On May 15, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Looking at the snowboard on the site Jostein uncovered,
>> I'd give him an "F". Obvious copy of elements if not in total.
>
> The student got an F in the course long before I even suspected
> plagiarism. (Skipped more
Igor Roshchin wrote:
>Of course, it is your choice of how much of your time and energy you are
>willing to invest in this.
Well, it's also up to my department chair and he seems reluctant to
take on the inevitable complications (read: work). And of course it is
not to my advantage to get into a
I doubt anything Mark could say would have any impact if he is
skipping 25% of classes and 50% of tests, and got 37% for a final
grade.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> Thu May 15 13:32:36 EDT 2014
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> P.J. Alling wrote:
>>
>> >It's derivative, at bes
Thu May 15 13:32:36 EDT 2014
Mark Roberts wrote:
> P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> >It's derivative, at best, but since the student has already failed, why
> >keep beating that dead horse.
>
> Exactly. I've forwarded everything to my department chair. He and I
> have elected not to pursue the matter any
On 15 May 2014, at 15:29, "Mark Roberts" wrote:
>
> Stanley Halpin wrote:
>
>> I agree with Bob. The student’s work is clearly derivative if not a copy.
>> I did a Yahoo search for Burton boards since the designer’s site Jostein
>> pointed to seems to indicate that his design was for that compa
On 5/15/2014 10:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Stanley Halpin wrote:
I agree with Bob. The student’s work is clearly derivative if not a copy.
I did a Yahoo search for Burton boards since the designer’s site Jostein
pointed to seems to indicate that his design was for that company. I did an
unaid
P.J. Alling wrote:
>It's derivative, at best, but since the student has already failed, why
>keep beating that dead horse.
Exactly. I've forwarded everything to my department chair. He and I
have elected not to pursue the matter any further. We'd have to get
the Dean involved and go through all
Burton has an 800 number - (800) 881-3138
On 5/15/2014 9:26 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
One of my students tried to pass this if as his own work:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/snowboard2.jpg
I suspect it isn't his.
Jostein has found this:
http://ideblogg.no/siljebee/2013/06/10/semesterinnlevering
It's derivative, at best, but since the student has already failed, why
keep beating that dead horse. I've run into worse offenders in the arts
community around here.
On 5/15/2014 9:45 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Looking at the snowboard on the site Jostein uncovered,
I'd give him an "F". Obvious
That depends on what you mean by lazy. One way the individual just does
no work, another the individual steals code that works modifies it just
enough to get the job done, a third, the individual writes relitively
little code but what they write is what's necessary and sufficient to
get the job
Darren Addy wrote:
>It sounds like this student's biggest problem is laziness. I suggest
>someone turn him on to a career in I.T.
No, his biggest problem is claiming someone else's work as his own.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On May 15, 2014, at 09:50 , Darren Addy wrote:
> It sounds like this student's biggest problem is laziness. I suggest
> someone turn him on to a career in I.T.
>
Oh, boo!
As someone in that field who just had to deal with a lazy cow-orker for the
past two years before he finally left the compa
Find me much of anything that ISN'T derivative. I'm reminded of the
old chestnut, "If you steal from one author it's plagiarism; if you
steal from many it's research." Same applies to design (or most
anything else you can think of).
It sounds like this student's biggest problem is laziness. I sugge
Stanley Halpin wrote:
>I agree with Bob. The students work is clearly derivative if not a copy.
>I did a Yahoo search for Burton boards since the designers site Jostein
>pointed to seems to indicate that his design was for that company. I did an
>unaided eye-ball scan of Yahoo images for Burto
I agree with Bob. The student’s work is clearly derivative if not a copy.
I did a Yahoo search for Burton boards since the designer’s site Jostein
pointed to seems to indicate that his design was for that company. I did an
unaided eye-ball scan of Yahoo images for Burton snowboards going back to
Bob Sullivan wrote:
>Looking at the snowboard on the site Jostein uncovered,
>I'd give him an "F". Obvious copy of elements if not in total.
The student got an F in the course long before I even suspected
plagiarism. (Skipped more than 25% of classes, skipped 50% of tests
during the semester, tu
Looking at the snowboard on the site Jostein uncovered,
I'd give him an "F". Obvious copy of elements if not in total.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> One of my students tried to pass this if as his own work:
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/snowboard2.jpg
> I suspect it
One of my students tried to pass this if as his own work:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/snowboard2.jpg
I suspect it isn't his.
Jostein has found this:
http://ideblogg.no/siljebee/2013/06/10/semesterinnlevering/ (scroll
down to the second image) which really looks like the work of the same
design
18 matches
Mail list logo
