Taken in Monument Valley of some of the vegetation. Due to the
unusually wet spring, I suspect that there were more greenery and
flowers than would be normal in the valley.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/5.6
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
I like that, Bruce. Your detail shots are quite nice. Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0508.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
Bruce,
I took the liberty of 'simplifying' this image. Juiced
the contrast a tiny bit, also.
What do you think?
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=72
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken in Monument Valley of some of the vegetation.
Due to the
unusually wet
Thanks for your comment Shel.
--
Bruce
Thursday, July 28, 2005, 10:28:01 AM, you wrote:
SB I like that, Bruce. Your detail shots are quite nice. Thanks!
SB Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0508.htm
Comments welcome
--
Hi Jack ... the removal of the orphan blossom does improve the pic a bit,
but it also changes its context. I think both work, although I do go back
and forth between which is preferable.
The additional saturation and contrast doesn't work for me. The photo
seems to want a softer, more delicate
Very nice. But I find that one lonely bud on the left that's half out of frame
to be quite disturbing. Half a minute with the clone tool could solve that
problem. Thanks for all the Monument Valley pics I've enjoyed them.
Paul
Taken in Monument Valley of some of the vegetation. Due to the
Based upon Jack's cropping to remove the partial bloom and Paul's
comment, I have cloned it out and present it here.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0508a.htm
I prefer this to the crop that Jack did as it just felt a bit too
tight for me.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, July
Excellent.
I haven't been to Monument Valley in quite a few years, but I don't recall
seeing any wildflowers there. I would guess it was a wet spring, as it was in
most of the southwest.
Paul
Based upon Jack's cropping to remove the partial bloom and Paul's
comment, I have cloned it out
Must have been the wet spring, as this type of wildflower was all over
in Arches, Monument Valley and most everywhere else in that dry
climate.
--
Bruce
Thursday, July 28, 2005, 11:53:40 AM, you wrote:
pcn Excellent.
pcn I haven't been to Monument Valley in quite a few years, but
pcn I don't
Bruce:
Well worth the time it took to make the changes!
Jim
Based upon Jack's cropping to remove the partial bloom and Paul's
comment, I have cloned it out and present it here.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0508a.htm
I prefer this to the crop that Jack did as it just felt
Bruce,
I do like your more open cropping on the left (right
sides are 'prox the same). I cropped slightly more on
the left to off-set the (my) feeling of a tipping to
the left.
I don't care for the OOF lower base tangle and I
needed to take down the top so as to feel comfortable
with its balance.
:16 PM
Subject: PESO - Pairs
Taken in Monument Valley of some of the vegetation. Due to the
unusually wet spring, I suspect that there were more greenery and
flowers than would be normal in the valley.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/5.6
Converted from Raw using
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
HC Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:16 PM
HC Subject: PESO - Pairs
Taken in Monument Valley of some of the vegetation. Due to the
unusually wet spring, I suspect that there were more greenery and
flowers than would be normal in the valley.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4
Hi!
Taken in Monument Valley of some of the vegetation. Due to the
unusually wet spring, I suspect that there were more greenery and
flowers than would be normal in the valley.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/5.6
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
Hi,
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A pair. A pear. A pple.
A perture...
A pt.
mike
There is not such thing as a pple
There are People.
I'm gonna hit Cotty with a wet sock.
Wetted, mind you, with something alcoholic.
You gotta tempt the horse to water before you
shove his head in for a brew. lol
Apple computer was invented by Hippies in the danged
70's. Anyone who uses one has
Ooooh, yes! I think pairs would be a wonderful theme. Can we
have it?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Pairs
I smell a pairs theme coming
On 18/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
A pair. A pear. A pple.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
On 18 Sep 2003 at 8:46, mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Tom wrote:
However as far as I know line pairs
consist of two lines with a space in the middle, when the space
disappears you have hit the limit of resolution. grin
So this pair consists of three things..
http://www.atis.org
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom wrote:
However as far as I know line pairs
consist of two lines with a space in the middle, when the space
disappears you have hit the limit of resolution. grin
So this pair consists of three things..
Imagine a pair of objects
A space is not a definable as a 'thing.'
keith
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Tom wrote:
However as far as I know line pairs
consist of two lines with a space in the middle, when the space
disappears you have hit the limit of resolution. grin
So this pair consists of three things
On 18 Sep 2003 at 5:25, Keith Whaley wrote:
A space is not a definable as a 'thing.'
