5 years and 21,000. Love it.
Rick
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 18:49 Brian Walters wrote:
> Maybe I got a good one as well - never any problems with it. Admittedly
> it's
> only had fairly light use (shutter count less than 1 in 6 years).
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
>
Maybe I got a good one as well - never any problems with it. Admittedly it's
only had fairly light use (shutter count less than 1 in 6 years).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
> On 03 June 2018 at
I'm still carrying my K5 after has been
since I bought it when it first came out. Wish I had a memory again...(?)
Only difference is it's a back up in
case?? Have used it a few times in
both single frame and burst mode.
Image quality still surprises me.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2018, at
Bill wrote:
"I'm not sure if they got everything fixed on the K5 during it's run, but in
addition to the AF issues, they had problems with spots of cement on the sensor
on early ones and buttons falling off. Apparently if you got a good one, they
were very good indeed. I wasn't so lucky."
I
Congratulations to Grace!
We all watched her grow up, and loved every image of it!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7.
> Grace uses the K7
Yes, and I didn't realize how
contentedly.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:48 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
>> Thanks, Bill!
>
> I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for
I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7. Grace
uses the K7 now. (She graduated from 8th grade today!)
Paul
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
>> I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up
On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic
On 6/1/2018 1:26 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for
web postings.
Pentax has always taken it up the bum for having crappy video. It's
always been OK for me,
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for web
postings.
jco
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:46:11 -0400, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems. Can't imagine why your
AF was so
On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for
me. It ended up being a far better camera than the K5 in my hands as I
got a Friday afternoon K5 that had pretty much
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
>> resisted.
>
> To me, it had the best colour of any Pentax DSLR, but it was really
At 11:23 AM 6/1/2018, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
The K-70 does not - it can use only the Pentax D-LI109 7.4 volt
lithium ion battery. I have seen no external supply options for the
K-70, and none are shown on the Ricoh site.
Do all
On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
To me, it had the best colour of any Pentax DSLR, but it was really only
good at base ISO. It used an updated from the K20 Samsung sensor. Great
at base ISO, but it went to hell in a hurry as the ISO was
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> K20D, then the K7, then the K5.
>
>> Do all Pentax Dslrs
On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
K20D, then the K7, then the K5.
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
Yes, but you have to buy the external battery grip and be prepared for
really crappy
K20D ?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
>
> Do all pentax Dslrs have interchangable focus screens?
> --
> J.C.
On 12/15/2015 8:47 AM, Alan C wrote:
Look what they're asking for older S/H Pentax DSLR's in SA.
There have been a spate of adverts in the last week. I've converted to
US$.With std. lens unless otherwise stated.
K20D 570; K200D 570; K10D (2 lens) 400; K10D 200;
K100D 500 & 280; Kx (2
Larry,
Some time ago, I was trying to find answers to similar questions.
Unfortunately, Pentax doesn't provide (at least at that point it didn't)
any specs with respect to this.
So, let me share the most essential bits of information that I was able to
find (and still remember).
First, a
Yes.
On 2/28/2014 10:49 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can be
used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
On 3/1/2014 2:53 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
On 2/28/2014 11:43 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use the same cable on
On 3/1/2014 11:19 AM, John wrote:
On 3/1/2014 2:53 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
On 2/28/2014 11:43 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use the same cable on DS, K200D and K-5. I assume the same
one will work on the K-3.
--
Cheers
Brian
On 2/28/2014 11:43 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use the same cable on DS, K200D and K-5. I assume the same
one
Well I took some firework photos last night I forgot to turn SR off.
They turned out fine.
I also took this shot after the fireworks, mainly as a long exposure/noise test.
Small (800x536 ~100kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0733_sml.jpg
Full size (3872x2592 ~1M)
On 14/01/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could somebody please explain the theory why
the Pentax AS should be turned off while using
a tripod??
I dont understand how it could hurt,
and intutively it seems like It might help
if the tripod isnt perfectly stable due to
wind,
to
read the f-stop setting on most of them ( K M series ).
What a joke that is
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 7:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR Shake
.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR Shake Reduction Question - Why turn it off on
whileon tripod?
On 14/01/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could somebody please explain the theory why
the Pentax
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
-
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for the K10D?
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Here we have actual evidence from Godfrey. Whatever happened to idle
speculation and blind prejudice, the mainstay of many a lengthy
thread!
