think we're on exactly the same wavelength today, Tom.
Edit. Build critical objectivity. Recognize that which is a good
photograph vs that which you're simply happy with because your puppy
looks cute. Etc. Editing is FAR harder than snapping a sharply
focused, well exposed picture. It's
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I think we're on exactly the same wavelength today, Tom.
Edit. Build critical objectivity. Recognize that which is a good
photograph vs that which you're simply happy with because your puppy
looks cute. Etc. Editing is FAR harder than snapping a sharply
focused,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:11:00 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:snip
No wait, prople think i'm crap any way.
Yeah, right, Dave, Mr. Second Place Winner at GFM in the Scenic Category.
We all know you're a wonderful photographer. You just can't spell is
all... LOL
cheers,
On 22/6/06, Norman Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dirty Socks
Space Aliens
Hangovers
Cotty
Spare Ribs
Baby Pigeons
Feel free to add more...
Norm
Norm with a consignment of cell phone covers stuffed up his nostrils.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 6/22/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norm with a consignment of cell phone covers stuffed up his nostrils.
Thanks, Cotty.
I just spewed my coffee across my desk.
cheers,
frank
Ni! Ni! Ni!!
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Oh - I forgot one: Figurines
Norm
From: Cotty
On 22/6/06, Norman Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dirty Socks
Space Aliens
Hangovers
Cotty
Spare Ribs
Baby Pigeons
Feel free to add more...
Norm
Norm with a consignment of cell phone covers stuffed up his nostrils.
--
PDML
Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:33:47 -0700
I think we're on exactly the same wavelength today, Tom.
Edit. Build critical objectivity. Recognize that which is a good
photograph vs that which you're simply happy with because your puppy
looks
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't want to start a flame war here, and before this escalates further,
perhaps you can define what constitutes a long time, Ann. How long does it
take for you to DL an image of about 150K? What do you mean when you say
it slows your system down?
I appreciate the
On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't want to start a flame war here, and before this escalates
further,
perhaps you can define what constitutes a long time, Ann. How
long does it
take for you to DL an image of about 150K? What do you
Yes, you have a point, although I was commenting on Ann's specific remark
that she can't see half the stuff you guys post to the
list to look at because it takes so long to load and it slows down the
system trying, not pics specifically posted to the PUG.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Keith
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/21 Wed AM 05:52:56 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
I don't want to start a flame war here, and before this escalates further,
perhaps you can define what constitutes a long time, Ann
Sorry Ann, didn't mean to offend. But even a change to the 100K number
you cite would be helpful. 75K is an artifact of the days of 300 baud
modems. It's not even in keeping with the capability of current dial-up
modems.
Paul
On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:31 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Paul Stenquist
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
It is, however, I think important to remember that it is not
really the size of a single file that is important: it is the
size of ALL the files in the gallery.
Say 10 files of 200K each is going to take a while
Godfrey -
Sorry - but you frequently post acid and sarcastic stuff and
I very seldome do, frankly
I might have been more gentle if it wasnt so hot here and I
was not so exhausted -
Yeah, I hit the send button quickly and I probably should
have written you off line and more gently.
I said ODD
Shel - I won't retract my feeling about some folk being
elitist judging from what
I've read here -- but I will explain my computer system and
its problems
System includes my ISP in my lingo... and the web in NY is
often slow no matter what
your set up is. I have a 7 year old computer Dell
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sorry Ann, didn't mean to offend. But even a change to the 100K number
you cite would be helpful. 75K is an artifact of the days of 300 baud
modems. It's not even in keeping with the capability of current dial-up
modems.
Paul
Thanks, Paul apology most certainly
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
Sorry Ann, didn't mean to offend. But even a change to the 100K number
you cite would be helpful. 75K is an artifact of the days of 300 baud
modems. It's not even in keeping with the capability of current
There's no reason for a pic posted here to be so large unless for a
specific reason. For example, Rob Studdert has presented huge pics to show
certain technical details about lenses, but he's also posted the size of
the images. Not to pat myself on the back, but I try to keep my pics to a
I agree. Although all my PESO shots are dimensionally generous, the file size
is always relatively low. I just took a look at the folder where I keep all the
shots I've linked for the past couple of years. Only one, the recent IR Pond
photo exceeds 200K. Most are well below 150K. Some are less
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
But if you want to look at ALL the photos in the gallery you do
have to download ALL the full resolution files...
