I did some IR work with the R-72 on an *istD as well. It was a nice
combination. Now I have that very expensive filter sitting in a drawer.
On Sep 14, 2013, at 9:44 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
I really liked the IR images that the *ist-D took. I mostly used an RM-90
filter
I've never seen a dslr torn down to the sensor and pcb board before.
quite honestly, an ist conversion doesn't look that hard if you take
great pains to put everything back together in the same order. that
said, I don't think I will be trying this. I guess the ist didn't have
shake reduction, so
I see dust
Dave
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never seen a dslr torn down to the sensor and pcb board before.
quite honestly, an ist conversion doesn't look that hard if you take
great pains to put everything back together in the same order. that
On 9/14/2013 10:03, Darren Addy wrote:
Considering that Ann has an *ist D for sale right now, I thought this
post might be of interest.
Make her an offer quick before she decides to keep it and do this herself.
:)
Zero chance of that - you would not be surprised to learn :-)
Thanks for
I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/cat49/
The only disadvantage is that you have longer shutter speeds so it
normally needs to be tripod mounted. Doing the
Fascinating, but you would have to be quite brave to attempt that! Even with
the long exposures, Mark's approach is better for the faint hearted. The
graveyard scenes are quite spooky. IR is the only way to make anyone imagine
what snow would look like in Phalaborwa! Now, what can you tell me
Pretty much the same story, Alan.
The K110D had a weaker IR cut filter compared to the cameras that came
later. You can modify them, by removing the filter, or use as-is with
longer exposures.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/174771-landscape-cachamay-falls-ir.html
On Sat, Sep
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/cat49/
The only disadvantage is that you
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:00:06PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
I really liked the IR images that the *ist-D took. I mostly used an
RM-90 filter (since I inherited oen - my father used to use it with
Kodak HIE) but I later used an R-72. Very long shutter speeds with the
RM90, better with the R-72. I now have an IR converted K-1)D, but I use
it much less
10 matches
Mail list logo