All I need now is the money for the camera, I already have the 150x card
Thanks Godfrey
Peter
On 12/13/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x
gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for
LOL ... I like to think that I'm not being innovative, Peter. ;-)
you're welcome.
Godfrey
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:45 PM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
Here we have actual evidence from Godfrey. Whatever happened to idle
speculation and blind prejudice, the mainstay of many a lengthy
thread!
All
Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
-
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for the K10D?
Joe
Well, we've got to remember that it's Joe making the call ;-))
Today I had a chance to play with the K10D and used both an 80X card and a
133X card. Even without measured tests and movies, it was clear that the
10D was faster with the faster card. Whether one needs the speed is
another matter
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
Thanks for that, very interesting.
I just conducted a similar test (no, I don't have a movie to watch :)
K10D, RAW (DNG) Test, SanDisk Extreme III 2GB SD card:
a.. 75 RAW exposures, 1.25 exp per sec or 0.8 secs per exp average.
a.. finish
If you did it right (yes, it is a pretty simple test) and these are
the numbers, it shows that you're getting something for your money
over the Transcend 150x cards. I suspected that the Transcend cards
might be rated a bit optimistically.
Of course, I'd like to get my hands on an Extreme
Well, we've got to remember that it's Joe making the call ;-))
Shel
-
Shel, why do you feel the need to blurt out a statement like that? And
why do you give in to the feeling?
I expected, perhaps naively, that a card that is 150% faster in its
nominal rating (150x vs 60x) should give
Note the smiley, Joe. Others have commented on your negativity - I've
stayed away from that. I was just poking a little fun at the reputation
you've garnered here over the past few months as someone who's frequently
finding fault. We can all learn to laugh at ourselves a bit ...
Why do I give
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x
gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to
different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On static subjects a combination of image combining (can secure
(1.21 jigawatts, etc, much deleted crunchy bits)
to do manually but there are some really nice automation kits out
there for serious work.
Yow, am I the only one who finds all the
On 17/10/06, gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On static subjects a combination of image combining (can secure
(1.21 jigawatts, etc, much deleted crunchy bits)
to do manually but there are some really nice automation kits out
there for serious
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
Your assumption is maximum depth of field is what is
Always needed when its not. With tilts and swings
You can entire offset planes in focus with selective (minimal)
DOF
: Friday, October 13, 2006 6:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Inet Shopper wrote:
Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
Architechure with any pentax cameras or
Lenses because you need full camera
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You clueless.
JC I have had enough. Your language is unacceptable. Bye-bye.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
There are only a few adapters for Canon FD series lenses and none
give full functionality.
Yes, adapters exist, but stop-down metering is not convenient. Plus, there is
either teleconversion and light loss, or loss of infinity focus. So I will buy
some lenses for the DSLR.
Go for the FA35/2
On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Inet Shopper wrote:
Go for the FA35/2 AL or FA28/2.8 AL. Both are very good lenses and
not too terribly expensive. They're not f/1.4, but the Pentax DSLRs
are quite clean in rendering up to ISO 800 and even 1600 in a
pinch ... much better than film.
The thing
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The 18-55 has some W-shape distortions ... a good lens but not really
at its best for architecture. The DA16-45 has a bit of simple barrel
distortion, easy to correct. The 20-35 has less and has nicer
rendering qualities.
Rendering-wise, the DA16-45 is
I've used 'em both. The 16-45 is better, but the 18-55 is still a good
lens for the money as you say, and a nice snapshop lens. Well worth the
price ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Carlos Royo
I have found that the distortions shown by the DA 18-55 are easily
corrected by using PT
All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't
choose it for doing architecture, however. Between the rendering
quality and the need to do rectilinear correction with PTLens, I'd
find it a pain. ;-)
Godfrey
On Oct 13, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've used
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't
choose it for doing architecture, however. Between the rendering
quality and the need to do rectilinear correction with PTLens, I'd
find it a pain. ;-)
Godfrey
I agree that there is no
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Carlos Royo
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:52 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't
choose it for doing architecture
Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
Architechure with any pentax cameras or
Lenses because you need full camera movements
That only a view camera can provide for architecture.
Its amazing what you can do with a view for that.
jco
I thought tilt/shift lenses were designed to perform
?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Inet Shopper
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:11 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
Architechure with any
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Inet Shopper
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:11 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
Architechure with any pentax cameras or
Lenses
- Original Message -
From: Inet Shopper
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
Architechure with any pentax cameras or
Lenses because you need full camera movements
That only a view camera can provide
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
- Original Message -
From: Inet Shopper
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Inet Shopper wrote:
Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
Architechure with any pentax cameras or
Lenses because you need full camera movements
That only a view camera can provide for architecture.
