On 6/12/2011 13:40, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I did get your test message.
Paul
Roger that.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I did get your test message.
Paul
On Jun 12, 2011, at 12:41 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 6/12/2011 03:04, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Boris,
Never did get it. No matter. Facebook isn't a very important issue.
Paul
I certainly agree. However my lack of ability to send you a private message
On 10/6/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Replied off list.
If we all did that there would be no list !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 10/6/11, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
In any case, people who don't want Facebook to analyse their face, can
always replace it with a photo of a mandrill's arse. I'm tempted to join
Facebook just to do that, but I don't think my 'friends' would spot the
difference.
Im sure I could tell
On 11/06/2011 08:32, Cotty wrote:
On 10/6/11, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
In any case, people who don't want Facebook to analyse their face, can
always replace it with a photo of a mandrill's arse. I'm tempted to join
Facebook just to do that, but I don't think my 'friends' would spot
Subject: Re: 18/06 - World Pentax Day
On 10/6/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Replied off list.
If we all did that there would be no list !
yes there would. It would be the Pentax Telling People You've Replied
Offlist Instead Of Sharing It List. It would consist
On Jun 11, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 10/6/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Replied off list.
If we all did that there would be no list !
And he didn't reply!
Paul
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On 6/11/2011 10:51, Bob W wrote:
Subject: Re: 18/06 - World Pentax Day
On 10/6/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Replied off list.
If we all did that there would be no list !
yes there would. It would be the Pentax Telling People You've Replied
Offlist Instead Of Sharing
On 6/11/2011 13:35, Paul Stenquist wrote:
And he didn't reply!
Paul
Awkward as it is, I did send you a message yesterday. Did it once more
time just a moment ago.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On 11/6/11, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
yes there would. It would be the Pentax Telling People You've Replied
Offlist Instead Of Sharing It List. It would consist of hundreds of messages
every day like this:
Replied off list
Replied off list to off list reply
Started conversation offlist
On Jun 11, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 6/11/2011 13:35, Paul Stenquist wrote:
And he didn't reply!
Paul
Awkward as it is, I did send you a message yesterday. Did it once more time
just a moment ago.
Hi Boris,
Never did get it. No matter. Facebook isn't a very important
On 6/12/2011 03:04, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Boris,
Never did get it. No matter. Facebook isn't a very important issue.
Paul
I certainly agree. However my lack of ability to send you a private
message needs to be addressed.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 6/10/2011 23:22, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Boris Liberman
On 6/9/2011 22:15, Bob W wrote:
a little language tip for you, Boris. Nobody says fucking
unbelievable.
It's always un-fuckin'-believable.
Even my granny says it that way, and she's 115.
B
Nothing can really replace good old
[...]
it's tweaked some the wrong way. Fortunately, one can easily opt out
of it. No big deal for those who don't suffer from paranoia.
Paul
one of the differences between the USA and Europe is that in Europe the
default must be to opt in to things, not opt out. Otherwise, and I know this
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:30 +0100, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
In any case, people who don't want Facebook to analyse their face, can
always replace it with a photo of a mandrill's arse. I'm tempted to join
Facebook just to do that, but I don't think my 'friends' would spot the
On 6/10/2011 11:45, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, that's too long for a Mark! - but I'm going to put that into my
'Hold' folder for future reference.
(anyone got a spare photo of a mandrill's arse?)
Feeding mandril ass picture to google can be enlightening in this
regard... Pun intended.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:47 +0300, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6/10/2011 11:45, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, that's too long for a Mark! - but I'm going to put that into my
'Hold' folder for future reference.
(anyone got a spare photo of a mandrill's arse?)
Feeding mandril
On 6/10/2011 11:50, Brian Walters wrote:
Oh dear, and I'm just about to have dinner
Surely and verily I cannot be held responsible for the unfortunate time
difference between my furiously hot time zone and yours...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
2011/6/10 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
Facebook does push the envelope. The facial recognition thing is meant to
make it easy to tag photos. It's not a plot to spy on members. But it's
tweaked some the wrong way. Fortunately, one can easily opt out of it. No
big deal for those
I agree that it would be preferable for Facebook to have made facial
recognition an opt-in feature, and they may well do that since there has been
some discontent. However, I fail to see any real downside to it. Once you're
logged in, the system already knows who you are. In any case, I suspect
2011/6/10 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
Once you're logged in, the system already knows who you are.
Agreed. But do take a look at what facebook says to advertise their
data mapping and mining abilities to online marketers. They infer all
sorts of information about you just from who
In the US it is possible to enter you phone numbers into a no call
database. That eliminates most of the calls, although charities and
political organizations to whom you have contributed and merchants
with whom you have transacted business can still call you.
https://www.donotcall.gov/
I guess
I'd love to have some deep philosophical attitude toward Facebook, but
mostly I just can't be bothered looking that often. I have a minimum
sort of a page because I go there sometimes, but it just doesn't float
my boat in general.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Peter Zalabai tim...@clancode.hu
On Jun 10, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Ecke PDML wrote:
2011/6/10 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
Once you're logged in, the system already knows who you are.
Agreed. But do take a look at what facebook says to advertise their
data mapping and mining abilities to online marketers. They infer
I've selected my main target (subjects) for World Pentax Day:
http://www.kearneyhub.com/news/local/article_cd6c2dd4-9128-11e0-a516-001cc4c03286.html
Also, my Olympus iS/L macro A-Life Size will arrive in about an hour,
so I will get to play with that this weekend, as well.
Should be a fun photo
On 2011-06-10 07:06 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
In the US it is possible to enter you phone numbers into a no call
database. That eliminates most of the calls, although charities and
political organizations to whom you have contributed and merchants
with whom you have transacted business can
From: Boris Liberman
On 6/9/2011 22:15, Bob W wrote:
a little language tip for you, Boris. Nobody says fucking unbelievable.
It's always un-fuckin'-believable.
Even my granny says it that way, and she's 115.
B
Nothing can really replace good old Russian Mat. I am pretty bad in
swearing
Free Farmville doesn't add much to my life...
MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Ecke PDML overpenta...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: 18/06 - World Pentax Day
2011/6/10 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
Once you're
On 09/06/2011 6:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
BH's Posner is a good man. He has been unjustifiably attacked by a person on this
list. But his record is solid, and BH is probably the most reliable, most honest
vendor in the camera biz.
As an example,
On another forum I troll from time to
On Jun 10, 2011, at 8:10 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 09/06/2011 6:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
BH's Posner is a good man. He has been unjustifiably attacked by a person
on this list. But his record is solid, and BH is probably the most
reliable, most honest vendor in the camera biz.
As
Yeah. BH and PF are looking to increase their FB likes. Not my cup of
tea personally but then I've already deleted my FB account once before
recreating it and now that facebook has added face recognition without
notifying me, I am on the verge of doing it again, except this time
for good.
I was thinking of contributing but I dislike even the idea of joining FB.
It probably shows that I am not a potential customer of BH and a
target of ther marketing dept.
Oh my ;)
Bulent
-
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ecke PDML overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yeah. BH and PF are looking to increase their FB likes. Not my cup of
tea personally but then I've already deleted my FB account once before
recreating it and now that facebook has added face recognition without
so true. they probably have an army of professional FB likers on their
payroll. likely the same people who build WoW accounts etc...
2011/6/9 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ecke PDML overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yeah. BH and PF are looking to increase
From: Boris Liberman
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ecke PDML overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yeah. BH and PF are looking to increase their FB likes. Not my cup of
tea personally but then I've already deleted my FB account once before
recreating it and now that facebook has added face
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I refuse to use FaceBook.
Take it or leave it, John, but like written in Hebrew letters
meaning to like something on Facebook/Twitter or some such seemingly
is becoming a new word in the language here...
--
Boris
--
On 09/06/2011 12:48 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
It probably shows that I am not a potential customer of BH and a
target of ther marketing dept.
Oh my ;)
If I'm buying grey market, I tend to use Adorama. Nothing really wrong
with BH, but Henry Posner (their face on the internet) can be a bit
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:30 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm buying grey market, I tend to use Adorama. Nothing really wrong with
BH, but Henry Posner (their face on the internet) can be a bit of a dick,
and that colours my attitude towards giving his employer money.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:30 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm buying grey market, I tend to use Adorama. Nothing really
wrong with
BH, but Henry Posner (their face on the internet) can be a bit of a
dick,
and that colours my attitude towards giving his employer
ROTFL. I had exactly the same thought. I could even hear my inner
English teacher saying it in the correcting voice.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:30 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm buying grey market, I
BH's Posner is a good man. He has been unjustifiably attacked by a person on
this list. But his record is solid, and BH is probably the most reliable, most
honest vendor in the camera biz.
Paul
On Jun 9, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
ROTFL. I had exactly the same thought. I
I don't know anything about selling Facebook likes. I have a page on Facebook
for my marketing company, and I've steadily accumulated followers. It's brought
me a fair amount of work.
BH markets on Facebook, rather unobtrusively in my opinion. Hell, any company
who has any marketing savvy
On 6/10/2011 04:07, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't know anything about selling Facebook likes. I have a page
on Facebook for my marketing company, and I've steadily accumulated
followers. It's brought me a fair amount of work. BH markets on
Facebook, rather unobtrusively in my opinion. Hell, any
On 6/9/2011 22:15, Bob W wrote:
a little language tip for you, Boris. Nobody says fucking unbelievable.
It's always un-fuckin'-believable.
Even my granny says it that way, and she's 115.
B
Nothing can really replace good old Russian Mat. I am pretty bad in
swearing in either Hebrew or
Peter, to participate one has to have a FaceBook account. This
condition seems to have been one of the reasons for a bit of a flame
on PF with this regards...
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Peter Zalabai tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Pentaxforums is giving away a Limited lens for the WPD this year.
45 matches
Mail list logo
