I agree with this argument. Everyone I have talked to who owns digital says
they shoot more now than they ever did with film. They experiment more and the
results show it... It's an argument in favour of digital that often gets
overlooked.
The down side that gets overlooked is the amount of
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:23:49 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Has Pentax missed again (More shots)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:24:00 -0400
.
The down side that gets overlooked is the amount
Wendy posted:
At 10:49 AM 13/10/2003 -0400, Vic wrote:
The down side that gets overlooked is the amount of time needed to tweak and
file all the digital images.
Have to agree with that.
On the other hand, shooting digital has forced me to catalogue and backup
my shots. I now have a CD (or
PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:27:16 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Has Pentax missed again (More shots)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:27:32 -0400
At 10:49 AM 13/10/2003 -0400, Vic wrote:
The down side that gets overlooked is the amount of time
4 matches
Mail list logo