Its amazing what you can do with a view for that.
jco
JCO:
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
If I am the john you are reffering to, I do use
Photoshop. Not sure which John you are talking about.
Photoshop can do perspective control with a loss in
Resolution but it cant
of the camera itself.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 6:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Inet
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:05 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Inet
If I am
of a bigger negative, it is a matter of control.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Inet Shopper
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some
On 14/10/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, for landscape work. That is how you get everything from the blades
of grass in front of the camera to the mountains in the background
sharp. Folks ought to read a good book on view camera techniques just so
they will know what can be done,
On Oct 9, 2006, at 8:39 PM, Inet Shopper wrote:
I shoot mostly landscapes and architecture, and prefer a wide-angle
lens. With
the compact I usually use the wide end (38mm) and with the Canon
A1, the lens
is usually 50/1.4 or 28/2. I also shoot at evening gatherings, and
like the low
You can probably afford the 40 limited. It's very cheap (About 2/3rds
the cost of a new FA 35/2 here in Canada)
If you mean the 43/1.9, it's currently US$370 after rebate at BH online, while
the FA 35/2 is US$300 (but out of stock). Does your Canadian store have a
website? I'd like to take a
You can probably afford the 40 limited. It's very cheap (About 2/3rds
the cost of a new FA 35/2 here in Canada)
The Sigma's not worth the money. The Tamron is, but the SMC-DA 16-45 f4
goes for similar (or less) cost and is a better option IMHO. The 18-55
is actually decent (unlike the
Inet Shopper wrote:
You can probably afford the 40 limited. It's very cheap (About 2/3rds
the cost of a new FA 35/2 here in Canada)
If you mean the 43/1.9, it's currently US$370 after rebate at BH online,
while
the FA 35/2 is US$300 (but out of stock). Does your Canadian store have a
Inet Shopper wrote:
You can probably afford the 40 limited. It's very cheap (About 2/3rds
the cost of a new FA 35/2 here in Canada)
The Sigma's not worth the money. The Tamron is, but the SMC-DA 16-45 f4
goes for similar (or less) cost and is a better option IMHO. The 18-55
is actually
No actually there is a 40mm f2.8 Ltd., designed specifically for the APS
format digital cameras. It's mostly an update of the old 40mm pancake
lens, looks to be the same optical formula with new coatings and a lens
barrel with no aperture ring.
Inet Shopper wrote:
You can probably afford the
Inet Shopper wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the 16-45/4. I'd wrongly assumed that it would be very
expensive, yet it's priced like the Tamron 17-35/2.8-4. It looks like the
cheap
route would be the kit lens and a used manual focus 28/2 or 35/2, and the more
expensive route would be the
On 9/10/06, Inet Shopper, discombobulated, unleashed:
But Canon and Nikon have the clear edge in
availability of used lenses and accessories, so I'd also like to hear from
members who use gear on the Canon and Nikon platforms.
H.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/mods/eoskmount.html
;-)
BTW
You're correct. An A lens will give you full functionality, minus autofocus.
The FA 35/2 is a superb lens, and I believe the A version is optically
identical.
-- Original message --
From: Inet Shopper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone,
I'm new - been lurking for
Inet Shopper wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm new - been lurking for a few days. I currently use film-based equipment
(Canon A1 and Rollei compact point-and-shoot), but am considering going
digital.
I shoot mostly landscapes and architecture, and prefer a wide-angle lens. With
the compact I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're correct. An A lens will give you full functionality, minus autofocus.
The FA 35/2 is a superb lens, and I believe the A version is optically
identical.
They are not the same optically. The FA 35 mm. 2.0 is a newer design, 6
elements in five groups, being one
Cotty wrote:
You like birds.
You want to shoot some wide angle shots up close with your *ist D / Ds /
Dl / K100D / K10D right next to the nest with remote operation from your
position up to 100 metres (330 feet) away.
How do you do it?
Pocket Wizard.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 18 September 2006 21:19
To: pentax list
Subject: Pentax DSLR Remote Operation
You like birds.
You want to shoot some wide angle shots up close with your
*ist D / Ds /
Dl / K100D /
:-)))
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 18 September 2006 21:19
To: pentax list
Subject: Pentax DSLR Remote Operation
You like birds.