That's at your option. If the work is compelling enough to be worth
the time, you do it. If not, you don't. I'd much rather
On Jun 20, 2006, at 10:34 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:14:29PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Annsan,
I don't know you at all. I've never had anything nasty to say about
or to you. When you've asked a question that I could help with, I've
always tried to answer with
On Jun 21, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
That's me, and I doubt I'm going to change me to suit some
asinine notion of being judged as 'that wonderful guy who is always
so nice'.
Godfrey, no one is ever going to confuse you with Wheatfield Willie.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
On Jun 21, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
That's me, and I doubt I'm going to change me to suit some
asinine notion of being judged as 'that wonderful guy who is always
so nice
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
If you don't want to listen to what I have to say, put me in your
kill file, filter my posts to the garbage. I don't care and I'm not
offended by that. If you do want to listen, don't complain
If the work is compelling enough to be worth
the time, you do it. If not, you don't. I'd much rather look at five
high quality photographs than a hundred poor quality ones.
Is that elitist? If so, folks will have to get used to it, or
not ... I really don't care. I have no intention of saying
Since you seem to have missed my post to Godfrey on the
subject, allow me to
clarify this for you.
The 75K file size was determined from several needed criteria.
The biggest deciding factor was the desire to keep the
gallery as small on
the Komkon server as possible, and to keep
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
But if you want to look at ALL the photos in the gallery you do
have to download ALL the full resolution files...
That's at your option. If the work is compelling enough to be worth
the time, you do it. If not,
I'd agree about the themes to some extent, but what I'd like to know is who
determines the themes? A few years ago there was a call for theme
suggestions, but I don't recall any of the suggestions having been used.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
Another important reason for this is
Actually those were some of my favorites...
Tom Trite
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: July PUG deadline today
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:25:54 +0100
Since you seem to have missed my
I would like everyone to submit. Some have previously opined that
they neither submit not comment because the PUG attracts low-quality
work. If they feel that way, there is nothing I can say to change
their minds. I would, however, prefer if the better photographers
would submit good work, to
Tom C wrote:
Actually those were some of my favorites...
Tom Trite
Mine too.
Can't say more; have to go or I will be late for kindy and have
to stand in the corner until recess.
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jun 21, 2006, at 11:46 AM, William Robb wrote:
odfrey, no one is ever going to confuse you with Wheatfield Willie.
To begin with, I'm not a pompous, self important faggot.
That's true. You're much worse than that.
At least I have the redeeming qualities of being a faggot.
Godfrey
June is
On Jun 21, 2006, at 11:49 AM, William Robb wrote:
If you don't want to listen to what I have to say, put me in your
kill file, filter my posts to the garbage. I don't care and I'm not
offended by that. If you do want to listen, don't complain about how
I come across ... obviously, in this
On Jun 21, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
But if you want to look at ALL the photos in the gallery you do
have to download ALL the full resolution files...
That's at your option. If the work is compelling enough to be worth
the time, you do it. If not, you don't. I'd much rather
They were used! Most of the trite ones were mine, I'm proud to say.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: July PUG deadline today
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:44:18 -0700
I'd
And what about subsequent years? I only recall one request for suggestions.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tom C
They were used! Most of the trite ones were mine, I'm proud to say.
I'd agree about the themes to some extent, but what I'd like to know is
who
determines the themes? A
In a message dated 6/21/2006 4:17:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were used! Most of the trite ones were mine, I'm proud to say.
Tom C.
===
Yeah, I think at least one of mine was used. Although I don't remember if I
was the first one to suggest it.
I think
In a message dated 6/21/2006 11:58:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To begin with, I'm not a pompous, self important faggot.
WW
===
True, you're not a faggot.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Subject: RE: July PUG deadline today
And what about subsequent years? I only recall one request
for suggestions.
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 21 June 2006 23:59
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: July PUG deadline today
They were used! Most of the trite ones were mine, I'm proud to say.
You must be one of those people who
I would like everyone to submit.
Some have previously opined that
they neither submit not comment because the PUG attracts low-quality
work.
But if i submit what i think is a great photo, and no one else does, am i crap,
Noone has
addressed that
No
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like everyone to submit.
Some have previously opined that
they neither submit not comment because the PUG attracts low-quality
work.
But if i submit what i think is a great photo, and no one else does, am i
No, but your photo may be. :-)
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: July PUG deadline today
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:11:00 US/Eastern
I would like
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo