Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - The simpleton, lying, abusing coward and active long term coprophagiac incurable homophobic fuckface posted: Subject: RE: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm > Thats NOT all you posted on the topic, > you specifically posted they told you they decided > to keep t

RE: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
ecause you cant remember your own lies? jco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm - Original Message - From: "J. C

Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm Listen WR, you complete dumbshit, Thats not what you said originally, you said they PROFITED $25-35 by not putting it in Um, you are not only a fuckface, you are a lying homophobic fuckface.

RE: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
: Pentax 1.8 85mm - Original Message - From: "John Whittingham" Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm > For the record, it's several parts, not one. The people at Pentax I've > heard from estimate that the parts and associated additional assembly > complexity add a

Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread John Whittingham
a DA 16-45 or maybe the DA 12- 24..oh and perhaps a telephoto with USM, HSM or whatever Pentax decide to label it in the future. John -- Original Message --- From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sat, 25

Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 25/11/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That $35.00 (US currency) is the estimated manufacturing cost per unit > that I got from a recently retired Pentax rep. In a normal marketplace, > that would translate to about a $150.00-$200.00 retail cost increase to > the end user of the eq

Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "John Whittingham" Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm > For the record, it's several parts, not one. The people at Pentax > I've heard from estimate that the parts and associated additional > assembly complexity add about $25.00-

Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread John Whittingham
ed in a heated debate or slanging match, if I'm prompted I WILL NOT reply. John John Whittingham -- Original Message --- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Sent: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:32:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

RE: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 7:33 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >So the $5 part is now a $50 part? For the record, it's

Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm

2006-11-24 Thread Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >So the $5 part is now a $50 part? For the record, it's several parts, not one. The people at Pentax I've heard from estimate that the parts and associated additional assembly complexity add about $25.00-35.00 to the cost of a camera. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List