You want to shoot some wide
On 9/18/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You like birds.
You want to shoot some wide angle shots up close with your *ist D / Ds /
Dl / K100D / K10D right next to the nest with remote operation from your
position up to 100 metres (330 feet) away.
I'd build my own remote cable release. Or
On 18/9/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://members.shaw.ca/richardbhill/birds.html
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
You like birds.
You want to shoot some wide angle shots up close with your *ist D / Ds /
Dl / K100D / K10D right next to the nest with remote operation from your
position up to 100 metres (330 feet) away.
How do you do it?
1. Radio remote
2. Fabricate an extra-long cable release
3. Train a squirrel to operate the shutter button
Nuts to that!
John Celio ;)
--
http://www.neovenator.com
AIM: Neopifex
Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a
statement.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 3/3/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
The attitude we've seen so far seems far more suited to a google
group, where it's more reasonable to assume that most of the
members are idiots, and need to be told how to tie their shoes.
As should be apparent, there are more than a few
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:40:45 -, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/3/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
The attitude we've seen so far seems far more suited to a google
group, where it's more reasonable to assume that most of the
members are idiots, and need to be told how to
Roman,
What's the point in doing that? PDML mostly deals with DSLR info already
(after beer, cars and the usual OT).
Besides PDML (for OT), Spotmatic group (for old stuff) and DPReview forum
(for digital), do we really need another group?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Roman
who have the
time.
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy Turku
www.computec.fi
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:14 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax-DSLR
On 3/3/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would love to invite you to join googlegroup, share your DSLR
information, sample photos , useful tips on digital photography,
cameras, cleaning techniquest, whatever.
Please see groups website on:
http://groups.google.com/group/pentax-dslr
Thank
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Cotty wrote:
Go away.
Cotty, you should join his group and continually invite their members
to join the PDML.
-Aaron
On 3/3/06, Aaron Reynolds, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, you should join his group and continually invite their members
to join the PDML.
Q.V. Groucho Marx ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Yeah, Cotty, join and invite them all to the PDML. Then sit back and
watch the gmail invites roll in. Man, you'll be in heaven.
On 3/3/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Cotty wrote:
Go away.
Cotty, you should join his group and continually invite
Cotty wrote:
On 3/3/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would love to invite you to join googlegroup, share your DSLR
information, sample photos , useful tips on digital photography,
cameras, cleaning techniquest, whatever.
Please see groups website on:
We don't want Cotty here. That is the only reason he stays. grin
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 3/3/06, Aaron Reynolds, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, you should
This one time, at band camp, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Would love to invite you to join googlegroup, share your DSLR
information, sample photos , useful tips on digital photography,
cameras, cleaning techniquest, whatever.
sounds aweful /marvin
Kevin
--
Democracy is two
On 3/3/06, Manuel Magalhães, discombobulated, unleashed:
LOL, Cotty from time to time you really make my day!
My purpose is served.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
sounds aweful /marvin
Yeah. No politics, religion, rumors, opinions ...
V B G
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax-DSLR googlegroup
This one time, at band camp, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Would love
What's the point in doing that? PDML mostly deals with...beer,
cars and the usual OT.
Dario
Go away.
Cotty
We don't want Cotty here. That is the only reason he stays.
Graywolf.
Man, you'll be in heaven.
Scott
My purpose is served.
Cotty
sounds aweful
Kevin
I don't have that much time
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:10:16PM -0700, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Go away.
Cotty
On the whole, I agree with Cotty.
The attitude we've seen so far seems far more suited to a google
group, where it's more reasonable to assume that most of the
members are idiots, and need to be told how to tie
It's not ridiculous if money is an issue. Digital MF will be really expensive,
and even many pros won't be able to justify it. Besides, LF film cameras
existed but where not a big market. Photographers shoot what they have to and
no more. One lesson of digital has been that many shot the
://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. oktober 2005 00:15
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Pentax DSLR future
I expect a price between 9K and 10K.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR future
On 22 Oct 2005 at 16:36, William Robb wrote:
There is a huge number of 645 lenses out there.
If I was the owner of a half dozen of them, I'd seriously look at
buying a
digital body
On 24 Oct 2005 at 14:53, Gonz wrote:
Those are my thoughts exactly. If the bottom line is always on their
mind, why take a huge loss on moving from one system to another? I
mean, if you have 10-20K invested in gear in one system, it might take
20-30k to move to a new, 35mm full frame
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