It's not a space it's a white line and a black line
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user
Dag,
While I would normally agree with Tom, regarding your following comment,
visually there IS no pair, unless you can distinguish between each line.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom wrote:
However as far as I know line pairs
consist of two lines
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A pair. A pear. A pple.
A perture...
Jostein
, and the other black, you must also decree that these line
pairs NOT be displayed on a white or black surface... it has to be some
other contrasting shade of color.
Situation two: you have a boundary that is one millimeter in width.
Within that boundary you place equal width black/white line pairs
Ever see two pertures?
Darndest thing you ever DID see! g
I once saw a percher on a dirt track, prancing around. Pretty thing it
was, too!
keith
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A pair. A pear. A pple.
A perture...
Jostein
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 Sep 2003 at 5:25, Keith Whaley wrote:
A space is not a definable as a 'thing.'
It's not a space it's a white line and a black line
Okay, I read you.
But, stay with me now, if all you have is a piece of white paper, on
Reminds me of an old joke from the boy scouts:
Be Alert! - your country needs lerts!
DagT
På torsdag, 18. september 2003, kl. 19:49, skrev Keith Whaley:
Ever see two pertures?
Darndest thing you ever DID see! g
I once saw a percher on a dirt track, prancing around. Pretty thing it
was, too!
På torsdag, 18. september 2003, kl. 22:04, skrev Jostein:
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ooooh, yes! I think pairs would be a wonderful theme. Can we
have it?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Um...
Wouldn't that need two galleries? :-)
Jostein
Of Course
På torsdag, 18. september 2003, kl. 22:05, skrev Jostein:
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ooooh, yes! I think pairs would be a wonderful theme. Can we
have it?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Um...
Wouldn't that need two galleries? :-)
Jostein
Of Course
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if i use gray paper, i have to use white ink and black ink...
Same if you use a sheet of clear film. ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
18, 2003 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Pairs
A space is not a definable as a 'thing.'
keith
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Pairs
A space is not a definable as a 'thing.'
keith
I prefer peaches over pairs
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
I have a peach with a pair... Hmmm.
Does that qualify or not?
keith
J.C. O'Connell wrote:
I prefer peaches over pairs
and be accepted.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Pairs
A space is not a definable as a 'thing.'
keith
Simple.
Infinity is that distance beyond which one can focus with a Pentax.
keith
Otis C. Wright, Jr. wrote:
Awh. There goes the weekend entertainment. Sure you don't want to
tackle infinitiy?
Have a great weekend.
Otis
Keith Whaley wrote:
Hi Otis!
Hah, ha, ha! No he
Boycott shampoo! Demand real poo!
Regards,
Bob...
Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
the object which is abused. Men can go wrong with wine
and women. Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?
-Martin Luther
From: Dag T [EMAIL
I am not stuck on the ink/paper analogy.
I'm stuck on the star/firmament analogy.
Regards,
Bob...
Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
the object which is abused. Men can go wrong with wine
and women. Shall we then prohibit and
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't say I have. Am I missing something?
keith
No you don't... :-)
It's just according to one particular writer that they be mentioned in
pairs...
Cheers
Jostein
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From
Well pants developed from legging which came in pairs. There are two
lenses in a pair of glasses as opposed to one in a glass (monocular).
Kidneys do come in pairs. and scissors are basically two knifes on a
hinge. However as far as I know line pairs consist of two lines with a
space
Some pairs are of objects that can also stand alone:
Pair of hard boiled eggs.
Pair of dancers.
Pair of kidneys.
Pair of salt pepper shakers.
Pair of hunters.
Some pairs are of objects that have no meaning alone:
Pair of scissors. (Ever heard
--
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:16:38 -0700
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lens resolution
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Mark,
One of
Can't say I have. Am I missing something?
keith
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Pairs
I have also seen a pair of scissors, and a pair of glasses... g
I don't know, Keith,
Hand me that pair of pliers and we'll rip those kidneys out and take a
look! g
cheers,
frank
Keith Whaley wrote:
Can't say I have. Am I missing something?
--
Hell is others
-Jean Paul Sartre
45 matches
Mail list logo
